EXHIBIT_C.doc
DOC document 122 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Remote Piloted Aircraft Beddown, Building 912
- Solicitation number
- W912PQ-16-R-0005
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A-13_W912PQ16R00050003.pdf | ||
| A-14_Building_Photos.pdf | ||
| W912PQ16R00050001.pdf | ||
| A-14_Preproposal_slides_-_18_May.pdf | ||
| A-14_Site_Visit_Sign_in.pdf | ||
| A-9_Advantor_JA.pdf | ||
| W912PQ16R0005.pdf | ||
| A-9_Simplex_JA.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W912PQ-16-R-0005 - Project # RVKQ139005 Remotely Piloted Aircraft Beddown, Bldg. 912.
EXHIBIT C1
SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTERAND PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Your Company Letterhead
Date: _________________
To: ______________________________________
We have listed your firm as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the 107th Airlift Wing Contracting Office. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. A completed CCASS Evaluation for a DoD project or similar Agency appraisal form may be substituted for this reference questionnaire. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e)(4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN 11:00 A.M. on 28 June 2016. Do not return them to our company.
Base Contracting Office
107th Airlift Wing
9910 Blewett Ave, Bldg 901, Rm 102
Niagara Falls ANG Base, NY 14304 Email: jason.m.fronden.mil@mail.mil Thank you for your assistance. E-Mail is preferred.
Signature and Title
RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing ratings.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Outstanding (O) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Good: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Acceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. |
| Unacceptable (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Unknown or Not Applicable (N/A) |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
THE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
Return via email to the email address shown above.
Mark cover sheet: (Attention: RFP W912PQ-16-R-0005 “Source Selection Sensitive Information”)
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS*****
(Exhibit C2) RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION AND RATINGS
(Part 1 Contractor submitting Proposal fill-in)
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION AND RATINGS
(Part 1 Contractor submitting Proposal fill-in) Reference is provided for:
Contract Number:
Project Title:
Date of Award:
Project Completion Date:
Project Location:
| Dollar Value: |
| $ |
Brief Description of Proj:
Your role in referenced contract:
(Part 2 Person providing Reference) Reference is provided by:
Company/Agency:
Business Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Project Completion Date:
Relationship to Contract:
If information in Part I is not accurate please indicate.
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS*****
OFFEROR NAME ________________________________Please circle the appropriate rating.
Please provide evaluation of the following Subfactors by placing an X in the appropriate column that corresponds to the rating definitions on the previous page.
QUALITY CONTROL
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| (O) |
| (G) |
| (A) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Quality of Workmanship
Adequacy of the quality control plan
Implementation of the Quality Control Plan
Quality of the Quality Control Documentation
Storage of Materials
Adequacy of Materials
Adequacy of Submittals
Adequacy of Quality Control Testing
Adequacy of As-Builts
Use of Specified Materials
Identification/Correction of Deficient work in a timely manner
Comments on Quality Control:
TIMELY PERFORMANCE
| (O) |
| (G) |
| (A) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule
Adherence to Approved Schedule
Resolution of Delays
Submission of Required Documentation
Completion of Punchlist Items
Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules
Warranty Response
Comments on Timely Performance:
EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT
| (O) |
| (G) |
| (A) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Cooperation and Responsiveness
Management of Resources/Personnel
Coordination and Control of Subcontractors
Adequacy of Site Clean Up
Effectiveness of Job-Site Supervision
Compliance with Laws and Regulations
Professional Conduct
Review/Resolution of Subcontractor Issues
Comments on Effectiveness of Management:
COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS
| (O) |
| (G) |
| (A) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Correction of Noted Deficiencies
Payrolls Properly Completed and Submitted
Comments on Compliance:
COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS
(O)
(G)
(A)
(M)
(U)
(N/A)
Adequacy of Safety Plan Safety History Comments on Safety Standards:
| OVERALL RATING of PERFORMANCE |
| (O) |
| (G) |
| (A) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Please provide any additional information you feel is important and not covered elsewhere in this evaluation:
Thank you for your remarks. Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency and not to the Contractor you are providing a reference for.
NAME__________________________________Contact Phone Number:____________________________
Respondent Signature ______________________________________Date Completed:_______________
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS*****
OFFEROR NAME ________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .