The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| Experience successfully leading virtual focus groups and/or advisory teams of educators, including facilitating meetings, guiding discussions, and effectively documenting feedback; |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated commitment to and specific, detailed examples of recognizing and elevating the identities and experiences of students from families and communities which have been historically underserved; |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| Current in research in second language acquisition, including Heritage Languages Research; |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 4 |
| Knowledge of both the 2021 MA World Languages Curriculum Framework, the ACTFL World Readiness Standards, and additional proficiency-based frameworks; |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 5 |
| Experience in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting educational data, particularly in language proficiency assessments, and assisting school-based partners in doing the same; |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 6 |
| Experience with a wide variety of world language programs and settings including elementary programs, vocational programs, dual language programs, and heritage programs; and |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 7 |
| Demonstrated technical expertise in drafting comprehensive educational guidance and/or support materials for school districts or state agencies. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 27TALAM1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-133774 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Preferred Qualification: Knowledge of the 2023 MA Heritage Languages Research Study, the 2025 Heritage Languages Guidance, and 2025 Heritage Languages Best Practices Manual; |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 2 |
| Narrative demonstrates understanding of the work and provides evidence that bidder meets the required qualifications; |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| Project plan provides a clear and feasible approach to completing all deliverables within the required timeframe and budget; |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| 4 |
| Educational guidance sample demonstrates the bidder’s ability to develop clear, practical, and accessible implementation resources; |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| 5 |
| Advisory-group work sample demonstrates the bidder’s ability to facilitate stakeholder engagement and analyze, document, and apply feedback; |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| 6 |
| Data-analysis work sample demonstrates the bidder’s ability to analyze and communicate quantitative and qualitative findings; |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| 7 |
| Résumés demonstrate that proposed key staff have the knowledge and experience necessary to complete the work; |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 8 |
| References demonstrate successful completion of relevant work by proposed key staff; |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 9 |
| Budget and budget narrative are complete, reasonable, and aligned with the deliverables, funding limits, and Prime bidder requirements; and |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif