3-Attachment E - RFP Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 44 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NS26-57
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for the State of Utah Division of Purchasing's Shelf Stable Food Items State Cooperative Contract (Solicitation #NS26-57). The procurement seeks to establish a contract for the supply of shelf stable food items to the State of Utah, with the potential for multiple awards. The contract term is five (5) years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for three (3) months on a quarterly basis.
The evaluation scoring is structured with mandatory requirements and technical criteria weighted at 70% of total points (1,850 points possible, with a minimum threshold of 1,295 points required) and cost evaluation weighted at 30% (792.9 points available). The mandatory requirements include the offeror's ability to meet the Scope of Work requirements, pricing for all line items on the Market Basket Cost Sheet, submission of pricing in the specified Unit of Measure, and uploading the completed Market Basket Cost Sheet to the U3P-Bonfire platform. Technical scoring criteria evaluate the offeror's understanding of deliverables and contract requirements, proposed delivery methods and timeframes, online ordering capabilities, product recall and notification procedures, disaster planning, product line completeness, relevant experience and qualifications, and statewide delivery coverage or subcontracting capability. The lowest-cost proposer receives the full 792.9 cost points, with other offerors receiving a proportional portion based on their cost differential. An administrative fee of 0.75% applies to this cooperative contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 6-Attachment D - MMR and Technical Criteria.docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-Attachment B - Scope of Work Shelf Stable Food Items.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Statewide RFP.pdf | ||
| 4-Attachment G - Anti-Lobbying Certification Form.doc | DOC document | |
| 9-Attachment F - Contract Management Process.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 8-Attachment C - Cost Sheet - Shelf Stable Foods Market Basket.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 5-Attachment A - Cooperative-Contract-GoodsServices-Combined.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Attachment E - RFP Score Sheet | |||||||||||
| State Cooperative Contract for Shelf Stable Food Items | |||||||||||
| Solicitation # NS26-57 | |||||||||||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | |||||||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Found In | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||||||
| 1 | Offer agrees they can meet the Attachment B - Scope of Work Requirements? | Bonfire Req Info MMR | |||||||||
| 2 | Offeror has inserted pricing for every line item on Attachment C - Market Basket Cost Sheet? | Bonfire Req Info MMR | |||||||||
| 3 | Offeror has submitted bid pricing in the Unit of Measure (UOM) provided on the Attachment C – Market Basket Cost Sheet? | Bonfire Req Info MMR | |||||||||
| 4 | Offeror has uploaded a completed Attachment C - Market Basket Cost Sheet in U3P-Bonfire platform? | Bonfire Req Info MMR | |||||||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Found In | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||||
| 1 | Offeror has demonstrated their understanding of the Deliverables/Contract Requirements - Shelf Stable Food Items, Delivery, Product Items, Labeling, Product Recall Procedures, End Users Ordering, Quality Assurance, and Food Safety described in the Attachment B - Scope of Work section. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 100 | 27.0% | 500.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 2 | Offeror's proposed method of delivery service. Provide Offeror's ability to deliver on time and describe the method, procedures, and policies used to minimize and govern late deliveries. Order minimums, lead times, and delivery charges. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 50 | 13.5% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 3 | Offeror’s instructions and ease of computer-based direct ordering or online product order entry explained. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 50 | 13.5% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 4 | Offeror’s product recalls & notifications explained. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 25 | 8.1% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 5 | Offeror’s regular delivery services and disaster plan deliveries explained. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 25 | 8.1% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 6 | Offeror’s full product line price list has all Shelf Stable Food items needed. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 50 | 13.5% | 250.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 7 | Offeror's experience & qualifications on similar contracts. | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 25 | 8.1% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 8 | Offeror's delivery coverage of the State explained. If not able to deliver to whole State, can Offeror subcontract delivery to entire state? | Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria | 25 | 8.1% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 100.0% | 1850.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Bonfire Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |||||
| Bonfire - Req Info | 70% | 1295.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||||||
| Cost | Bonfire Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||
| Bonfire - Req Info | 30% | 792.9 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 792.9 points (100% of the total cost points available). All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their total cost is than the total lowest cost. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | |||||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 1,850.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 792.9 | 0.0 | ||||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 2,642.9 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .