2324-014 FEMA Risk MAP RFQ UPDATED TIME.pdf

SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

NO. 23/24-014

FEMA RISK MAP PROGRAM SUPPORT

Table of Contents

Section Title Page 1 Introduction 2 2 Proposed Schedule 2 3 Instructions to Respondents 2 4 Key Points 3 5 Scope of Services 9 6 Qualification Documents 10

Suwannee River Water Management District

9225 CR 49

Live Oak, FL 32060 386-362-1001

386-362-1056 (Fax) 800-226-1066 (Florida only) www.mysuwanneeriver.com http://www.mysuwanneeriver.com/

SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION

The Suwannee River Water Management District (District) desires to enter into agreements with consultants to assist the District in the development of its fully integrated floodplain management program and for the implementation of FEMA’s Risk MAP Program. The District has been a Cooperating Technical Partner (CTP) implementing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map Modernization and Risk MAP programs for over 20 years.

On a 5-year cycle, the District requests qualifications from consultants to assist the District with this program.

SECTION 2 - PROPOSED SCHEDULE

April 15, 2024 Release of Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

May 03, 2024 – 1 p.m. Deadline for submittal of questions.

May 10, 2024 – 5 p.m. Questions with answers posted.

June 10, 2024* Qualifications due prior to 11 a.m. Opening will occur at this time. *

August 23, 2024* Selection Committee meeting, 2 p.m.*

October 08, 2024 Request for Governing Board Approval of Recommended List. *

* Denotes a public meeting. All meetings will be held at District Headquarters located at the corner of U.S. 90 and C.R. 49 in Live Oak, Florida. All times are Eastern Standard/Daylight Savings Time.

SECTION 3 - INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENTS

Delivery of Response:

Responses shall be submitted electronically through DemandStar.

https://www.demandstar.com/app/agencies/florida/suwannee-river-water-management-district/procurement

***For articles and videos to assist you through the DemandStar registry and uploading of documents visit the DemandStar business support page at -https://network.demandstar.com/business-support/

Response packages are to be uploaded to the platform no later than 11:00 a.m. June 10, 2024.

Proposals received after this time, for any reason, will be rejected.

Submission of a Response constitutes acknowledgment of receipt of all addenda. Submittals will be construed as though all addenda had been received. Failure of the Respondent to receive any addenda does not relieve Respondent from any and all obligations under the Response as submitted. All addenda become part of the Agreement.

This procurement is conducted under the rules, policies, and procedures of the District and the District’s Governing Board. This procurement is not conducted pursuant to Ch. 287, Florida Statutes, except where explicitly provided by law. The District’s rules, policies and procedures https://www.demandstar.com/app/agencies/florida/suwannee-river-water-management-district/procurement https://www.demandstar.com/app/agencies/florida/suwannee-river-water-management-district/procurement https://network.demandstar.com/business-support/ are available by contacting the procurement officer found below:

Sharon Hingson 9225 County Road 49 Live Oak, FL. 32060 386.647.3117 Sharon.Hingson@srwmd.org

Questions:

District staff are not authorized to orally interpret the meaning of the specifications or other Agreement documents, or correct any apparent ambiguity, inconsistency, or error therein. To be binding upon the District, the interpretation or correction must be given by the Procurement Specialist and must be in writing. The Respondent is ultimately responsible for submitting the Submittal in the appropriate form and in accordance with written procedures.

To provide equal opportunity and ensure the same information is provided to all Respondents, all questions should be submitted by email to Sharon.Hingson@SRWMD.org before 1 p.m., May 3, 2024. Questions with answers will be posted on the District website www.mysuwanneeriver.com, at or before 5 p.m. May 10, 2024. Questions cannot be answered via telephone or other verbal communication.

Respondents to this solicitation or persons acting on their behalf may not contact, between the release of the solicitation and the end of the 72-hour period following the agency posting the notice of intended award, any employee or officer of the executive or legislative branch concerning any aspect of this solicitation, except in writing to the procurement officer or as provided in the solicitation documents. Violation of this provision may be grounds for rejecting a response.

SECTION 4 – KEYPOINTS

The District will select one Program Management Consultant (PMC) and three Product Production Consultants (PPC).

The PMC will perform program management in accordance with District requests and requirements, as well as FEMA program management policies, procedures and requirements that include activities as described in the Mapping Activities Statement (MAS), Community Outreach and Mitigation Strategies (COMS) Statement of Work (SOW), and the Program Management (PM) SOW. In addition, the PMC may perform Discovery and/or Quality Assurance and Quality Control in accordance with the FEMA requirements as listed above.

The PPCs will perform all other activities as required by the District, FEMA and the MAS to produce a finished product, carry the MAS to completion and complete any requirement as established by FEMA or the District.

Budget:

All work will be accomplished through the issuance of a Task Work Assignment (TWA).

Respondents should not have any expectation or promise as to the volume of work that may be accomplished pursuant to this solicitation. The below amounts were spent over the last 5 years.

The amounts should not be taken as a limit of the District in awarding TWAs and Respondents are cautioned to not make any assumptions about the total funds available for proposed work under this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) based on the chart below. In addition, the District mailto:Sharon.Hingson@srwmd.org reserves the right to increase, decrease, or delete any class, item, or part of the Work to reduce costs for any reason. The District may discuss alternatives for reducing the cost of the TWAs with Respondents and make such modifications as it determines to be in its best interest.

Program Management Consultant $2,810,320 Product Production Consultant #1 $1,807,884 Product Production Consultant #2 $1,977,910 Product Production Consultant #3 $1,653,699 Total $8,249,813

Signature and certification requirements:

The individual submitting a response must electronically sign their name therein, provide their contact information and the contact information of every other person listed in the Submittal as principal. If a firm or partnership submits the Submittal, state the name and contact information of each member of the firm or partnership. If a corporation submits the Submittal, an authorized officer or agent must sign the Submittal, subscribing the name of the corporation with his or her own name and affixing the corporate seal. Such officer or agent must also provide the name of the state under which the corporation is chartered, and the names and business contact information of the President, Secretary, and Treasurer. Corporations chartered in states other than Florida must submit evidence of registration with the Florida Secretary of State for doing business in the State of Florida. Respondent must certify that all persons or entities having an interest as principal in the Submittal or in substantial performance of the Work have been identified in the Submittal forms.

Public records law:

Any material submitted in response to this RFQ (except trade secrets as defined in s. 812.081, Florida Statutes (F.S.) will become a public record pursuant to Section 119.07, F.S. This includes material which the responding proposer might consider to be confidential or a proprietary. Any claim of confidentiality, except for trade secrets, is waived upon submission, effective after opening pursuant to Section 119.07, F.S. Contractor’s refusal to comply with this provision shall constitute sufficient cause for termination of the contract resulting from this RFQ.

It shall be the responsibility of the Responder to specifically identify trade secret information submitted within the response. Designating a page as containing trade secret information is not sufficient; EACH ITEM OF TRADE SECRET INFORMATION MUST BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED. A Responder claiming trade secret protection shall be responsible for providing a defense to any claim lodged challenging the claim and shall be responsible to the DISTRICT for any costs incurred in defending such a claim, including reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs, including through any appeal.

Disqualification of respondents:

Any of the following causes will be considered as sufficient grounds for disqualification of a Respondent and rejection of the Submittal:

A. Contacting a District employee or officer other than the procurement employee named in this solicitation about any aspect of this solicitation before the notice of intended decision is posted.

B. Submission of more than one Submittal for the same subject matter by an individual, firm, partnership, or corporation under the same or different names.

C. Evidence of collusion among Respondents.

D. Submission of materially false information with the Submittal.

E. Failure to submit by the submission deadline.

F. Information gained through checking of references or other sources which indicates that

Respondent may not successfully perform the Work.

G. Respondent is failing to adequately perform on any existing contract with the District.

H. Respondent has defaulted on a previous contract with the District.

I. The evidence submitted by Respondent, or the District’s investigation of Respondent, fails to satisfy the District that Respondent is properly qualified to carry out the obligations of the Agreement in a manner acceptable to the District and within the time period specified.

J. The Respondent fails to provide the UEI and DUNS Number of the primary and all subconsultants in the submittal.

K. Any other cause that is sufficient to raise doubt regarding the ability of a Respondent to perform the Work in a manner that meets the District’s objectives for the Work.

Receipt of Submittal:

Submittals must be filed electronically as stated in Section 3 above. Submittals will be considered non-responsive and may be rejected if they show material omissions, conditions, limitations, or other material irregularities. The District may consider incomplete any Submittal not prepared and submitted in accordance with the provisions specified herein and reserves the right to waive any minor deviations or omissions in an otherwise valid Submittal.

The District reserves the right to reject any and all Submittals and cancel this request for qualifications when it determines, in its sole judgment and discretion, that it is not in its best interest to award the agreement(s). The District may make such investigations as it deems necessary to determine the ability of the Respondent to perform the Work.

Withdrawal of Submittal:

Respondent may be permitted to withdraw its Submittal no later than 72 hours after the Submittal opening for good cause, as determined by the District in its sole judgment and discretion.

Evaluation by District Selection Committee:

The District Selection Committee (DSC) will meet to evaluate and rank the Submittals in the location(s), time(s) and date(s), stated at the beginning of this RFQ package. The DSC will select, in order of preference, no fewer than two PMC firms and four PPC firms deemed to be the most highly qualified to perform the required services, unless there are insufficient submittals. The DSC shall rank no more than four firms for each category. Submittals will be evaluated by the DSC based upon the criteria and weighting set forth in “EVALUATION

CRITERIA.”

Responses will be scored and ranked individually by the Committee members. Each Committee member will individually score the Responses using the evaluation forms included with this solicitation. Using these scores, each Committee member will rank the responses using “1” for the Response receiving the highest number of points from the evaluation forms. Responses with an equal number of points will receive the same numerical ranking (i.e. – tie for third: 1, 2, 3, 3).

The individual rankings of each of the DSC members will be totaled to produce a composite score. The Highest possible composite score is 15. The two PMC firms and four PPC firms receiving the highest composite scores will constitute the short list for the purpose of commencing negotiation of a contract.

Reservation of Rights The District reserves the right to reject all proposals with or without cause. The District reserves the right to waive technical errors or deficiencies within submitted proposals. The District reserves the right to modify the time frames within this solicitation as deemed necessary by the District and such changes will be posted on the District’s website. The District reserves the right to modify the anticipated scope of work as defined in this solicitation provided that such modification are natural and necessary extensions of the original anticipated scope of work.

Section 286.0113, F.S., exempts from being open to the public, any portion of a meeting at which: (1) a negotiation with a Respondent is conducted pursuant to a competitive solicitation;

(2) a Respondent makes an oral presentation as part of a competitive solicitation; (3) a Respondent answers questions as part of a competitive solicitation; or (4) negotiation strategies are discussed. Also, recordings of and any records presented at the exempt meeting are exempt from §119.07(1) and §24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution (Public Records) until such time as the District provides notice of an intended decision or until 30 days after opening the Submittal or final replies, whichever occurs earlier. A complete recording shall be made of any portion of an exempt meeting. No portion of the exempt meeting may be held off the record.

Pursuant to §286.0113 F.S., if the District rejects all Submittals and concurrently provides notice of its intent to reissue the competitive solicitation, any recordings or records presented at any exempt meeting relating to the solicitation shall remain exempt from §119.07(1) and §24(a), Art.

I of the State Constitution (Public Records) until such time as the District provides notice of an intended decision concerning the reissued competitive solicitation or until the District withdraws the reissued competitive solicitation. A recording and any records presented at an exempt meeting are not exempt for longer than 12 months after the initial District notice rejecting all Submittals.

Following the evaluation process, the District will submit the final recommendation of qualified firms to the Governing Board for approval. All Respondents will be notified of the Selection Committee’s final recommendation.

Contract negotiations will then commence with the qualified firms.

For the PMC, should the District be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the firm considered to be the most qualified for the PMC Consultant listed above, at a price the agency determines to be fair, competitive, and reasonable, negotiations with that firm will be terminated and the District will then undertake negotiations with the second most qualified firm. Should the District be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the ranked firms, the District may select additional firms in the order of their competence and qualification and continue negotiations until an agreement is reached for the one contractual position or the District may, at its option, terminate all negotiations and re-solicit.

For the PPC, should the District be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with the firm considered to be the most qualified for either of the proposed contractual Consultants listed above, at a price the agency determines to be fair, competitive, and reasonable, negotiations with that firm will be terminated and the District will then undertake negotiations with the second most qualified firm. Failing accord with the second most qualified firm, the District will then terminate negotiations and undertake negotiations with the third most qualified firm. Failing accord with the third most qualified firm, the District will then terminate negotiations and undertake negotiations with the fourth most qualified firm. Failing accord with the fourth most qualified firm, the District will then terminate negotiations and undertake negotiations with the fifth most qualified firm. Should the District be unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the ranked firms, the District may select additional firms in the order of their competence and qualification and continue negotiations until an agreement is reached for the four contractual positions or the District may, at its option, terminate all negotiations and re-solicit.

Challenge of Solicitation Process:

If a potential respondent protests any provisions of this RFQ, a notice of intent to protest shall be filed with the District in writing within 72 hours after the posting of the request for qualifications on the District's website and the respondent shall file a formal written protest within ten (10) days after filing of notice of intent to protest. Any respondent who files a formal written protest pursuant to Chapter 28-110, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), and Section 120.57(3), F.S., shall post with the District at the time of filing the formal written protest, a bond pursuant to Section 287.042(2)(c), F.S. (2018).

Failure to file a notice of intent to protest or failure to file a formal written protest within the time prescribed in Chapter 28-110, F.A.C. and Section 120.57(3), F.S. or failure to post the bond or other security required by law within the time allowed for filing a bond shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120, F.S. More specifically, "Failure to file a protest within the time prescribed in Section 120.57(3), F.S., shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120 of F.S."

Challenge of District's Intent to Award Contract:

If a respondent intends to protest District's intent to award contract, the notice of intent to protest must be filed in writing within 72 hours after posting of a notice of intent to award contract, and the respondent shall file a formal written protest within ten (10) days after filing of notice of intent to protest. Any respondent who files a formal written protest pursuant to Chapter 28-110, F.A.C., and Section 120.57(3), F.S., shall post with the District at the time of filing the formal written protest a bond pursuant to Section 287.042(2)(c), F.S. (2018).

Failure to file a notice of intent to protest or failure to file a formal written protest within the time prescribed in Chapter 28-110, F.A.C., and Section 120.57(3), F.S., or failure to post the bond or other security required by law within the time allowed for filing a bond shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120, F.S. More specifically, "Failure to file a protest within the time prescribed in Section 120.57(3), F.S., shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120 of F.S."

Americans with Disabilities Act:

The District does not discriminate upon the basis of any individual's disability status. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District's functions including one's access to, participation, employment, or treatment in its programs or activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should contact the District at 386.362.1001 or 800.226.1066 (Florida only). The District's fax number is 386.362.1056.

Minority Business Enterprises:

The District recognizes fair and open competition as a basic tenet of public procurement.

Respondents doing business with the District are prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, handicap, age or sex. The District encourages participation by minority business enterprises. Whenever two or more service providers are ranked equally, a minority business enterprise shall be given preference in the award process.

Veteran's Preference:

In the absence of minority business enterprise, whenever two or more service providers are ranked equally by the District, a veteran-owned business enterprise shall be given preference in the award process.

Equitable Distribution of Contracts:

The District may evaluate recent, current and projected workloads of respondents and the volume of work previously awarded each respondent by District with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms, provided such distribution does not violate the principal of selection of the most highly qualified firms.

Drug Free Workplace Act:

The selected respondent shall represent that it has established a drug free workplace.

Public Entity Crime:

Section 287.133(2)(a), F.S., states "A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list."

Scrutinized Company:

Section 287.135, F.S., states “A company is ineligible to, and may not, bid on, submit a proposal for, or enter into or renew a contract with an agency or local governmental entity for goods or services of:

1) Any amount if, at the time of bidding on, submitting a proposal for, or entering into or renewing such contract, the company is on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List, created pursuant to s. 215.4725, or is engaged in a boycott of Israel; or

2) One million dollars or more if, at the time of bidding on, submitting a proposal for, or entering into or renewing such contract, the company:

a) Is on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized

Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, created pursuant to s. 215.473; or

b) Is engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria.”

Insurance Requirements:

If awarded, respondent shall represent and guarantee that all employees, agents, servants or representatives of the respondent, and all agents, servants, employees or representatives of subcontractors are covered by workers' compensation insurance as required by law. Prior to entering into contract with the District, respondent agrees to furnish the District certificates of insurance on all insurance, naming District as additional insured for items 2 and 3 below, providing evidence that respondent has in full force and effect the following minimum insurance http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0200-0299/0215/Sections/0215.4725.html http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0200-0299/0215/Sections/0215.473.html with insurers authorized to do business in the State of Florida:

1) Workers' compensation insurance as required above.

2) Motor vehicular liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit which insurance shall be applicable to any and all vehicles utilized by respondent to provide the services requested by District.

3) General liability insurance for all services rendered by respondent for the requested services with a minimum of $300,000 personal and advertising injury and $300,000 general aggregate.

4) The certificate of insurance shall also provide that District shall be notified in writing by the carrier at least 30 days prior to any cancellation of said insurance.

Respondents to this solicitation or persons acting on their behalf may not contact, between the release of the solicitation and the end of the 72-business hour period following the agency posting the notice of intended award, any employee or officer of the District concerning any aspect of this solicitation, except in writing as indicated above.

Violation of this provision may be grounds for rejecting a response.

SECTION 5 - SCOPE OF SERVICES

Selected firms will be expected to perform some, or all of the tasks listed in the MAS, COMS SOW and PM SOW, and FEMA program requirements each year for the life of the grant. In addition, any additional reports, submittals or work requested by the District when such request is for the sole and explicit purpose of managing or submitting information as requested by or for the Risk MAP program.

The District is also seeking firms who have knowledge and working experience with LiDAR.

These firms should understand the State of Florida and FEMA LiDAR specifications and be able to conduct LiDAR acquisition, processing, quality control, mapping, and analysis.

Firms do not have to be qualified in all areas of responsibility reflected in each of the MAS, COMS SOW or PM SOW. Firms shall only submit qualifications for those areas they have experience and expertise in.

After the firms are selected, the District will begin negotiations with such firms to decide which tasks will be performed by the District and which tasks will be provided by the selected firms.

SECTION 6 – QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTS

***Rest of page left blank

RFQ 23/24-014

Qualifications Response Form

(Page 1 of 2) Respondents are required to complete and submit this form. One original, one thumb drive and three (3) copies shall be delivered in one envelope as discussed in Section 3. PLEASE USE

ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY

Date:

Firm:

State Certification # Telephone:

DUNS # UEI #

Address:

Website:

Point of Contact for this submittal:

Phone: E-mail:

Subcontractor Firm(s)

State Certification # Telephone:

DUNS # UEI #

Address:

Website:

Subcontractor Firm(s)

State Certification # Telephone:

DUNS # UEI #

Address:

Website:

Please indicate which type of consultant for which you wish to be considered PMC / PPC (circle one):

Have you previously done work for the District? Yes____ No . If Yes, explain.

Are you currently under contract with or have been selected on a services shortlist for the District? Yes No . If yes, explain.

Have you worked on a MAS, COMS SOW or PM SOW for any other agencies/states? Yes__ No __. If Yes explain.

Have you previously done work for, or do you currently represent any clients who may cause a potential conflict of interest if you are selected as a contractor for the District? Yes_____ No______ If Yes, list clients and nature of conflict:

Is your company eligible for veteran's preference? Yes______ No______

Please include supporting documentation.

Are you a minority Business or Enterprise? Yes_____No_______

Please include supporting documentation

Provide any other information about your firm that may assist the District in evaluating your qualifications.

QUESTIONNAIRE

NOTE: Completed Questionnaire and Experience forms are recommended but not required. If preferred, the requested information may be submitted in an alternate format. Questionnaire shall include information about the key personnel to be used for these services.

Project Manager Name: _______________________________________________

Firm: ______________________________________________________________

Telephone: E-mail

I. Educational Background:

School attended: _______________________________________________

Degree obtained: __________________________________________

A) Professional Designations:

1) Year

2) Year

3) Year

4) Year

B) Recent courses/seminars attended:

1) Year

2) Year

3) Year

4) Year

C) Recent courses/seminars taught:

1) Year

2) Year

3) Year

4) Year

D) Additional information regarding educational background

II. Other background information:

A) I (have) (have not) attached a personal resume.

General:

EXPERIENCE

(Last Five Years)

Firm: ________________________________________________________

Name of Project:

Agency/Company:

Contact:

Phone: E-mail:

Project Description:

Start Date: ___ ___ _(mm/yy) Completion Date: ___ _______(mm/yy)

Cost of Project $

Names of Personnel Assigned to Project:

Name of Project:

Agency/Company:

Contact:

Project Description:

Start Date: ___ ___ _(mm/yy) Completion Date: ___ _______(mm/yy)

Cost of Project $

Names of Personnel Assigned to Project:

REFERENCES

Firm: ________________________________________________________ (Names and contact information of three clients who can attest to your experience as it relates to the tasks provided in the RFQ attached).

Agency/Company Name:

Address:

Contact Person:

Phone: E-mail:

Agency/Company Name:

Address:

Contact Person:

Agency/Company Name:

Address:

Contact Person:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

CRITERIA- FEMA Risk MAP PROGRAM RFQ

FIRM: SCORE

Women owned Business (YES/NO) Minority Owned Business (YES/NO) Veteran Owned Business (YES/NO)

1 Submittal is complete with all pertinent information provided.

Maximum score five points

All required and recommended information was provided in a manner that allows the selection committee to review the provided information and make an informed decision. All information provided for the primary firm is also provided for sub-contractors.

2 Technical qualifications, education and experience of key personnel.

Maximum score 40 points

Key personnel, from the primary and sub-contractor firms, have an understanding of the requested services and are qualified through education, qualifications, certifications, licenses and experience to perform the expected scope of work for the proposed work.

3 Relevant experience and performance of similar projects from other agencies.

Maximum score 40 points

Respondent has provided examples of similar projects from other agencies which provide reasonable assurance that that they have performed and completed those projects, within scope, budget and time. Reference letters help with scoring but are not required.

4 Location of project manager within the District's boundary or, if not, within the state.

Maximum score ten points

More consideration will be given to Respondents for which the primary or subcontractor has an office within the state. More consideration will be given to Respondents which have the project manager for the primary or subcontractor located within the State. Higher consideration will be given to Respondents for which the primary of subcontractor has an office within the District. Higher consideration will be given to Respondents which have the project manager for the primary or subcontractor located within the District.

5 Quality of previous District work and successful completion of projects.

Maximum score five points

Consideration will be given to respondents who have provided high quality work and completed tasks on time, on scope and within budget. Responsiveness of project managers and dedication to complete projects are considered

TOTAL /100

Signature: