36C10F18R0634-0002000.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SEPS2BIM - Technical & Training Support Services
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F18R0634
About this file
36C10F18R0634 0002 36C10F18R0634 P0002.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10F19D0001-000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10F18R0634-00001000.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10F18R0634-002.pdf | ||
| 36C10F18R0634-001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C10F18R0634-000.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)
CODE
7. ADMINISTERED BY
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER
CODE
6. ISSUED BY
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED
PAGE
OF PAGES
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED
BPA NO.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
FACILITY CODE
CODE
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
E. IMPORTANT:
is extended,
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
(REV. 11/2016)
is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.
is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO:
Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
15C. DATE SIGNED
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS
ENTERED INTO
PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER
BY
Contractor
16C. DATE SIGNED
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
STANDARD FORM 30
PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)
(If required)
(SEE ITEM 11)
(SEE ITEM 13)
(X)
CHECK
ONE
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 09-07-2018
101PR2247B
003C4 Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (00CFM3B) 425 I Street NW Washington DC 20001 101F Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management 425 I Street NW Washington DC 20001 To all Offerors/Bidders
36C10F18R0634 09-06-2018
X X X See attached request for revised offers and changes in Attachment A. ---END---
Attachment A: Changes to Solicitation
1. Request for revised offers:
Only those offerors remaining in the competitive range may submit revised proposals by 12:00 PM Eastern on September 14, 2018. Proposals from offerors not in the competitive range shall not be considered.
Instructions to only those Offerors in the competitive range:
You are responsible for reviewing the Solicitation package in its entirety and ensuring that all submittal requirements are met including changes in this amendment. When submitting revised proposals please highlight or summarize changes from the initial proposal.
2. Changes include the following:
a) STATEMENT OF WORK:
Paragraph B. SPECIFIC MANDATORY TASKS AND ASSOCIATED DELIVERABLES
Add under TASK 1: SEPS2BIM and Data Technical Support - “1.11 Provide Server Web Hosting/ Internet Services shall provide and maintain a website that hosts the functionality and capabilities currently on SEPS2BIM.org”
Paragraph F. TRAVEL REQUIREMENTS 2: All local travel will be by private or public ground transportation. Government rates and tips (not to exceed 15%) shall apply. No per diem will be allowed for local travel is here by changed to: Local travel will not be reimbursed by VA and is the responsibility of the contractor.
Paragraph H - KEY PERSONNEL
1.4 BIM Modeler shall have a minimum of “eight (8) years” is changed to “five (5) years”
3. Delete, “Instructors are designated as Key Personnel for this requirement.”
b) B.3 PRICE/COST SCHEDULE (p11) Item #7: Travel for one (1) day meetings shall be paid on a Cost Reimbursement bases not to exceed costs in accordance with Federal and VA Travel Regulations.
c) CONTRACT CLAUSES Delete clauses:
52.216-21 – Requirements, 852.219-11 VOSB Set-Aside, and 852.215-70 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors.
d) INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS
1. 52.212-2, Evaluation paragraph (a) Factor 4 Price Reasonableness, delete “Reasonableness”.
2. Replace “Technical and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal to price” with “Technical Competence/Org Structure, Professional Qualifications, and Past Performance, when combined, are approximately equal to price.”
3. Submissions:
The submitted Technical Proposal shall consist of no more than twenty-five (25)….. Replace with “twenty-seven (27)”.
4. Factor 1. Technical Competence/Organizational Structure
a. Item #1 BIM Modeler - Minimum eight (8) years of experience to “five (5)
5. Factor 3: Past Performance:
Replace “Contractors shall provide a minimum of three (3), but no more than seven (7), relevant, recent projects for clients for which the proposed team members provided a significant technical contribution” With, “Contractors provide three (3), but no more than seven (7), relevant, recent projects for clients for which the proposed team members provided a significant technical contribution.”
6. See changes to the “FACTOR RATING DEFINITIONS”
Evaluation Rating Scale:
FACTOR RATING DEFINITIONS
| Adjective |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| The Offeror’s proposal exceeds the requirements and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the goals and objectives of the acquisition. The proposal is comprehensive, in-depth, clear, and uniformly outstanding in quality. Two or more significant strengths exist and no more than one weaknesses. There is very low risk associated with selection of Offeror. |
| Very Good |
| The Offeror’s proposal meets the requirements and demonstrates understanding of the goals and objectives of the acquisition. The proposal contains at least one significant strength and only two minor weaknesses which the Government anticipates can be satisfactorily resolved by the contractor. There is low risk associated with selection of Offeror. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s proposal meets the requirements and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the goals and objectives of the acquisition. The proposal contains at least one significant strength and more than two minor weaknesses and the Government anticipates these weaknesses can be satisfactorily resolved by the contractor. There is an acceptable level of risk associated with selection of Offeror. |
| Marginal |
| The Offeror’s proposal fails to meet two or more of the requirements and their understanding of the goals and objectives of the acquisition is less than satisfactory. There are both strengths and weaknesses, but the weaknesses outweigh the strengths and the Government anticipates that those weaknesses may not be satisfactorily addressed by the contractor. There is a moderately high level of risk associated with the selection of this Offeror. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Offeror’s proposal fails to meet a majority of the requirements and has limited to no understanding of the goals and objectives of the acquisition. The proposal has one or more significant weaknesses that will be very difficult and/or impossible to correct. Major revision(s) are required for minimum acceptability. The risk for unsuccessful contract performance associated with selection of Offeror is unacceptable. |
File details come from the government source that posted it.