Attachment_4_-_Proposal_Submission_Package.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CHOH FY21 RESURFACE TOWPATH PMIS25493A/B
- Solicitation number
- 140P3021R0011
About this file
This document contains instructions and forms for submitting a proposal in response to a solicitation from the National Park Service. Offerors are required to provide details of up to five prior project experiences using the Project Experience form, including contract amounts, dates, modifications, and reasons for delays or disputes. A Customer Rating Questionnaire is also included for references to evaluate the offeror's performance. The solicitation seeks resurfacing of the towpath in Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park in Maryland. Offerors must specify biobased products to be used along with their biobased content percentages. Experience with biobased products over the past two years must also be documented. At least the biobased content percentages listed are required for the products identified. Solicitation number 140P3021R0011 has been issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service for this opportunity.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4
QUOTE SUBMISSION PACKAGE
INSTRUCTIONS: The following forms may be used to prepare proposals for the subject solicitation as applicable.
CONTENTS:
For Technical Volume:
1. Project Experience Form
2. Customer Rating Questionnaire
For Business & Price Volume:
3. General Information
4. Biobased Certification
Project Experience Form (Offerors must complete this form for evaluation purposes)
| NAME OF FIRM |
| POINT OF CONTACT |
TELEPHONE NO.
FAX NO.
PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR - LIST UP TO FIVE (5) INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
| CONTRACT/PROJECT NO. |
| LOCATION |
| CONTRACT AMOUNT (ROUND TO NEAREST DOLLAR) |
| ORIGINAL |
| FINAL |
1.
| $ |
| $ |
2.
| $ |
| $ |
3.
| $ |
| $ |
| NAME OF CLIENT/AGENCY |
| POINT OF CONTACT |
| TELEPHONE NO. |
| FACSIMILE NO. |
| ORIGINAL PROJECT DATES |
| WERE YOU A PRIME CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR? |
| WERE THERE CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS? (YES/NO) |
| HOW MANY? |
| WHO INITIATED THEM? CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR BOTH? |
| START |
| COMPLETION |
| WERE THERE ANY TIME EXTENSIONS? (YES/NO) |
| IF SO, INDICATE NEW COMPLETION DATE? |
| WAS THE SCHEDULE MET? |
(YES/NO)
IF NOT, WHAT WAS THE REASON?
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
| HAVE YOU EVER ENTERED INTO A DISPUTE? (YES/NO) |
| IF SO, WHAT WAS THE REASON? |
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
HAVE YOU EVER
BEEN DEFAULTED?
(YES/NO)
IF SO, WHAT WAS THE REASON?
(USE BLANK PAGE IF NECESSARY)
CUSTOMER RATING QUESTIONNAIRE
Reference is provided for: _____________________
Please provide information for the primary individuals completing this survey.
Name: ____________________________________________________________________
Office Identifier: _____________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: __________________________________________________________
Mailing Address: _____________________________________________________________
E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________________
Contract # and Title, and Relation to Contract: ______________________________________
THE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
Return via e-mail to craig_madison@nps.gov RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing ratings.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Exceptional (1) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Exceeded that required by the contract. |
| Good (2) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met All contractual requirements. |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Essentially All contractual requirements. |
| Marginal (4) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Some of the contractual requirements. However, changes to the contractor’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (5) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Failed to Meet the minimum Government requirements. |
| Unknown or Not Applicable (6) |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
| (1) How responsive was the contractor’s quality program in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (2) How complete were the contractor’s quality procedures and how well do employees follow them? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (3) Rate timeliness in meeting requirements and adhering to contract schedules (delivery/performance). |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (4) Did the contractor provide adequate, competent and qualified, management, key personnel and technical personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
(5) How flexible, cooperative, and reasonable was the contractor in meeting mission Requirements, particularly when faced with short-notice mission changes?
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (6) How effective was the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations? Did the contractor implement and follow their safety plan? Did they run a “safe” jobsite? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (7) Applicable to Federal Contracts – How well did the contractor comply with applicable Federal Laws and Regulations such as Service Contract Act – timely payrolls and compliance; Drug-Free Workplace; Executive Order 13101? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (8) How innovative was the contractor in performing the technical aspects of this contract and resolving problems? How well did the contractor respond to and act on customer feedback? (Customer Satisfaction) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
REMARKS:
| (9) How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
(10) Please Provide Any Additional Information You Feel Is Important Not Covered Elsewhere:
Thank you for your remarks. Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency and not to the Contractor referenced with the Reference ID Form you were provided.
Signature:____________________________________ Date Completed:___________________________
GENERAL INFORMATION
DUNS #:
TIN #:
Biobased Certification
1. Offerors shall identify the Biobased products to be purchased and used under this contract. For each Biobased product. the offeror shall specify the percentage of Biobased content, and for the USDA-designated Biobased content products, the offeror shall demonstrate that the products to be used under this contract will contain the percentage specified in the USDA recommendations or the highest level of Biobased material practicable, consistent with USDA's recommended percentages of Biobased content Product Description % Biobased Content
2. The offeror shall document prior experience in specifying, purchasing, using, and installing Biobased products. The offeror shall provide a list for all relevant contracts over the past two years involving the specification, purchase, and/or use of Biobased products. The offeror shall include a list of the Biobased products specified, purchased, used, and installed.
The BioBased Products Identified in Base and Option and shall be required throughout performance:
· 2-Cycle Engine Oils – 34% Minimum BioBased Content
· Concrete and Asphalt Cleaners – 70% Minimum BioBased Content
· Concrete and Asphalt Release Fluids – 87% Minimum BioBased Content
· Corrosion Preventatives – 53% Minimum BioBased Content
· Diesel Fuel Additives – 90% Minimum BioBased Content
· Dust Suppressants – 85% Minimum BioBased Content
· Erosion Control Materials – 77% Minimum BioBased Content
· Fertilizers – 71% Minimum BioBased Content
· Fuel Conditioners – 64% Minimum BioBased Content
· Gasoline Fuel Additives – 92% Minimum BioBased Content
· Graffiti and Grease Removers – 34% Minimum BioBased Content
· Greases – Truck – 71% Minimum BioBased Content
· Inks – Sheetfed (Black) – 49% Minimum BioBased Content
· Inks – Sheetfed (Color) – 67% Minimum BioBased Content
· Metalworking Fluids – General Purpose Soluble, Semi-Synthetic, and Synthetic Oils – 57% Minimum BioBased Content
· Mobile Equipment Hydraulic Fluids – 44% Minimum BioBased Content
· Mulch and Compost Materials – 95% Minimum BioBased Content
· Multipurpose Lubricants – 88% Minimum BioBased Content
· Pneumatic Equipment Lubricants – 67% Minimum Biobased Content
Other BioBased Products not stated above that may be used as identified by Contractor, but not included above:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .