Att I - UGU Module Evaluation.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STC SMALL SOFTWARE APP DEVELOPMENT State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 5400020845
- Issued by
- South Carolina
About this file
This is a Module Evaluation Form used by the South Carolina government for assessing contractor performance on completion of a Job Order (JOR) for software app development work. The evaluation template is designed to be completed by the UGU Primary Contact and documents contract information including the contract number, JOR number/module number, JOR title, award date, module completion date, total cost, and identifies the prime contractor and principal subcontractors involved in the work.
The evaluation form employs a standardized rating system with six performance levels—Plus (6), Excellent (5), Good (4), Fair (3), Poor (2), and Unsatisfactory (1)—to assess 16 distinct performance factors. These factors encompass schedule adherence for major tasks and milestones, responsiveness to technical direction changes, risk identification and mitigation capabilities, problem-solving efficiency, industry standards compliance, government communication effectiveness, key personnel reliability, personnel recruitment and retention, project management across multiple diverse tasks, subcontractor management, cost estimation and control accuracy, planning and scheduling oversight, use of management tools, and overall technical and management performance. The form additionally requires documentation of major technical deliverables with corresponding submission dates, due dates, and evaluation notes, space for general comments, contractor eligibility for future engagement, and designated space for contractor response to the evaluation findings.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Att H - Process Flow Chart.doc | DOC document | |
| Att F - Job Order - Required Clauses.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att J - TAPFIN Vendor Request Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att D - Outline - Modules and Deliverables.doc | DOC document | |
| Att G - Tapfin-Supplier Agreement.docx | DOCX document | |
| Award Extension.pdf | ||
| Att B - Pricing Attachment.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Notice of Award Posting #2.pdf | ||
| Amendment #2.pdf | ||
| Att C - Job Title Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att A - SPSAQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Notice of Award Posting.pdf | ||
| Att E - Job Order - Cover Page.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment #1.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SAP
Attachment I
MODULE EVALUATION
(To be completed by UGU Primary Contact)
1. Contract Number 2. JOR Number/Module Number 3. JOR Title
4. JOR Award Date 5. Module Completion Date 6. Total Cost
8. a. Prime Contractor b. Principal Subcontractor(s) (List the Prime subcontractors that worked on the JOR)
c. End of Module Evaluation
END OF MODULE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
| FACTORS/RATINGS |
| "Plus" |
(6) "Excellent" (5) "Good" (4) "Fair" (3) "Poor" (2) "Unsatisfactory" (1) Not Applicable (N/A.)
1. Completion of major tasks/milestones/ deliverables on schedule.
2. Responsiveness to changes in technical direction.
3. Ability to identify risk factors and alternatives for alleviating risk.
4. Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously.
5. Ability to employ industry standards or best practices.
6. Overall communication with the Government.
7. Effectiveness and reliability of Contractor's Key Personnel
8. Ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel.
9. Ability to manage multiple and diverse projects/tasks from planning through execution.
10. Ability to effectively manage subcontractors.
11. Ability to accurately estimate and control cost to complete tasks.
12. Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring.
13. Use of management tools (e.g. cost/schedule, task management tools).
14. How would you rate the Contractor's overall technical performance on this contract/order?
15. How would you rate the Contractor's overall management performance on this contract/order?
16. How would you rate the Contractor's ability to be cooperative, business-like and concerned with the interests of the customer?
9. Additional Comments:
10. Would you use contractor again? __ Y __ N (please explain)
11. List the Major Technical Deliverables delivered during this TO:
Date "Deliverable Title Description Date Due Date Recd Eval." Submitted 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
12. Contractor Comments:
Name ____________________________________ UGU Primary Contact
Page
Page
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .