Attachment F Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Laboratory Forensic Commercial Support Services
Solicitation number
15F06720R0000196
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a solicitation for laboratory forensic commercial support services. The past performance questionnaire is a template for evaluating contractors' performance on previous contracts and contains six performance criteria rated on an adjective scale: quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, management of key personnel, and utilization of small business.

The solicitation seeks commercial forensic labor services to support various FBI laboratory divisions located in Quantico, Virginia and Huntsville, Alabama. Services include initial evidence processing, control and management, as well as examinations in trace evidence, tool marks, DNA, and chemistry. The solicitation number is 15F06720R0000196 and was issued by the Department of Justice FBI Headquarters Division to augment commercial forensic labor capacity and enable processing and examination of submitted forensic materials. Response and award dates are not provided.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
7-29-2020 Final Clarifications with responses.pdf PDF
SF33-14C FILLED OUT Version 2 7-29-2020.pdf PDF
7-29-20_Attachment E Labor Category pricing LFCSS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment B 7_29_2020 Version 4.pdf PDF
7-29-2020 Missed Questions and Clarifications posted July 24 2020 to include gridlines.pdf PDF
LFCSS Cover letter to Amend RFP Version 4 7-29-2020.pdf PDF
Task Orders 012 TE Version 3.pdf PDF
Task Orders 008 FDDU Version 2.pdf PDF
15-4603 Wage Determination for Huntsville AL.txt TXT text file
Task Order 001 EMU-Q Version 2.pdf PDF
Task Orders 010 FASU Version 2.pdf PDF
7-24-2020 Missed Questions and Clarifications.pdf PDF
Task Orders 009 FTU Version 3.pdf PDF
LFCSS Request for Proposal Version 3 7-24-2020.pdf PDF
Task Orders 006 DCU Version 2.pdf PDF
Task Orders 011 CU Version 2.pdf PDF
Task Order 003 BAU Version 3.pdf PDF
Attachment B 7_24_2020 Version 3.pdf PDF
LFCSS Cover letter to Amend RFP Version 3.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
LFCSS Request for Proposal Version 2 7-17-2020.pdf PDF
Task Order 003 BAU Version 2.pdf PDF
Acquisition_Risk_Questions.pdf PDF
LFCSS Cover letter to Amend RFP Version 2.pdf PDF
Copy of Key Management Personnel Listing Form.pdf PDF
Task Orders 012 TE 6_18_20.pdf PDF
Task Order 002 EMU-H version 2.pdf PDF
Task Orders 009 FTU Version 2.pdf PDF
Attachment B Position Categories Amendment.pdf PDF
SF33-14C FILLED OUT.pdf PDF
Task Order 005 TIEDS 6_18_20.pdf PDF
LFCSS Performance Metrics.pdf PDF
Task Order 002 EMU-H.pdf PDF
Task Order 003 BAU.pdf PDF
Attachment E Labor Category pricing LFCSS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Task Order 012 TE 6_18_20 PS.pdf PDF
Attachment C Unit designation and mission.pdf PDF
Task Order 008 FDDU 6_18_20.pdf PDF
Task Order 009 FTU.pdf PDF
Attachment G Individual Task Orders six year pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Task Order 010 FASU 6_18_20.pdf PDF
Attachment A Task Orders.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Task Order 006 DCU.pdf PDF
Task Order 007 DSU 6_18_20.pdf PDF
Task Order 001 EMU-Q.pdf PDF
Attachment B Position Categories.pdf PDF
Attachment D Deliverables.pdf PDF
Task Order 011 CU.pdf PDF
Task Order 004 EU 6_18_20.pdf PDF
Request for Proposal_ LFCSS Final.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION

NAME:

TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL
Click here to enter text.

For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .