Full Food Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 7.doc

DOC document 91 KB Posted

Attached to
Full Food Services Base Kodiak Alaska
Solicitation number
70Z08421QKKO0101
Issued by

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing full food services at Base Kodiak in Kodiak, Alaska. The U.S. Coast Guard is soliciting quotes for full food services through solicitation number 70Z08421QKKO0101. The incumbent contractor is being evaluated, and references are being contacted to provide ratings on compliance with specifications, adherence to schedules, billing practices, working relationships, and end user satisfaction. References are asked to indicate if they would award another contract to this contractor and provide an overall assessment. Responses are due by September 8, 2021. The contract is for full food services at the Coast Guard base in Kodiak, Alaska and involves delivery schedules, estimates, billing practices, and management of subcontractors if applicable.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire

Attachment 7

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. COAST GUARD

DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONAL LOGISTICS DOL-9 / DOL-95

300 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 965

NORFOLK, VA 23510-9112

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION NUMBER: 70Z08421QKKO0101

Full Food Service Base Kodiak, AK In order to assess potential vendors, the U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Operational Logistics (DOL-9) contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each offeror. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate the offeror’s past performance. This PPQ must be completed by the Past Performance Reference (i.e. you), NOT the Offeror, and submitted directly to USCG, DOL-9-DOL-95 by the Past Performance Reference. The completed PPQ shall not be released to the offeror. In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. We are thanking you in advance for your time, effort, and cooperation in responding to this questionnaire.

Please submit the completed form to the Contract Specialist by E-mail: Patricia.d.martin@uscg.mil. Please contact the Contract Specialist, Pat Martin, at (757) 628-4115 to confirm receipt, and if you have any questions. The completed PPQ is due on or before September 8, 2021, 12:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

I. GENERAL GUIDANCE

Please use the following rating in scoring the performance elements below (assessments should reflect only contractor-liable performance):

RATING
DESCRIPTION
Exceeds
The Contractor's past performance far exceeds the customer's expectations and provided significant, unusual worthwhile features or benefits.
Satisfactory
The Contractor's past performance met the customer's expectations and contract requirements.
Marginal
The Contractor's past performance could have been improved. The Contractor required major agency resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory
The Contractor's past performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.

II. GENERAL INFORMATION

A.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE & AGENCY IDENTIFICATION:

1
Name:
2
Title:
3
Organization/Agency:
4
Address:
5
Phone Number:
6
Fax Number:
7
E-mail Address:
8
Date:
9
Signature:

B.

CONTRACTOR & CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:

1
Name of Contractor:
1
Type of Instrument

(e.g. Contract/BPA/Order/Other):

2
Contract Number:
3
Order Number (if applicable):
4
Project Title and Service/Supply Description (add rows if needed):
5
Type of Contract

(e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid):

6
Pricing Type (e.g. Fixed Price, T&M,

Cost Reimbursement, other):

7
Competitive (Y/N):
8
Follow-On (Y/N):
9
Date of Award:
10
Initial Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
11
Final Contract Dollar Value (w/Options):
12
Period of Performance:
13
Place(s) of Performance:
14
Complexity of Work

(e.g. difficult, routine):

15
If applicable , type and extent of subcontracting:

C.

GENERAL INFORMATION

1
Has the Contractor ever been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, etc.? If yes, explain.
FORMCHECKBOX

No / FORMCHECKBOX Yes

2
Has this contract been partially or completely terminated? If yes, explain and identify type of termination (e.g. default, convenience, cause).
FORMCHECKBOX

No / FORMCHECKBOX Yes

3
If this was an award or incentive fee contract, what percentage of the available fee did the Contractor usually receive?
4
Changes in contract dollar amounts throughout the life of the contract are/were generally attributable to customer-issued Change Orders, Contractor-submitted claims, other Customer actions (please explain):

III. EVALUATION: How Would You Rate This Contractor With Respect To:

A. Compliance with the Specifications; conformance to standards of good workmanship, and responsiveness to technical direction:

Rating
Exceeds
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check (

Summary:

B. Adherence to the contract delivery schedule:

Rating
Exceeds
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check (

Summary:

C. Adherence to contract/task order estimates; reasonableness of change order proposals; and completeness of billing:

Rating
Exceeds
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check (

Summary:

D. Working relationship with Contracting Officer, Contract Specialist, COTR, and other points of contact:

Rating
Exceeds
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check (

Summary:

E. Relationship with and satisfaction level of agency end-user of product or service required:

Rating
Exceeds
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

Check (

Summary:

IV. SUMMARY

Would your agency/organization award another contract to this Contractor? FORMCHECKBOX Yes / FORMCHECKBOX No In summary, if you care to, please give your overall assessment of this contractor.

Do you have any additional comments to add?

“Source Selection Information” in accordance with FAR 3.104.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .