06-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA3016-21-U-0001
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Price List-v2_25Jan2021.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment-001 FA301621U0001.pdf | ||
| 05-Past Performance Reference-3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 01-Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| 05-Past Performance Reference-3.pdf | ||
| 07-Professional Exemption.pdf | ||
| 03-PWS-Talent Agencies.pdf | ||
| 04-Price List.pdf | ||
| RFQ-FA301621U0001 Talent Agencies.pdf | ||
| 08-Additonal Information.pdf | ||
| 06-Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| 02-Terms and Conditions.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ # FA3016-21-U-0001
ATTACHMENT—06
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST AND PRESENT
Talent Agencies Coordinating Musical Commissions and Guest Artists
This document was created and tailored by 502 CONS for this particular requirement.
When filled, this document must be handled with Source Selection Sensitivity IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104.
a. CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name:
Contact Person:
Email Address:
Telephone No. #
Project Title or Brief Description of Work:
Contract Period or Date(s) of Performance Provided by Contractor:
*NOTE: If the contractor holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation, please list the contract(s) in the remarks section on the next page and add your comments.
Contractor performed as the:
Prime Contractor󠅝
Subcontractor
Joint Venture or Key Personnel
b. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Organization:
Title/Position:
Telephone #:
Email Address:
| c. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: |
| 502 CONS/JBKCB sandra.smith.24@us.af.mil |
| d. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: |
| Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes |
the contractor’s performance quality. Please provide a narrative explanation for any quality ratings of 1 or 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Not Applicable |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
| # |
| PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: |
| N/A |
| UNSAT |
| MARG |
| SAT |
| VERY GOOD |
| 1 |
| Provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 3 |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 4 |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspections procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 7 |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 8 |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 9 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 10 |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 11 |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 12 |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 13 |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 14 |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 15 |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 16 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES |
| NO |
| 17 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks." |
| YES |
| NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT #:
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .