Attachment_B_-_Past_Performance_Survey.doc
DOC document 174 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 2
- Solicitation number
- 15-233-SOL-00374
About this file
Attachment B - Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Health and Human Services
Program Support Center
Past Performance Survey
15-233-SOL-00374
| Contractor Name: |
Client Information
FORMCHECKBOX
Commercial Client
FORMCHECKBOX
Federal Client
| Client Name: |
| Client Address: |
City
State
Zip Code
| Project Name: |
| Contract Number(s): |
| Total Contract Value: |
| Performance Period: |
| Teaming Partner(s): |
| Government or Commercial Project Manager Contact |
| Alternate Government or Commercial Project Manager Contact |
| Name: |
| Name: |
| Title: |
| Title: |
| Phone number: |
| Phone number: |
| Fax number: |
| Fax number: |
| E-mail address: |
| E-mail address: |
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
Instructions: This part consists of open-ended questions to determine the scope, complexity, and relevance of the project to the current requirement. Please answer the questions concisely and to the best of your knowledge.
| 1. |
| Describe the overall project type the contractor provided. |
| 2. |
| Describe the end goal/end product and result. |
| 3. |
| Describe the long-term program development involved in performing this task. |
| 4. |
| Describe the level of planning and staffing contractor was required to perform and if they met the contracts exceptions. |
| 5. |
| Describe the average timeline involved in completing this project and if contractor met that timeline within reason. |
PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Comments to support ratings may be noted on last page. The Government will assess an overall past performance rating for each reference contacted. The overall ratings of each reference will then be combined to arrive at a final past performance rating that will be assigned points based upon the following rating scheme:
RATINGS ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
Definition
Description
Excellent
The Contractor demonstrates an excellent performance level in all categories. There have been no performance problems and the Contractor has demonstrated initiative to enhance/exceed contractual requirements and objectives. The Contractor also has maintained an excellent Contractor/Government relationship throughout contract performance
Good
There are no quality of service problems; no cost/price issues; and no delays. Responses to inquiries and technical/service administrative issues are consistently effective and responsive. Non-conformance does not impact achievement of contract requirements.
Acceptable
Non-conformances are minor and have little impact in achievement of contract requirements, requires minor intervention by Government personnel to resolve issues.
Marginal
Non-conformances are impacting achievement of contract requirements, requires substantial intervention by Government personnel to resolve issues.
Unacceptable Non-conformances are compromising the achievement of contract requirements, despite substantive intervention by Government personnel.
PART 1: GENERAL PERFORMANCE
INSTRUCTIONS: PLEASE CHECK THE APPROPRIATE RATING
| Quality of Service |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
| 1. Compliance with contract requirements |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 2. Accuracy of Reports |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 3. Effectiveness of Personnel |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 4. Technical Excellence |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 5. Record of conforming to specifications and standards of good workmanship |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 6. Ability to provide services nationwide, including small and rural communities |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Cost Control |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
| 1. Record of forecasting and controlling target costs |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 2. Current, accurate, and complete billings |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 3. Relationship of negotiated costs to actual |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 4. Cost efficiencies |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Timeliness of Performance |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
| 1. Met interim milestones |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 2. Reliability |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 3. Responsive to technical direction |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 4. Completed on time including wrap up |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 5. Met delivery schedules |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 6. Amount of Liquidated Damages (Excellent=Low or None, Unacceptable= High) |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Business Relations |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
| 1. Effective Management, including subcontracts |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 2. Reasonable/cooperative behavior |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 3. Responsive to contract requirements |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 4. Notification of problems |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 5. Flexibility |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 6. Pro-active vs. Reactive |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 7. Effective small/small disadvantage business subcontracting program |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 8. History of staff turnover |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| Customer Satisfaction |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
| 1. Commitment to customer satisfaction |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 2. Would you recommend selection of this firm again? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 3. Overall Rating of Contractor |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .