W912P4-09-R-0001 17 feb 09.doc
DOC document 475 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Buffalo District Construction
- Solicitation number
- W912P4-09-R-0001
About this file
Please see the attached solicitation and other attached documents below. The response date is 19 March 2009.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| MATOC Amendment 3.doc | DOC document | |
| MATOC PreBid List.pdf | ||
| MATOC Amendment #2.doc | DOC document | |
| PROJECT.pdf | ||
| Safety Attachments.pdf | ||
| 97-BRL-1_13.PDF | ||
| 79-BLSF-1_3.PDF | ||
| NYST3.PDF | ||
| NYST4.PDF | ||
| BRL Full Specs FINAL.pdf | ||
| 97-BRL-1_2.PDF | ||
| Full Set - Tabloid.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_Bldg 1 Soil Borings | — | |
| Full Set - Full Size.pdf | ||
| 79-BLSF-1_1.PDF | ||
| REGISTER.pdf | ||
| 79-BLSF-1_2.PDF | ||
| NYST1.PDF | ||
| Attachment_2_brcslip-1995 lead line.pdf | ||
| NYST2.PDF | ||
| Proposal Submission Requirments.doc | DOC document | |
| Typical Projects.doc | DOC document |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS
1. OVERVIEW.
1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) under which Construction task orders for similar types of contracting projects illustrated in the “Typical Projects” section of the Scope of Work will be issued. This work may be performed within the boundaries of the Buffalo District. Task Orders issued under any resultant contract(s) will be Firm-Fixed Price.
1.2 For the purposes of this solicitation, the Government will utilize a Price Performance Trade-off (PPT) process. In a PPT, interested Offerors submit certain specified performance and capability proposals in conjunction with price proposals for review and consideration by the Government. The Government will evaluate these performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein.
2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
2.1 This is a Small Business Set Aside. The Government intends to award at least one contract to a HubZone Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business, and an 8(a) Small Business.
2.2 Contractor Team Arrangements. Contractor Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. The Offeror shall identify the major or critical aspects of the requirement to be performed by those identified in the Contractor Team Arrangement. The submission must contain a narrative that clearly explains the relevance to a particular factor of information concerning a company that is part of a Contractor Team Arrangement. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance of the information to this procurement.
2.3 Information submitted about any company other than the Offeror, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of this requirement, or other associated business, WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor unless the proposal contains a detailed narrative explaining why this submitted information is relevant to this acquisition. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance and weight of the information to this procurement. Information about subcontractors may not be given much weight unless the proposal contains some evidence that the subcontractor is committed to perform the work. Where information about a subcontractor is properly submitted and given significant weight during the evaluation, the failure of the Offeror to actually perform with that subcontractor may be grounds for termination for default.
2.4 Offerors shall submit their proposal to the address shown in Block 7 of Standard Form 1442.
2.5 Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.
3. PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS
3.1. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of two (2) separately bound parts, Part I - Price Proposal, and Part II - Past Performance Information.
3.2. Specific Instructions:
PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original and one (1) copy
(a) Complete blocks 14, 15, 16, 17 (if applicable) 19 (if applicable), 20A, 20B, and 20C of the RFP. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP.
(b) Provide the proposed lump sum price for the attached task order.
(c) Provide bid bond for 20% of the amount proposed for the attached task order.
(c) A copy of the ORCA certification shall be provided with the proposal.
(d) Format for proposal Part I shall be as follows:
(i) No more than ten pages (not including the ORCA certification). A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper containing information.
(ii) Typing shall not be less than 11 pitch.
PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Submit original plus three (3) copies.
(a) Performance Surveys: The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices/evaluation systems and commercial sources, to assess performance. Offerors will complete Section A of the Past and Present Performance Questionnaire below and submit questionnaires to the references for completion. The format of the questionnaire should not be altered in any way. The references should send the completed questionnaires to Eila.A.Olson@usace.army.mil by the closing date and time of the RFP in order to be considered. No more than three references shall be accepted. Include copies of the questionnaires sent to the references in PART II of your proposal. The questionnaires should reflect the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years. Relevant contracts include the types of projects illustrated in the “Typical Projects” section of the Scope of Work. The references shall be similar to the “Typical Projects” referenced in the scope of work and be between $50,000 and $4,000,000 dollars in order to be considered relevant.
(b) Format for proposal Part II shall be as follows:
(i) No more than 20 pages (including copies of the questionnaires sent out to references). A page is defined as one face of an 8 ½” x 11” sheet of paper containing information.
(ii) Typing shall not be less than 11 pitch.
3.3 Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this RFP will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name: _________________________________ Telephone Number: _________________________________ Address: __________________________________________ Fax Number: _______________________________________
Contractor Point of Contact: ________________________________ Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: _____________________________________ Dollar Amount: _______________________________________ Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
_______________________ Title: _________________________
Address: _____________________
Telephone Number: ___________________
Email Address: _______________________
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
Eila.A.Olson@usace.army.mil D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, A, M, P, and U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| A |
| M |
| P |
| U |
| Excellent |
| Good |
| Adequate |
| Marginal |
| Poor |
| Unknown |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER: _________________________________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| A |
| M |
| P |
| U |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 3. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 5. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 6. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 7. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 8. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 9. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 10. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 11. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 12. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 13. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 14. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 15. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 16. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 17. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 18. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 19. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________________________
CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________________________________
Remarks:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EVALUATION FACTORS
BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors' past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than cost or price considerations. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. All such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The Government intends to award 3 or more contracts as a result of this solicitation.
The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:
A. Initially offers shall be ranked according to price. An offeror’s proposed price will be determined by the lump sum amount bid on the attached task order. Any resulting contract(s) will have a maximum ordering amount of $15,000,000 over five years. However, the ordering amount for all contracts over the five year period can not exceed $15,000,000.
B. Using questionnaires, the contracting officer shall seek relevant performance information on each offeror based on (1) the past and present efforts provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. The government reserves the right to make award(s) to higher priced offerors if lower priced offeror(s) do not receive an Excellent performance assessment. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in this RFP, based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past performance. The assessment process will result in an overall performance assessment of Excellent, Good, Adequate, Marginal, Poor, or Unknown as defined follows:
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS
| Rating |
| Description |
| Excellent |
| Essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on their performance record. Risk Level: Very Low |
| Good |
| Little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on their performance record. |
Risk Level: Low
| Adequate |
| Some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort based on their performance record. |
Risk Level: Moderate
| Marginal |
| Significant doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform |
the required effort based on their performance record.
Risk Level: High
| Poor |
| It is extremely doubtful that the offeror will successfully perform |
the required effort based on their performance record.
Risk Level: Very High
| UNKNOWN |
| The offeror has little/no relevant past performance upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction: Risk Level: Unknown |
Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating "Unknown," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.
C. In evaluating past performance, the government will make a relevant/not relevant decision regarding the references provided by the contractor. In order to be considered relevant, the reference must be for a project between $50,000 and $4,000,000 and be similar to the “Typical Projects” referenced in the scope of work D. If the lowest priced offeror(s) is/are judged to have an Excellent performance assessment, that/those offer(s) represent the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that/those offeror(s) without further consideration of any other offers.
E. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest priced offeror(s) if the lowest priced offeror(s) is/are judged to have a performance assessment of "Good" or lower. In that event, the Source Selection Authority shall make an integrated assessment best value award decision.
F. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the RFP. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.
G. The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
| 52.204-6 |
| Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number |
| APR 2008 |
| 52.215-1 |
| Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition |
| JAN 2004 |
| 52.222-23 |
| Notice of Requirement for Affirmative Action to Ensure Equal Employment Opportunity for Construction |
| FEB 1999 |
| 52.232-14 |
| Notice Of Availability Of Progress Payments Exclusively For Small Business Concerns |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.232-38 |
| Submission of Electronic Funds Transfer Information with Offer |
| MAY 1999 |
| 252.236-7000 |
| Modification Proposals-Price Breakdown |
| DEC 1991 |
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
The Government contemplates award of a Multiple Award Task Order contract resulting from this solicitation. The orders will be made on a firm fixed price basis.
(End of provision)
52.222-5 DAVIS-BACON ACT--SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (JUL 2005)
(a)(1) The offeror shall notify the Government if the offeror intends to perform work at any secondary site of the work, as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of the FAR clause at 52.222-6, Davis-Bacon Act, of this solicitation.
(2) If the offeror is unsure if a planned work site satisfies the criteria for a secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a determination from the Contracting Officer.
(b)(1) If the wage determination provided by the Government for work at the primary site of the work is not applicable to the secondary site of the work, the offeror shall request a wage determination from the Contracting Officer.
(2) The due date for receipt of offers will not be extended as a result of an offeror's request for a wage determination for a secondary site of the work.
(End of provision)
52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
(a) Protests, as defined in section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from 1776 Niagara Street, Buffalo, NY 14207.
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within one day of filing a protest with the GAO.
(End of provision)
Section 00600 - Representations & Certifications
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
| 52.203-11 |
| Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions |
| SEP 2007 |
| 52.222-38 |
| Compliance With Veterans' Employment Reporting Requirements |
| DEC 2001 |
| 252.209-7001 |
| Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a Terrorist Country |
| OCT 2006 |
52.203-2 CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION (APR 1985)
(a) The offeror certifies that --
(1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without, for the purpose of restricting competition, any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to –
(i) Those prices,
(ii) The intention to submit an offer, or
(iii) The methods of factors used to calculate the prices offered:
(2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and
(3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an offer for the purpose of restricting competition.
(b) Each signature on the offer is considered to be a certification by the signatory that the signatory --
(1) Is the person in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and that the signatory has not participated and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision; or
(2) (i) Has been authorized, in writing, to act as agent for the following principals in certifying that those principals have not participated, and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provison ______________________________________________________ (insert full name of person(s) in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and the title of his or her position in the offeror's organization);
(ii) As an authorized agent, does certify that the principals named in subdivision (b)(2)(i) above have not participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above; and
(iii) As an agent, has not personally participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision.
(c) If the offeror deletes or modifies subparagraph (a)(2) of this provision, the offeror must furnish with its offer a signed statement setting forth in detail the circumstances of the disclosure.
(End of clause)
52.204-3 TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION (OCT 1998)
(a) Definitions.
Common parent, as used in this provision, means that corporate entity that owns or controls an affiliated group of corporations that files its Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis, and of which the offeror is a member.
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), as used in this provision, means the number required by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to be used by the offeror in reporting income tax and other returns. The TIN may be either a Social Security Number or an Employer Identification Number.
(b) All offerors must submit the information required in paragraphs (d) through (f) of this provision to comply with debt collection requirements of 31 U.S.C. 7701(c) and 3325(d), reporting requirements of 26 U.S.C. 6041, 6041A, and 6050M, and implementing regulations issued by the IRS. If the resulting contract is subject to the payment reporting requirements described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.904, the failure or refusal by the offeror to furnish the information may result in a 31 percent reduction of payments otherwise due under the contract.
(c) The TIN may be used by the Government to collect and report on any delinquent amounts arising out of the offeror's relationship with the Government (31 U.S.C. 7701(c)(3)). If the resulting contract is subject to the payment reporting requirements described in FAR 4.904, the TIN provided hereunder may be matched with IRS records to verify the accuracy of the offeror's TIN.
(d) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN).
___ TIN:.--------------------------------------------------------
___ TIN has been applied for.
___ TIN is not required because:
___ Offeror is a nonresident alien, foreign corporation, or foreign partnership that does not have income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States and does not have an office or place of business or a fiscal paying agent in the United States;
___ Offeror is an agency or instrumentality of a foreign government;
___ Offeror is an agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government.
(e) Type of organization.
___ Sole proprietorship;
___ Partnership;
___ Corporate entity (not tax-exempt);
___ Corporate entity (tax-exempt);
___ Government entity (Federal, State, or local);
___ Foreign government;
___ International organization per 26 CFR 1.6049-4;
___ Other--------------------------------------------------------
(f) Common parent.
___ Offeror is not owned or controlled by a common parent as defined in paragraph (a) of this provision.
___ Name and TIN of common parent:
Name-------------------------------------------------------------------
TIN--------------------------------------------------------------------
(End of provision)
52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2006)
(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 237990.
(2) The small business size standard is $33.5M.
(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.
(b)(1) If the clause at 52.204-7, Central Contractor Registration, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (c) of this provision applies.
(2) If the clause at 52.204-7 is not included in this solicitation, and the offeror is currently registered in CCR, and has completed the ORCA electronically, the offeror may choose to use paragraph (b) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:
(__) Paragraph (c) applies.
(__) Paragraph (c) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.
(c) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) website at http://orca.bpn.gov. After reviewing the ORCA database information, the offeror verifies by submission of the offer that the representations and certifications currently posted electronically have been entered or updated within the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201); except for the changes identified below [offeror to insert changes, identifying change by clause number, title, date]. These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer.
FAR Clause Title Date Change
Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications posted on ORCA.
(End of Provision)
52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (DEC 2008)
(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-
(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-
(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;
(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property; and
(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.; and
(D) Have [ballot], have not [ballot], within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.
(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:
(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.
(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.
(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.
(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.
(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.
(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).
(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.
(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a subsidiary, division, or business segment; and similar positions).
(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.
(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.
(End of provision)
52.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (MAY 2004)
(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 237990 (insert NAICS code).
(2) The small business size standard is 33.5M (insert size standard).
(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.
(b) Representations. (1) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a small business concern.
(2) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents, for general statistical purposes, that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a small disadvantaged business concern as defined in 13 CFR 124.1002.
(3) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a women-owned small business concern.
(4) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a veteran-owned small business concern.
(5) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a veteran-owned small business concern in paragraph (b)(4) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.
(6) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.) The offeror represents, as part of its offer, that--
(i) It ( ) is, ( ) is not a HUBZone small business concern listed, on the date of this representation, on the List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration, and no material change in ownership and control, principal office, or HUBZone employee percentage has occurred since it was certified by the Small Business Administration in accordance with 13 CFR part 126; and
(ii) It ( ) is, ( ) is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 126, and the representation in paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this provision is accurate for the HUBZone small business concern or concerns that are participating in the joint venture. (The offeror shall enter the name or names of the HUBZone small business concern or concerns that are participating in the joint venture:____________.) Each HUBZone small business concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the HUBZone representation.
(c) Definitions. As used in this provision--
Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern--
(1) Means a small business concern--
(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and
(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.
(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).
"Small business concern," means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR Part 121 and the size standard in paragraph (a) of this provision.
Veteran-owned small business concern means a small business concern--
(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans (as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and
(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.
"Women-owned small business concern," means a small business concern --
(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women; in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women; and
(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.
(d) Notice.
(1) If this solicitation is for supplies and has been set aside, in whole or in part, for small business concerns, then the clause in this solicitation providing notice of the set-aside contains restrictions on the source of the end items to be furnished.
(2) Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, or women-owned small business concern in order to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8(a), 8(d), 9, or 15 of the Small Business Act or any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of program eligibility, shall--
(i) Be punished by imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both;
(ii) Be subject to administrative remedies, including suspension and debarment; and
(iii) Be ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the authority of the Act.
(End of provision)
52.222-22 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS (FEB 1999)
The offeror represents that --
(a) ( ) It has, ( ) has not participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal Opportunity clause of this solicitation;
(b) ( ) It has, ( ) has not, filed all required compliance reports; and
(c) Representations indicating submission of required compliance reports, signed by proposed subcontractors, will be obtained before subcontract awards.
(End of provision)
52.223-13 CERTIFICATION OF TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASE REPORTING (AUG 2003)
(a) Executive Order 13148, of April 21, 2000, Greening the Government through Leadership in Environmental Management, requires submission of this certification as a prerequisite for contract award.
(b) By signing this offer, the offeror certifies that--
(1) As the owner or operator of facilities that will be used in the performance of this contract that are subject to the filing and reporting requirements described in section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) (42 U.S.C. 11023) and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (PPA) (42 U.S.C. 13106), the offeror will file and continue to file for such facilities for the life of the contract the Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Form (Form R) as described in sections 313(a) and (g) of EPCRA and section 6607 of PPA; or
(2) None of its owned or operated facilities to be used in the performance of this contract is subject to the Form R filing and reporting requirements because each such facility is exempt for at least one of the following reasons: (Check each block that is applicable.)
( ) (i) The facility does not manufacture, process, or otherwise use any toxic chemicals listed in 40 CFR 372.65;
( ) (ii) The facility does not have 10 or more full-time employees as specified in section 313.(b)(1)(A) of EPCRA 42 U.S.C. 11023(b)(1)(A);
( ) (iii) The facility does not meet the reporting thresholds of toxic chemicals established under section 313(f) of EPCRA, 42 U.S.C. 11023(f) (including the alternate thresholds at 40 CFR 372.27, provided an appropriate certification form has been filed with EPA);
( ) (iv) The facility does not fall within the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes or their corresponding North American Industry Classification System sectors:
(A) Major group code 10 (except 1011, 1081, and 1094.
(B) Major group code 12 (except 1241).
(C) Major group codes 20 through 39.
(D) Industry code 4911, 4931, or 4939 (limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce).
(E) Industry code 4953 (limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subtitle C (42 U.S.C. 6921, et seq.), 5169, 5171, or 7389 (limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis); or
( ) (v) The facility is not located within the United States or its outlying areas.
(End of clause)
52.236-28 PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS--CONSTRUCTION (OCT 1997)
(a) Proposals must be (1) submitted on the forms furnished by the Government or on copies of those forms, and (2) manually signed. The person signing a proposal must initial each erasure or change appearing on any proposal form.
(b) The proposal form may require offerors to submit proposed prices for one or more items on various bases, including--
(1) Lump sum price;
(2) Alternate prices;
(3) Units of construction; or
(4) Any combination of paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(3) of this provision.
(c) If the solicitation requires submission of a proposal on all items, failure to do so may result in the proposal being rejected without further consideration. If a proposal on all items is not required, offerors should insert the words “no proposal” in the space provided for any item on which no price is submitted.
(d) Alternate proposals will not be considered unless this solicitation authorizes their submission.
(End of provision)
Section 00700 - Contract Clauses
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
| 52.202-1 |
| Definitions |
| JUL 2004 |
| 52.203-3 |
| Gratuities |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.203-5 |
| Covenant Against Contingent Fees |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.203-7 |
| Anti-Kickback Procedures |
| JUL 1995 |
| 52.203-8 |
| Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or Improper Activity |
| JAN 1997 |
| 52.203-10 |
| Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity |
| JAN 1997 |
| 52.203-12 |
| Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions |
| SEP 2007 |
| 52.204-4 |
| Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Recycled Paper |
| AUG 2000 |
| 52.204-7 |
| Central Contractor Registration |
| APR 2008 |
| 52.209-6 |
| Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment |
| SEP 2006 |
| 52.211-13 |
| Time Extensions |
| SEP 2000 |
| 52.215-2 |
| Audit and Records--Negotiation |
| JUN 1999 |
| 52.215-20 |
| Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data |
| OCT 1997 |
| 52.215-21 |
| Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information Other Than Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications |
| OCT 1997 |
| 52.216-18 |
| Ordering |
| OCT 1995 |
| 52.219-6 |
| Notice Of Total Small Business Set-Aside |
| JUN 2003 |
| 52.219-8 |
| Utilization of Small Business Concerns |
| MAY 2004 |
| 52.219-14 |
| Limitations On Subcontracting |
| DEC 1996 |
| 52.222-3 |
| Convict Labor |
| JUN 2003 |
| 52.222-4 |
| Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - Overtime Compensation |
| JUL 2005 |
| 52.222-6 |
| Davis Bacon Act |
| JUL 2005 |
| 52.222-7 |
| Withholding of Funds |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-8 |
| Payrolls and Basic Records |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-9 |
| Apprentices and Trainees |
| JUL 2005 |
| 52.222-10 |
| Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-11 |
| Subcontracts (Labor Standards) |
| JUL 2005 |
| 52.222-12 |
| Contract Termination-Debarment |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-13 |
| Compliance with Davis-Bacon and Related Act Regulations. |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-14 |
| Disputes Concerning Labor Standards |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-15 |
| Certification of Eligibility |
| FEB 1988 |
| 52.222-21 |
| Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities |
| FEB 1999 |
| 52.222-26 |
| Equal Opportunity |
| MAR 2007 |
| 52.222-27 |
| Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction |
| FEB 1999 |
| 52.222-35 |
| Equal Opportunity For Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans |
| SEP 2006 |
| 52.222-36 |
| Affirmative Action For Workers With Disabilities |
| JUN 1998 |
| 52.222-37 |
| Employment Reports On Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans Of The Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans |
| SEP 2006 |
| 52.222-50 |
| Combating Trafficking in Persons |
| AUG 2007 |
| 52.223-5 |
| Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information |
| AUG 2003 |
| 52.223-6 |
| Drug-Free Workplace |
| MAY 2001 |
| 52.223-14 |
| Toxic Chemical Release Reporting |
| AUG 2003 |
| 52.225-13 |
| Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases |
| JUN 2008 |
| 52.227-1 |
| Authorization and Consent |
| DEC 2007 |
| 52.228-1 |
| Bid Guarantee |
| SEP 1996 |
| 52.228-2 |
| Additional Bond Security |
| OCT 1997 |
| 52.228-11 |
| Pledges Of Assets |
| FEB 1992 |
| 52.228-15 |
| Performance and Payment Bonds--Construction |
| NOV 2006 |
| 52.229-3 |
| Federal, State And Local Taxes |
| APR 2003 |
| 52.232-5 |
| Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts |
| SEP 2002 |
| 52.232-13 |
| Notice Of Progress Payments |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.232-16 |
| Progress Payments |
| APR 2003 |
| 52.232-17 |
| Interest |
| OCT 2008 |
| 52.232-18 |
| Availability Of Funds |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.232-23 |
| Assignment Of Claims |
| JAN 1986 |
| 52.232-27 |
| Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts |
| OCT 2008 |
| 52.232-33 |
| Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--Central Contractor Registration |
| OCT 2003 |
| 52.233-1 |
| Disputes |
| JUL 2002 |
| 52.233-3 |
| Protest After Award |
| AUG 1996 |
| 52.233-4 |
| Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim |
| OCT 2004 |
| 52.236-1 |
| Performance of Work by the Contractor |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-2 |
| Differing Site Conditions |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-3 |
| Site Investigation and Conditions Affecting the Work |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-4 |
| Physical Data |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-5 |
| Material and Workmanship |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-6 |
| Superintendence by the Contractor |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-7 |
| Permits and Responsibilities |
| NOV 1991 |
| 52.236-8 |
| Other Contracts |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-9 |
| Protection of Existing Vegetation, Structures, Equipment, Utilities, and Improvements |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-10 |
| Operations and Storage Areas |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-11 |
| Use and Possession Prior to Completion |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-12 |
| Cleaning Up |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-13 |
| Accident Prevention |
| NOV 1991 |
| 52.236-15 |
| Schedules for Construction Contracts |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-17 |
| Layout of Work |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.236-21 |
| Specifications and Drawings for Construction |
| FEB 1997 |
| 52.236-26 |
| Preconstruction Conference |
| FEB 1995 |
| 52.242-13 |
| Bankruptcy |
| JUL 1995 |
| 52.242-14 |
| Suspension of Work |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.243-4 |
| Changes |
| JUN 2007 |
| 52.246-12 |
| Inspection of Construction |
| AUG 1996 |
| 52.246-21 |
| Warranty of Construction |
| MAR 1994 |
| 52.248-3 |
| Value Engineering-Construction |
| SEP 2006 |
| 52.249-2 |
| Termination For Convenience Of The Government (Fixed-Price) |
| MAY 2004 |
| 52.249-10 |
| Default (Fixed-Price Construction) |
| APR 1984 |
| 52.253-1 |
| Computer Generated Forms |
| JAN 1991 |
| 252.201-7000 |
| Contracting Officer's Representative |
| DEC 1991 |
| 252.203-7001 |
| Prohibition On Persons Convicted of Fraud or Other Defense-Contract-Related Felonies |
| DEC 2004 |
| 252.204-7003 |
| Control Of Government Personnel Work Product |
| APR 1992 |
| 252.209-7001 |
| Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a Terrorist Country |
| OCT 2006 |
| 252.223-7004 |
| Drug Free Work Force |
| SEP 1988 |
| 252.231-7000 |
| Supplemental Cost Principles |
| DEC 1991 |
| 252.236-7002 |
| Obstruction of Navigable Waterways |
| DEC 1991 |
52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)
The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract as determined by each delivery order, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use as determined by each delivery order. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.
(End of clause)
52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)
(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of TBD per delivery order.
(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.
(End of clause)
52.216-19 Order Limitations. (OCT 1995)
(a) Minimum order. When the Government requires supplies or services covered by this contract in an amount of less than $1,000.00, the Government is not obligated to purchase, nor is the Contractor obligated to furnish, those supplies or services under the contract.
(b) Maximum order. The Contractor is not obligated to honor:
(1) Any order for a single item in excess of $4,000,000.00;
(2) Any order for a combination of items in excess of $4,000,000.00; or
(3) A series of orders from the same ordering office within 5 days that together call for quantities exceeding the limitation in subparagraph (1) or (2) above.
(c) If this is a requirements contract (i.e., includes the Requirements clause at subsection 52.216-21 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)), the Government is not required to order a part of any one requirement from the Contractor if that requirement exceeds the maximum-order limitations in paragraph (b) above.
(d) Notwithstanding paragraphs (b) and (c) above, the Contractor shall honor any order exceeding the maximum order limitations in paragraph (b), unless that order (or orders) is returned to the ordering office within 5 days after issuance, with written notice stating the Contractor's intent not to ship the item (or items) called for and the reasons. Upon receiving this notice, the Government may acquire the supplies or services from another source.
(End of clause)
52.216-22 Indefinite Quantity. (OCT 1995)
(a) This is an indefinite-quantity contract for the supplies or services specified, and effective for the period stated, in the Schedule. The quantities of supplies and services specified in the Schedule are estimates only and are not purchased by this contract.
(b) Delivery or performance shall be made only as authorized by orders issued in accordance with the Ordering clause. The Contractor shall furnish to the Government, when and if ordered, the supplies or services specified in the Schedule up to and including the quantity designated in the Schedule as the "maximum". The Government shall order at least the quantity of supplies or services designated in the Schedule as the "minimum".
(c) Except for any limitations on quantities in the Order Limitations clause or in the Schedule, there is no limit on the number of orders that may be issued. The Government may issue orders requiring delivery to multiple destinations or performance at multiple locations.
(d) Any order issued during the effective period of this contract and not completed within that period shall be completed by the Contractor within the time specified in the order.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .