5-Scoresheet - For information only.xls
XLS spreadsheet 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BB27-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation BB27-1, issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services, for Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (TF-CBT) training services. The department seeks to procure a certified trainer to provide TF-CBT instruction to private contracted mental health providers serving children ages 2-11 who are identified as seriously mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed through the System of Care grant. The contract term is five years, and the evaluation will be conducted using a combination of mandatory technical requirements and scoreable technical criteria. No specific response dates, due dates, bidder meetings, or award dates are identified in this scoresheet document itself.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes six mandatory pass/fail requirements that offerors must meet, including possession of a master's or doctoral degree in a mental health field, current licensure to practice mental health therapy, TF-CBT certification with completed training and consultation requirements, certification by the TF-CBT National certification program as an authorized training source, and a minimum of three years combined experience in TF-CBT training and practice. Three scoreable technical criteria, each weighted at 33.3 percent for a total of 1,050 points, address submission of a comprehensive resume with professional training experience, current licensure verification, a detailed Statement of Work with course descriptions and training schedule, and narrative evidence or documentation of three years of combined TF-CBT experience. Offerors must achieve a minimum of 60 percent (630 points) on technical evaluation to proceed. Cost evaluation will award points to the lowest-priced proposal at 100 percent of available cost points, with all other proposals receiving proportional points based on their price relationship to the lowest bid. The solicitation specifies that pricing should not be included in initial qualification submissions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-Attachment A - Terms and Conditions.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-Attachment B - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Training Services | |||||||||
| SOLICITATION # BB27-1 | |||||||||
| EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | |||||||||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | |||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||||
| 1 | Offeror must possess a master’s or doctoral degree in a mental health field | ||||||||
| 2 | Offeror must be licensed to practice mental health therapy | ||||||||
| 3 | Offeror must be certified in TF-CBT having completed all training and consultation call requirements | ||||||||
| 4 | Offeror must be certified by the TF-CBT National certification program and recognized as an authorized source for TF-CBT training. | ||||||||
| 5 | Offeror must have a minimum of 3 years combined with training and practice of TF-CBT. | ||||||||
| 6 | |||||||||
| 7 | |||||||||
| 8 | |||||||||
| 9 | |||||||||
| 10 | |||||||||
| 0 | |||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||
| 1 | The Offeror shall submit the following: A comprehensive resume detailing the proposed individual's prior experience in a professional training capacity. |
| Verifiable proof of current, active licensure relevant to the proposed scope of work. | 70 | 33.3% | 350.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 2 | The Offeror shall submit a proposed Statement of Work (SOW) detailing the comprehensive course descriptions and an itemized schedule of the proposed training. | 70 | 33.3% | 350.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 3 | The Offeror shall provide narrative evidence and/or verifiable documentation (e.g., detailed resumes, service logs, or reference letters) confirming a minimum of three (3) years of combined experience in the active practice and training of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). | 70 | 33.3% | 350.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 10 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 11 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 12 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| 100.0% | 1050.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 60% | 630.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | Other cost evaluation methods may be used as long as they are within Procurement Code/Rule. Ensure the method for awarding points is clearly stated on the score sheeet and within the solicitation documents. | |||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,050.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 0% | 1,050.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .