Amendment_000002.pdf

PDF 551 KB Posted

Attached to
Lake George Work Center Office Expansion
Solicitation number
AG-82X9-S-15-0006
Issued by

About this file

Amendment 000002

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Site_Visit_Q As_-_III.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Q As_-_II.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Attendance_Roster.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Q As.pdf PDF
Amendment_000003.pdf PDF
Amendment_000001.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-4.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-5.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-3.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-2.pdf PDF
Attachment_J-1.pdf PDF
AG-82X9-S-15-0006.pdf PDF
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

(x)

AG-82X9-S-15-0006

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT

THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

82X9

GOLDEN CO 80401

740 SIMMS STREET

ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION ATTN AQM

USDA FOREST SERVICE

03/25/2015000002

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

03/25/2015

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

IGF::OT::IGF

Lake George Work Center Expansion

The purpose of this amendment is to correct the address/date information in Attachment J.4.

Attachment J.4. is hereby removed and replaced with the corrected attachment.

No other changes are being incorporated into this amendment. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged and in full affect.

Period of Performance: 05/22/2015 to 11/30/2015

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

HOWARD D. REDDEN

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror for sending References Questionnaire Forms:

Prepare and send a reference questionnaire package for each project you list as a reference for the Past Performance evaluation factor. You are encouraged to send a questionnaire to other clients of contracts. For Government contracts, send to Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is your responsibility to follow-up and to encourage your references to send in their questionnaire.

If you have multiple references at one location, send one cover letter and questionnaire for each contract you want a reference for. Your questionnaire package should contain the following.

Cover Letter (See Example).

Respondent Information Rating Sheets.

Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes.

Suggested – Pre Addressed stamped envelope to return to the Contracting Officer.

Offeror should place their name on the top of each questionnaire page.

OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT

QUESTIONNAIRES.

Attachment - J.4. AG-82X9-S-15-0006 Page 1 of 4

SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER

Your Company Letterhead

Date

To:

We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Pike and San Isabel National Forest, Lake George Work Center, 140 Trail Creak Road, Lake George, CO 80827. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm’s past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306(e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.

Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN May 1, 2015. Do not return them to our company.

USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region, Acquisition Management Attn: Howard Redden, Contracting Officer 740 Simms Street Golden, Colorado 80401

If you have any questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact Howard Redden @ (303) 275-5288, or hredden@fs.fed.us . Thank you for your assistance.

Signature and Title

Attachment - J.4. AG-82X9-S-15-0006 Page 2 of 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Contractor Name: 2. Contract Number:

3. Contractor Address: 4. Contract Type:

_______ Firm Fixed Price

_______ Cost Reimbursement

_______ Other (Please Specify)

5. Agency Name: 6. Agency POC/Phone/Fax:

7. Period of Performance: 8. Dollar Amount of Award:$

Total Dollar Value with Mods:

9. Title of Contract:

10. Description of Contract Service:

11. Complexity of Work: Difficult:___________ Routine: _____________

Note: Please use adjectival ratings from attached sheet.

12. Evaluation Factor 13. Comments (Att. additional sheets, if necessary) 14. Rating

a. Quality of Work

b. Personnel

c. Subcontractor Mgmt

d. Business Relations

e. Timeliness of Performance

f. Customer Satisfaction

g. Cost/Budget Control

13. Would you select this firm again? If no, please explain. (Att. Additional sheet if necessary.)

14. Name & Date: 15. Title:

Attachment - J.4. AG-82X9-S-15-0006 Page 3 of 4

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING GUIDELINES

Summarize Contractor Performance in each of the rating areas. Assign each area a rating of Unsatisfactory, Poor, fair, Good, and Excellent. Use the following instructions as guidance in making these evaluations. Note:

There is no corresponding guidance for “Customer Satisfaction”. Please use the comments area on the preceding form to justify the rating given “Customer Satisfaction.”

Ratings Quality of

Work/Personnel/ Service

Cost Control Timeliness of Performance

Business Relations/Sub Contractor Mgmt

-Compliance w/contract requirements -Accuracy of reports -Appropriateness of personnel -Technical excellence

-Within budget -Current, accurate, complete billings -Relationship of negotiated costs to actual -Cost efficiencies -Change Orders issued

-Met interim milestones -Reliable -Responsive to technical direction -Completed on time

-Effective Mgmt -Businesslike correspondence -Responsive to contract requirements -Prompt notification of problems -Reasonable/ cooperative -Flexible -Pro-active -Effective SB/ SDB Subcontract Program

Unsatisfactory Quality problems are comprising the achievement of contract requirements

Cost issues are comprising performance

Delays are compromising achievement of contract requirements

Response is not effective

Poor Quality problems require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements

Cost issues require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements

Delays require major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements

Response is marginally effective

Fair Quality problems require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements

Cost issues require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements

Delays require minor agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements

Response is somewhat effective

Good Quality problems do not impact achievement of contract requirements

Cost issues do not impact achievement of contract requirements

Delays do not impact achievement of contract requirements

Response is usually effective

Excellent There are no quality problems

There are no cost issues

There are no delays

Response is effective

Attachment - J.4. AG-82X9-S-15-0006 Page 4 of 4

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .