1-WSA RFP for Design-Build Construction Services (Kearns HS) (1).pdf

Request for Proposals (“RFP”) For Design-Build Construction Services

This RFP is Being Issued by:

Wallace Stegner Academy 4590 S. 5600 W.

West Valley City, UT 84120

Date of RFP Issue: October 8, 2026

Deadline to Submit Proposals: November 5, 2026 at 4:00 p.m.

I – KEY DATES

A. Date of RFP Issue: October 8, 2026.

B. Question and Answers: Any questions about this RFP must be submitted by email to Adam Gerlach at agerlach@wsacharter.org by October 27, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. Any questions submitted after this date and time may not be answered. By October 29, 2026 at 5:00 p.m., the school will post on its website (https://wsacharter.org) answers to all timely questions submitted by email.

C. Mandatory Site Visit: Interested offerors must attend a mandatory site visit on Monday, October 26, 2026, at 10 am at 4590 S. 5600 W., West Valley City, UT 84120.

D. Deadline to Submit Proposals: Proposals must be submitted by email to Adam Gerlach at agerlach@wsacharter.org by November 5, 2026 at 4:00 p.m.

E. Opening of Proposals: November 5, 2026 shortly after 4:00 p.m. at Wallace Stegner Academy’s main office at 175 South Main Street, Suite 1050, Salt Lake City, UT 84111.

Offerors are not expected to attend the opening of proposals.

F. Review of Submitted Proposals November 2026

G. Anticipated Contract Award Date: November 2026

H. Anticipated Contract Term: Approximately November 2026 to project completion.

I. Commencement of Construction: As soon as possible.

J. Completion of Construction: August 1, 2027.

II – GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Introduction. Wallace Stegner Academy (“WSA” or the “School”) is a Utah nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation and public charter school with campuses located in Salt Lake City, West Valley City, Kearns, and Sunset, Utah. WSA began operations in 2008 and enrolls over 2,000 students in grades K-12.

The services that are the subject of this RFP is for the Kearns campus high school building located at 4590 S. 5600 W., West Valley City, UT 84120.

B. Purpose of RFP. WSA believes its students would benefit from the renovation of its current facilities at its Kearns high school campus. The purpose of this RFP is to solicit proposals for the design and construction of the remodeling of the current “black box theater” space located on the second floor at its Kearns high school campus, including constructing five (5) classrooms, two storage areas, and two student restrooms as depicted on Exhibit A. Attached to this RFP as Exhibit B is the current floor plan for the second floor of the Kearns high school campus. Full plans for the original construction of the Kearns high school building are available upon request.

C. Plans. WSA does not have final construction plans for the proposed work and is therefore soliciting design-build construction services.

D. Construction Materials, Design, Additional Requirements. The construction materials and finishes for the proposed work should match and be equivalent in style and quality to the materials used to mailto:agerlach@wsacharter.org https://wsacharter.org/ mailto:agerlach@wsacharter.org construct the original Kearns campus high school building. Offerors must specifically address in their proposals the design approach, scope, assumptions, coordination requirements, and anticipated modifications for each of the following: (1) HVAC, including heating and cooling loads, ventilation and outside-air requirements, zoning and controls, distribution, equipment capacity, balancing, and integration with existing systems; (2) plumbing, including domestic water, sanitary waste and vent piping, fixtures, water heating, floor drains, required tie-ins, and the capacity and condition of existing systems serving the two proposed student restrooms; (3) fire protection and life safety, including sprinkler modifications, fire alarm devices, notification systems, rated assemblies, egress, inspections, testing, and coordination with the applicable fire authority; (4) electrical and data, including service and panel capacity, power distribution, lighting and controls, emergency and exit lighting, receptacles, classroom technology, low-voltage pathways, data cabling and outlets, wireless-network support, and connections to existing systems;

(5) theater demolition, including removal or disposition of existing fixtures and equipment; (6) work within an occupied school (if work is scheduled to begin prior to May 28, 2027), including separation of construction areas from students and staff, controlled access, temporary barriers, dust, odor and noise control, protection of existing facilities, delivery and staging plans, utility shutdown procedures, emergency access, background-check or badging requirements, and scheduling of disruptive work outside instructional hours when reasonably necessary; and (7) schedule milestones, including design development, owner review and approval, code and agency review, permitting, procurement of any long-lead items, mobilization, demolition, rough-in and above-ceiling inspections, enclosure and finishes, systems startup and commissioning, substantial completion, final inspections, certificate of occupancy, punch-list completion, closeout, and final completion no later than August 1, 2027. Offerors must identify any existing-system limitations, required investigations, owner decisions, long-lead equipment, shutdowns, phasing constraints, allowances, exclusions, or other matters that may affect cost or schedule.

E. Award of Contract. The contract will be awarded to the offeror whose proposal is determined to be the most advantageous to WSA based on the scoring of all substantive evaluation criteria outlined in this RFP as well as cost. No other criteria will be used in the evaluation. Please note that the Utah Procurement Code requires that cost information be evaluated independently from the substantive evaluation criteria. The final determination shall be in writing and shall be determined at the sole discretion of WSA’s Board of Directors. To the extent permitted by law, WSA may reject any and all proposals and may waive any informality or technicality in any proposal received if WSA’s Board determines it would serve the best interests of the School.

F. Contract Documents. The successful offeror selected by WSA’s Board pursuant to this RFP will be required to enter a written guaranteed maximum price contract consistent with the acceptable services, terms, and conditions outlined in the successful proposal and the requirements set forth in this RFP. However, the guaranteed maximum price amount will not be established by contract until after final plans and designs for the addition are completed and agreed upon by the parties.

Pricing and payment for the design phase of this project, which pricing constitutes a portion of the guaranteed maximum price amount, will be established by contract within a reasonable time after the successful offeror has been notified of being selected by WSA’s Board pursuant to this RFP.

G. Project Scope. WSA reserves the right to reduce or increase the scope of this project during project planning if the School determines that a change in the scope of the project is in the best interest of

WSA.

III – PROPOSAL INFORMATION

A. Proposals must be delivered by email in compliance with Sections I and V of this RFP.

Proposals received by any other unapproved form are not acceptable.

B. The content of a proposal must comply with the requirements stated in Section VI of this

RFP.

C. Submission of a proposal will be construed to mean that the offeror understands the requirements contained herein and that the offeror anticipates being able to supply the described services for the pricing proposal contained in its submitted proposal.

D. Proposals will be opened publicly at the School’s main office on the date and time specified in Section I, above. Only the names of offerors who submitted proposals will be shared at the opening of proposals. However, upon request, a register of proposals will be prepared and shall be open for public inspection after the contract for this project is awarded. WSA will reasonably cooperate with all potential offerors in their attempt to obtain information. Offerors are not expected to attend the opening of proposals.

E. WSA’s evaluation committee may, for the purpose of assuring full understanding of and responsiveness to the RFP’s requirements, enter into discussions or conduct interviews with, or attend presentations by, offerors who submit proposals.

F. Offeror’s acknowledge that WSA’s issuance of this RFP does not obligate WSA to accept any of the proposals submitted in response to this RFP, nor does it guarantee that WSA will in fact accept any of the said proposals. To the extent permitted by law, WSA’s Board reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals and/or to waive any or all formalities in any proposal or in the proposal process deemed to be in the best interest of WSA. No agreement exists on the part of WSA and any offeror until a written contract is approved and executed by WSA’s Board.

G. This RFP does not obligate WSA to pay for any costs of any kind whatsoever that may be incurred by an offeror or any third parties in connection with a proposal. All submitted proposals, responses, and supporting documentation shall become property of WSA. Further, WSA shall not be liable to any offeror, person, or entity for any losses, expenses, costs, claims or damages of any kind arising out of, by reason of, or attributable to, the offeror responding to the RFP.

H. At any time during the evaluation process, WSA’s evaluation committee may, with appropriate approval, request best and final offers, as provided for in Utah Code § 63G-6a-707.5, from responsible offerors who submit responsive proposals that meet any minimum qualifications, evaluation criteria, or score thresholds identified in this RFP.

IV – SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

Expectations for WSA

A. WSA owns or will own the property on which the proposed work will be performed. WSA will permit the winning offeror to have adequate access to its land and building, as necessary, to complete this project. In addition, WSA officials or representatives will be reasonably available to consult with and advise the winning offeror throughout this project.

B. WSA officials or representatives will be reasonably available to consult with and advise the winning offeror throughout the design and construction phase of the project.

Expectations for Offerors

A. It is expected that offerors will hold appropriate and current state licensure to engage in the business of commercial construction before, during, and for a period of at least three years after completion of the project.

B. It is expected that offerors utilizing subcontractors will ensure that the selected subcontractors hold appropriate and current state licensure to engage in the business of commercial construction during the project. It is also expected that subcontractors will sign an approved lien release form and have adequate insurance before any payments are disbursed to them.

C. It is expected that the architects and engineers selected to work on this project hold appropriate and current state licensure to engage in architectural or engineering services during the project.

D. It is expected that offerors will have adequate financing to fund their business and construction obligations during the project.

E. It is expected that offerors will have knowledge of and comply with construction reporting requirements for public schools in Utah.

F. It is expected that the winning offeror will act as a design-builder for WSA for the purpose of designing and constructing the proposed improvements as described in this RFP.

G. It is expected that the winning offeror will enter into written guaranteed maximum price contract documents with WSA within the reasonable deadlines required by WSA’s Board.

H. It is expected that the winning offeror will begin working and coordinating with WSA in a timely manner after entering into a written contract with the School.

I. It is expected that the winning offeror will commence project planning and renditions in a timely manner after entering into a written contract with the School.

J. It is expected that the winning offeror will commence design work immediately, commence construction as soon as possible, and complete construction of the project no later than August 1, 2027, in order to enable WSA to begin the 2027 school year on time. Offerors may propose alternative deadlines in their proposals. The offeror must demonstrate in its proposal how it will ensure student safety during construction work at the School while school is in session, if applicable.

K. It is expected that the winning offeror will meet all legal requirements of public school construction in the State of Utah and will comply with all applicable building codes, statutes (including the ADA), rules, and regulations governing public school construction.

L. It is expected that the winning offeror will obtain all necessary and appropriate approvals, permits, and authorizations to commence construction at the School’s property as indicated herein, including any and all necessary approvals from the Utah State Board of Education.

M. It is expected that the winning offeror will, upon request, secure a payment and performance bond for a sufficient amount in connection with the project.

N. It is expected that the winning offeror will, upon request, agree to a reasonable liquidated damages amount for each day the project goes beyond the scheduled completion date.

Expectations Regarding Pricing Proposal

A. Proposals must include a total anticipated guaranteed maximum price to be charged by the offeror to complete the project.

B. WSA understands that because it has not provided offerors with final plans or designs for the addition, and because WSA has not agreed to any specific plans or designs for the addition, all pricing proposals submitted by offerors in response to this RFP will only be reasonable estimates based on the design and construction work specified and solicited in this RFP. The final guaranteed maximum price to be charged by the winning offeror to complete this project may be agreed upon by the parties after final plans and designs are completed and agreed upon by the parties. Final pricing will be included in the guarantee maximum price contract documents entered into by WSA and the winning offeror.

1. NOTE TO OFFERORS: Notwithstanding the foregoing, offerors should not use the lack of details and the early stage of the project as justification for submitting unreasonably low pricing in their proposals in order to obtain an advantage in the procurement. Offerors are responsible for identifying and anticipating costs associated with the project. The School expects bidders to have sufficient experience and expertise to estimate project costs with a reasonable amount of accuracy given the details of the project at this stage. As the School evaluates proposals, the School reserve the right to deduct points from an offeror who fails to account for project costs in a manner that demonstrates reasonable experience and expertise. In the event a proposal is selected, offerors will be expected to reasonably honor pricing outlined in the proposal, and failure to do so, or a demonstrated failure to have accounted for costs that should reasonably have been anticipated, will be considered justification for terminating the award prior to executing a definitive construction contract or for terminating the contract once executed.

V – PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Potential offerors are hereby invited to submit a proposal for the design and construction of WSA’s proposed addition to its School building. The scope of the design and construction work for this project is described above in Section II(B)-(D).

A. Delivery Requirements. Proposals must be submitted by email as set forth in Section I, above.

B. Format Requirements. Proposals must be separated by cost and non-cost related information. An offeror’s email must contain two separate PDF files – one containing (and labeled) non-cost information and another containing (and labeled) cost information. No cost information may be submitted in the same file/document that includes non-cost information.

All cost and non-cost information in proposals must be separate.

C. Submission of Protected Information. Protection of disclosure of information submitted by an offeror in response to this RFP is governed by Utah’s Government Records Access and Management Act in Utah Code Ann. § 63G-2-101 et seq. and Utah Administrative Code Rules R33-7-105 and R33-7-106. An offeror that desires to request protected status of any information it submits to WSA in response to this RFP must specifically identify the information that it desires to protect and the reasons that the information should be afforded protected status under the law.

In making this request, the offeror shall comply with the requirements in Utah Code Ann. § 63G- 2-305, Utah Code Ann. § 63G-2-309, and Utah Administrative Code Rule R33-7-105. In turn, WSA will comply with Utah Code Ann. § 63G-2-309 and Utah Administrative Code Rule R33-7- 106 with respect to disclosing such information. Submission of protected information in response to this RFP shall be deemed an acknowledgment and consent by the offeror that the offeror agrees with this paragraph and will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless WSA, its members, directors, officers, staff, and agents from any and all liability relating to the proper disclosure of information provided by the offeror in response to this RFP, even if the offeror requested protected or other confidential status for the information.

D. Submission of Proposals with Protected Business Confidential Information. In accordance with Utah Administrative Code Rule R33-7-107, if an offer submits a proposal that contains information claimed to be business confidential or protected information, the offeror must submit two separate proposals as follows:

1. One redacted version for public release, with all protected business confidential information either blacked-out or removed, clearly marked as “Redacted Version;” and

2. One non-redacted version for evaluation purposes clearly marked as “Protected Business

Confidential.”

Please note that pricing may not be classified as business confidential and will be considered public information. In addition, an entire proposal may not be designated as “protected,” “confidential,” or “proprietary” and shall be considered non-responsive unless the offeror removes the designation.

VI – PROPOSAL CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

A. Content of Proposals. Offerors must address the following in their proposals:

1. Experience, Qualifications, and Track Record. Provide information demonstrating that the offeror has the experience and qualifications necessary to complete this project and that it has a proven and successful track record of engaging in charter school construction. The information may include such things as:

a. Summaries/examples of the offeror completing projects similar to the one described in this RFP for charter schools; and

b. A copy of the offeror’s valid Utah contractor’s license.

2. Past Performance for WSA and/or References. Identify any construction projects the offeror has completed for WSA in the past. If the offeror has not completed any construction projects for WSA, the offeror must provide a list of references for at least three construction projects similar to the project described in this RFP. Offerors who have completed construction projects for WSA may also provide a list of references.

3. Management Plan. Provide a summary of how the offeror will manage and complete the project set forth in this RFP. The summary must include information about at least the following:

a. Project schedule; and

b. Project safety.

If the offeror is aware of any major obstacle to completing the proposed project that hasn’t already been identified in this RFP (such as the existence of any easements, storm drains, or underground utilities that must be relocated; unsuitable soil conditions on site; etc.), please identify those obstacles in your management plan and describe how the offeror would overcome the obstacle.

4. Pricing. Provide the total anticipated guaranteed maximum price to be charged by the offeror to complete the project. Pricing must be reasonably itemized among construction and design and proposals must include the required Bidder Cost Sheet attached to this

RFP.

NOTE TO OFFERORS: Offerors should not use the lack of details and the early stage of the project as justification for submitting unreasonably low pricing in their proposals in order to obtain an advantage in the procurement. Offerors are responsible for identifying and anticipating costs associated with the project. The School expects bidders to have sufficient experience and expertise to estimate project costs with a reasonable amount of accuracy given the details of the project at this stage. As the School evaluates proposals, the School reserve the right to deduct points from an offeror who fails to account for project costs in a manner that demonstrates reasonable experience and expertise. In the event a proposal is selected, offerors will be expected to reasonably honor pricing outlined in the proposal, and failure to do so, or a demonstrated failure to have accounted for costs that should reasonably have been anticipated, will be considered justification for terminating the award prior to executing a definitive construction contract or for terminating the contract once executed.

B. Selection and Scoring. Selection of a general contractor will be based on offerors’ responses to these content requirements in relation to the Evaluation Criteria set forth in Section VII. The successful proposal will address each of the required content areas, demonstrate how the offeror meets or exceeds WSA’s needs with respect to this project, and communicate clearly how the offeror will complete this project in a timely and economical manner. The Evaluation Criteria set forth in Section VII contains a numerical score for each of the proposal specifications and proposals will be ranked based on their score. The Evaluation Criteria Unrelated to Cost will be subjectively scored by the Evaluation Committee based on offerors’ responses to the content requirements contained in Section VI (A)(1)-(3) above. The Evaluation Criteria Related to Cost will be scored by the Evaluation Committee after the Evaluation Committee has scored the Evaluation Criteria Unrelated to Cost so that cost and non-cost criteria is scored separately. The Evaluation Committee will use the following formula to score a proposal’s cost: Total Cost Points Possible x (Lowest Proposed Price ÷ Proposal Price Being Evaluated. The offeror with the lowest proposed price (which proposed price is provided by offerors in response to the specification in Section VI(A)(4) above) meeting the requirements of the RFP), subject to the conditions set forth above regarding completeness and accuracy of pricing, will receive 100% of the cost points (30) and all other offerors will receive a portion of the cost points based on the formula above.

VII – EVALUATION CRITERIA

Evaluation Criteria Unrelated to Cost

A. Offeror’s Experience, Qualifications, and Track Record (30 points possible). This criterion is based on the information provided in response to the specifications contained in Section VI(A)(1).

B. Past Performance for WSA and/or References (30 points possible). This criterion is based on the information provided in response to the specifications contained in Section VI(A)(2).

C. Management Plan (10 points possible). This criterion is based on the information provided in response to the specifications contained in Section VI(A)(3).

Evaluation Criteria Related to Cost*

D. Pricing (30 points possible). This criterion is based on the pricing proposal provided in response to the specifications in Section VI(A)(4). Proposals must include the required Bidder Cost Sheet included with this RFP.

Total points possible based on Evaluation Criteria: 100 points

* NOTE: Cost will be scored independently from the substantive evaluation factors.

COST SHEET

Offeror shall complete and submit this Cost Sheet in the separate cost proposal PDF required by Section V. Amounts must reflect the Offeror’s anticipated total cost for the complete design-build scope described in the RFP. Attach additional detail where necessary and clearly identify all assumptions, allowances, exclusions, alternates, contingencies, and fee percentages used to calculate the proposed cost.

Bidder and Proposal Identification

Offeror legal name Contact name and title Email / phone Proposal date Pricing validity period calendar days Anticipated construction duration calendar days

Proposed Cost Summary

Cost category Basis / notes Amount Preconstruction services $ Architectural design $ Engineering and consultants $ Permits, plan review, and governmental fees $ General conditions $ Site protection, mobilization, and temporary facilities $ Selective demolition $ Structural work $ Architectural construction and finishes $ Mechanical systems $ Plumbing systems $ Electrical, lighting, fire alarm, and low-voltage systems $ Fire protection $ Testing, inspections, commissioning, and closeout $ Bonds and insurance $ Allowances (from schedule below) $ Contingency % $ Overhead % $ Profit / contractor fee % $ Other: $

TOTAL ANTICIPATED GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE $

Fee and Markup Percentages

Fee / markup Percentage Applied to Preconstruction fee % Design-builder / contractor fee %

Overhead % Profit % Change-order markup on self-performed work % Change-order markup on subcontractor work % Subcontractor markup, if any % Bond / insurance markup % Other: %

Assumptions

No. Assumption used in pricing Cost impact / reference

Allowances

No. Allowance description Amount Basis / quantity 1 $ 2 $ 3 $ 4 $ Total allowances $

Exclusions

No. Excluded scope or cost Reason / anticipated owner responsibility

Alternates and Unit Prices

Item Description Add Deduct Unit price / unit 1 $ $ $ / 2 $ $ $ / 3 $ $ $ /

Bidder Certification

By signing below, the Offeror certifies that this Cost Sheet is complete and that the proposed cost includes all work reasonably necessary to deliver the described project except for the exclusions expressly listed above. The Offeror acknowledges that all assumptions, allowances, contingencies, fees, markups, and exclusions used in preparing the proposed cost have been disclosed.

Authorized representative

Title Signature Date

EXHIBIT A

6'

- 1

1"

EYEWASH

OPEN TO

BELOW

FUME

HOOD

AND SHOWER

Picture above is company logo for Silverpeak Engineering with the company name and a mountain peak.

FUTURE

LOCKERS

R.R.

53 SF

53 SF

BOYS

278 SF

GIRS

287 SF

STORAGE

196 SF

7' - 6" 15' - 11" 3' - 11" 4' - 0" 17' - 4" 11' - 3"

CLASSROOM

684 SF

794 SF

752 SF

24' - 2" 27' - 11" 32' - 9"

239 SF

755 SF

711 SF

Total Travel

164' - 11" SEAL:

356 SF

DATE: 12/20/2024

PROJECT: AW-060.03

MANAGER: ZH

REVISIONS

# DATE DESCRIPTION

A 11/05/24 Addendum A

D 12/3//24 Addendum D

LEVEL 2 FLOOR

PLAN

LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 1

3/32" = 1'-0" A102

SHEET NUMBER:

A102 PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES.

To tal

Tr av el

8'

- 2

Co mm on

P ath

8"

C om mo n P at h

9"

2"

3"

6'

- 1

1"

0"

9"

W

AL

LA

CE

S

TE

GN

ER

H

IG

H

SC

HO

OL

E.

A

NT

EL

O

PE

D

R.

S

TE

. B

LA

YT

O

N , U

T

PH

O

NE

1)

-5

S

W

ES

T

VA

LL

EY

C

IT

Y, U

T

S

TR

U C

TU

R

A

IV

IL

S U

R V

E

W .S

IL

VE

R

PE

AK

EN

G .C

O M http://www.silverpeakeng.com/

EXHIBIT B

6'

- 7

1/ 4"

7'

- 7

4 5 /8"

1/

2"

0 7

7 3

/4"

2"

4"

3'

- 4

4"

4"

4'

- 8

121' - 4"

FOR CONSTRUCTION SET - 12-20-2024

GENERAL NOTES

1. CONFIRM EXACT LOCATION OF ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT WITH KITCHEN SUPPLIER. COORDINATE EXACT

SIZE OF OPENING FOR SERVING TABLE WITH KITCHEN SUPPLIER.

2. ALL CONDENSER & COMPRESSOR EQUIPMENT FOR WALK-IN REF/FREEZER UNITS MUST BE ROOF

MOUNTED

3. CUBBIES & LOCKER NOTE:

-PROVIDE ADA ACCESSIBLE CUBBIES & COAT HOOKS AS APPLICABLE. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS -A MINIMUM OF 5% OF LOCKERS PROVIDED IN AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE PER

APPLICABLE IBC.

4. THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEMS:

-A FIRE RESISTIVE WALL OR FLOOR MUST BE SEALED BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL FIRE INTEGRITY WHEN

PENETRATED. CONTRACTOR TO USE THE UL DESIGN NUMBERS BELOW TO MAINTAIN FIRE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 184' - 8" 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 RESISTIVE INTEGRITY.

-STUD WALLS: W-L-1002

-CMU WALLS: W-J-1009

3' - 4" 15' - 0" 7' - 0" 21' - 10" 10' - 2" 12' - 8" 18' - 0" 10' - 8" 4' - 0" 18' - 8" 42' - 8" 12' - 0" 4' - 8" -CONCRETE FLOOR ASSEMBLY: F-A-1008

-FIRE RESISTIVE ROOMS:

6' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 7' - 4" 6' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 6' - 0" 3' - 4" 8' - 0" 3' - 4"

A202

8' - 8" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 8' - 8" 1' - 4" 2' - 8"

-FIRE RISER ROOM

-ELEVATOR SHAFT

-ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM

-STORAGE UNDER STAIRS

5. IN KITCHEN, PROVIDE HAND SINK, 4-COMP SINK & HOOD. ALL OTHER KITCHEN EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY

OWNER.

6. PROVIDE WOOD BLOCKING FOR ALL RESTROOM PARTITIONS, ADA GRAB BARS, HANDRAILS, ETC. SEE

MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LOCATIONS OF BLOCKING.

7. PROVIDE METAL STRAPPING BLOCKING FOR WHITEBOARDS (SEE MANUFACTURER'S

A A A

B 2 2 30' - 8"

D

14' - 8"

A A

30' - 10 5/8"

2 ' - 5 3/8"

18' - 0"

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LOCATION OF BLOCKING).

B FLOOR PLAN LEGEND

2 32' - 0" 2

D

2' - 0"

2 28

1A

6' - 8" 6' - 8"

SCIENCE

4' - 6"

236A

236B

7' - 8"

SYMBOL

1t

DESCRIPTION

WALL TYPE TAG - SEE WALL TYPES SHEET A501.

DOOR TAG - SEE DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A601.

WINDOW TAG - SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET A611.

1- HR FIRE RATING

E 230

3 3

F

1 BREAKOUT

ROOM

5' - 11"

205 203

5 1

1' - 6"

201B

2' - 2"

SCIENCE C

2- HR FIRE RATING

3- HR FIRE RATING

F

Picture tab above is company logo

A201 3

10' - 0" 10' - 0"

BREAKOUT

ROOM

5' - 0"

33' - 10"

10' - 0"

FUME

HOOD

32' - 2" C 1

A301 NUMBER OF LOCKERS AT LEVEL 1: 296

NUMBER OF LOCKERS AT LEVEL 2: 308

TOTAL ________________________ 604

FUTURE LOCKER: 106

for Silverpeak Engineering with the company name and a mountain

G

2' - 8" 8' - 0" 2' - 8"

H

OPEN TO

BELOW

CORRIDOR

10' - 2"

6' - 5"

SCIENCE

201A

AND SHOWER

A631

235 G

H peak.

15' - 0" 2

70' - 4"

11' - 0"

31' - 10 3/4"

1A 32' - 5 1/4"

18' - 0"

I

J

A A A

235A

I

EYEWASH J

22' - 8"

6' - 0"

2' - 8"

6' - 8" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 8' - 8" 2 A201

K 229C

A311

8 7/8" 2

2' - 8"

2 A202

A202 3 K

2 211 2 5

6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 6' - 8" 6' - 0" 8' - 8" 2' - 8" 8' - 0" 2' - 8"

COORDINATE W/ HVAC CONTRACTOR

L

COORDINATE W/ HVAC CONTRACTOR

ELEC.

229A

8 7/8"

L

2 M

CLASSROOM

1A 213 2 87' - 1 3/8" 11' - 6 5/8" 32' - 3 3/8" 32' - 4 5/8" 14' - 0"

N

FLEX SPACE

1' - 7"

3' - 0"

1 N

4' - 6"

22' - 5" 15' - 3 3/8"

7' - 7" 18' - 10 5/8" 2 3

1 1

MENS

1 FUTURE

1 CORRIDOR

7' - 9 13/16"

A1

A301

RESTROOM

1 221

231 2' - 9 1/8"

3' - 3 3/8"

2' - 10"

JANITOR

CLOSET

BREAKOUT A

Q

A401

15' - 6 3/8"

229B

WOMENS

RESTROOM

A401

4' - 1"

11' - 2 5/8"

5' - 10"

5' - 10" 1

ROOM

1 2 Q

SEAL:

9 A631

WORK

1 223

A1

T

E E

25' - 8"

25' - 10"

25' - 10"

T

12/20/2024

DATE: 12/20/2024

PROJECT: AW-060.03

MANAGER: ZH

REVISIONS

# DATE DESCRIPTION

A 11/05/24 Addendum A D 12/3//24 Addendum D

A301

A611

1 2 3 4

5 6 7

2' - 8"

6' - 0"

184' -A82" 01

2' - 0"

5' - 4"

9 10

13 14

15 16

LEVEL 2 FLOOR

PLAN

SHEET NUMBER:

LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 1

3/32" = 1'-0" A102 A102

PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED AND THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY ALL OF THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES.

228 205 203 236

3'

- 4

1'

- 4

3'

- 4

9'

- 4

4'

- 8

0"

3 3

4 1

8'

- 0

4" 8'

- 0

8"

8"

4'

- 8

0"

0"

4"

8'

- 8

3/ 4"

8"

4"

8"

8"

0 3

3'

- 4

2'

- 8

8'

- 0

5/

8"

1 3

8"

4'

- 8

7'

- 6

6'

- 2

1/ 2"

1'

- 0

1/ 4"

4'

- 1

1'

- 6

5'

- 4

4 1 /2"

2'

- 6

6 5

4 3

- 4

6'

- 0

4'

- 8

6'

- 0

3'

- 4

3'

- 2

3'

- 2

- 2

2'

- 0

3/ 4"

3'

- 2

9'

- 1 0"

3" 8'

- 6 1/

4"

3/ 4"

1'

- 7

3/ 8"

3'

- 2

2'

- 0

6'

- 7

1/ 4"

1'

- 6

3'

- 1

0" 3'

- 1 3/

8"

2"

0"

8"

0"

8"

8"

8'

- 0

4"

1'

- 6

1'

- 4

7'

- 4

6'

- 0

0"

4'

- 0

0"

4'

- 0

0"

3'

- 4

3'

- 4

8"

8"

8" 8'

- 0

0"

8"

0"

W

AL

LA

CE

S

TE

GN

ER

H

IG

H

SC

HO

OL

7 E . A

NT

EL

OP

E

DR

. S

TE

. B

LA

YT

ON

, U T

PH

ON

E:

(8

) 4

-5

S

ES

T

VA

LL

EY

C

IT

Y, U

T

ST

RU

CT

UR

AL

CI

VI

L

SU

RV

EY

W

.S

IL

VE

RP

EA

KE

NG

.C http://www.silverpeakeng.com/

A102