Amendment R0004 - Barracks.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to reflect replacing Section 00 21 00 and 00 22 00, include revised draw ings and specs, and extend closing date to 17 April 2023. Offerors are required to acknow ledge the amendments and submit w ith their proposal. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW23R2001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Mar-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

U0004

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Apr-2023

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW23R2001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 13-Apr-2023 02:00 PM to 17-Apr-2023 12:00 AM.

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS

seSECTION 00 21 00

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK

1.2 MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION

1.3 SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS

1.4 GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

1.5 COPIES OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS

1.6 OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

1.7 SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE

1.8 PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS

1.9 SITE VISIT

1.10 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS

1.11 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS

1.12 PROPOSAL FORMAT

1.13 BID GUARANTEE

1.14 JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Seattle District has a requirement to design and construct a new three

– story, 150-person, barracks located at Joint Base Lewis McChord (JBLM), Washington. The primary facilities include living, sleeping quarters, baths, storage, services areas, information system, fire protection, alarm system, Energy Monitoring Control Systems (EMCS) connection, and cybersecurity measures. Supporting facilities includes Site development such as demolition, utility connections, electrical power, telecommunications, streetlights, pedestrian lights, site lighting, street paving, road improvements, parking, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, potable water, stormwater, wastewater, information systems, landscaping, signage and sport courts, heating and air conditioning will be provided by a self-contained system utilizing the base’s available energy utilities.

Comprehensive building and furnishing related interior design services are required.

1.2 MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION:

In accordance with DFARS 236.204(ii), the magnitude of construction for this project is between $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

1.3 SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS:

FAR Clause 52.232-18 “Availability of Funds,” (APR 1984) Funds are not presently available for this contract. The Government’s obligation under this contract is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for contract purposes can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer for this contract and until the Contractor receives notice of such availability, to be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer.

1.4 GOVERNMENT SECURITY REQUIREMENTS:

The only authorized transmission method for submission in response to this solicitation is electronically. NO

OTHER TRANSMISSION METHODS (FACSIMILE, REGULAR MAIL, HAND CARRIED, ETC.) WILL BE

ACCEPTED at the Government’s physical location. The Offeror’s proposal shall not contain classified data.

1.5 COPIES OF RFP DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS:

Copies of the RFP and amendments will be distributed by INTERNET ONLY.

The Offeror shall submit the proposal with all requested information specified in this RFP. There will be no public opening of the proposals received as a result of this RFP.

NOTE: PIEE.gov is the official U.S. Government website for Contract Opportunities.

The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this RFP.

1.6 OFFEROR'S QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS:

All inquiries regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via ProjNet (See below). Telephone and email inquiries will not be accepted. ProjNet is a web-based program that allows offerors to post questions regarding the solicitation and to view all questions by other offerors and answers by the government.

BIDDER INQUIRY (ProjNet):

1. Technical inquiries and questions relating to bid procedures or bonds are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in

ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet.

a. To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this RFP listed below, and your e-mail address, click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and then click continue.

b. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

c. Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

d. The RFP Number is: W912DW23R2001.

e. The Bidder Inquiry Key is: V4UUHY-BWGDXB

2. The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable for new inquires three (3) business days prior to bid submission in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the RFP, if necessary.

3. Offerors are requested to review the specification in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

4. The call center operates weekdays from 8AM to 5PM U.S. Central Time Zone (Chicago). ProjNet Call Center numbers: 833-389-1097 and 217-367-3273 or email: staff@projnet.info (preferred)

5. Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals.

1.7. SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD/NAICS CODE:

See Section 00 45 00, FAR Provision 52.204-8 for the small business size standard/NAICS Code.

1.8. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRE-CONTRACT COSTS:

This Request for Proposal (RFP) does not commit the Government to pay, as a direct charge, any costs incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal.

1.9 SITE VISIT:

An organized site visit has been scheduled. See Section 00 21 00, FAR provision 52.236-27 Alt 1, Site Visit (Construction). Offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where construction is to be performed and to satisfy themselves as to all general and local conditions which may affect the cost of performance of the contract, to the extent, such information is reasonably obtainable. In no event, will a failure to inspect the site constitute grounds for a claim after award of the contract.

1.10 ACCURACY IN PROPOSALS:

Proposals must set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this RFP, (including attachments).

The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

1.11 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS:

Instructions for Proposal:

In an effort to reduce paperwork and cost, your proposal shall be submitted electronically through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module at https://piee.eb.mil/. When posting an offer, ensure electronic files are clearly identified with the solicitation number, company name, volume, section, and or/item. The minimum required naming format for files is as follows:

Solicitation Number_Company Name_Item

Offers will not be accepted if submitted by mail or hand carried and will not be evaluated. Offers sent through proprietary or third party File Transfer Protocol (FTP) sites or DoD SAFE will not be accepted. The Offeror is responsible to confirm the offer has been received. All offers received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as late submissions and will not be considered except under facts and circumstances allowed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the solicitation.

For PIEE registration, training, and instructions for posting an offer, refer to the following links:

PIEE Registration_ https://piee.eb.mil/

Note: There are two vendor roles (Proposal Manager, Proposal View Only) for PIEE Solicitation Module.

The Proposal Manager role is required to submit an offer to a solicitation. Please be advised that when using the PIEE Solicitation Module, the user’s email address in PIEE must match the email address on file in https://piee.eb.mil.

PIEE Solicitation Module_

Training and instructions are accessible through PIEE – Web Based Training (WBT) at https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/ (For instructions specific to posting an offer, select ‘Solicitation Module’ -- ‘Proposals (Offers)’ – ‘Posting Offer’)

For Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and additional training, go to the DoD Procurement Toolbox – eBusiness -- Solicitation Module at https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/solicitation-module

In the unlikely event the PIEE system and/or Solicitation Module is not operational, and the offeror is unable to access or use the system, the Offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist.

Notification must occur prior to the submission deadline and shall be in writing through authorized email identified in the solicitation. If an alternate method for offer submission is authorized via email due to system outages, the Offeror must obtain prior approval from the Contracting Officer to use the alternate submission method.

Ensure all documentation submitted meets supported file extensions identified in PIEE FAQs. Narrative portions of the offer shall be in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF) searchable text format. Embedded sound or video (e.g., MPEG) files are not authorized and shall not be included.

1.12 PROPOSAL FORMAT:

a) Volume I – offeror’s Technical Proposal shall include the following sections, in the gerneral format specified below:

Table of conent for Volume I – (listing of all sections of the technical proposal) Tab A – which contains submittal for Factor A – Team Personnel.

Tab B which contains submittals for Factor B – Past Performance.

Pre-Award Information found at back of section 00 45 00 (filled out in its entirety).

b) Volume II – offeror’s Price Proposal shall include the following, in the general format specified below:

Corporate Certificate Standard Form (SF) 1442 and Price Schedule.

Bid Guarantee.

Joint Venture Agreement (If applicable).

1.13 BID GUARANTEE:

Bid Bonds (SF24) must be accompanied by a Power of Attorney containing an original OR electronic signature from the surety, which must be affixed to the Power of Attorney after the Power of Attorney has been generated.

Computer generated and signed Powers of Attorney will be accepted if accompanied by a certification from a current officer of the surety attesting to its authenticity and continuing validity.

Digital scans, or photographed or otherwise reproduced images, of ink signatures are not considered acceptable "electronic signatures." If a required submitted document does not contain electronic signatures, you must submit original hard-copy documents. Current SF24 forms are available at the following website:

http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/type/TOP.

1.14 JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS:

When proposing as a joint venture, all members of the joint venture shall sign the SF 1442 and the bid bond, unless a written agreement by the joint venture is furnished with the proposal designating one firm with the authority to bind the other member(s) of the joint venture. In addition, a copy of the fully-signed, Joint Venture agreement shall be submitted with the price proposal. Failure to comply with the foregoing requirements may eliminate the proposal from further consideration. If this is an 8(a), SDVOSB or HubZone joint venture, the Offeror shall ensure that it complies with the applicable requirements of 13 CFR Part 124, 13 CFR Part 125 and 13 CFR Part 126, respectively.

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

BASE OF AWARD AND EVALUATION

SECTION 00 22 00

BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 BASIS OF AWARD

Award of this Contract will be made to the technically acceptable responsible Offer submitting the lowest priced offer – Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA). This acquisition will result in the award of a firm-fixed price, construction contract.

The technical evaluation of each proposal will be solely on the basis of Technical Evaluation Factors found in this section. The Government will evaluate each proposal on a technically acceptable/ unacceptable basis only with respect to the technical evaluation factors (criteria) described herein. Award will be to the Offer who presents the technically acceptable proposal with the overall total lowest reasonable price. It is the intent of the Government to award off initial offers without discussions.

2.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

2.1 Technical Evaluation:

Technical acceptability of your proposal will be based on all Factors receiving an acceptable rating by the Government (Please see the evaluation method of each Factor below of how “acceptability” will be determined) and other requirements of the RFP. The proposal will be evaluated according to the criteria for each Non-Price Evaluation Factor of this section.

Proposals will receive either an acceptable or an unacceptable rating for each of the evaluation factors. Find the description of the Technical Ratings in Table 1.

Table 1: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:

Rating: Description:

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS:

The evaluation process consists of three parts:

1. Proposal Compliance Review. This is an initial review to ensure all required forms and certifications are complete, and a complete proposal is received. The initial review of each of the proposals will be conducted to check for apparent errors, omissions and areas which require clarification. The purpose of this preliminary review session is to eliminate minor irregularities or apparent clerical mistakes. This preliminary evaluation will ensure each proposal contains the Volume I (Technical) and Volume II (Price) separately and the correct number of copies.

2. Team Personnel and Past Performance. Team Personnel and Past Performance will be evaluated according to the CRITERIA for Non-Price Evaluation Factors found within this section.

Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate price for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis. Price will also be verified for unbalancing of line items.

3.1 Definitions:

Clarification are limited exchanges between the Government and Offerors that may occur when award without discussion is contemplated.

Communications are exchanges, between the Government and Offerors, after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range.

Discussions are exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the Offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(d).

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) is a process used in competitive negotiated contracting where the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. See FAR 15.101-2.

Recent - Submitted project(s) completed within the past six years from the solicitation issue date.

Source Selection is the process used in competitive, negotiated contracting to select the proposal that offers the best value to the Government.

Similar Scope/Size – projects which must, at minimum, have contract costs of $25M (or greater) on DOD installations.

Complexity – projects that clearly demonstrate multi-story construction with progressive collapse.

Year – A “year” is 365 consecutive days.

3.2 Bid Guarantee:

Please see provision 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee (SEP 1996), in Section 00 21 00.

3.3 Submission Format: (Please refer to Section 00 21 00, paragraph 1.12 Proposal Format).

All proposal materials shall be submitted electronically through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module at https://piee.eb.mil. The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified below in Volume I: Technical Proposal, and Volume II: Price Proposal.

1. Volume I - Offeror’s Technical Proposal shall include the following sections, in the general format

Table of Contents for Volume I - (Listing of all sections of the technical proposal) Tab A which contains submittal for Factor A – Team Personnel.

Tab B which contains submittal for Factor B – Past Performance.

Pre-Award Information found at back of Section 00 45 00 (filled out in its entirety).

2. Volume II – Offeror’s Price Proposal shall include the following, in the general format specified below:

NOTE: Offeror’s Price Proposal is due AT THE SAME TIME as Technical Proposal.

4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.1 CRITERIA for Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Proposals shall concisely, accurately, and completely provide the information required for each of the following non-price evaluation factors. NOTE: Absence of complete information will be deemed as if no support information was provided for that factor. Proposals which do not meet the minimum requirements of any non-price evaluation factors shall be determined to be UNACCEPTABLE and is not eligible for award consideration.

NO assumptions may be made by the Government. Your proposal must CLEARLY demonstrate the requisite technical experience and qualifications to receive an ACCEPTABLE rating for each of the following criteria:

Table 2: Evaluation Factors: Location: Description:

Factor A Volume 1, Tab A Team Personnel

1. Project Superintendent

2. Project Manager

3. Contractor Quality Control System Manager

4. Commissioning Firm

5. Lead Commissioning Specialist Factor B Volume 1, Tab B Past Performance

5.0 FACTOR A (Volume 1, Tab A) –Team Personnel:

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Offeror shall submit Resumes, training certificates, and letters of commitment to demonstrate the following:

1) Project Superintendent –The resume must demonstrate the Superintendent has a minimum of 10 years of experience in construction with at least five (5) of those years as a superintendent on multi-story construction projects similar in size and complexity.

2) Project Manager – The resume must demonstrate the Project Manager has a bachelor's degree in engineering, architecture, or construction management, with a minimum of five years construction experience with relevant multi-disciplinary and schedule-critical work for projects similar to the scope and complexity of this project; Or at least ten (10) years of experience as a Project Manager with relevant multi-disciplinary and schedule-critical work on projects similar to the scope and complexity of this project.

3) Contractor Quality Control System Manager –The resume must describe previous project experience of the Three Phases of Control – Preparatory Phase, Initial Phase, and Follow-up Phase. Additionally, resume must identify that the individual has one of the following degrees: graduate engineer, graduate architect, or a graduate of construction management, with a minimum of 5 years construction experience on projects similar to the scope and complexity of this project; Or an individual with a minimum of 6 years of experience with multi-story construction on projects similar to the scope and complexity of this project.

4) Commissioning Firm – The resume must demonstrate the Commissioning Firm has achieved certification by one of the following: the AABC Commissioning Group (ACG); the National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB); the International Certification Board/Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing Bureau (ICB/TABB); the Building Commissioning Association (BCA); the Association of Energy Engineers (AEE). Also, submit letter of commitment signed by the commissioning firm.

5) Lead Commissioning Specialist (CxC) –The resume, and certificate(s) must demonstrate the CxC has a minimum of five years of commissioning experience, including two projects of similar size and complexity as this project.

Individual must also have evidence of one of the following: a NEBB qualified Systems Commissioning Administrator (SCA); ACG Certified Commissioning Authority (CxA); ICB/TABB Certified Commissioning Supervisor; BCA Certified Commissioning Professional (CCP); AEE Certified Building Commissioning Professional (CBCP); University of Wisconsin-Madison Qualified Commissioning Process Provider (QCxP);

Building Commissioning Professional (BCxP). Also, submit letter of commitment signed by the commissioning specialist.

Table 3: Factor 1 – Team Personnel Matrix

REQUIRED

SUBMISSIONS

1. Project Superintendent

2. Project Manager

3. Contractor Quality Control System Manager

4. Commissioning Firm

5. Lead Commissioning Specialist

RESUME

X

CERTIFICATIONS

N/A

SIGNED LETTERS OF

COMMITMENT

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will review the extent the proposals meets compliance with Team Personnel qualifications, experience, and training. Offeror compliance to be confirmed by review of submitted resumes, certificates and signed letters of commitment.

Years of experience on projects of similar size and complexity will be measured by indicating on the resume the actual construction start and completion dates (Month/Year).

6.0 FACTOR B (Volume 1, Tab B) – Past Performance:

6.1 Submission Requirements for Factor B:

The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum RFP requirements. This assessment is based on the Offeror’s present/past performance record of recency and relevancy in relation to the specific requirement being procured.

The past performance will be evaluated to determine how well the Offeror performed on the prior contracts.

In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration will be given to what aspects of an offeror’s contract performance history that would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the requirements of the contract that is contemplated to be awarded as a result of the evaluation of proposals in the current procurement.

Second, the past performance evaluation will determine how well the offeror performed on the prior contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

At a minimum, the Government will review past performance information from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), when available.

NOTE: If a CPARS rating is not available, the Offeror must submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for similar project(s). (See Attachment 2 at the back of this section).

An Offeror shall not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS evaluation is available. If both are submitted, only the CPARS will be evaluated. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal ONLY if a CPARS evaluation is not available. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 2), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

If the client requests, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contacts, Mary Hesser, via email at Mary.A.Hesser@usace.army.mil and Susan F. Newby at Susan.F.Newby@usace.army.mil prior to the proposal closing date. The Offeror shall instruct the clients to refer to the RFP number in the subject line. The PPQs are Source Selection materials. All successfully submitted PPQs will receive an e-mail confirmation upon receipt. If the Offeror does not receive the confirmation, it is their responsibility to follow up to ensure the government has received the information before the due date of your proposal.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror. Offeror may provide explanation on problems encountered on past projects and the corrective actions taken by the Offeror.

6.2 Evaluation Method for Factor B:

The Government’s evaluation rating for Factor B of your proposal will be in accordance with Table 5 below:

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror’s past performance may not be evaluated as favorable or unfavorable. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

Table 5: Factor B – Past Performance of Offeror’s Evaluation Rating Rating: Description:

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See Note below)

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

7.0 PRICE:

Price Evaluation:

The prices for the base and optional items will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). Price analysis will be conducted to determine that the overall price offered is fair and reasonable. The prices for the base and optional items will also be checked for unbalancing of line items in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g).

10.0 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS:

The representations and certifications apply to this RFP. The Offeror submitting a proposal in response to this RFP shall fill in the appropriate information and/or check the appropriate boxes for each provision listed in the System for Awards Management (SAM) and complete the Pre-Award Information which can be found in Section 00 45 00.

This information shall be submitted with the Offeror’s Price Proposal.

Contractors are required to be registered in SAM for awards resulting from RFPs.

LACK OF REGISTRATION IN THE SAM DATABASE WILL MAKE AN OFFER INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

The web site may be accessed at www.sam.gov.

SECTION 00 22 00 – ATTACHMENT 1

LETTER OF COMMITMENT

(USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Prime), that (insert name of subcontractor) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project).

Sincerely, (Authorized Official of Prime)

Date:

(Authorized Official of Subprime)

SECTION 00 22 00 – ATTACHMENT 2

THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, or other)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE

OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS

FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE

CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that Contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT:

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the Contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the Contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by Contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the Contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the Contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes:

following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies).

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this Contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

ATTACHMENT 3 - RETURN INFORMATION:

It is preferred that your questionnaire be returned to the Offeror. However, you may also send your completed questionnaire directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at the following address by Regular Mail:

USACE, Seattle District ATTN: CENWS-CTA, Mary Hesser P.O. Box 3755 Seattle, WA 98124-3755

Or by Overnight Mail/FEDEX:

USACE, Seattle District ATTN: CENWS-CTA, Mary Hesser 4735 E. Marginal Way S, Bldg. 1202 Seattle, WA 98134-2385

The questionnaires can also be emailed to both mary.a.hesser@usace.army.mil and susan.f.newby@usace.army.mil.

End of Section 00 22 00

(End of Summary of Changes)

Solicitation W912DW23R2001 - Three Story Barracks - JBLM, Washington

This solicitation is a 100% Small Business Set - Aside.

NAICS Code for this acquisition is 236220, Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, w ith a small business size standard of $39.5 million.

Per DFARS 236.204(ii), the Magnitude of Construction for this project is betw een $25,000,000 and $100,000,000.

MARY A HESSER 206-316-3168

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

13-Mar-2023

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________730 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________17 Apr 2023 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

12:00 AM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

206-764-6817FAX:TEL: 206-316-3168 TEL: FAX:

W912DW23R2001 65

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 01 10 - Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION TITLE

Cover Page

SF1442

00 01 10 Table of Contents

00 10 00 Caution to Offeror, Corporate Certificate and Price Schedule.

00 21 00 Instructions

00 22 00 Basis of Award and Evaluation.

00 45 00 Representations and Certifications, and Pre-Award Information

00 72 00 General Conditions - Contract Clauses

00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions:

Davis-Bacon General Wage Decision No: 20

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

CAUTION

! ! ! C A U T I O N TO O F F E R O R ! ! !

BEFORE SIGNING AND SUBMITTING YOUR OFFER, PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOWING

AS FAILURE TO PERFORM ANY ONE OF THESE ACTIONS MAY CAUSE YOUR OFFER TO BE

REJECTED

1. BUSINESS HOURS: Seattle District Corps of Engineers hours are from 7:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Due to the Covid-19 public health challenges, the business hours and access may change.

2. AMENDMENTS: Have you acknowledged receipt of ALL amendments?

3. AMENDED SECTIONS: If any of the amendments furnished amended sections, the amended sections must be used in submitting your offer.

4. MISTAKE IN OFFER: Have you reviewed your offer price for possible errors in calculation or work left out?

5. OFFER ACCEPTANCE PERIOD: The minimum offer acceptance period is specified in block 13D of the first page of the SF1442, “Solicitation, Offer and Award.” Please ensure that you allow at least the stated number of calendar days for the Government to accept your offer.

6. SAM.GOV: Contractors are required before receipt of contract award to ensure that their entity information is posted at the Government website sam.gov. Ensure all entity information required is current and up to date.

CORPORATE CERTIFICATE

IF THE CONTRACTOR IS A CORPORATION OR PARTNERSHIP, THE

APPLICABLE PORTION OF THE FORM LISTED BELOW MUST BE

COMPLETED. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, OTHER EVIDENCE MUST BE

SUBMITTED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE AUTHORITY OF THE PERSON

SIGNING THE CONTRACT. IF A CORPORATION, THE SAME

OFFICER SHALL NOT EXECUTE BOTH THE CONTRACT AND THE

CERTIFICATE.

CORPORATE CERTIFICATE

I, , certify that I am the

Secretary of the Corporation named as Contractor herein; that

, who signed this contract on behalf of the Contractor was then of said corporation; that said contract was duly signed for and on behalf of said corporation by authority of its governing body and is within the scope of its corporate powers.

(CORPORATE

(Secretary) SEAL)

AUTHORITY TO BIND PARTNERSHIP

This is to certify that the names and signatures of all partners are listed below and that the person signing the contract has authority actually to bind the partnership pursuant to its partnership agreements. Each of the partners individually has full authority to enter into and execute contractual instruments on behalf of said partnership with the United States of America, except as follows: (state "none" or describe limitations, if any)

This authority shall remain in full force and effect until such time as the revocation of authority by any cause whatsoever has been furnished in writing to, and acknowledged by, the Contracting Officer.

(Names and

Signatures of all Partners)

NAME SIGNATURE

PRICE SCHEDULE

PRICE SCHEDULE

CLIN

Item #

Description of Item QTY Unit Unit Price Amount

BASE ITEMS

0001 All work for Construction of UEPH Barracks (Base Building) and all site work within 5-feet of the building.

1 JOB N/A $_________________

0002 All work for Site preparation (Base Site) including demolition and construction of site work, site utilities, roadways, and all other improvements from the construction limits to 5-feet from the building, (excluding the basketball court and associated appurtenances, as described in Optional Item #0007).

1 JOB N/A

0003 All work for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manuals as specified in Section 01 78 23

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

MANUALS from preparation to final approval.

*See Note 6

1 JOB N/A $60,000

0004 All work for As-Built drawings as specified in Section 01 78 00.00 27 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS from preparation to final approval.*See Note 6

1 JOB N/A $25,000

0005 All work for DD 1354 Checklist and Equipment in Place List as specified in Section 01 78 00.00 27 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS from preparation to final approval. * See Note 6

1 JOB N/A $12,000

0006 All costs for work completed by PSE for the relocation of natural gas utility service as specified in Section 33 11 23 NATURAL GAS

AND LIQUID PETROLEUM PIPING.

1 JOB N/A $_________________

TOTAL ALL BASE ITEMS 0001-0006 $_____________________

OPTIONAL ITEMS

0007 All work for construction of basketball court pavement, basketball goals, court lighting and lighting circuit, and fence. *See note 7

1 JOB N/A $_________________

0008 All work for Construction of UEPH Barracks (Optional Building…