Attachment 8 Houston Customer Past Performance Satisfaction Survey.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Houston ARTCC, Chiller Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-22-R-00401
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey and details of a federal contract opportunity for chiller replacement services. The Federal Aviation Administration is seeking proposals from small businesses to replace two chillers and potentially two additional chillers at its Air Route Traffic Control Center in Houston, Texas. The NAICS code for this project is 238220 for plumbing, heating, and air conditioning contractors. The estimated value is between $850,000 and $1,300,000. Interested parties must RSVP by August 10th for a site visit and have any questions submitted by August 17th. Offers are due by August 29th. The past performance survey included is to collect feedback on contractors' previous work for use in evaluating bidders. Relevant details include services required, response dates, award dates, pricing terms, small business set aside, federal agencies involved, and incumbent evaluation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 697DCK-22-R-00401 AMD 2 8 22 22.pdf | ||
| FAA Response to Questions 8 22 22.docx | DOCX document | |
| 697DCK-22-R-00401 amd 1.pdf | ||
| ZHU Chiller Pre-Bid Site Visit Amendment 1 8 17 22.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 Davis Bacon Wage Determination TX20220253 7 8 22.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 LOTO_Guidelines.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 1 SPECIFICATION_ZHU CHILLER 400 AND 500 REPLACEMENT.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-22-R-00401 final 7 28.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 SOP HAZARDOUS ENERGY.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 6 FAA-C-1217H.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 ZHU CHILR Drawing Portfolio.pdf | ||
| Cover memo ZHU Chiller 7 28 22 (002).pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 FAA-STD-019e.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 8
CUSTOMER PAST PERFORMANCE SATISFACTION SURVEY
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Houston ARTCC – Chiller Replacement
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is pursuing a firm for the replacement of two (2) chillers at the Houston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) located in Houston, Texas. As part of the contracting process, we are collecting past performance information on firms and their key personnel. This information will be used to assist the FAA in the selection of a firm to complete the project. You have been listed as a past performance reference. Please fill out the survey below and expand on any areas that will assist in evaluating the past performance of the contractor.
RATER’S NAME & TITLE/POSITION
RATING ORGANIZATION / AGENCY
TEL NO.
FAX :
E-MAIL:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME & ADDRESS
TITLE OR DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT VALUE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):
| CONTRACT TYPE: | |
| |_| FIXED PRICE | |_| COST + FEE |
| |_| COMPETITIVE | |_| NON-COMPETITIVE |
|_| SET-ASIDE
|_| SEALED BID |_| NEGOTIATED
|_| SEALED BID |_| NEGOTIATED
CONTRACT AWARD & COMPLETION DATE:
On your project, rate the firm in the following areas as follows:
1=Excellent 2=Good 3=Satisfactory 4=Poor
Satisfaction
N/A
| 1. |
| Communicated effectively with all parties |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 2. |
| Displayed Flexibility in Responding to Your Needs |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 3. |
| Displayed Timely Initiative in Problem Solving |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 4. |
| Completed Your Project Milestones on Time |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 5. |
| Submitted All Required Documentation in a Timely Manner |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 6. |
| Managed the Project Effectively (including adequate Cost Controls) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 7. |
| Managed their Work Force Effectively (including Subcontractors) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 8. |
| Rate the contractors quality of work; i.e., professionalism |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 9. |
| Rate contractor’s technical expertise on this project |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 10. |
| Adhered to all safety standards and/or requirements |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 11. |
| Contractor utilized problem solving skills effectively when problems arose during project |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 12. |
| Your OVERALL Level of Customer Satisfaction |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
N/A
| 13. |
| Was payment withheld or liquidated damages assessed? (If yes, please describe below). |
Yes......No......N/A
| 14. |
| Would you work with this firm again? |
| Yes…..No….. |
COMMENTS:
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .