7-4-MP27003-27046640 HazMat Survey.pdf

ASBESTOS (LIMITED), LEAD (LIMITED), AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

INSPECTION, SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

FOR THE

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

225 SOUTH 700 EAST

St. GEORGE, UTAH 84770

A LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

FOR THE

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

August 18, 2026

Prepared for:

Mrs. Aubrey Stapel Hazmat Program Manager

Utah Department of Government Operations Division of Facilities, Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building, 3rd Floor 4315 South 2700 West

Taylorsville, Utah 84114

PH: (801) 641-0964

Prepared by:

R & R Environmental, Inc. (R & R) 47 West 9000 South, Suite #2

Sandy, Utah 84070 jamison@rrenviro.com Phone (801) 928-1560

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ASBESTOS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS

4.0 SURVEY RESULTS

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSION OF WARRANTY.……………………………………………………6

List of Appendices

Appendix A Sample Log

Appendix B Laboratory Report

Appendix C Photo Log

Appendix D Floor Plans

Appendix E State of Utah Certifications

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 1 Utah Tech University Smith Computing Center Roof

1.0 INTRODUCTION

R & R Environmental, Inc. (R & R) was contacted to conduct a limited asbestos survey for the Utah Tech University Smith Computing Center Roof located at 225 South 700 East in St. George, Utah 84770. The Smith Computing Center is scheduled to have the roof renovated. The survey consisted of a visual assessment of the roof of the building for suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) and bulk sampling of the materials. The fieldwork component of this survey was conducted by Mr. Tyler Coles who is a Utah Certified Asbestos Building Inspector.

This report presents the conditions and observations noted on the visit dates.

The following general information is included in this survey report:

• Executive Summary (Section 2.0)

• Sampling Methods (Section 3.0)

• Analytical Results (Section 4.0)

• Conclusions (5.0)

• Limitations & Exclusion of Warranty (6.0)

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 2

2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

No asbestos containing materials were identified during this limited survey.

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 3

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY, SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

225 SOUTH 700 EAST, St. GEORGE, UTAH 84770

DATE OF SURVEY: JULY 22, 2026

NESHAP - REGULATED

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS (R-ACM)

1. Friable asbestos material (>1% asbestos and can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure) Thermal system insulation (TSI)* Textured ceiling material (TCM)* Spray-on insulation or fireproofing* Blown-in insulation* Ceiling tiles/panels* Plaster, gypsum board, gypsum board joint compound* Cloth materials* (Boiler Flue Gasket) Paper materials* (HVAC Paper Tape and Insulating Board) Electrical wiring insulation* Sink undercoating (loose)* Other*

2. Category I ACM which has become friable

Packings Gaskets Resilient floor coverings (floor tile and sheet vinyl) Asphalt roofing products (Dust Debris, Roofing Underlayment Debris, Flashing Material)

3. Category I ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading

Packings Gaskets Resilient floor coverings (floor tile and sheet vinyl) Asphalt roofing products

4. Category II ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become friable during demolition or renovation operations Asbestos cement materials (TransiteT)* Asphalt, tar and rubber-base ACM products other than roofing products* Non-asphalt and non-paper roofing products* Paint* Fire brick and/or mortar* Stainless steel sink undercoating (solid)* Encapsulated TCM* Encapsulated TSI* Mastic for floor tile, ceiling tile, cove molding, etc.* Other

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 4

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY, SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

225 SOUTH 700 EAST, St. GEORGE, UTAH 84770

DATE OF SURVEY: JULY 22, 2026

NESHAP NON-REGULATED

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL (N-R-ACM)

1. > 1% asbestos

2. Category I Non-friable (cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure)

ACM with >1% asbestos by new PLM procedure Packings Gaskets (Window Glazing & Caulking) Resilient floor coverings (floor tile) Asphalt roofing products

3. Category II Non-friable ACM with >1% asbestos by new PLM procedure (Category includes items meeting Category I definition but not specifically listed in that category) Asbestos cement materials (TransiteT)* (Fume hoods, counter tops, and window panels) Asphalt, tar and rubber-base ACM products other than roofing products* Non-asphalt and non-paper roofing products* Paint* (Silver Paint Sealant) Fire brick and/or mortar* Sink undercoating (solid)* Mastic for floor tile, ceiling tile, cove molding, etc.* Other*

Notes:

1. (*) Denotes R&R’s interpretation of materials included in this category.

2. New PLM procedure is outlined in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR, Part 783, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy.

3. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAP) asbestos revision as outlined in 40 CFR, Part 61, became effective November 20, 1990. The asbestos classification system outlined in the revision and included in this section is dynamic in nature. Asbestos materials classified as “NON-REGULATED” at the time of the survey may become “REGULATED” due to ongoing or planned maintenance, renovation, or demolition actions, which can transform a material containing greater than 1% asbestos from a “non-friable” and NON-REGULATED to a friable and REGULATED condition.

Classification of ACM in this section and in the executive summary of this report is, therefore, based on the observations of the surveyor at the time of the survey and may or may not be appropriate at later dates.

4. Maintenance, renovation, demolition, weathering, normal wear, water, or other damage can alter the “NON-REGULATED” status of materials, and necessitate precautions required for handling them as “REGULATED” asbestos-materials.

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 5

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS

Survey procedures were based on those outlined in Title 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 763, USEPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, and the Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan (effective April 4, 1994). The procedures included visual observation, physical inspection, bulk sample collection, and condition assessment of suspect ACM. The number of samples collected was based on the amount and accessibility of each homogeneous material, with consideration given for the type, age, and condition.

Nine (9) samples were collected from the suspect materials to assess the presence of asbestos (or lack thereof) in building materials/systems. Each sample collected was placed into a sealable plastic bag or tub, marked with a unique sample identification code, and packaged for subsequent shipment to the laboratory for analysis. Individual sample identification consisted of a numeric code denoting the sampling media/location.

After packaging and labeling, samples were submitted under proper chain-of-custody to Reservoirs Environmental, Inc., Denver, Colorado. The National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896 accredits Reservoirs for asbestos analysis.

Samples were analyzed via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) utilizing EPA Method 600/M4- 82-020. Please note that USEPA and OSHA regulations define an ACM as a material containing more than one (1) percent asbestos, by volume, as determined by PLM analysis. In the case of multi-layer systems (e.g., floor tile/mastic layers), the laboratory analyzed and reported each layer separately.

4.0 SURVEY RESULTS

Nine (9) representative samples collected were submitted for analytical determination. A summary of analytical results for samples collected and analyzed for this survey are in Appendix B (Laboratory Results) and are discussed below by building material/system type. Photographs of the buildings where samples were taken are included as Appendix C. Floor Plans of the building where samples were taken are included in Appendix D

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 6

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

No asbestos-containing materials were identified during this limited survey.

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSION OF WARRANTY

This asbestos survey and assessment was performed using procedures and a level of diligence typically exercised by professional consultants performing similar services. However, asbestos-containing material (ACM) can be present in a structure, but not identified using ordinary investigative procedures.

No asbestos survey can completely, eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM.

R&R Environmental, Inc.’s level of diligence and investigative procedures are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding the presence of ACM. The procedures used for this survey attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative costs, time, and building damage, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, the determinations in this report should not be construed as a guarantee that all ACM present in the subject property has been included in this report.

This report presents R&R Environmental, Inc.’s professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained during performance of consulting services. R&R Environmental, Inc. assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by sources outside of R&R Environmental, Inc.

No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied, or otherwise, except stated or acknowledged herein.

Limited Asbestos Survey Report Page 7

A LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT

OF THE

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

On July 22, 2026, R & R Environmental, Inc. (R & R) of Sandy, Utah, conducted a limited asbestos survey and assessment of the Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Roof located at 225 South 700 East in St. George, Utah 84770. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing materials were collected and analyzed. The condition of all friable and non-friable asbestos-containing materials was, assessed. The following accredited inspector conducted the survey and assessment.

Inspected by:

Tyler Coles Date State of Utah, Division of Air Quality Inspector Certification Number: ASB-8562 State of Utah Company Certification: ASBC-237

This report was reviewed by:

David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP Date State of Utah, Division of Air Quality Inspector Certification Number: ASB-1370 AHERA Inspector #5 PSI 65451 I Certified Safety Professional #15774 Certified Industrial Hygienist #8529 State of Utah Company Certification: ASBC-237

Appendix A

Sample Log

SAMPLE LOG

Sample

Material/ Homogenous Area

Sample Location

Quantity

Lab Result (%/Type)

Assessment SC-01 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged SC-02 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged SC-03 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged

SC-04 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged

SC-05 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged

SC-06 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged

SC-07 Roof Membrane Roof 15,908 ft² None Detected Undamaged

SC-08 White Caulk Roof 12 ft² None Detected Undamaged

SC-09 White Caulk Roof 12 ft² None Detected Undamaged

Appendix B

Laboratory Report

Appendix C

Photo Log

PHOTO 1: Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Roof

R & R Environmental, Inc.

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2, Sandy, Utah 84070

(801) 352-2380 • Fax: (801) 352-2381

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

A LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY AND

ASSESSMENT

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

PROJECT NO:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

REVIEWED BY:

DRAWN BY:

DATE:

FILE:

Appendix D

Floor Plan

01 02

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER

895 NORTH 900 EAST

ST. GEORGE, UTAH 84770

JULY 2026

# SAMPLE NUMBER AND LOCATION

ROOF

TEST LOCATIONS

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Ty Coles

Appendix E

State of Utah Certifications

LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

Utah Department of Government Operations Division of Facilities, Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building, 3rd Floor 4315 South 2700 West

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2

Sandy, Utah 84070

LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Building Description

3.0 Lead-based Paint Definition

4.0 Procedures

4.1 Paint Sampling Methods

4.2 XRF Calibration

4.3 Field Documentation

5.0 Findings

6.0 Results and Recommendation

8.0 Limitations and Exclusion of Warranty

Appendices

A. Data Tables Table 1 – Building Component with Lead Levels at 0.1 mg/cm2 and above Table 2 – Building Component with Lead Levels at below 0.1 mg/cm2

B. Photograph Log C. Certifications

Utah Tech University Limited Lead-Based Paint Inspection Smith Computing Center Roof Page 1

Limited Lead-Based Paint Inspection

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On July 22, 2026, a limited lead-based paint (LBP) survey was conducted for the Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Roof. The purpose of the survey was to identify lead in paint on the exterior surfaces of the building. Measurements for lead in paint were made using a SciApps X550 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer. No chip sampling or laboratory analysis was performed for confirmation of XRF measurements.

The survey work was overseen by David Roskelley with R & R Environmental, Inc. in Sandy, Utah. David Roskelley has completed Lead Inspector Training through the University of Utah, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (RMCOEH), an EPA-sponsored Regional Lead Training Center, and is certified by the State of Utah, Division of Environmental Quality, as a Lead Inspector.

The U.S. Department of housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in housing (HUD Guidelines), Chapter7: Lead-Based Paint Inspection, 1997 Revision, was generally followed for this survey, with modifications appropriate for a non-residential building.

The following accredited and certified inspector oversaw the inspection, collected the samples and made assessment:

August 18, 2026 David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP Date Lead-Based Paint Inspector Certification Number: PB-1041

This report was reviewed by:

David C. Roskelley, MSPH, CIH, CSP Date Lead-Based Paint Inspector Certification Number: PB-1041

Smith Computing Center Roof Page 2

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Identification

Building Name .................. Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Building Address ................... 225 South 700 East, St. George, Utah 84770

Building Construction

Building Construction Date ................................................................ 1980’s Building Type ............................................................................. Classrooms Building Total Sq. Ft ................................................................... ~30,000 ft2 Structural System ............................................................... Steel & Concrete Exterior Wall Construction ................................................................. Stucco Floor Deck Construction .......................................................................... NA Roof Construction ........................................................................ Membrane Floors Above Grade Floors Below Grade ................................................................................. NA

Interior Finishes

Floors ....................................................................................................... NA Walls ........................................................................................................ NA Attic .......................................................................................................... NA Crawl space .............................................................................................. NA

Building Mechanical

Heating Plant ............................................................................................ NA Main Heating Distribution ....................................................................... NA Cooling Plant ........................................................................................... NA Main A / C Distribution ........................................................................... NA

Smith Computing Center Roof Page 3

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT DEFINITIONS

HUD defines “lead-based paint” as any coating that has a lead concentration of 1.0 milligram of lead per square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) or greater, or if the lead concentration is greater than 0.5% by weight. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) currently considers paint to be lead-containing if the concentration of lead exceeds 600 ppm (0.06% by weight). In 1978, the CPSC banned the sale of lead-based paint to consumers, and banned its application in areas where consumers have direct access to painted surfaces. Both the CPSC and HUD definitions of lead-containing paint are aimed at protecting the general population from exposure to lead in the residential setting.

By contrast, the mission of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) with respect to lead-containing paint, is to protect workers during construction activities that may generate elevated airborne lead concentrations. OSHA states that construction work (including renovation, maintenance, and demolition) carried-out on structures coated with paint have lead concentrations lower than the HUD or CPSC can still result in airborne lead concentrations in excess of regulatory limits. For this reason, OSHA has not defined lead-containing paint, but states that paint having any measurable level of lead may pose a substantial exposure hazard during construction work, depending upon the work performed.

4.0 PROCEDURES

4.1 Paint Sampling Methodologies

Direct measurements of lead in paint were made using a SciApps X550 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer. The SciApps X550 X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyzer non-destructively measures lead concentrations of painted surfaces, regardless of the number of layers present. These instruments were developed specifically for addressing lead-based paint issues in housing and their use in identifying potential exposure hazards for renovation or construction work must be augmented by selective collection and analysis of physical paint chip samples.

The newer XRF instruments are capable of identifying lead in paint at concentrations of about 0.01 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) or greater. When lead concentrations are lower than this, the instruments are not capable of making accurate, reliable measurements, and the reported lead concentration may underestimate or overestimate the actual lead concentration in the paint. Therefore, an XRF readings of 0.01 mg/cm2 or greater may be considered lead-containing from an OSHA perspective, and any readings of 0.0mg/cm2 or less should be confirmed by the collection and laboratory analysis of paint chip samples, or assumed to be positive for lead.

Where paint chip samples are necessary, samples are collected according to the protocol specified in the HUD Guidelines. The samples are then submitted to a laboratory recognized under the EPA’s National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP) for analysis by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry according to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) method ASTM E 1645.

Smith Computing Center Roof Page 4

4.2 XRF Calibration

Before beginning the testing and after the testing was completed, the internal calibration of the LPA-1 was checked by taking two consecutive measurements on a National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) standard with a known concentration of lead. Three more readings were taken on a lead-free wood block. These calibration checks are reported within the XRF data tables found in Appendix A of this report and are maintained in a file at R & R Environmental, Inc. to detect changes in instrument performance over time.

4.3 Lead Paint Inspection Data Tables

The XRF instrument generates a unique set of data tables for each inspection and can be exported into Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet format .xls. The Sequential Report lists the measurements made throughout the property in sequential order, from the first measurement to the last. The Data table is maintained in a file at R & R Environmental, Inc.

5.0 FINDINGS

The XRF instrument indicated that lead is not present on the exterior surfaces. These surfaces are listed in Table 1 “positive” building components (Measurements of 0.01 mg/cm2 and above) in Appendix A of this report.

If lead was detected in some of the building’s painted surfaces, the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) will apply to any construction work (including renovation and demolition) that may disturb those surfaces. The standard requires, among other things, the following:

• Initial training on the hazards of lead exposure, proper work practices, respiratory protection, and other topics;

• An initial exposure assessment, by air monitoring, to determine the lead exposure assessment, until sample analysis indicates exposures below the Permissible Exposure Limit;

• Hand washing facilities, designated clean change areas, and designated eating areas.

In addition to the above considerations, the presence of lead in demolition debris has the potential to impose limitations on where and how the debris may be disposed. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Subtitles C and D, require that the waste must be analyzed to determine the amount of leachable lead present. The type of test to be performed on the waste is the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead, and the results of this test will determine whether the material must be handled and disposed of as hazardous waste. For structures containing large amounts of lead-containing paint, significant potential for failing the TCLP exists.

Smith Computing Center Roof Page 5

6.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

No lead-based paint was found during this limited survey.

7.0 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF WARRANTY

This lead inspection was performed using procedures and a level of diligence typically exercised by professional consultants performing similar services. However, lead-based paint (LBP) can be present in a surface, but not identified using ordinary investigative procedures.

No lead inspection can completely eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of LBP. R & R Environmental, Inc. level of diligence and investigative procedures are intended to reduce, but not eliminate, potential uncertainty regarding the presence of LBP. The procedures used for this survey attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative costs, time, and building damage, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, the determinations in this report should not be construed as a guarantee that all LBP present in the subject property has been included in this report.

This report presents R & R Environmental, Inc.’s professional determinations, which are dependent upon information obtained during performance of consulting services. R &R Environmental, Inc. assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information provided by sources outside of R & R Environmental, Inc.

No warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is made regarding the findings, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report. The limitations presented above supersede the requirements or provisions of all other contracts or scopes of work, implied or otherwise, except those stated or acknowledged herein.

Appendix A

Lead Paint Inspection Data Tables

Table 1

Building Components with Lead Levels at 0.01 mg/cm2 and Above

Room

Floor (2)

Number

Lead Level

(mg/cm2)

Component

Side (1)

Substrate

Color

Condition

1 0.9 CALIBRATION

2 0.9 CALIBRATION

3 0.9 CALIBRATION

19 1.0 CALIBRATION

20 1.0 CALIBRATION

21 1.0 CALIBRATION

*Side: A=North, B=East, C=South, D=West

Table 2

Building Components with Lead Levels Below 0.01 mg/cm2

Room

Floor (2)

Number

Lead Level

(mg/cm2)

Component

Side (1)

Substrate

Color

Condition Roof 1 4 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 5 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 6 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 7 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 8 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 9 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 10 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 11 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 12 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 13 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 14 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 15 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 16 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 17 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact Roof 1 18 0 Pipe Center Metal Silver Intact

*Side: A=North, B=East, C=South, D=West

Appendix B

Photograph Log

PHOTO 1: Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Roof

R & R Environmental, Inc.

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2, Sandy, Utah 84070

(801) 352-2380 • Fax: (801) 352-2381

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

A LEAD BASED PAINT INSPECTION

PROJECT NO:

DESIGNED BY:

SCALE:

REVIEWED BY:

DRAWN BY:

DATE:

FILE:

Appendix C

Certifications

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTION

UTAH TECH UNIVERSITY

SMITH COMPUTING CENTER ROOF

Utah Department of Government Operations Division of Facilities, Construction and Management (DFCM)

Taylorsville State Office Building, 3rd Floor 4315 South 2700 West

47 West 9000 South, Suite #2

Sandy, Utah 84070

Utah Tech University Hazardous Material Inspection

Hazardous Materials Inspection

St. George, Utah 84770

On July 22, 2026, Tyler Coles of R & R Environmental, Inc., conducted a hazardous materials inspection of the Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Roof located at 225 South 700 East in St. George, Utah 84770. The purpose of this survey was to identify the existence, extent, and condition of hazardous materials. The inspection was conducted based on an agreement with Aubrey Stapel with Utah DFCM.

Hazardous materials requiring proper removal and disposal were identified at the Utah Tech University, Smith Computing Center Roof, St. George, Utah as follows:

Material Location Quantity Unit Cost Bulbs Roof 2 bulbs $2.00 / unit

Ballasts Roof 2 units $8.00 / unit Chemical, Paint, Oil, Lubricant Roof 1 gal $NA / gal

Fire Extinguishers Roof 1 unit $150.00 / unit

The State of Utah’s DFCM policy requires the items above to be removed and disposed of at a facility approved to accept such waste prior to demolition. This may or may not be applied to the city of St. George in Washington County, but R & R Environmental, Inc.

recommends removal and proper disposal of these components prior to any demolition activities.

The cost estimate to remove and dispose of these hazardous materials is estimated at approximately >$170.00. This cost estimate does not include transportation, removal, design, or management fees associated with dismantling and packaging the materials.