Attachment_III_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Dry Dock Repairs NOAA Ship Reuben Lasker
Solicitation number
1305M220QNMAN0010
Issued by

About this file

Please see attached

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 009 Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment I - RLFY20DDSOW Revision 2.pdf PDF
Amendment 0009.pdf PDF
Amendment 8.pdf PDF
Q&A5.docx DOCX document
Attachment I - RLFY20DDSOW Revised.pdf PDF
Attachment III Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment II Past Performance Information Form.rtf RTF text file
Amendment 7.pdf PDF
A0006.pdf PDF
FSV6-437-04 Rev A.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Price Schedule RL Revised.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Laundry Space Photo 3.jpg JPG image
Laundry Space Photo 1.jpg JPG image
Amendment 005.pdf PDF
FSV6-651-01_1-3_Rev B.pdf PDF
Laundry Space Photo 2.jpg JPG image
Laundry Space Photo 5.jpg JPG image
Laundry Space Photo 4.jpg JPG image
256-01-00003-010 Rev_-_ Heat Exchanger.pdf PDF
Amendment_0004_11-6.pdf PDF
FSV6-581-01_B.pdf PDF
533-1_Potable_Water_Tank_Disinfection.pdf PDF
FRV40-226-006-010_Rev_A__SternTubeBearing_and_Shaft_Seal.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003_11-5.pdf PDF
1305M220QNMAN0010_Amend_2.pdf PDF
1305M220QNMAN0010_Amend_1.pdf PDF
Lasker_Reference_Drawings_Zip_File.zip ZIP file
Attachment_VI_-_Subcontracting_Plan_Outline.doc DOC document
Attachment_I_-_RLFY20DDSOWr4.pdf PDF
1305M220QNMAN0010.pdf PDF
Attachment_V_-_Deliverables.pdf PDF
Attachment_II_Past_Performance_Information_Form.rtf RTF text file
Attachment_IV_-_Price_Schedule_RL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SYNOPSIS_-_FY20_LASKER_DD.pdf PDF
Show all 35

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M220QNMAN0010 Attachment: III

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Chris Meconnahey no later than November 21, 2019 12:00 pm Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Chris Meconnahey, no later than November 21, 12:00 pm Eastern Time:

Chris. Meconnahey@noaa.gov

Source Selection Information

File details come from the government source that posted it.