A1_Preston_Peak_Asbestos_Report.pdf

245 S Grape St ● Medford, OR 97501 ● (541) 770-5678

400 SE G St, Suite B ● Grants Pass, OR 97526 ● (541) 479-4053 www.nrclabs.com

NEILSON RESEARCH CORPORATION

Environmental Testing Laboratory

Klamath National Forest Ken Kellogg

Dear Ken Kellogg:

RE: Preston Peak Barracks Order No.: 1604A71

FAX

TEL: (530) 841-4536

1711 S Main St Yreka, CA 96097

5/3/2016

Neilson Research Corporation received 3 sample(s) on 4/28/2016 for the analyses presented in the following report.

Alec C Smith

The results relate only to the parameters tested or to the sample as received by the laboratory.

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of Neilson Research Corporation. If you have any questions regarding these test results, please feel free to call.

Sincerely, Neilson Research Corporation

Project Manager http://www.nrclabs.com

Neilson Research Corporation 245 South Grape Street, Medford, Oregon 97501 541-770-5678 Fax 541-770-2901

Analysis Report ORELAP 100016

EPA OR00028

Project: Preston Peak Barracks CLIENT: Klamath National Forest

Lab Order: 1604A71

CASE NARRATIVE

Date: 03-May-16

This report contains analytical results for the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. No unusual difficulties were experienced during analysis of this batch except as noted below or qualified with data flags on the reports.

ANALYTICAL COMMENTS FOR ASBESTOS ANALYSIS

Samples were analyzed using the methods outlined in "Bulk Asbestos Analysis" by EPA 600/4-82-020.

Analytical Comments for METHOD ASBESTOS, SAMPLES 1604A71-01A through 1604A71-03A:

Asbestos was found in the texture layer of each sample.

Should you have any questions regarding the asbestos noted in this report, please contact Steven Croucher - Oregon DEQ - 541-776-6107.

Klamath National Forest Lab Order: 1604A71

Reported Date: 5/3/2016 10:57:39 AM Received Date: 4/28/2016 11:05:00 AM

Yreka, CA 96097

1711 S Main St

Neilson Research Corporation 245 South Grape Street, Medford, Oregon 97501 541-770-5678 Fax 541-770-2901

Analysis Report ORELAP 100016

EPA OR00028

Preston Peak BarracksSample Information:

Client Sample ID: Preston Peak Barracks-01Lab ID: 1604A71-01 Collection Date: 4/18/2016 12:30:00 PM

Matrix: SOLID Sample Location:

Source Drywall

Analyst: DJKAsbestos by PLM Date AnalyzedAnalyses Result Qual Units

Dilution MRL Factor

NELAP

Accredited

Chrysotile N 4/29/20160 % 15% Total Asbestos N 4/29/20160 % 15%

Client Sample ID: Preston Peak Barracks-02Lab ID: 1604A71-02 Collection Date: 4/18/2016 12:30:00 PM

Matrix: SOLID Sample Location:

Source Tape

Analyst: DJKAsbestos by PLM Date AnalyzedAnalyses Result Qual Units

Dilution MRL Factor

NELAP

Accredited

Chrysotile N 4/29/20160 % 15% Total Asbestos N 4/29/20160 % 15%

Client Sample ID: Preston Peak Barracks-03Lab ID: 1604A71-03 Collection Date: 4/18/2016 12:30:00 PM

Matrix: SOLID Sample Location:

Source Glue

Analyst: DJKAsbestos by PLM Date AnalyzedAnalyses Result Qual Units

Dilution MRL Factor

NELAP

Accredited

Chrysotile N 4/29/20160 % 15% Total Asbestos N 4/29/20160 % 15%

Qualifiers:

* Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E Value above quantitation range H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits ND Not Detected at the Minimum Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

NRC SOP QA-1104/AD-3100

Revision 2

Effective Date: 04/24/15

Neilson Research Corporation

DATA FLAGS

B Analyte detected in the associated method blank.

BA BOD Alternative Calculation: The initial results performed by Standard Methods did not fall within parameters of the

Standard Methods calculation. An alternate approved calculation was performed using the HACH method and the value reported is an estimated concentration.

C Sample(s) does not meet NELAP/ORELAP sample acceptance criteria. See Case Narrative.

C1 Sample(s) does not meet NELAP/ORELAP sample acceptance criteria for temperature.

CF Results confirmed by re-analysis.

CU Cleanup performed as specified by method.

D1 The diesel elution pattern for the sample is not typical.

D2 The sample appears to be a heavier hydrocarbon range than diesel.

D3 The sample appears to be a lighter hydrocarbon range than diesel.

D4 Detected hydrocarbons do not have pattern and range consistent with typical petroleum products and may be due to biogenic interference.

D5 Detected hydrocarbons in the diesel range appear to be weathered diesel.

E Estimated value.

ER Elevated reporting limit due to matrix. Report limits (MDLs, MRLs & PQLs) are adjusted based on variations in sample preparation amounts, analytical dilutions, and percent solids, where applicable.

FC Fecal Coliforms: Sample(s) received past 40 CFR Part 136 specified holding time. Results reported as estimated values.

G1 The gasoline elution pattern for the sample is not typical.

G2 The sample appears to be a heavier hydrocarbon range than gasoline.

G3 The sample appears to be a lighter hydrocarbon range than gasoline.

G4 Detected hydrocarbons in the gasoline range appear to be weathered gasoline.

HP Sample re-analysis performed outside of method specified holding time.

HR Sample received outside of method specified holding time.

HS Sample analyzed for volatile organics contained headspace.

HT At the client’s request, the sample was analyzed outside of method specified holding time.

H Analysis performed outside of method specified holding time.

J Analyte detected below the Minimum Reporting Limit (MRL) and above the Method Detection Limit (MDL). The J flag result is an estimated value and the user should be aware that this data is of limited reliability.

MI Surrogate or Matrix Spike recovery is out of control limits due to matrix interference. Sample results may be biased.

N See Case Narrative on page 2 of report.

Q Closing continuing calibration verification (CCV) or laboratory control sample (LCS) exceeded high recovery limits, but associated samples are non-detect and the sample results are not affected. Data meets EPA/NELAP requirements.

R Relative percent difference (RPD) is outside of the accepted recovery limits.

R1 Relative percent difference (RPD) is outside of the accepted recovery limits. However, analyses are not controlled on

RPD values for sample concentrations that are less than the reporting limit.

R3 The relative percent difference (RPD) and/or percent recovery for the duplicate (DUP) or matrix spike (MS)/matrix spike duplicate (MSD) cannot be accurately calculated due to the concentration of analyte already present in the sample.

R4 Duplicate analysis failed due to result being at or near method reporting limit.

S Surrogate and/or matrix spike recovery is outside of the accepted recovery limits. Sample results may be biased.

S1 Surrogate or matrix spike recovery is outside of control limits due to dilution necessary for analysis.

SC Sub-contracted to another laboratory for analysis.

T Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure – Sample submitted contained < 0.5% solids. If the waste contains <0.5% dry solids, the liquid portion of the waste, after filtration, is defined as the TCLP extract.

# Value exceeds regulatory level for TCLP contaminant.

X1 The motor oil elution pattern for the sample is not typical.

X2 The sample appears to be a heavier hydrocarbon range than motor oil.

X3 The sample appears to be a lighter hydrocarbon range than motor oil.

* Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level or is outside the acceptable range.