W912HQ17R0004-0001_Summary_of_Changes.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This amendment clarifies/amends the follow ing:

-CLINS 0001 through 4002 have been amended -52.212-1, Paragraph 1.2 - How to submit Conflict of Interest Information -52.212-1, Paragraph 1.4 - The Final Cut-Off Date for Question Submission -52.212-1, Paragraph 1.7.1 d - Submission of Proposal Formats -52.212-1, Paragraph 2.2.1 - The Definition of "Recent" Past Performance -52.212-2, Paragraph 2.2.2.1 - Where to find the Submission Criteria for Past Performance -FBO.gov Post, Attachment 2: Appendix D - IDIQ SATOC PRICE MODEL, has been amended

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 30

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 19-Jul-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912HQ-17-R-0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

06-Jul-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Jul-2017

CODE

USACE HUMPHREYS ENGR CTR SPT ACTIVITY

ATTN: CECT-HC,

7701 TELEGRAPH ROAD

ALEXANDRIA VA 22315-3860

W912HQ 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912HQ-17-R-0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0001

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, NECESSARY TO PERFORM

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2017

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2018.

To:

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL AND SUPERVISION NECESSARY TO

PERFORM FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). THIS CLIN INCLUDES THE PHASE-IN PERIOD FROM 03

OCTOBER 2017 TO 02 APRIL 2017 IN ACCORDANCE WITH PWS PARAGRAPH 6.4, PHASE-IN. THE FULL PERFORMANCE PERIOD FOR THIS CLIN IS FROM 03 APRIL 2017 THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2018.

CLIN 0002

TRAVEL COSTS SHALL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS (JTR). THIS IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

EXCEED (NTE) AMOUNT WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF THE TASK ORDER

AWARD. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2017 THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2018.

TRAVEL COSTS SHALL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS (JTR). THIS IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

EXCEED (NTE) AMOUNT OF $20,000.00. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2017

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2018.

CLIN 1001

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, NECESSARY TO PERFORM

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2018

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2019.

PERFORM FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2018

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2019.

CLIN 1002

TRAVEL COSTS SHALL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS (JTR). THIS IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

AWARD. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2018 THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2019.

IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

EXCEED (NTE) AMOUNT OF $20,000.00. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2018

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2019.

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 19,999.00 from 1.00 to 20,000.00.

CLIN 2001

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, NECESSARY TO PERFORM

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2019

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2020.

PERFORM FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2019

CLIN 2002

IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

AWARD. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2019 THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2020.

IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

EXCEED (NTE) AMOUNT OF $20,000.00. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2019

CLIN 3001

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, NECESSARY TO PERFORM

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2020

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2021.

PERFORM FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2020

CLIN 3002

TRAVEL COSTS SHALL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS (JTR). THIS IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

AWARD. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2020 THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2021.

IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

EXCEED (NTE) AMOUNT OF $20,000.00. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2020

CLIN 4001

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, NECESSARY TO PERFORM

FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2021

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2022.

PERFORM FINANCIAL SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE (CEFMS) AS DEFINED IN THE

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS). PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2021

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2022.

CLIN 4002

TRAVEL COSTS SHALL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS (JTR). THIS IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

AWARD. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2022 THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2023.

TTRAVEL COSTS SHALL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH JOINT TRAVEL REGULATIONS (JTR). THIS IS A NON-FEE BEARING COST CLIN. OFFERORS SHALL NOT PRICE THIS CLIN. IT IS A NOT-TO-

EXCEED (NTE) AMOUNT OF $20,000.00. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: FROM 03 OCTOBER 2022

THROUGH 02 OCTOBER 2023.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1002 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 03-OCT-2018 TO

02-OCT-2019

N/A USACE FINANCE CENTER

SHEILA SMITH

5700 WASP AVENUE, BLDG 787

MILLINGTON TN 38054

901-873-9009

FOB: N/A

W19JAA

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 03-OCT-2018 TO

02-OCT-2019

N/A USACE FINANCE CENTER

SHEILA SMITH

5700 WASP AVENUE, BLDG 787

MILLINGTON TN 38054

901-873-9009

FOB: N/A

W19JAA

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 -- INSTRUCTIONS

52.212-1 -- Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items.

Part 1. PROPOSALSUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Eligible Offerors

1.2 Organizational Conflict of Interest(OCI) Disclosure

1.3 Access to Solicitation

1.4 Request for Information

1.5 Pre-Proposal Conference

1.6 Proposal Submission Address and Deadline

1.7 Proposal Submission Requirements

2.0 Technical Evaluation Factors

2.1 VOLUME I – Seed Task Order Project Technical Approach

2.2 VOLUME II – Experience/Past Performance

2.3 VOLUME III – Management Approach, Key Personnel, and Transition Plan TAB A: Management Approach TAB B: Key Personnel TAB C: Transition Plan

3.0 VOLUME IV – Price

4.0 VOLUME V – Administrative Requirements

PART 2. FAR CLAUSE 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS –

COMMERICAL ITEMS ADDENDUM

1.0 Introduction. This is a competitive small business set-aside conducted in accordance with FAR Parts 12 and 15 as well as DoD source Selection Procedures Best Value Tradeoff. Processes from FAR Part 15 will be utilized as authorized by FAR 12.102(b) to establish an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Single Award Task Order Contract (SATOC) in support of USACE Finance Center (UFC) Corps of Engineers Financial Management System (CEFMS). In this source selection, a technical proposal (Volumes I-III), a price proposal (Volume IV), and an Administrative Requirements (Volume V) are submission requirements.

In general, the work to be performed is described in the Performance Work Statement contained the solicitation. The term of the contract will include a 12-month base period and four (4) 12-month option periods that may be exercised at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. Firm-Fixed-price task orders will be issued against this contract.

1.1 Eligible Offerors. An Eligible Offeror is self-certified as a Small Business, as defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration. All Offerors, including Joint Ventures, must have an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) with their DUNS number under the appropriate NAICS code for this acquisition. Registration can be completed on the SAM website at https://www.sam.gov. If assistance is needed with SAM registration, contact the SAM helpdesk at https://www.fsd.gov or (866) 606-8220.

1.2 Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Disclosure. The Offeror shall fill in the disclosure statement in Volume V of the proposal which describes all the relevant facts concerning any past or present organizational conflicts of interest relating to this solicitation. In the same statement, and if applicable, the Offeror shall provide information to assure the Government that the conflicts of interest have been mitigated and/or neutralized to the maximum extent possible. If a conflict of interest is discovered after award of this contract, the Contracting Officer will make a decision whether to terminate the contract. If no conflicts of interest exist the Offeror shall provide a statement stating no conflicts of interest exist. An OCI Statement may be added to Appendix A – Proposal Data Sheet.

1.3 Access to the Solicitation. The solicitation is available by INTERNET ACCESS ONLY. All solicitation documents will be posted to the FedBizOpps (FBO) website at www.fedbizopps.gov. All amendments to the solicitation (if any) will be posted to FBO. It shall be the Offeror’s responsibility to check the websites for any amendments or updates. The Offeror shall submit in its proposal all required information specified in the Request for Proposal solicitation.

1.4 Request for Information. Any questions or comments regarding this solicitation shall be submitted via email to Eric P. Thor, Contract Specialist, at eric.p.thor@usace.army.mil with copy furnished to Yolanda C. Harlan, Contracting Officer, at yolanda.c.harlan@usace.army.mil. These are the only individuals to whom questions should be addressed. Questions and comments relative to the solicitation shall be submitted no later than 26 July 2017 at 2:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time so they may be given adequate consideration, or appropriate actions taken, prior to receipt of proposals.

For questions or comments regarding this solicitation, no means of communication other than email will be accepted. Oral exchanges between Offerors and the Government prior to award of the contract will not be binding. Any additional information concerning this solicitation will be furnished to all Offerors as an amendment posted to the FedBizOpps website.

1.5 Pre-Proposal Conference.

a. A Pre-Proposal Conference will be conducted at 5722 Integrity Drive Millington, Tennessee 38054-5005.

DATE: Monday, 24 July 2017

TIME: 1:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time

b. Attendance at the Pre-Proposal Conference is strongly recommended. During the Pre-Proposal Conference, the requirements set forth in the solicitation will be reviewed and discussed, and part of the conference will include a question and answer period.

c. Those interested in attending will coordinate their visit with Eric Thor, Contract Specialist,via email at eric.p.thor@usace.army.mil.

d. Information obtained during the Pre-Proposal Conference is not contractually binding unless it is included through an amendment and posted in

FBO.

1.6 Proposal Submission Address and Deadline. Proposals shall be submitted to the U.S. Army Humphrey’s Engineer Center Activity (HECSA) at the address shown in Block 9 of Standard Form 1449 (SF1449) in this solicitation. The Government must receive proposal submission no later than the time and date specified in Block 8 of the SF1449. Any and all amendments to the solicitation shall be acknowledged by completion of Block 30a of the SF 1449.

Hand carried proposal submissions shall be delivered to the U.S. Army Humphrey’s Engineer Center Activity, 7701 Telegraph Road, Building 2593, Alexandria, VA 22315- 3864, ATTN: Eric P. Thor, Contract Specialist, at eric.p.thor@usace.army.mil and to

Yolanda C. Harlan, Contracting Officer, at yolanda.c.harlan@usace.army.mil. Hand carried proposal submissions will not be accepted at any other location. Offerors must coordinate with Contract Specialist Eric P. Thor at eric.p.thor@usace.army.mil for access and delivery of hand carried proposal submissions. Only a procurement official from the HECSA Center Contracting Office will accept the proposal package and sign a delivery receipt provided by the individual delivering the package. HECSA Contracting Office operating hours are 0800-1700, Monday-Friday, excluding holidays. Offerors are cautioned to allow ample time for processing through security to access Federal facilities, which must be accomplished prior to delivery of proposals to the designated place for receipt. Hand carried submissions must be delivered to HECSA and received by a procurement official from the Contracting Office by the specified proposal due date and time. Facsimile or email transmissions will not be accepted.

Period of Acceptance for Offeror. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, as identified in block 8 of the solicitation.

1.7 Proposal Submission Requirements.

1.7.1 To effectively and equitably evaluate proposals, the Government must receive information sufficiently detailed and in the order described below that clearly describe an Offeror's capabilities. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to submit complete proposal information and documents that are fully responsive to the submission requirements of the solicitation. Offerors are responsible for organizing submitted material sequentially under tabs and numbered pages to facilitate evaluation. Materials not organized under the appropriate tabs and in the sequence of subparagraphs set out below, may easily be overlooked during evaluations, possibly affecting an Offeror’s rating.

Submit proposals in the format and quantities as indicated below. Proposals shall be comprised of five volumes, and submitted in paper copy and electronic form, as indicated below.

a. TECHNICAL VOLUMES. Organize the technical proposal as follows:

Volume I - Seed Task Order Project Technical Approach

Volume II - Experience/Past Performance

Volume III - Management Approach, Key Personnel, and Transition Plan TAB A: Management Approach

TAB B: Key Personnel TAB C: Transition Plan

Volume IV – Price Volume V – Administrative Requirements

• For each proposal volume, submit an original and 4 copies for a total of 5 copies.

• Submit each paper copy of each volume in separate, 3-ring binders, labeled on the spine and front cover with the solicitation number, date, and Contractor’s name

• Submit written proposals in 8 ½” x 11” format, 1-inch margins, with 12-point or larger font size, single spaced. Each paragraph should be separated by at least one blank line. Arial or Times New Roman fonts are required

• Spreadsheets, table, charts, etc. may be 11” x 17”, but will count as two pages.

Tables and illustrations may be landscape, and may use a reduced font size of no less than 10-point

• No Price Information is to be submitted in Volumes I, II, III, or V

b. PRICE VOLUME. Submit the price proposal in Volume IV as follows:

• Submit an original version and 3 copies for a total of 4 printed copies

• Submit each copy of the Volume IV proposal in a separate, 3-ring binder

• Paper copies of the worksheets may be 8-1/2” x 11” and foldouts shall not exceed 11” x 17”

• Worksheets are to be printed 1-sided and in color.

• In the footer of each Excel worksheet, provide date, solicitation number, and company name

• In the original price proposal binder, submit 1 electronic copy of the Price

Proposal Workbook in the native files (read only files) on a compact disc (CD) using the Excel Workbook issued by the Government

• No technical information shall be included in the Price Volume

c. BOUND VOLUMES. All bound volumes (Volumes I-V) shall include the following:

• A cover page that includes the volume number, solicitation number, firm name and address, business size, CAGE code, and a point of contact for all correspondence related to the proposal. Include the phone number and the email address

• Table of Contents

• List of tables/figures

• Solicitation number should appear on each page

• Volume number and page number should appear in the bottom right corner of each page. Include the proposal revision number for the amended page, if amended

d. ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

• Submit one electronic copy of the entire proposal (Volume I-V) in a Portable Document File (PDF) format on compact disk (CD) with the initial proposal

• Information submitted in the paper copy format takes precedence over the information provided in the CD’s in case of a conflict

• Submit one CD containing Volumes I, II, III, and V. Submit a second CD containing Volume IV. Submit both CDs in an envelope labeled with the solicitation number, date, Offeror’s name and project name and location

• Label the CD with the project name, company name, solicitation number and the date

• Page Limitation. Only pages of a proposal within the respective page limits as follows will be evaluated:

Volume I – shall not exceed 60 pages (30 sheets double sided) Volume II – shall not exceed 60 pages (30 sheets double sided) Volume III – shall not exceed 30 pages (15 sheets double sided) Volume IV – no page limit Volume V – no page limit

NOTE: It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the compact disk (CD) and all files contained therein are readable, complete, and accessible without password.

The digital files shall be provided in a word searchable PDF format. Pricing worksheets shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel, Version 2010 compatible, with formulas accessible. If the electronic copy and hard copy of the proposal differ, the hard copy will govern. Zip disks are not permitted. Each disc should be externally labeled with the volume(s) number(s), date, solicitation number and the Offeror’s name.

*** Self extracting exe files are not acceptable.

2.0 Technical Evaluation Factors.

2.1 VOLUME I - Seed Task Order Project/Technical Approach

Offerors shall submit a proposal response to the Seed Task Order that includes the Offeror’s proposed level of effort using the provided format in the addendum to the 1449, and the technical approach to performing the requirement as described in the Task Order Performance Work Statement. Technical approach narratives may be enhanced with charts, tables, or any logical means of conveying the proposed technical approach that the Offeror will use to accomplish the work. Broad general statements that merely mimic the solicitation, repeat, paraphrase, or promise general performance are not sufficient.

2.2 VOLUME II - Experience/Past Performance

The Offeror that signs the SF1449 is to provide its past performance information regarding recent and relevant efforts and the quality of those efforts to demonstrate accomplishments and capabilities to successfully perform and accomplish the effort required by this RFP. There are two aspects to the past performance information to be submitted: (a) Relevant Company Effort and (b) Quality of Past Performance.

2.2.1 RELEVANT COMPANY EFFORT. The Offeror shall submit no more than five (5) examples of its most “recent” and “relevant” project efforts performed to demonstrate its company’s accomplishments on contracts similar to the effort required in this solicitation. Efforts are considered “Recent” if their performance occurred within the last five years. For each “recent” and “relevant” project example, the Offeror shall furnish the information specified below. If the Offeror is submitting “task order type projects”, each single task order project shall be submitted on a separate project data sheet. Do not combine tasks orders and present them as one entire project. As a minimum, provide the following information:

a. Required Information

(1) Company Name

(2) Name of Project

(3) Location of Project

(4) Owner’s Name and Owner's Point of Contact, (telephone, e-mail)

(5) General Scope of Project/Contract Work as it relates to the PWS of this solicitation, including project size, complexity, and any distinctive and/or unique features of the project)

(6) Offeror’s Role (Prime, Subcontractor, Joint Venture Partner, etc.) and the type of work your company self-performed

(7) Contract Type (e.g., performance based, Firm-Fixed-Price, etc.)

(8) Contract Award Date (Month/Year); Completion Date of the Base Year:

(Month/Year); Completion of option years (Month/Year)

(9) If this contract is being performed under an option year the completion date of the current option being performed: (Provide Month/Year)

(10) Contract Dollar Value - Base Year Price and Total Price (Base Year and all Options)

(11) Type and Extent of Work Subcontracted

(12) The Approach to the Operational Services

(13) How the Project was Managed (e.g., oversight, schedule, quality, property management, safety, etc.)

(14) Termination or Liquidated Damages Information (comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions)

b. QUALITY OF PAST PERFORMANCE.

(1) The Offeror shall submit evidence of the quality of its past performance on the projects submitted in paragraph 2.2.1 (a). The Offeror shall provide a completed Contractor performance evaluation, whether annual or final, found in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (www.ppirs.gov). If a completed Contractor performance evaluation does not exist in PPIRS (example, non-U.S. Government projects), the Offeror shall provide completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (see Appendix A). If, at time of evaluation, a completed Contractor performance evaluation exists in PPIRS that conflicts with a submitted PPQ, the completed contractor performance evaluation will govern.

(2) Any past performance surveys/assessment/evaluation forms, other than PPIRS or the PPQ form provided at the end of this section, are unacceptable submissions by the Offeror to evidence the quality of its past performance and will not be considered or evaluated.

(3) Completed PPIRS or PPQs that were submitted in response to previous solicitations may be used in this source selection. However, Offerors shall not incorporate any PPIRS or PPQs by merely referencing other proposals.

A copy of the PPIRS or PPQ must accompany the company effort submitted under Experience/Past Performance in paragraph 2.2.1(a). While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

(4) If an Offeror has been required to take corrective action for any substandard performance, other performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc., the Offeror should explain the circumstances and the corrective actions taken.

(5) If a project owner will only provide completed PPQ’s and/or PPIRS directly to the U.S. Army Humphrey’s Engineering Center, it is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the project owner submits the PPQ and/or PPIRS before the proposal due date using the following electronic mailing addresses:

Eric P. Thor at eric.p.thor@usace.army.mil with copy furnished to Yolanda C. Harlan at yolanda.c.harlan@usace.army.mil

PPQ’s and/or PPIRS received after the proposal receipt date will not be considered timely and will not be included in the Offeror’s proposal.

2.2.1.1 Joint Venture Submission Requirements. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as the offering Joint Venture. The Offeror must provide up to five (5) “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV’s ability to perform the work as required by Paragraph 2.2.1 subparagraphs (a) and (b).

2.2.1.2 If the Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the JV to meet the requirement, the Offeror must provide those “recent”, “relevant” projects that they have performed as the JV, and then supplement the record with additional “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by each JV member in their individual capacities. In such instance, each JV member must satisfy the requirement, to include any work performed as the JV.

2.2.1.3 If the JV has no “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV, then each member of the JV must provide up to five (5) “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV member that reflect the JV member’s ability to perform the work as required by Paragraph 2.2.1.

2.2.2 Verification: The Government reserves the right to verify the past performance record of cited projects (or other recent projects not submitted) by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), or other Government appraisal systems, or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

An Offeror will be afforded the opportunity to reply to or explain adverse performance information which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to address.

2.2.3 Teaming Submission Requirements. Offerors proposing with subcontractor or Team Partners shall provide a Teaming Agreement fully executed by all parties that identifies the subcontractor Teaming Partner(s) company name, DUNS number, and SAM verification, and clearly states the subcontractor’s commitment to perform on this contract and the type of work to be provided as part of the Team.

The Prime Contractor must provide up to five (5) “recent”, “relevant” projects that reflect the Offeror’s ability to perform the work as required by Paragraph 2.2.1 subparagraphs (a) and (b). Additionally, the Offeror must provide up to five (5) “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by each proposed Teaming Partner that reflect the Teaming Partner’s ability to perform the work identified in the Teaming Agreement.

Only the experience and past performance information for the Prime Contractor and major Subcontractors performing at least 25% percent of the work for this factor shall be submitted. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major Subcontractors to allow disclosure of past performance information to the Offeror.

2.3 VOLUME III – Management Approach, Key Personnel, and Transition Plan TAB A: Management Approach TAB B: Key Personnel TAB C: Transition Plan

TAB A - Management Plan – The Offeror shall describe its staffing structure and include an organizational chart that clearly shows the management team and lines of authority and communication.

TAB B – Personnel – Offerors shall propose the Key Personnel identified by the Government for this requirement and submit resumes demonstrating the appropriate education and experience. Resumes should include proposed job title, education, certifications held, special qualifications, and experience (listing the job title, specific duties, responsibilities and the respective dates). The Offeror shall submit letters of commitment for all key personnel.

The Key Personnel as identified in the PWS:

Labor Category Responsibilities Qualifications Project Manager Provides day-to-day management of all project activities under the task order.

Manages and reports project schedule and performance.

Manages personnel staffing and other administrative functions to meet established performance objectives.

Years of Relevant Experience: 10+ Education: Master’s or Bachelor's Degree Certifications: No minimum required. Certification in project management (e.g., PMP) desired.

Skills/Experience: Project Management experience managing day-to-day operations across the project lifecycle.

Location: Must be within the USACE Millington Site.

Senior Oracle DBA Responsible for the design, implementation and maintenance of production and non-production databases in compliance with application specifications and applicable policies, standards and procedures. Designs and maintains access and security administration. Designs, implements and maintains backup and recovery strategies Troubleshoots alerts and performance issues. Supports multiple services and multiple databases of high complexity with multiple concurrent users, ensuring control, integrity and accessibility of data.

Years of Relevant Experience: 10+ Education: Bachelor's Degree Certifications: CISSP, Security+, or similar certification Skills/Experience: Experience as an Oracle DBA managing large Oracle databases and depth knowledge of Oracle performance and tuning.

System Engineer/Architect Defines and develops systems architecture from customer requirements. Possesses understanding of system requirements and Federal and DoD architecture standards.

Capable of analyzing moderate to complex solutions and interpreting requirements into architectural artifacts.

Years of Relevant Experience: 10+ Education: Bachelor's Degree Certifications: No minimum required.

Skills/Experience: Experience leading design and systems architecture development using Federal/DoD architecture standards.

Senior Forms Developer

Maintains and compiles Oracle Forms, Libraries, and Menus in UNIX environment. Interprets software design specifications and translates them into Oracle Forms. Develops and unit tests Oracle Forms. Develops and maintains Oracle queries, stored procedures, functions, and packages using SQL Developer. Integrates modules with other modules and external systems.

Mentors and transfers technical knowledge to employee staff as necessary.

Years of Relevant Experience: 7+ Education: Bachelor's Degree Certifications: No minimum Skills/Experience: Experience with developing Oracle forms using Oracle SQL language skills in the current version of Oracle (11g or 12c).

Senior Java Developer

Design, develop, implement and maintain user-facing interfaces code and internet applications. Integrates applications by designing database architecture and server scripting;

studying and establishing connectivity with network systems, search engines, and information servers. Determine design methodologies and tools sets.

Years of Relevant Experience: 5+ Education: Bachelor's Degree Certifications: No minimum Skills/Experience: Proven working experience with Java development (HTML, CCS and Javascripting) and a strong understanding of Java and Java web applications. Working knowledge of JDBC, SQL and database-stored

Drive best practices, quality and consistency within design and development phases and coordinates efforts with fellow teammates. Identify production and non-production application features, limitations and issues. Identify opportunities to fine-tune and optimize applications of java developed projects. Provide technical support and consultation for java application and infrastructure questions.

Establish, refine and integrate development and test environment tools and software as needed. Supports continuous improvement by investigating alternatives and new technologies and presenting these for architectural review.

Develop and execute unit test plans to ensure compliance with specifications.

Support formal testing and resolve test defects.

procedures. Familiar with Oracle Application Development Framework

(ADF).

TAB C - Transition Plan. The Offeror shall submit a transition plan that clearly describes the process, details, and schedule for providing an orderly transition to minimize impact on the continuity of operations, and maintaining effective communication throughout the transition period. The transition plan should identify potential barriers to transition and suggest solutions to the same.

3.0 VOLUME IV – Price

Offerors shall submit a price proposal for the overall IDIQ contract to include a total compensation plan that lists salaries and fringe benefits proposed for the professional employees who will work under the contract. Supporting information shall include recognized national and regional compensation surveys and studies of professional, public, and private organizations used in establishing the total compensation structure.

The total compensation plan should indicate the capability of the proposed compensation structure to obtain and keep suitably qualified personnel to meet mission objectives. The salary rates must take into account differences in skills, complexity of various disciplines, and professional job difficulty. The IDIQ SATOC Personnel Price Model is provided as an attachement in the FBO posting.

In the price proposal, the Offeror shall fully complete the Seed Task Order Price Model with labor rates for the Base and Option Years that will include the Unit Price and Level of Effort. Price will be binding for all 66 months. The Offeror is responsible for the accuracy of all data input, formulas, and calculations.

The Seed Task Order Price Model Key Personnel labor rates and the other Labor Categories apply to the IDIQ SATOC Base and Option Years. All proposed prices shall be binding. Labor categories included in the Government Price Model shall be priced for each Labor Category. However, Offerors may substitute labor categories with equivalent titles/categories and identify the substitutions in the Price Model. The first five labor categories listed in the Price Model are identified as Key Personnel. The Offeror is responsible for the accuracy of all data input, formulas, and calculations.

The Personnel Price Model is provided as an attachment in the FBO Posting.

4.0 VOLUME V - ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS. The Offeror shall submit the following in the manner indicated in the Proposal Submission Requirements:

4.1 Signed and dated Standard Form 1449, acknowledging any and all amendments by completing Block 30a of the SF1449

4.2 Proposal Data Sheet Completed and Signed (Appendix B)

4.3 Personnel Price Model for the SATOC and the SEED Task Order Completed (Provided as an attachment in the FBO Posting)

4.4 Complete Representation and Certifications contained at FAR Clause 52.212-3 or provide a copy from the Offeror’s SAM registration

4.5 One compact disk of the entire proposal

4.6 Agreements.

4.6.1 Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable): If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, a copy of the fully executed Joint Venture Agreement must be provided. When submitting a proposal as a Joint Venture, each member of the Joint Venture must complete the Representations and Certifications unless the Joint Venture Agreement designates one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the Joint Venture. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may render the proposal non-responsive. For 8(a) Joint Ventures, the Offeror shall also submit evidence that it has notified the appropriate SBA Servicing office regarding the proposed Joint Venture and that it has submitted the Joint Venture Agreement for approval. If the proposing Joint Venture is operating under a Mentor Protégé Agreement (MPA), the fully executed and approved MPA must be submitted.

4.6.2 Teaming Agreements (if applicable): Offerors proposing as a Prime Contractor supported by Team Partners under a Teaming Arrangement must submit a fully executed Teaming Agreement that identifies the subcontractor Teaming Partner’s company name, DUNS number, and SAM verification, and clearly states the subcontractor’s commitment to perform on this contract and the work to be provided as part of the Team. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may impact the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal.

4.7 Financial Statements. Provide a current financial statement of the Offeror, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or by an authorized officer of the organization. If the financial statement is more than 60 days old, a certificate must be attached stating that the company’s financial condition is substantially the same or, if not the same, what changes have occurred. Such statements will be treated as confidential by the Government.

4.8 Bank Information. Offeror shall provide the following information regarding its current Banking Institution:

• Name

• Address

• Point of Contact

• Fax Number

• Phone Number

52.212-2 -- EVALUATION

FAR 52.212-2 – EVALUATION – COMMERICAL ITEMS

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: See Addendum Below.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced.

Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

FAR 52.212-2 – EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS FOR AWARD – ADDENDUM

1.0 Evaluation Process

1.1 A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB), composed of representatives from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), will evaluate the proposals. The SSEB, which is comprised of a technical evaluation team and a price team, will utilize technical advisors in the evaluation process, as necessary. The number and identities of Offerors will not be revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process.

1.2 The evaluation process consists of four parts:

(1) Proposal compliance review;

(2) Volumes I-III, Technical proposal evaluations;

(3) Volume IV Price analysis; and

(4) Technical-price tradeoff analysis.

1.2.1 Proposal Compliance Review: This is a review by the Contracting Office to ensure that all required Volumes, forms, certifications, etc., are complete and all administrative requirements are met in accordance with the Request for Proposal

(RFP).

1.2.2 Technical Evaluations: Without knowledge of price, the SSEB Technical Evaluation Team, will evaluate the technical proposals received from the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). The technical evaluation consists of an evaluation and adjective rating of all source selection factors. The rating systems and definitions used for the technical evaluations are in this Section.

1.2.3 Price Evaluation. Price will be analyzed using price analysis and realism. Price is not rated with an adjective rating, and will not be revealed to the Technical Evaluation Team until they have completed evaluation and rating of the technical proposals.

1.2.4 Performance/Technical-Price Tradeoff Analysis: Upon completion of the evaluations, the SSEB will consider and compare the proposed prices in connection with the technical evaluations to make recommendations to the SSA regarding advantage to the Government. The tradeoff analysis will be conducted after evaluations of initial offers if discussions are not necessary or, upon completion of the technical and price evaluations of the final proposal revisions, if discussions are necessary.

2.0 Evaluation Criteria

2.1 Evaluation Criteria for Factor 1 – Seed Task Order Project Technical Approach The Offeror shall be evaluated on its demonstrated technical approach to respond to the Seed Task Order. The Offeror must submit a narrative to describe its technical approach for the Seed Task Order described in the solicitation.

2.1.1 Address each of the following items, in a narrative format:

Offeror shall be evaluated on its ability to support the full system development life cycle.

Offeror shall be evaluated on their knowledge of the Agile Development Process and the ability to utilize agile development methodologies. The Offeror must demonstrate knowledge of Oracle Database Administration, UNIX and System Administration, Electronic Signature Software, Configuration Management, Cybersecurity, and the ability to migrate CEFMS to new system architecture using Oracle Products such as:

Multitenant Databases, Real Application Clusters, Oracle Golden Gate, Oracle Advance Security, Oracle Advance Compression, Oracle Access Manager and Oracle DataGuard. The Offeror shall be evaluated on its demonstrated knowledge of Oracle Business Intelligence Migration, Development and Maintenance based on Knowledge of DoD and Civil Works financial management laws, regulations, policies and generally accepted accounting standards.

Offeror must demonstrate knowledge of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) policies and Federal financial management systems requirements. Offeror must demonstrate knowledge of U.S. Treasury USSGL pro-forma logic and rules for both proprietary and budgetary general ledgers. Offeror must demonstrate understanding of Oracle products and the ability to draw upon additional resources and maintain a “reach-back” knowledge base capability that can be utilized as needed. Offeror must demonstrate knowledge of Federal financial accounting transactions to include proprietary and budgetary general ledgers, as well as knowledge of DoD End-to End (E2E) Integration framework and business processes. The Offeror shall also be evaluated on the experience and qualifications of the key personnel as required in accordance with Performance Work Statement (PWS).

The Government will evaluate the strengths, significant strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses and any deficiencies in the Offeror’s technical approach. The Government will evaluate how well an Offeror’s proposed seed project technical approach adequately describes their procedures, methods, and delivery of services that meet or exceeds the Government’s minimum requirements.

2.1.2 Combined Technical/Risk Rating Scheme. For Factors 1 and 3, when Combined Technical/Risk Rating will be assigned to reflect the degree to which the proposal meets or does not meet the minimum capabilities and performance requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weakness, deficiencies, and risk of a proposal. The factor will receive one of the following combined technical/risk ratings described below.

2.2 Evaluation Criteria for Factor 2 – Experience/Past Performance

2.2.1 In Factor 2, there are two aspects of experience/past performance information of the Prime Contractor/Offeror:

(a) Relevant Company Effort

(b) Quality of Past Performance.

The past performance information of the Prime Contractor named on the signed Standard Form 1449 submitted in Volume II, will be evaluated in combination with all the other required information submitted in Factor 2.

2.2.2. The Government will evaluate and rate Factor 2 – Experience/Past Performance Information, using a two rating scheme process, as described below.

2.2.2.1 Evaluation of Past Performance Information. This is a three-step evaluation process. The SSEB Technical Team will first review all past performance

TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Color Rating Description

Blue Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

information submitted in the proposal for compliance with the submission criteria found in solicitation provision FAR 52.212-1 Paragraph 2.2. A compliant project is a recent project that has both (a) the “Relevant Company Effort” and (b) the required PPIRS or PPQ record of quality. Only RFP compliant projects will be included in step two, Past Performance Relevancy Rating. The SSEB will compare each compliant effort to the effort to be acquired, reach a consensus, and assign a relevancy rating.

The SSEB will also evaluate the quality of the effort accomplished. The SSEB determines relevancy and, in making this determination, the following definitions for relevancy will apply:

TABLE 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/Past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/Past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/Past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

2.2.2.2 When the recent/relevant performance record indicates performance quality problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the appropriateness and effectiveness of any corrective action taken (not just planned or promised). An Offeror shall be given the opportunity to address any problems that they have not previously had an opportunity.

2.2.2.3 Based on the Past Performance Relevancy assessment phase of the evaluation, the SSEB will conduct the third step in the evaluation process which is the overall Performance Confidence Assessment rating. The overall Performance Confidence Assessment rating is an overall rating which takes into consideration the level of relevancy of each recent, rated project, the quality ratings of those rated projects, and the general trend of the recent, rated efforts have to the effort required by this RFP. The more relevant the recent projects are, the stronger predictor of successful performance. If the Offeror is submitting as a Joint Venture (JV), the SSEB will utilize the information submitted to conduct the relevancy rating and performance confidence assessment ratings of the JV, as previously stated in 2.2.1(b).

Based on the information submitted by the JV Offeror, the SSEB will evaluate and assess:

(1) The JV’s “Past Performance Information” and/or

(2) Each JV partners’ “Past Performance Information” and any past performance information that is recent/relevant to the JV or relevant to each partner of the JV

The overall Performance Confidence Assessment Rating reflects…