3-Attachment E - RFP Score Sheet.xls

XLS spreadsheet 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Utah State Cooperative Contract for Shelf Stable Foods
Solicitation number
NS26-57
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for the State of Utah Division of Purchasing's Shelf Stable Food Items State Cooperative Contract (Solicitation #NS26-57). The procurement seeks to establish a contract for the supply of shelf stable food items to the State of Utah, with the potential for multiple awards. The contract term is five (5) years, with vendors required to guarantee pricing for three (3) months on a quarterly basis.

The evaluation scoring is structured with mandatory requirements and technical criteria weighted at 70% of total points (1,850 points possible, with a minimum threshold of 1,295 points required) and cost evaluation weighted at 30% (792.9 points available). The mandatory requirements include the offeror's ability to meet the Scope of Work requirements, pricing for all line items on the Market Basket Cost Sheet, submission of pricing in the specified Unit of Measure, and uploading the completed Market Basket Cost Sheet to the U3P-Bonfire platform. Technical scoring criteria evaluate the offeror's understanding of deliverables and contract requirements, proposed delivery methods and timeframes, online ordering capabilities, product recall and notification procedures, disaster planning, product line completeness, relevant experience and qualifications, and statewide delivery coverage or subcontracting capability. The lowest-cost proposer receives the full 792.9 cost points, with other offerors receiving a proportional portion based on their cost differential. An administrative fee of 0.75% applies to this cooperative contract.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Attachment E - RFP Score Sheet
State Cooperative Contract for Shelf Stable Food Items
Solicitation # NS26-57
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsFound InEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Offer agrees they can meet the Attachment B - Scope of Work Requirements?Bonfire Req Info MMR
2Offeror has inserted pricing for every line item on Attachment C - Market Basket Cost Sheet?Bonfire Req Info MMR
3Offeror has submitted bid pricing in the Unit of Measure (UOM) provided on the Attachment C – Market Basket Cost Sheet?Bonfire Req Info MMR
4Offeror has uploaded a completed Attachment C - Market Basket Cost Sheet in U3P-Bonfire platform?Bonfire Req Info MMR
Scoreable Technical CriteriaFound InEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Offeror has demonstrated their understanding of the Deliverables/Contract Requirements - Shelf Stable Food Items, Delivery, Product Items, Labeling, Product Recall Procedures, End Users Ordering, Quality Assurance, and Food Safety described in the Attachment B - Scope of Work section.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria10027.0%500.00.0
2Offeror's proposed method of delivery service. Provide Offeror's ability to deliver on time and describe the method, procedures, and policies used to minimize and govern late deliveries. Order minimums, lead times, and delivery charges.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria5013.5%250.00.0
3Offeror’s instructions and ease of computer-based direct ordering or online product order entry explained.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria5013.5%250.00.0
4Offeror’s product recalls & notifications explained.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria258.1%150.00.0
5Offeror’s regular delivery services and disaster plan deliveries explained.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria258.1%150.00.0
6Offeror’s full product line price list has all Shelf Stable Food items needed.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria5013.5%250.00.0
7Offeror's experience & qualifications on similar contracts.Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria258.1%150.00.0
8Offeror's delivery coverage of the State explained. If not able to deliver to whole State, can Offeror subcontract delivery to entire state?Attach D -MMR & Tech Scoring Criteria258.1%150.00.0
100.0%1850.00.00.0
Required Technical Point ThresholdBonfire SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
Bonfire - Req Info70%1295.00.00.0%0
CostBonfire SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Bonfire - Req Info30%792.90.0
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 792.9 points (100% of the total cost points available). All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their total cost is than the total lowest cost. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%1,850.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points30%792.90.0
Total Evaluation Points100%2,642.90.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .