Attachment 9 - Section M 29May2020.pdf

PDF 159 KB Posted

Attached to
REPLACE BLDG 10056 B-PLANT CHILLER Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA301620B0009
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document provides the evaluation criteria and instructions for a solicitation to replace a building chiller at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland in Texas. The project value is between $500,000 and $1,000,000, and it has a 100% set-aside for women-owned small businesses. Offerors must submit pricing and documentation electronically in two volumes. Volume I must include a detailed cost breakdown using RS Means format. Volume II must include a completed SF-1442 identifying the offeror and any amendments, pricing for all contract line items, and all required representations and certifications including eligibility in the WOSB Program Repository as a women-owned small business. Price will be the sole evaluation factor, with award going to the lowest total evaluated price. The solicitation number is FA301620B0009 and was issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command to replace the chiller at Building 10056 on Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to REPLACE BLDG 10056 B-PLANT CHILLER, newest first.
File Type Posted
BLDG 10056 Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
Attachment1- Statement of Work Rev17Sep2020.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301620B00090006.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Section L Rev17SEP2020.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301620B00090004.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Section L Rev11SEP2020.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301620B00090005 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 6- Building Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301620B00090002.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301620B00090003 SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Section L 21 Aug2020.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA301620B00090001.pdf PDF
HVAC Chiller Justification and Approval - Signed_R.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Section L 29May2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 2-Draft Submittal Register.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 5-Physical Data 2019-2020.pdf PDF
Attachment 10-10056 Asbestos Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 6-Wage Determination TX20200231 Building.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 As-Built-Cad Files.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 SOW and Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 DD 1354.pdf PDF
Solicitation -FA301620B0009.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 9 29 May 2020

FA301620B0009 Page 1 of 2

Section M – Evaluation for Award

Evaluation and Basis for Award. The 502d CONS/JBKAD will issue an award to the offeror who is determined to offer the best value to the Government.

1. The Government will perform a general review of each bid, as follows:

a) Only bids that are specific to this effort will be evaluated.

b) This acquisition is restricted for Woman Owned Small Businesses as determined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in accordance with 13 CFR Part 125.

Therefore, only offer from WO Small Businesses will be eligible for award.

c) Offerors will be checked against the List of Parties Excluded From Federal Procurement and Nonprocurement Programs. Any offeror who is listed will be eliminated without further consideration.

d) Bids will be checked for minor informalities or irregularities. The Contracting Officer either will give the offeror an opportunity through a clarification to cure any defect resulting from a minor informality or irregularity, whichever is to the advantage of the Government. The Government plans on awarding a contract without conducting discussions.

e) Price will be the sole evaluation factor evaluated.

f) Offerors shall submit all required bid documentation to be considered responsive (Volume

I and II).

2. Only electronic copies will be evaluated. The response shall consist of two (2) separate volumes:

a) Volume I – Pricing (Contractor Detailed Cost Breakdown): The offeror shall submit a detailed cost breakdown (Attachment #4) displaying the essential elements of work with pricing.

b) Volume II – Contract Documentation (Filled SF 1442): The offeror shall submit the SF

1442 with all required fill ins.

(i) Section A: SF 1442 with completed blocks 14, 15, 16 (if different than block 14), 17, 20a, 20b, 20c, and block 19 if amendments have been issued. An authorized official of the firm must sign SF 1442 block 20b.

(ii) Section B: Complete pricing information for all CLINs.

(ii) Section I: Complete appropriate certifications.

(iv) Section K: Complete all appropriate and applicable Representations and

Certifications.

(v) Bid Guarantee: A copy of the bid guarantee should be included in the electronic bid. The original sealed copy should be mailed out addressed to the official POCs so it is received no later than the time and day of bid opening.

(vi) Screen Print-out validating WOSB documents are uploaded into the WOSB Program Repository (not to be confused with SAM Registration).

3. Price Evaluation. Price will be the sole factor evaluated to determine best value for the

Attachment 9 29 May 2020

FA301620B0009 Page 2 of 2

Government. The evaluated price shall be the total price proposed by the offeror in Section B as supplemented by the Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown (Attachment 4).

3.1 Price Factor: Prices will be evaluated based on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP), which will be calculated by multiplying the quantities for CLIN 0001 by the CLIN’s unit price to determine the total amount for CLIN0001. The total amount for CLIN0001 will then equal the TEP.

3.2 Best Value: The offeror that provides the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP) for all items covered in the solicitation will represent the best value and be considered for an award.

3.3 Price Reasonableness: The contracting officer will make a determination that a prospective contractor is responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1 and that the prices offered are reasonable and balanced using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1. Note that unreasonably high prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for the Government not to proceed with award. The burden of proof for credibility of prices rests with the Offeror.

3.4 Adequate price competition for this acquisition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1) is anticipated;

therefore, certified cost or pricing data are not required per FAR 15.403-1(b)(1). If at any time, however, during this competition the CO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, or if price reasonableness cannot be determined offerors may be required to submit certified cost or pricing data or additional data other than certified cost or pricing data (as appropriate) for the CO to determine price reasonableness.

(End of Evaluation)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .