36C77621R0194_3.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C77621R0194
About this file
This pre-solicitation notice seeks statements of qualifications from architecture and engineering firms to provide design services for the construction of an 11,500 square foot eye clinic at the Sacramento VA Medical Center in Mather, California. The scope of work includes investigative design, schematic design, design development, construction documents, specifications, cost estimates, and construction period services. The period of performance for design is 400 calendar days from notice of award with an anticipated design completion of March 30, 2022. The construction budget is $8.5 million and this opportunity is set aside 100% for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. Statements of qualifications are due by December 1, 2021 with interviews for shortlisted firms to be held thereafter and award by March 30, 2022. Evaluation criteria include professional qualifications, specialized experience, capacity, past performance, locality knowledge, and construction period experience.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Modification to a Previous Notice Modification to a Previous Notice
| SUBJECT* |
| 36C77621R0194 - Construct Eye Clinic Minor Design - Mather |
GENERAL INFORMATION
| CONTRACTING OFFICE’S ZIP CODE* |
| 44131 |
| SOLICITATION NUMBER* |
| 36C77621R0194 |
| BASE NOTICE TYPE |
| P |
| RESPONSE DATE/TIME/ZONE |
| 12-01-2021 14:00 EASTERN TIME, NEW YORK, USA |
| ARCHIVE |
| 99 DAYS AFTER THE RESPONSE DATE |
| RECOVERY ACT FUNDS |
| N |
| SET-ASIDE |
| SDVOSBC |
| PRODUCT SERVICE CODE* |
| C1DZ |
| NAICS CODE* |
| 541330 |
| CONTRACTING OFFICE ADDRESS |
| Department of Veterans Affairs |
Program Contracting Activity Central
6150 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 300 Independence OH 44131
POINT OF CONTACT*
Contract Specialist Jason Schultz jason.schultz@va.gov 216-447-8300
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
| ADDRESS |
| Sacramento VA Medical Center (VAMC) |
10535 Hospital Way
Mathers CA
| POSTAL CODE |
| 95655-4200 |
| COUNTRY |
| USA |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
AGENCY’S URL
| URL DESCRIPTION |
| Department of Veterans Affairs Homepage |
| AGENCY CONTACT’S EMAIL ADDRESS |
| jason.schultz@va.gov |
| EMAIL DESCRIPTION |
| Jason Schultz |
DESCRIPTION
The purpose of this mod to previous pre-sol is to provide responses to the technical questions received:
Question 1:
We are interested in pursuing the above referenced project, but we have a question about the Design Within Funding Limitation of $716,853. Is that the cost for construction, or for the design?
VA Response:
That would be for design.The $716,853 amount listed was a typo and is to be disregarded.
Question 2:
Is it safe to assume that all the references in the Pre-solicitation Notice and the SOW to Hematology/Oncology, USP800/797 pharmacy compounding units, cancer treatment facilities, infusion centers, and renovation space are erroneous?
VA Response:
Please see the answer to question #4 as this has now been updated.
Question 3:
The construction budget for a new 11,500sf two-story facility of $8,500.000 seems light based on our recent experience at Loma Linda and Tucson with new construction. Can we assume that the Design Funding Limitation of $716,853 was based on this budget?
VA Response:
The Design Within Funding Limitation and Construction Budget amount is $8.5M. The $716,853 amount listed was a typo and is to be disregarded.
Question 4:
Can you also clarify the following section, is this a carry over from another submission? This project is for and Eye Clinic not blood lab or USP 800 correct?
“Specialized experience and technical competence in the design, construction, and construction period services provided for Hematology /Oncology Infusion Center. Provide specialized experience examples in healthcare planning and delivery. Any provided past performance information on projects should include relevant work with Hospitals, Civil, Architectural, Mechanical, Structural, Electrical, and physical security upgrades/installation. Include no more than six (6) Government and/or private projects that demonstrate relevant experience with project that are similar in size, scope and complexity, and experience with specialized building types requiring physical security measures. Offeror shall include at least two (2) examples of USP800/797 design experience. The A/E shall have completed at least two (2) different oncology / infusion centers and have the capacity and experience to design this type of healthcare facility. AE shall have at least five (5) years’ experience with designs in hospitals or other hospital related facilities. The evaluation will consider the management approach, coordination of disciplines and subcontractors, quality control procedures, prior experience of the prime firm and any key subcontractors working together on relevant projects and familiarity with VA Design Guides/Manuals, Master Specifications and other applicable standards.”
VA Response:
This has been updated to:
“Specialized experience and technical competence in the design, construction, and construction period services provided for Hematology /Oncology Infusion Center. Provide specialized experience examples in healthcare planning and delivery. Any provided past performance information on projects should include relevant work with Hospitals, Civil, Architectural, Mechanical, Structural, Electrical, and physical security upgrades/installation. Include no more than six (6) Government and/or private projects that demonstrate relevant experience with project that are similar in size, scope and complexity, and experience with specialized building types requiring physical security measures. Offeror shall include at least two (2) examples of USP800/797 design experience. The A/E shall have completed at least two (2) different oncology / infusion centers and have the capacity and experience to design this type of healthcare facility. AE shall have at least five (5) years’ experience with designs in hospitals or other hospital related facilities. The evaluation will consider the management approach, coordination of disciplines and subcontractors, quality control procedures, prior experience of the prime firm and any key subcontractors working together on relevant projects and familiarity with VA Design Guides/Manuals, Master Specifications and other applicable standards.”
Question #5
Can you clarify/elaborate on the Scope of Work to include the need for experience with USP800/797, as well as the need for Oncology/Hematology experience within the Eye Clinic?
Clarification of the SOW will also allow us to determine if any additional Key Staff members will need to be included as a pertinent position related to the scope of work.
VA Response:
The following areas have now removed the reference for experience with USP800/797. The following areas now read as follows:
Past Performance: Past performance on contracts with Government agencies and private industry in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with performance schedules. The past performance will be evaluated for all projects provided in section F to include a review of Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS). The following information is required for all projects noted in section F: contract/task order number, project title, prime firm, start date, and completion date. Evaluations may also include additional performance related from the firm, customer inquiries, Government databases, publicly available sources, and additional projects in CPARS.
Evaluations will consider superior performance ratings on recently completed projects as well as the reputation and standing of the firm and its principal officials with respect to professional performance, general management, and cooperativeness. Also, consider, as appropriate, the record of significant claims against the firm because of improper or incomplete architectural and engineering services. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified. All projects provided in the SF 330 must be completed by the office/branch/individual team member performing the work under this contract.
All submitted projects must be relevant in size and scope as they relate one or more of the following factors: Optometry/Ophthalmology and hospital experience shall be required experience in all submitted projects.
The information for this factor shall be provided in Section H of the SF 330. If there is no CPARS data available, Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) will be accepted. Please utilize the attached PPQ document. *Completed PPQs should be incorporated into the SF330 directly. PPQs should not be submitted to VHA PCAC directly. The PPQs will be counted towards the page limitations for this submission.
PHASE II INTERVIEW PRESENTATION:
Team Proposed for this Project: Provide an organizational chart of the team and discuss the roles of the key personnel for this project. If possible, include the assigned key personnel in the interview presentations. Describe the specialized experience and technical competence A/E Services to develop Construction Documents for site investigation/ renovation/ demolition/expansion of an existing Optometry/Ophthalmology Service and lessons learned / corrected from previous designs completed.
Approach to Project Challenges: Discuss approach to overcome geographical obstacles considering the amount of site visits needed for this specific project (address both design phase site visits as well as CPS visits). Discuss ability, familiarization, or experience with VA design guides and directives and their interpretations and application to this design. Describe your specific experience with Optometry/Ophthalmology Service vs. VA requirements. Describe plans with this project to ensure VA requirements are kept current, and specified equipment will be approved by the VA.
QUESTION #6
Reference Statement of Work, Section D. General Requirements, 14. Environmental (NEPA):
Can you clarify the NEPA level of analysis required for this project?
Are you pursuing Categorical Exclusion (CATEX), or are you pursuing additional services within the NEPA process?
VA Response
Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) would be what we are pursuing
End of Document
| *= Required Field |
| Modification to a Previous Notice |
Modification to a Previous Notice
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .