AMENDMENT_0004.pdf

Revised by amendment 0004

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Tail Dock Altus AFB, OK See Summary of Changes pages.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 25-Nov-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV-15-R-0085

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Sep-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25-Nov-2015

CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

USACE, TULSA 1645 S 101 E AVE

TULSA OK 74128-4609

W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

1 – Amendment 0004

KC‐46A FTU ADAL FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE HANGAR

ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

CHANGES TO THE SPECIFICATIONS

1. Replacement Sections: Replace the following specification sections/appendices with the accompanying revised specification sections/appendices of the same number. Revised information can be located in the specification sections by searching for an asterisk and amendment number (i.e., *AM4). Footers also bear the following notation: “Revised by Amendment 0004.”

Note: To quickly locate amended information within a specification section, perform a word search for an asterisk followed by the amendment number (e.g. *AM#). A second asterisk marks the end of the amended text. New text, added by amendment, is underlined; whereas deleted text is deleted and noted as such (e.g. Text Deleted).

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

00 22 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 50 02.00 10 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND TEMPORARY CONTROLS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

07 42 16.05 INSULATED CORE METAL WALL PANELS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

09 97 13.27 EXTERIOR COATING OF STEEL STRUCTURES

21 13 25.00 HIGH‐EXPANSION FOAM FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM

28 31 64.00 FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM, ADDRESSABLE

31 63 29 DRILLED CONCRETE PIERS AND SHAFTS

2. Delete Sections: Delete the specifications listed below from the solicitation:

01 27 00 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT

01 35 26.10 10 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK INSULATION

09 97 13.00 40 STEEL COATINGS

3. Add Sections: Add the specifications listed below to the solicitation:

01 35 26.00 10 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

01 45 01.00 10 USACE QUALITY CONTROL

2 – Amendment 0004

CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGS

4. Replacement Drawings: Replace the drawings listed below with the attached revised drawings of the same number bearing the amendment notation for Amendment 0004 in the revision block.

AE001 LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GENERAL NOTES

AE120 ROOF PLAN

AE402 TYPICAL WALL SECTIONS

CD101 DEMOLITION PLAN

CG201 STORM SEWER PROFILES

FX131 FOAM RELEASING SYSTEM

FX501 FIRE PROTECTION NOTES AND DETAILS

S101 FOUNDATION PLAN

S503 TYPICAL CONCRETE DETAILS SHEET 3

CHANGES TO THE APPENDICES

5. Replacement Appendices: Replace the appendices listed below with the attached revised appendices of the same number bearing the amendment notation for Amendment 0004.

APPENDIX B LEAD BASED PAINT ASBESTOS REPORTS

APPENDIX C RECORD DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING HANGAR 518

6. Added Appendices: Add the appendices listed below to the solicitation:

APPENDIX E REPAIR FIRE PROTECTION PLANS

End of Summary of Changes

KC-46A FTU ADAL FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE DOCK

Altus AFB, OK

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1REVISED BY AMENDMENT 0004

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 00 – PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

00 11 00 SF1442 AND CLIN SCHEDULE

00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

00 22 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Revised by *AM4*

00 45 00 REGISTRATION AND CERTIFICATIONS

00 72 00 CONTRACT CLAUSES

00 73 00 SPECIAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

00 73 46 WAGE DETERMINATION SCHEDULE

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 04 00 COORDINATION, FIELD ENGINEERING, AND MEETINGS

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK

*AM4 01 27 00 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT - SECTION DELETED*

01 30 50 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00.10 10 DIGITAL SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES AND CORRESPONDENCE

*AM4 01 35 26.10 10 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS - SECTION DELETED*

*AM4 01 35 26.00 10 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS*

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.10 10 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)

*AM4 01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL - SECTION DELETED*

*AM4 01 45 01.00 10 USACE QUALITY CONTROL*

01 50 02.00 10 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND TEMPORARY CONTROLS

01 57 20.00 02 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

01 58 00.00 10 BULLETIN BOARD, PROJECT SIGN, AND SAFETY SIGN

01 60 00.00 50 MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT

01 62 35 RECYCLED/RECOVERED/BIOBASED MATERIALS

01 70 00.00 10 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 75 00 STARTING AND ADJUSTING

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

DIVISION 02 - EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

02 83 13.00 20 LEAD IN CONSTRUCTION

DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE

03 30 00 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

DIVISION 05 - METALS

05 05 23.13 10 ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF WELDMENTS

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 21 19 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST FRAMING

05 30 00 STEEL DECKS

05 40 01 COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING AND EXTERIOR SHEATHING

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

05 51 33 METAL LADDERS

DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES

06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY

DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

REVISED BY AMENDMENT 0004

07 11 13 BITUMINOUS DAMPPROOFING

*AM4 SECTION 07 21 13 SECTION DELETED*

07 21 16 MINERAL FIBER BLANKET INSULATION

07 22 00 ROOF AND DECK INSULATION

07 41 13 METAL ROOF PANELS

07 42 16.05 INSULATED CORE METAL WALL PANELS

07 52 00 MODIFIED BITUMINOUS MEMBRANE ROOFING

07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 91 00 PREFORMED JOINT SEALS

07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS

DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

08 34 16.10 STEEL SLIDING HANGAR DOORS

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 91 00 METAL WALL LOUVERS

DIVISION 09 - FINISHES

09 06 90 COLOR SCHEDULE

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

*AM4 09 97 13.00 40 STEEL COATINGS SECTION DELETED*

09 97 13.27 EXTERIOR COATING OF STEEL STRUCTURES

DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES

10 44 16 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

DIVISION 21 - FIRE SUPPRESSION

21 13 13.00 10 WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FIRE PROTECTION

21 13 25.00 HIGH-EXPANSION FOAM FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM

DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING

22 00 00 PLUMBING, GENERAL PURPOSE

DIVISION 23 - HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING

23 00 00 AIR SUPPLY, DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS

23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

23 08 00.00 10 COMMISSIONING OF HVAC SYSTEMS

23 09 23.13 20 BACnet DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR HVAC

23 11 25 FACILITY GAS PIPING

23 52 00 HEATING BOILERS

DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

26 41 01.00 10 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM

26 42 14.00 10 CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM (SACRIFICIAL ANODE)

26 51 00 INTERIOR LIGHTING

DIVISION 28 - ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

28 31 64.00 10 FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM SYSTEM, ADDRESSABLE

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3REVISED BY AMENDMENT 0004

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 31 16 SOIL TREATMENT FOR SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE CONTROL

31 63 29 DRILLED CONCRETE PIERS AND SHAFTS

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 01 19 FIELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALING JOINTS IN RIGID PAVEMENTS

32 11 23 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE

32 13 11 CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR AIRFIELDS AND OTHER HEAVY-DUTY

PAVEMENTS

32 17 24.00 10 PAVEMENT MARKINGS

32 92 19 SEEDING

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES

33 11 00 WATER DISTRIBUTION

33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES

APPENDICES:

APPENDIX A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

APPENDIX B LEAD BASED PAINT AND ASBESTOS REPORT

APPENDIX C RECORD DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING HANGAR 518

APPENDIX D PROJECT DRAWINGS

*AM4 APPENDIX E H518 REPAIR FIRE PROTECTION PLANS*

--END OF SECTION-

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 00 22 11 - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA, BASIS OF

AWARD ONE-STEP-BEST VALUE, DESIGN-BUILD (SINGLE AWARD)

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION 00 22 11

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. 0 OVERVIEW

This is a competitive best value solicitation for a construction contract for the KC-46A FTU ADAL Fuel System Maintenance Dock for Hangar Building 518, Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma, in accordance with the plans and specifications contained in the RFP. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible firm whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and is determined the overall best value to the Government.

The selected contractor shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1.1 WHO CAN SUBMIT

a. Firms formally organized as construction contractors, firms associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms, or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors.

b. Organization Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Disclosure: The Offeror shall provide a disclosure statement with its proposal which concisely describes all the relevant facts concerning past or present organizational conflicts of interest relating to work on this project. In the same statement, and if applicable, the Offeror shall provide information to assure the Government that the conflicts of interest have been mitigated and/or neutralized to the maximum extent possible. If a conflict of interest is discovered after award of this contract, the Contracting Office will make a decision whether to terminate the contract.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer intends to award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered more important than price. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal for the required work. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract if the proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001.

The Government reserves the right to reject any offer if the offer is not in the best interest of the Government.

3. 0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS.

3.1.1 Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Ensure that the outside of each separate volume is clearly marked to indicate its contents and the identity of the Offeror.

3.1.2 The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

3.1.3 No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

3.1.4 All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal (Volume 1). Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

3.1.5 Deviations, Exceptions and Assumptions

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation are not allowed. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the proposal may be deemed “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award. Any questions related to specific terms and conditions of the solicitation must be resolved prior to submission of the proposal. If the Offeror must make any assumptions prior to submitting the proposal, the Offeror shall list and describe in detail the assumptions on the first page of each Tab. All assumptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. The Offeror shall clearly describe on the Proposal Cover Sheet submitted with the Price Proposal any assumptions made concerning contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. This information will not be evaluated separately but may impact the evaluation of other factors.

3.2 DISCUSSIONS

The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to making an award.

Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

3.3 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

3.3.1 Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section.

Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, paper documents, etc. All pages must be numbered.

3.3.2 *AM4 Use only CDs/DVDs with files in PDF format. Do not submit scanned PDF documents. Use font size 10 or greater and avoid unusual font styles such as script, or condensed print for any submission.

All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers.

*AM4 All Proposals shall be submitted via AMRDEC SAFE web site:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/.

No hard copy proposals or CD`s will be accepted.

3.3.3 *AM4 Submit CDs/DVDs in covers and mark each CD/DVD and its case with the company name, project title, volume and any other pertinent information such as “original proposal” and/or dates.

3.3.4 “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Proposals containing information that is not to be disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data.”

3.3.5 For submissions with page limitations, pages containing tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

3.3.6 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall: be numbered; be clearly marked “REVISED;” show the date of revision; be submitted as incorporated in the complete revised technical and/or price volume.

3.4 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

3.4.1 Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal. Submit *AM4 one PDF five CDs/DVDs of the Technical Proposal. Provide the complete Technical Proposal in one PDF on each CD/DVD and the complete Price Proposal on one in a separate PDF CD/DVD. The PDF CDs/DVDS shall contain the entire Technical Proposal, or Price Proposal, in PDF format using Adobe Acrobat software; do NOT scan the document(s) into a PDF file. The text portion of the complete Technical Proposal shall be contained as a single PDF file and Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order. The Price Proposal shall also be contained as a single PDF file and Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order.

3.4.2 Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. All copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such and organized using the tabs specified in the chart below.

3.4.3 Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each Factor/Subfactor:

Factor 1 – Performance Capability:

Subfactor 1, Specialized Experience – Limited to 20 pages. 1 page per project and a maximum of 5 forms per contactor/subcontractor (see paragraph 5.1.1).

Subfactor 2, Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule - No page limit.

Subfactor 3, Key Personnel – Limited to 1 page for each resume provided.

Subfactor 4, Organization/Technical Approach – Limited to 8 pages.

Factor 2 - Past Performance – No page limitation.

Factor 3 - Small Business Utilization – No page limitation.

3.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL, Factor 4 (VOLUME 2)

3.5.1. Number of Sets of the Price Proposal. Submit one ORIGINAL of the Price Proposal*AM4 in PDF format on CD/DVD including an electronic copy of the bid bond. Bid bonds shall be submitted as electronic copies: *AM4 the Government may request original bid bonds be submitted by firms selected for the competitive range, if used. All offerors shall submit a hard copy Bid Bond as well. It is not due by the proposal due date and time.

3.5.2. Size Restrictions and Page Limits. There are no page limitations for the Price Proposal.

3.5.3 Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: if the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab (such as a JV Agreement) in accordance with the instructions below, include that tab followed by an explanation page on why the information was not submitted.

4.0 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor/ Subfactor/ Element

LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE

IMPORTANCE

FACTOR 1 PERFORMANCE

CAPABILITY

The most important Factor

Subfactor 1 Vol 1 Tab A Specialized Experience Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 2 Vol 1 Tab B Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

2nd Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 3 Vol 1 Tab C Key Personnel 3rd Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 4 Vol 1 Tab D Organization and Technical Approach

4th Most Important Subfactor

FACTOR 2 Vol 1 Tab E PAST PERFORMANCE Second most important Factor

FACTOR 3 Vol 1 Tab F SMALL BUSINESS

UTILIZATION

Third most important Factor

VOLUME 2 – PRICE PROPOSAL

Factor/ Subfactor

LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

N/A Vol 2 Tab 1 Proposal Cover Sheet Not Rated N/A Vol 2 Tab 2 Signed Letter Responding to RFP, SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

Not Rated

FACTOR 4 Vol 2 Tab 3 SECTION 00 11 00, PRICING SCHEDULE

4th Most Important Factor (Technical Factors, when combined, are more important than price)

N/A Vol 2 Tab 4 Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) Not Rated N/A Vol 2 Tab 5 Representations &

Certifications Not Rated

N/A Vol 2 Tab 6 JV Agreement or Other Agreements (if applicable)

Not Rated

N/A Vol 2 Tab 7 Subcontracting Plan Acceptable/Unacceptable

5.0 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 – PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY – The most important Factor.

5.1 VOLUME 1 – TAB A: SUBFACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

Most Important Subfactor.

5.1.1 Submission Requirements:

Demonstrate the specialized experience of the Offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contractors, on projects same/similar in size and complexity to that described in the solicitation for same/similar construction services. If using subcontractors as part of the proposed team to demonstrate experience, describe the role they will play in this project and the percentage of work each will perform.

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section (Attachment 1), in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete within the last 5 years. At least two (2) of the projects submitted must be valued at over $4,000,000.

5.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the Offeror in regard to their role on this project. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. Offerors demonstrating experience with projects of similar size and complexity will be viewed more favorably by the Government.

(1) The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in construction, for the project (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this solicitation. Recent experience includes projects well underway (50% or more complete) or those completed and turned over within 5 years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for construction experience. Offerors submitting projects for experience, where the offeror was part of a Joint Venture, must state each firm’s role in the Joint Venture, roles performed in the respective project, and demonstrate related construction experience. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project. If any of the information required is not included in the form (Attachment 1), then the Contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable for this Subfactor.

(2) The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Construction Contractor (or Architect-Engineer) Appraisal Support System (CCASS/ACASS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems, or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

(3) To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

(4) The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(a) Number, size, type work, complexity, location.

(b) Dates (well under way or completed no more than 5 years preceding date of Solicitation).

(c) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” or similar minor work on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience).

5.2 VOLUME 1 - TAB B: SUBFACTOR 2 - PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND

SUMMARY SCHEDULE.

2nd Most Important Subfactor.

5.2.1 Submission Requirements:

a. The Offeror shall propose a contract duration in the appropriate location on the Pricing Schedule not to exceed the maximum contract duration specified in the Special Contract Requirement (SCR) entitled COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK. The proposed duration, if accepted, shall become the required contract duration.

b. Submit a summary level schedule for construction including any construction phasing. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab 2. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed summary schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration.

Give attention to the following features:

(1) Show the overall construction phase for major item(s), for the site work, and for utilities (if applicable).

(2) Show turnover of the project. Identify any proposed phased turnovers (if applicable). The time to complete the project and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(4) Show as-built submissions.

(5) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

c. Provide a narrative explanation to include the pre-construction actions, crew assembly activities by feature of work, material handling & long lead time item(s), as well as close-out procedures.

The intent is to provide enough detail to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the project; however, it is not the intent for the Offeror to provide the amount of detail that will be required in the pre-work submittals contained in Division 01 of this RFP.

5.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. Proposed Contract Duration: This duration will become the contractually binding completion period. The Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the Offeror in the Pricing Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration shown in the SCR entitled COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum allowed duration will receive additional rating consideration, provided it is realistic and deemed to be achievable. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment. During the subsequent comparison between proposals, differences between proposed contract durations of at least three weeks (differences of 21 calendar days between proposals) will be considered an advantage to the Government, with greater differences also considered, accordingly.

No advantage will be considered between proposals for differences less than 21 calendar days.

b. Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for construction. The length of the schedule must match the proposed contract duration. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it offers no advantage to the Government because it is non-binding, only representing a preliminary planned schedule. A schedule shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the

Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required contract completion period. Both parties shall assume field overhead costs are included in the contract price for the full proposed contract duration. Therefore, the Government believes that there is no valid need to shorten the schedule less than the full proposed contract duration. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting, long lead items, phasing, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating submittals, the firm's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

c. Narrative: The Government will evaluate the narrative for realism and logic in regard to the work crew assembly and work schedule.

5.3 VOLUME 1 - TAB C: SUBFACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL

3rd Most Important Subfactor.

5.3.1 Submission Requirements:

The Offeror shall provide resume data for the following key personnel: Construction Project Manager, Quality Control Manager (CQC System Manager), Site Superintendent, and Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO). Resume information to be provided shall be limited to no more than one (1) page per person and shall include the following information as a minimum:

a. Name and title.

b. Project assignment.

c. Name of firm with which associated.

d. Years experience in the role identified.

e. Years experience with this firm and with other firms.

f. Education degree(s), year, specialization, if applicable.

g. Active professional registration, year first registered, if applicable.

h. Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract.

The minimum experience requirements for the Construction Project Manager and on-site superintendent shall be in accordance with Section 01 45 01.00 10. Minimum experience requirements for other personnel shall be as required by Division 01 sections.

5.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the Offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary to perform construction. Offerors providing resumes for key personnel for this project that have experience in similar key positions on the projects shown under Specialized Experience will be viewed more favorably by the Government. Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government. If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference.

Offerors must demonstrate the following minimum standards for the listed key personnel to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

(a) Project Manager – At least 5 years experience as a construction project manager.

(b) Site Superintendent – At least 5 years experience as a superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors.

Quality Control Manager – *AM4At least 2 years experience as a Quality Control Manager and shall be a graduate engineer, graduate architect, or a graduate of construction management.

( ) The Quality Control Manager must be a graduate engineer, graduate architect, or a graduate of construction management, with a minimum of 2 years construction experience on construction similar to this contract, or a construction person with a minimum of 15 years in related construction work.

(d)(c) (e)(d) Safety Officer – At least 5 years experience as a safety officer.

5.4 VOLUME 1, TAB D: SUBFACTOR 4 – ORGANIZATION AND TECHNICAL APPROACH

4th Most Important Subfactor.

5.4.1 Submission Requirements:

a. Provide information that describes the offeror’s organizational approach to executing the construction contract per the detailed requirements herein. Limit the information to 8 pages or less;

clearly but concisely describe the organizational and technical approach to project management and execution.

b. Organization: Describe what firms, their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) may be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s). Present a matrix of responsibilities for each firm in executing the key work breakdown structure activities of the project, including construction activities for each major feature. Identify the firms chosen for the project if not to be self-performed. The Offeror shall be required to obtain the Contracting Officer’s approval for any substitution of firms listed.

Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing how the construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations, their job/position title within the organization. The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the firms, and with the list of key personnel to be provided under the Tab, “Key Personnel.”

c. Self-Performed Work: Generally describe the items the offeror will self-perform to comply with the requirements in Section 00 72 00, “Self Performed Work by Contractor,” for self-performed work.

d. Quality Control: Describe the team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. Describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan. Provide information on how you will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation. There is no need to submit a quality control plan as the successful offeror will provide that after award. Describe how the team will meet USACE three phase quality control requirements.

e. Safety Plan: Describe the team’s safety approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain safety requirements during construction. Describe the proposed safety organization, including the proposed staffing plan. The intent is to provide enough detail to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the project; however, it is not the intent for the Offeror to provide the amount of detail that will be required in the pre-work submittals contained in Division 01 of this RFP.

5.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the plan. The Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding of the requirements described in Division 01 plans and technical specifications of the Solicitation and the capability to execute the project. Some additional specific evaluation considerations are listed below. This list is not all-inclusive.

b. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. If applicable, joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

c. Self-performed work. The Government will evaluate whether the proposed self-performed work complies with the requirements stated in the respective clause for self-performed work.

d. Quality Control. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s capabilities and understanding of the contractually required quality control processes for construction. The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the staffing plan to cover all required tasks and responsibilities.

e. Safety Plan: The Government will evaluate the narrative for realism, logic, and understanding of the contractual requirements in regard to the safety plan.

6.0 VOLUME 1 -TAB E: FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE – 2nd Most Important Factor.

6.1 Submission Requirements:

a. For the projects listed under Factor 1, Subfactor 1 – Experience, the Government will query the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (to include ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS) to validate past performance ratings on Department of Defense contracts and any other past performance information the Government deems necessary to evaluate a contractor’s past performance.

b. For each project that does not have a ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation, Offerors shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included at Attachment 2 to the points of contact responsible for monitoring performance under such contracts. The Past Performance Questionnaire included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Subfactor 1 – Experience. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted with your proposal. A client may request, in writing to the cognizant Contract Specialist, that questionnaires be submitted directly to the Contract Specialist identified in Section 00 21 00, Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors via email prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs by reference into their proposal. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

c. The information contained in the questionnaires will be used to evaluate the offeror’s past performance. If any negative past performance information is received, the contractor will be given an opportunity to provide rebuttal. Each contractor shall provide at least three (3) past performance ratings.

Any rating an offeror has in ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS for the projects listed under Factor 1, Subfactor 1 – Experience will count toward this requirement. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the Contracting Officer (KO) has received a minimum of three (3) questionnaires prior to the proposal due date/time or has provided written notification to the KO that they have current applicable ratings in ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS. Entities that have no past customers shall notify the KO in writing, prior to the date and time established for the RFP closing, that they have had no previous clients and that the minimum number of questionnaires cannot be provided. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. Do not request past performance questionnaires on projects that have final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluations. If a past performance questionnaire is received on a project where a final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation exists, the ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation will serve as the official rating of record for evaluation purposes.

d. The Government may contact references provided as part of Factor 1, Subfactor 1 – Experience for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on a project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions.

e. The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance.

Other sources may include, but are not limited to: past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and/or System for Award Management (SAM), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal; inquiries of owner representative(s);

Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS); Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS); and any other official source available to the Government.

f. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

6.1.1 Joint Venture Submission Requirements. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the CCR and/or System for Award Management (SAM) as the offering Joint Venture. The Offeror must provide three (3) to five (5) "recent," "relevant" projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV's ability to perform the work required in this solicitation as required by paragraph 5.1 “Specialized Experience.”

a. If the JV Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects to meet the minimum requirement, the JV Offeror must provide "recent," "relevant" projects performed by the JV, and then supplement the record with additional "recent," "relevant" projects performed by each JV member in their individual capacities. In such instance, each JV member must satisfy the minimum requirement of three

(3) projects, to include any performed as the JV.

b. If the JV Offeror has no "recent," "relevant" projects performed by the JV, then each member of the JV must provide three (3) to five (5) "recent," "relevant" projects that reflect the JV member's ability to perform the work required in this solicitation as required by paragraph 5.1 “Specialized Experience.”

c. In addition to submittals of "Company Specialized Experience" and "Past Performance

Questionnaires,” the Joint Venture shall provide a brief narrative (not to exceed 1 page) stating the roles each partner will perform on this project. The attached "Specialized Experience" and "Past Performance Questionnaire" forms shall be used by the Joint Venture or the JV partners. The JV Offeror must also explain how the JV is structured.

d. Verification: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects not submitted by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or other Government appraisal systems, or to interview owner or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. An Offeror will be afforded the opportunity to reply to or explain adverse performance information that the Offeror has not had an opportunity to previously address.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. Past Performance evaluation includes two aspects to assess the offeror’s probability of performing the requirements stated in the RFP, based on the offeror’s demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts (well under way or turned over no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation). First, the offeror’s past performance will be evaluated to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the requirements of the RFP. Second, the offeror’s past performance shall be given a Performance Confidence Assessment based on how well the contractor performed on past contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance.

If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting construction errors, warranty work, etc. The Government will target areas covered in the requirements of this proposal including records of conforming to quality, schedule, cost control, customer satisfaction, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, problem resolution for construction errors, warranty work, and safety. The Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments. The Government also places a higher value on projects which document successful outcomes and are supported by outside source confirmation. For example, sources including but not limited to telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal, CCASS/ACASS or other agency performance databases, Offeror furnished references, or personal knowledge. The Government also places a higher value on recent relevant projects and projects, which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the contractor used to successfully resolve problems. The Government’s evaluation is not limited to past performance information on the cited example projects. Firms without a history of past performance will receive a neutral rating.

b. The evaluation will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, proposed key personnel currently working for the company who have relevant experience, or FORMALIZED teaming partners, JV firms or dedicated subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the acquisition. Each entity (firm) will be rated on its own performance or that of its predecessor, if relevant. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its proposed key personnel, apart from that of the entity.

c. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the proposal may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, but will be given a “neutral” rating and the performance risk will be considered “unknown.”

d. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer. For example, a subsidiary of an Alaska Native Corporation with multiple, affiliated companies, or a major firm with separate geographical or specialty divisions, can only qualify past performance for the subsidiary submitting the proposal: the Government will not recognize other divisions or units.

e. The proposal should contain qualifying past performance information for each of the projects identified in the Specialized Experience technical factor. If the proposal does not contain at least 3 qualifying (PPIRS, PPQ-0, CCASS, etc.) past performance evaluations, the past performance is inadequate for assigning a rating other than “neutral” with “unknown” performance risk.

7.0 VOLUME 1, TAB F: FACTOR 3 – SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION – 3rd Most Important Factor.

7.1 Submission Requirements:

All Offerors shall identify the extent to which Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs), HUBZone Small Businesses, Small Disadvantage Businesses (SDBs), Woman-Owned Small Businesses (WOSBs), Economically Disadvantaged Woman-Owned Small Businesses (EDWOSBs), and Historically Black…