2-BPM003500 Consensus Evaluation Report - signed (1).pdf
PDF 322 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Master Agreement AZ|CTR056544
- Contract number
- CTR056544
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Report for Solicitation No. BPM003500 for "Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring", involving an evaluation committee that reviewed proposals from multiple contractors. The key offerors include Harris Environmental Group, Blaine, Tetra Tech, and Great Lakes Environmental Center (GLEC). The evaluation was conducted by procurement professionals including Patricia Lorenzen, Daniel Reeder, Gwen Minnier, and Jason Jones.
The solicitation evaluated proposals across three primary criteria: Experience and Capacity (500 points), Proposed Approach (400 points), and Cost Proposal (100 points). The evaluation committee recommended awarding contracts to Harris Environmental Group, Tetra Tech, and Great Lakes Environmental Center. The proposed areas of work include water quality sampling across multiple domains such as Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater, and Fish Tissue. Scoring was based on meeting expectations, with variations in performance across different evaluation categories. The total scores ranged from 450 to 643 points, with Tetra Tech receiving the highest score of 643 and demonstrating above expectations in experience and capacity, particularly noted for having skilled staff with relevant experience for the project scope.
View the file
Other files
Show all 41
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION REPORT
Solicitation No. BPM003500
Total Score
Weight
1 - Experience and Capacity =
500 points 500 1.1 Experience and Capacity Meets Expectations 250 Meets Expectations 250 Above Expectations 375 Meets Expectations 250
Weight
2 - Proposed Approach =
400 points 400 2.1 Proposed Approach Meets Expectations 200 Below Expectation 100 Meets Expectations 200 Meets Expectations 200
100 3 - Cost Proposal = 100 points 77 100 68 91
Comments
Daniel reeder
Procurement Officer Name: Evaluator Name:
Signature Date Signature Date
Gwen Minnier
Evaluator Name: Evaluator Name:
Signature Date Signature Date
Jason Jones
The members of the evaluation committee have completed their review and reached consensus regarding the proposals received in response to
Solicitation No. BPM003500 for " Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring". This evaluation report accurately and completely reflects the opinion of the committee as a whole. Therefore, in accordance with Section 3-A, 6.0 Evaluation of Offers, it is recommended that it would be in the best interest of the State to make an award to the following Contractors:Harris Environmental Group, Tetra Tech and Great Lakes Environmental
Center.
Patricia Lorenzen
Tetra Tech
GLEC
250375
Capacity with number of experienced staff.
Skilled staff with relevant experience for
Scope.
Questions were not answered completely or with detail.
Offerors Blaine
Harris
Below Expectation = Proposal doesn’t fully meet or doesn’t completely address requirement(s) of the RFP
Unacceptable = Elements of the proposal that are unacceptable to the State.
Formula for Scoring Overall Price (Criteria 3)
Lowest Price / Offered Price X Maximum Points = Awarded Points
Areas Proposed
Description: Water Quality Sampling and Monitoring
For each evaluation criteria that follows, a determination was made regarding how well the proposals satisfied the stated requirements. The rating definitions, Rating Definitions for Criteria 1 and 2
Exceeds Expectations = Proposal is very detailed, indicates a clear understanding of the RFP and provides innovative or exceptional responses.
Above Expectations = Proposal meets all requirement(s) outlined in the RFP but also provides a response that goes beyond what is required.
Meets Expectations = Proposal meets requirement(s) outlined in the RFP.
Rating Definitions for Criteria 4
Complies with no exceptions
Complies with minimal exceptions
Does not comply - Several Exceptions
Stream, Biological, SDAM Groundwater Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater & Fish Tissue
Stream, Lake, Biological, SDAM, Groundwater & Fish Tissue
Gwen Minnier (Aug 2, 2021 15:10 PDT) Gwen Minnier Aug 2, 2021Jason Jones (Aug 2, 2021 15:32 PDT)
Jason Jones Aug 2, 2021
Aug 2, 2021Aug 3, 2021 https://secure.na1.adobesign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM https://azadoagov.na1.echosign.com/verifier?tx=CBJCHBCAABAA3ksVuu9ai7pVMe6xHwKU9-9UOyjfdWGM
| 2021-08-03T06:47:43-0700 | |
| Agreement certified by Adobe Sign |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .