B.08.02 W912JC22R0006 Solicitation Amendment P00002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Jan-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912JC22R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Dec-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Jan-2022

CODE

USPFO KS PURCHASING & CONTRACTING

2737 S KANSAS AVE

TOPEKA KS 66611-1170

W912JC 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912JC22R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

CONTINUATION PAGE 0002

The following have been modified:

CONTINUATION PAGE

A. NECESSITY FOR CHANGE: Solicitation is being amended as a result of contractor questions.

B. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: See the below list:

a. Section L – Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Bidders: Section – V Proposal Submission Requirement, Evaluation Criteria, and Basis of Award, is changed to only an electronic copy is required for submitted proposals.

b. Section M – Evaluation Factor for Award is changed to clarify Jobs Contract Type (for example, Indefinite-Delivery, Firm Fixed Price, Cost Plus, Individual Task orders are acceptable, but not SATOC or MATOC).

c. Section M – Evaluation Factor for Award, Corporate Experience Evaluation Criteria: Item #4 is changed to clarify and defin “codes” (Ex: Installation, City or State Ordinances and Regulations.

C. TIME: N/A.

D. WAGE RATES: N/A

E. PAYMENT: N/A

F. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS: All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

G. CONTRACTING OFFICER STATEMENT: Only a warranted Contracting Officer (either a Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) or an Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)), acting within their delegated limits, has the authority to issue modifications or otherwise change the terms and conditions of this contract. If an individual other than the Contracting Officer attempts to make changes to the terms and conditions of this contract you shall not proceed with the change and shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been deleted:

CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION V

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS,

EVALUATION CRITERIA, AND BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL INFORMATION

The proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing straightforward, concise delineation of capabilities to perform the contract. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear and coherent. All proposal information is to be submitted utilizing the English language.

The technical proposal shall address the offeror’s proposed approach to fully perform the requirements of the Request for Proposals (RFP). Offerors are discouraged from providing information not required by the RFP.

2.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

All offerors shall be required to submit a proposal with the minimum content as specified herein.

Proposals without the minimum content may be rejected. Proposals will be received until the date and time indicated on Standard Form 33 in electronic format at james.d.sparkes.mil@army.mil

3.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT AND SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. In order to be considered for award of a contract for the requirements of this solicitation, the offeror must submit a proposal with its offer. Failure to submit a complete proposal may result in the entire offer being rejected. The proposals shall be submitted in Volumes as follows:

VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (Tabs A through B)

VOLUME 2: PRICE PROPOSAL (Tab A through B) consisting of an original signed Standard Form 33 “Solicitation, Offer, and Award”; providing a price for all line items in the corresponding Price Proposal Schedule; and acknowledgment of all amendments to the solicitation and in Tab B - Pro Forma Requirements. Only an electronic copy is required.

2. Proposal Characteristics

a) Each Volume shall contain a table of contents and all pages of each factor shall be sequentially numbered. All text must be legible and easily read. The page size of the offeror’s proposal shall not exceed 8-1/2 by 11 inches. Diagrams, charts and tables shall conform to the paper size. All text shall be typed single-spaced. Margins (1-inch) shall be clean and clear. If fold-out charts are unavoidable, and are to be utilized, all sheets shall be reproduced on 11 by 17 inch, and folded to 8-1/2 by 11 inch size. Submit the SF 33, completed and signed by a person authorized by the offeror. Offerors shall limit Volume 1, Technical Proposal, to a maximum of 20 pages. Pages in excess of 20 will not be evaluated.

b) Each Volume of the proposal shall be identified by the Solicitation Number, project title, company name, address, and telephone number of the offer, and the following on the volume in bold letters:

VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VOLUME 2: PRICE PROPOSAL

c) The Proposal shall be organized by factors. They shall be described in separate sections, appropriately tabbed in a report form. All pages of each factor shall be sequentially numbered. Elaborate or lengthy presentations are not necessary or desirable. The Proposal’s clarity, organization and cross referencing are mandatory.

No material shall be incorporated by reference. The Technical proposal shall not refer the reviewer to information contained in the Price proposal.

d) Additional Information to be provided in Volume 2. The following items should be submitted labeled “Pro Forma Requirements”:

1. Offeror will submit a cover letter containing:

i. Solicitation number

ii. Name, address, email, and telephone and fax numbers of the offeror

iii. Names, title, email, and telephone and fax numbers of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this RFP.

iv. Name, title and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal

v. A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions and provisions included in the RFP

2. For Joint Ventures, the information required by paragraph “Joint Ventures”

3. The Offer (the SF33) duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company.

4. Include the Offeror’s DUNS number in block 14.

5. Acknowledgement of all amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30 (amendment form).

6. The completed Section K of the RFP (Representations and Certifications), including the ORCA certification from SAM Registration.

7. Financial statement and bank letter that verifies that sufficient funds will be available to finance the work

4.0 INQUIRIES/QUESTIONS

Bidder inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation shall be submitted to James Sparkes at james.d.sparkes.mil@army.mil.

Bidder inquiries will be unavailable for new inquiries ten calendar days before proposal due date. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

5.0 JOINT VENTURES

Joint Ventures shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

1) A certified copy of their Joint Venture agreement.

2) A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages, where appropriate.

a. The relationship of the joint venture parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, and profit distribution or loss sharing.

b. The management approach of the joint venture in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise and control the project and have custody and control of the assets of the Joint Venture and perform the duties necessary to complete the work.

c. The structure of the joint venture and decision-making responsibilities of the Joint Venture parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of the work.

d. The bonding responsibilities of the Joint Venture parties.

e. Identification of the key personnel having authority to legally bind the Joint Venture to subcontracts and state who will provide or contract for the labor and materials for the Joint Venture.

f. Identification of party maintaining the Joint Venture bank accounts for the payment of all expenses and the deposits of all receipts, keep the books and records, and pay applicable taxes for the Joint Venture.

g. Identification of party furnishing the facilities, such as office supplies and telephone service.

h. Identification of party having overall control of the Joint Venture.

Other sections of the proposal shall identify, where appropriate, whether key personnel are employees of the individual Joint Venture parties and identify the party, or hired as employees of the Joint Venture.

If one of the Joint Venture parties possesses experience and/or past performance as a Federal Government contractor or as a National Guard contractor, that experience and/or past experience will be included as the experience and/or past experience of the Joint Venture.

6.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

The award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Proposals will be evaluated utilizing two technical (non-price) factors, Key Personnel and Corporate Experience and will be assessed on acceptable/unacceptable basis, but will not be ranked. In order for an offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating in every non-price Factor. A proposal receiving a rating of “Unacceptable” in any non-price Factor will not be eligible for award.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

TECHNICAL FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

A. VOLUME 1 TECHNICAL INFORMATION

Factor Location Description

FACTOR 1 VOLUME 1 TAB A CORPORATE EXPERIENCE

FACTOR 2 VOLUME 1 TAB B KEY PERSONNEL

B. VOLUME 2 PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Location Description

FACTOR 3 VOLUME 2 TAB A PRICE (Standard Form 33 and Price Proposal Schedules)

FACTOR 3 VOLUME 2 TAB B PRO FORMA REQUIREMENTS

VOLUME 1 - FACTOR 1: CORPORATE EXPERIENCE

Submission Requirements The offeror shall submit a project portfolio with 3 (no more and no less) similar contracts (projects) performed that have been completed by the offeror (prime Case management contractor) in the last five years or substantially complete (90%) for non-clinical Case management and Care Coordination patient care services, with a minimum cost of $700,000.00 in magnitude. Similar contracts (projects) under this criterion consists of firm fixed-price contracts for medical services, clinical or non-clinical case management service, and Care coordination services on a military installation or at a Federal Government Facility.

If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies, state if this project represents a joint venture effort for the listed parties. A maximum of three (3) contracts (projects) performed will be evaluated.

If more than three (3) contracts (projects) are submitted, only the first three (3) contracts (projects) listed in the proposal will be evaluated. Data presented shall be limited to two pages per contract/job described. Use the following format to provide project information:

a. Jobs Title, Contract Number and Location.

b. Jobs Contract Type (for example, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity, Firm Fixed-Price, Cost Plus, Individual Task Orders are acceptable for Corporate Experience, but not SATOC or MATOC Awards) ****

c. Total Dollar Amount

d. Start and Completion Dates (Month/Year)

e. Role of Firm (address type of work performed, and percentage of work, as applicable) (also include any proposed team members that were directly involved in this job, including work performed, roles and responsibilities)

f. Brief Description of job and address how this relates to this solicitation and meets the similarity requirement.

g. Significant provisions taken to work in high security restricted areas by Offeror as a prime Contractor or as a significant subcontractor. ****

h. Customer Point of Contact (name, relationship to project, agency/firm affiliation, city, state, current phone number, and e-mail address)

i. Awards or recognition received, where applicable.

The offeror shall describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the job list. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the prime contractor and team members as relevant to their role on this job. If Corporate Experience is provided for the teaming member, instead of the prime medical case management contractor, a letter of commitment is required for it to be acceptable.

Corporate Experience Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s corporate experience based on the below evaluation criteria:

To receive an Acceptable rating for this factor the offeror must demonstrate all of the minimum requirements for each contract/job:

1. 3 case management projects:

2. Projects must include clinical or non-clinical medical case management and care coordination services.

3. On a Military Installation or at a Federal Government Facility

4. Demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes (ex: Installation , City, or State Ordinances and

Regulations)

5. Minimum relevant contract cost of $700,000.00

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating Definition Acceptable Proposal meets minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 2: KEY PERSONNEL

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Offeror shall submit a resume displaying the qualifications for each of the below Key Personnel:

QTY POSITION

1 Lead Case Manager

3 Case Manager

6 Care Coordinator

Evaluation Criteria

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Key Personnel based on the below evaluation criteria:

To receive an Acceptable rating for this factor the offeror must demonstrate all of the minimum requirements for each key personnel:

1. Lead Case Manager: A registered nurse III (DOL Occ. Code 12314) or a person with a minimum of 5 years of experience in either:

a. Medical or laboratory clinic administration or management; or

b. Medical and/or non-medical care coordinator experience; or

c. Clinic or laboratory support services

2. Case Manager: A registered nurse II (DOL Occ. Code 12312) or a person with a minimum of 4 years of experience in either:

a. Medical or laboratory clinic administration or management; or

b. Medical and/or non-medical care coordinator experience; or

c. Clinic or laboratory support services

3. Care Coordinator: Associate degree in related fields of sciences, buisness, or medical care and a minimum of 2 years of experience with;

a. Demonstrated capability in health care coordination;

b. Experience working with community agencies

c. Experience working with military personnel

TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating Definition Acceptable Proposal meets minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

VOLUME 2 - FACTOR 3: PRICE PROPOSAL

Submission Requirements

Offerors shall submit the Price Proposal consistent with the CLINS included in this solicitation (Price Proposal Schedule). The Price Proposal Schedule consists of the original signed Standard Form 33 “Solicitation, Offer, and Award”; providing a price for all line items in the corresponding bid schedule; and acknowledgement of all amendments to the solicitation.

Proposed prices must be entered for all items of the Price Proposal Schedule.

Evaluation Criteria

Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis. The SSEB will evaluate the reasonableness of the price proposal using their expert judgment. The SSEB will also evaluate for unbalanced pricing. In the event, during the course of the analysis, the SSEB has reason to question the reasonableness of a price proposal, the SSEB may conduct such additional fair and reasonable analysis as it requires in order to complete a thorough price analysis. Because the evaluation of the price proposal will represent a portion of the total evaluation, it is possible that an offeror might not be selected because of an unreasonable price proposal. The price proposal will also be evaluated for completeness; all price information required by the RFP must be submitted.

(End of Summary of Changes)