810-FORM-0002G SRPO DR Checklist.pdf

PDF 134 KB Posted

Attached to
NASA Sounding Rocket Operations Contract (NSROC) IV - FINAL Request for Proposal, eLibrary Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC21R0037-eLibrary
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This document is a design review evaluation checklist for a NASA sounding rocket operations contract. It provides criteria for evaluating a contractor's design review package, meeting, and memorandum. Key areas of evaluation include the completeness of presentations and documentation on mission details, software, integration and testing plans, schedules, risk assessments, procedures, and hazard analyses. The review panel is chaired by NASA and includes safety and technical experts. Action items are identified to ensure all requirements will be met. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center solicitation seeks proposals for the NASA Sounding Rocket Operations Contract IV to provide mission and launch services, engineering, and operations. The incumbent contractor will support suborbital research rocket programs over multiple years.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NASA Sounding Rocket Operations Contract (NSROC) IV - FINAL Request for Proposal, eLibrary, newest first.
File Type Posted
SR Risk Management Plan Official Release - 2010-04-15 signed and scanned.PDF PDF
NSROC III Selection Statement.pdf PDF
SRPO Annual Report 2018.pdf PDF
Wallops Range Users Handbook.pdf PDF
Rocket Report 3rd quarter 2020.pdf PDF
Rocket Report 2nd quarter 2020.pdf PDF
SRPO Annual Report 2020.pdf PDF
SRPO Missions Bluebook September 2021.pdf PDF
SRWG_Findings_Jan_2020.pdf PDF
SRWG_Findings_Feb_2019.pdf PDF
NPR 9501.2.pdf PDF
NPR 7120.8.pdf PDF
NPR 8621.1.pdf PDF
800-PG-8710.3.1 Updated WFF Flex Hose Handling.pdf PDF
NPR 1800.1 Updated.pdf PDF
800-PG-8715.1.1E Danger Area Control and Roadblocks for Hazardous Operations.pdf PDF
GPR 1860.1.pdf PDF
GPR 1600.1.pdf PDF
800-PG-7150.4.1 Updated Software SMA Process.pdf PDF
GPR 8710.3.pdf PDF
GPR 1860.3.pdf PDF
GPR 1700.5.pdf PDF
GPR 8830.1.pdf PDF
GPR 8719.1.pdf PDF
800-PG-8715.1.1E Unmanned Roadblocks_ Danger Area Control for Hazardous Operations April 2021_FINAL_ GDMS (1).pdf PDF
GPR 8500.4.pdf PDF
NPD 4500.1.pdf PDF
GPR 6730.1.pdf PDF
GPR 4520.4.pdf PDF
GPR 1860.4.pdf PDF
NPR 2810.1.pdf PDF
810-PG-7120.1.1E Review of NSROC Sounding Rocket Mission Work Orders.pdf PDF
GPR 1820.1.pdf PDF
GPR 4520.2.pdf PDF
NPR 9710.1.pdf PDF
NPR 1600.3.pdf PDF
NPD 1600.3.pdf PDF
GPR 8800.2 Admin Ext Local Exhaust Ventilation.pdf PDF
NPD 9501.1.pdf PDF
NPD 1600.9 Updated.pdf PDF
NPD 2810.1.pdf PDF
NPD 2530.1.pdf PDF
NPD 1600.2 Updated.pdf PDF
800-PG-8710.0.1D Mission Planning for Fire Alarm Contingencies.pdf PDF
GPR 1700.1.pdf PDF
NPR 1600.2.pdf PDF
GPR 8715.10.pdf PDF
NPD 8610.6.pdf PDF
NPD 1040.4.pdf PDF
NSROC CBA IAMAW 11.01.21 final FULLY EXECUTED.pdf PDF
Show all 50

NASA Sounding Rocket Operations Contract (NSROC) IV - FINAL Request for Proposal, eLibrary has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

810-FORM-0002G (March 2018) Design Review Evaluation Checklist

Contract Number: NNG16WA70C Meeting Date:

Mission Number:

Estimated date of Design Review (DR) from applicable Requirements Definition Meeting (RDM) Schedule:

RATINGS

Evaluate contractor performance for each evaluation criteria and provide ratings and/or comments as appropriate. Utilize the following guidelines:

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional (Fails Requirements) (Low Performance) (Baseline Performance) (High Performance) (Exceeds Contract Requirements) 1 2 3 4 5

After completion of individual categories, circle the summary rating evaluation provided at the end of this form for the composite DR evaluation of the DR PACKAGE, MEETING, and

MEMORANDUM.

Evaluation Criteria Comments Presentations (with documentation) are made by each support discipline represented on the payload as follows:

Mission Manager (introduction, overview, and general information)

Principal Investigator Mechanical Performance Power Telemetry Guidance, Navigation and Control Systems (Including ACS, Boost Guidance, Uplink Command, etc.)

Vehicle Systems Safety For each support discipline represented on the payload:

Details of any new or modified software are included in the DR package

Complete integration & testing plan (including software assurance test plan for any new or modified software) is included in DR Package and presented

Integration and testing plan is appropriate to ensure mission success

Complete drawing list with status is included in DR Package

Details of any discipline relevant first flight items and any exceptions, deviations, waivers, testing anomalies, etc. that could affect mission success

Flight sequence of events is reviewed and included in the DR Package

Design Review Evaluation Checklist (Page 1 of 4)

DR Package contains complete payload team engineering staff assignment list

RDM Action Items are closed and documented in DR Package

DR Package contains complete description of minimum and comprehensive success criteria (any change from RDM noted)

Success criteria are approved (in writing) by the experimenter

RDM Requirements Compliance Matrix is updated and any changes noted & explained concurred by

SRPO

DR Package contains updated schedule from RDM which includes completed activities and (as a minimum) Fabrication and Assembly Activities, Pre-Integration Review (PIR), Integration & Testing Activities, Mission Readiness Review, Field Operations, Launch Date, and Post Launch Activities

Schedule is realistic & adequate to meet mission requirements

The Preliminary Flight Worthiness Assessment is included as an attachment and identifies any deviations from nominal flight worthy design and rationale, list of any new or first use launch vehicle or safety critical flight hardware, and a summary of estimated gravimetric, impact, performance, and dispersion data

DR Package contains a preliminary Mission Telemetry Requirements (MTR) addressing telemetry system parameters, ground support systems, and test requirements

Resource conflicts (personnel, facilities, equipment, etc.) are identified and mitigated in DR Package

Potential Design and operational problems are identified and mitigated in DR Package

DR Package contains comprehensive Risk Matrix for the mission that also identifies risks associated with any new or modified software

Any innovative/creative ideas or partnering with PI or others, to reduce mission costs without degrading scientific return (NSROC initiated exceeding contract requirements)

Design Review Evaluation Checklist (Page 2 of 4)

Any innovative/creative analyses, designs, and/or actions that improve the likelihood of mission success and/or exceed contract requirements (NSROC initiated)

Any innovative/creative measures implemented on mission which will continue to reduce overall program costs on future missions (NSROC initiated exceeding contract requirements)

DR Package contains a Hazard Assessment; the Hazard Assessment includes a list of any items that may require a waiver. For missions at all launch locations except WSMR, the DR Package shall contain a Range Safety Data Package For missions at WSMR, the DR Package shall contain a Preliminary Ground Safety Data Package

A comprehensive list of procedures (involving hazardous operations, safety-related issues, and assembly of the launch vehicle and payload) is included with new or revised procedures noted and status of NASA Safety approval noted

Payload team engineering staff (or alternate representatives as necessary) is present at DR

NSROC management representation is present to participate in programmatic decisions

All designs are complete and available for review as requested

Design addresses all requirements established at the RDM and is cost effective

Review Panel chaired by NSROC and constructed of NASA Safety and contractor personnel from each discipline represented

Review Panel discussion resulted in appropriate Action Items especially in instances where the presentation fails to demonstrate that all mission requirements will be achieved

DR conducted on schedule that was presented at RDM (or appropriate explanation for variance)

DR Package contains all documentation and material presented at DR

Format of DR Package Design Review Evaluation Checklist (Page 3 of 4)

DR Memorandum (DRM) includes the DR Package as an attachment, , identifies attendees, summarizes the meeting, addresses significant topics of discussion, identifies Action Items resulting from DR

DR Memorandum (DRM) received on time, within 5 working days of DR

COMPOSITE DR EVALUATION FOR DR PACKAGE, MEETING, AND

MEMORANDUM

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional (Fails Requirements) (Low Performance) (Baseline Performance) (High Performance) (Exceeds Contract Requirements) 1 2 3 4 5

COMMENTS:

Evaluator: Date:

(Signature)

COR: Date:

(Signature)

Design Review Evaluation Checklist (Page 4 of 4)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .