S02 - Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire - 596A4-18-102.pdf
PDF 264 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Z1DA--596A4-18-102 - Replacement elevators Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C24923R0021
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information on a related federal contract opportunity for elevator upgrades. The past performance questionnaire is for contractors bidding on Project 596A4-18-102 to upgrade five elevators at the Lexington VA Healthcare System in Lexington, Kentucky. The questionnaire is to be completed by both the contractor and assessors to provide past performance information by January 4, 2023. The related federal contract opportunity notice is for construction services for the same elevator upgrade project. The project budget is between $1 million and $2 million, and it is set aside 100% for verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. The solicitation is expected to be issued on or around November 30, 2022.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project 596A4-18-102, Upgrade Elevators at the
Lexington VA Healthcare System, Troy Bowling Campus in Lexington, Kentucky.
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation to Upgrade Elevators at the Lexington
VA Healthcare System, Troy Bowling Campus
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to
NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist-Robert Pritchard by way of email at
Robert.pritchard2@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than January 4, 2023, at 2:00pm CDT. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (Robert.Pritchard2@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number
Project/Requirement
Customer/Agency
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s ______________________________________
Name and Address: ______________________________________
2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________
3. Phone number (with area code): ___________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract: ______________________________
6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9
Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.)
RATING SCALE Definitions
Past Performance Evaluation Ratings
Rating Description
ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
UNACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the
Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the
Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining
A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively
Resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
ACCEPTABLE ___ UNACCEPTABLE ___
8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
______ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor, but would do so if no better alternative existed.
______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
✓ Role Period of Involvement
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .