ERDC_OTA_ATTACHMENT_II.DOCX
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912HZ1890001
About this file
This document contains an attachment outlining annual report requirements and a federal contract opportunity notice. The attachment lists metrics for evaluating the performance of an Engineering Research and Development Center Military Engineering consortium, including the diversity of its membership and distribution of awarded business. It assesses the consortium's insights into and awareness of emerging private sector technologies. The federal contract opportunity is a competitive solicitation to establish an Other Transaction for Prototype Agreement with an eligible consortium. The consortium will provide a lead management organization to collaborate across public and private sector barriers. Proposals are due no later than August 7, 2018 at 3:00 PM Central Time and shall be emailed to the specified Army Corps of Engineers contracting officer. The agreement will support the Engineering Research and Development Center's Military Engineering business area.
DRAFT OTA ARTICLES ATTACHMENT II
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912HZ1890001_Draft_Article_Clarifications.pdf | ||
| ERDC_OTA_ATTACHMENT_I.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| Draft_ERDC_OTA_Agreement_Articles_v7_-_Final_Draft.docx | DOCX document | |
| OTA_Questions_and_Answers_W912HZ-18-9-0001.pdf | ||
| ERDC_OTPA_Synopsis-Solicitation_V4.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT II
ANNUAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS
Consortium Metrics
Does the Consortium engage a sufficiently broad segment of the innovators, developers, suppliers and integrators within the ERDC ME and related technology industry?
- % traditional defense companies
| - % small companies |
| - % non-traditional companies |
| - % academic research institutions |
| -% 2nd & 3rd tier suppliers |
How is business distributed among Consortium members? Are small and non-traditional companies successful in winning ERDC ME and related technology business?
- $ value awarded to small companies
- $ value awarded to non-traditional companies
- $ value awarded to academic research institutions
- Number of partnering activities within Consortium members to execute task awards
- Number of tasks executed solely by small companies
- Number of tasks executed solely by non-traditional companies
- Number of tasks executed solely by academic research institutions
- Number of new small and non-traditional companies joining the Consortium after initial start up and on an annual basis due to perceived value to them
Is the Consortium providing greater insights into and awareness of ERDC ME and related technologies emerging from the private sector?
- Number of technologies proposed by Consortium members that were approved by Government for future investment
- $ value awarded to Consortium members for technologies proposed via Consortium input
Is the Consortium managed in a manner perceived as “fair” by Consortium members such that “full and open” competition is realized?
- Do Consortium members perceive their proposals were evaluated fairly by government personnel and process such that award meets fair and open competition obligations?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .