ExhibitC.doc
DOC document 125 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Design/Build closed loop geothermal heating and cooling HVAC system Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91ZRS-08-R-0003
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ExhibitA.doc | DOC document | |
| Ex_H_GeneralDecision_CT20080004_20080606.doc | DOC document | |
| ExhibitB.doc | DOC document | |
| ExhibitF.doc | DOC document | |
| W91ZRS-08-R-0003.doc | DOC document | |
| CEKT062001volume2.doc | DOC document | |
| CEKT062001solicitation .doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W91ZRS-08-R-0003
Geothermal HVAC System, Bradley
EXHIBIT C PACKAGE INFORMATION AND FORMS
Instructions to Offeror for sending Reference Questionnaire Forms: Prepare and send a reference questionnaire package for each project listed on your Exhibit A, Performance Information Form. For Government contracts, send to Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is your responsibility to follow-up and to encourage your references to send in their questionnaire. If you have multiple references at one location (Base etc.) send one cover letter and questionnaires for each contract you want a reference for. Your questionnaire package should contain the following.
1. Cover Letter (See SAMPLE)
2. Respondent Info Rating Sheets Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes
3. Suggested Pre Addressed stamped envelope.
DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES
EXHIBIT C
SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER
AND
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Your Company Letterhead
Date: _________________
To: ______________________________________
We have listed your firm as a reference for work we have performed for you Our firm intends to submit a proposal under a project advertised by The USPFO for Connecticut entitled, Geothermal HVAC System, Bradley Air National Guard Base. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. (include the following paragraph if more than one questionnaire is sent to the same organization or delete the paragraph) Furthermore, a questionnaire has also been sent to ____________________ of your organization. Only one response from each office is required. If at all possible, we suggest that you individually answer this questionnaire and then coordinate your responses with that of ________________________, to forge a consensus on one overall response from your organization.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER
THAN 11:00 AM on July 17, 2008, the date and time set for receipt of Phase I proposals. Do not return them to our company.
If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contact, . Thank you for your assistance. E-Mail is preferred.
Signature and Title
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Upon completion of this form, and the questionnaire please send directly to the following:
USPFO for Connecticut Purchasing and Contracting
Attention: Michael Mastalski 360 Broad Street Hartford, CT 06105-3706
Phone: (860) 524-4873
FAX: (860) 524-4874
e-mail: michael.mastalski@us.army.mil Do not return this form to offeror’s office. Return this page with the Questionnaire to Contracting Officer at the USPFO for Connecticut.
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION AND RATINGS
(Part 1 Contractor submitting Proposal fill-in) Reference is provided for: ________________________________Prime____ or Subcontractor____
Subcontractor provide name of Prime contractor proposing ____________________.
Contract Number or Project Title______________________________________________________
Date of Award/ ________________________Completion Date______________________________
If not complete provide percentage complete _____________________________________
Location_________________________________________________________________________
Dollar Amount of Award__________________ Final or Current ____________________________
Brief Description of work and your role in the referenced contract: ___________________________
(Part 2 Person providing Reference) Reference is provided by: ___________________________
Company/Agency: _________________________________________________________________
Business Address; ________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________________________________________________
E-Mail Address: __________________________________________________________________
Relationship to Contract: ___________________________________________________________
If information above (Part 1) is not accurate please indicate.
To obtain an electronic version of the form please contact: Michael Mastalski at michael.mastalski@us.army.mil
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
Please Mark the appropriate rating. Use the rating chart on the last page. Include the name of the company the reference is for on each page. Please provide remarks so we can better understand you rating.
| (1) Quality Control (QC) (Design and or Construction) – Evaluate the contractor's performance in complying with contract requirements, quality achieved and overall technical expertise demonstrated Overall, how would you rate the quality of workmanship for this project? To what extent did the contractor: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Demonstrate adequate QC practices
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| · Adequacy of Materials - Were Submittals well researched and were materials clearly identified |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| · Provide adequate "As-Builts” |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (2) Timely Performance (Design and or Construction Rate timeliness in meeting requirements and adhering to contract schedules (delivery/performance), taking into account all excusable delays including cooperation and attention to contract completion efforts. To what extent did the contractor: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Meet established schedule
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Resolve delays in an expeditious manner
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Identify/correct deficient work in a timely manner
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Timely complete punch-list items( construction) or respond to design comments (A&E)
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Provide timely and satisfactory responses to warranty issues after project completion. (NA- A&E)
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Process submittals in a timely manner
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Provide timely submission of close out documents
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
· Provide timely solutions to design defects or omissions (NA Construction)
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (3) Management Effectiveness (Design and or Construction) Overall, how would you rate this contractor’s business practices, customer relationship, and ability to successfully perform? Did the contractor demonstrate a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s contract management personnel? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| To what extent did the contractor provide experienced personnel with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements contract schedules (delivery/performance), taking into account all excusable delays including cooperation and attention to contract completion efforts. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| To what extent did the contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attending meetings (as applicable) and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (4) Subcontractor Management: Rate how well subcontractors/tradesmen were managed and work coordinated. Explain in remarks any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| To what extent did the contractor provide experienced, adequate, competent and qualified, management, subcontractors capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| To what extent were subcontractors/suppliers paid in a timely manner (NA Design) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
(5) Pricing: How effective was the contractor in meeting Cost/Price performance targets and controlling contingencies (i.e. changes, etc.)? Did the proposals accurately represent the work required?
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
To what extent did the contractor's supporting price/cost information for modifications are accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated). Was pricing data well-substantiated?
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
(6) Site Management/Superintendent/Designer Involvement To what extent did the contractor's Management team ensured compliance to contract requirements?
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| How timely and effective were the contractor’s responses to and resolution of technical problems? Did Site/Project Management team have sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| Was the Site manager always present on site when work was performed? (NA for A&E) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| How flexible, cooperative, and reasonable was the contractor in meeting mission requirements? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (7) How effective was the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations? Did the contractor implement and follow their safety plan? Did they run a “safe” jobsite? (NA for A&E) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (8) Applicable to Federal Contracts – How well did the contractor comply with applicable Federal laws and regulations such as Davis Bacon Act- timely payrolls and compliance, Drug Free Workplace? (NA for A&E) |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (9 To what extent were Environmental Regulations followed and Use of Recovered Materials, Executive Order 13101 specified and used? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
| (10) Applicable to Federal Contracts Only – How well did the contractor comply with Utilization of Small Business Concerns requirements? For Large Businesses: Were Small Business goals met in the Small Business Subcontracting Plan? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
REMARKS:
| (11) How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
To what extent were the end users satisfied with:
Quality? Cost? Schedule?
Exceptionally Satisfied Q____ C_____S____
Highly Satisfied
Q____ C_____S____
Satisfied
Q____ C_____S____
Somewhat Dissatisfied Q____ C_____S____ (explain please)
REMARKS:
(12) What were the contractor’s top documented strengths, if any, in performing the contract requirements?
REMARKS:
(13) Please Provide Any Additional Information You Feel Is Important Not Covered Elsewhere:
REMARKS:
Thank you for your remarks. Please ensure that you return this questionnaire to the Contracting Agency. Do NOT return to the evaluated contractor. Be sure to include the information page.
Reference provided by ________________________________ DATE:________________
RATING DEFINITION CHART IS ON NEXT PAGE
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Exceeded that required by the contract. (Timeliness) Completion was ahead of schedule. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met All contractual requirements. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Essentially All contractual requirements. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Some of the contractual requirements. However, changes to the contractor’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Failed to Meet the minimum Government requirements. |
| Unknown or Not Applicable (N/A) |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
� Insert name and phone number
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .