SOW_Attachment_A_-_NCANG_Leak_Investigation_Report_-_Bldg._12.pdf
PDF 7 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Multiple Facilities
- Solicitation number
- W91242-17-B-0994
About this file
SOW Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation Report - Bldg. 12
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Visitor_Request_Worksheet.pdf | ||
| SOW_Attachment_B_-_NCANG_Leak_Investigation_Report_-_Bldg._3.pdf | ||
| Bid_Schedule_Mulitple_Facilities_RTS_-_Blank.docx | DOCX document | |
| W91242-17-B-0994_0001.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Leak Investigation Report
Building #12
39563 Warrior Way New
London, NC 28127
31 May 2017
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
Moisture Infiltration Locations
Multiple leaks were reported in the building as shown in the figure below.
N
Leak at grade
Roof leak above office
Leak at grade
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
Executive Summary
BACKGROUND
A leak investigation was performed on Tuesday, November 8, 2016. The investigation consisted of a visual observation of the roof and exterior walls, and a water spray test of the roof and through-wall flashing above the office leak.
Observations were documented with representative photographs, which are included in this report. Additional photographs are on file, and are available upon request.
INTERIOR INSPECTION
Building personnel reported that the leaks occur during a typical rain event lasting more than a day, or during driving rain events. Multiple ceiling tiles were removed in the office above below the through-wall flashing these areas and rust was observe on the bottom side of the roof support members (Photograph 1 and 2).
VISUAL ROOF INSPECTION:
The following were observed upon inspecting the single ply roof system, metal coping, counter flashing, and sealants:
1. Detached metal coping termination (Photograph 3).
2. Evidence of ponding water on the roof membrane (Photograph 4).
3. Receiver flashing lap was not sealed (Photograph 5).
4. Through-wall flashing was not adhered to receiver flashing (Photograph 6).
5. Receiver flashing was not lapped (Photograph 7).
6. Missing sealant in control joint (Photograph 8).
7. Open sealant joints at coping termination (Photograph 9).
VISUAL EXTERIOR WALL INSPECTION:
The following were observed upon inspecting the exterior wall, through-wall flashing and sealants:
1. Organic growth at the base of the wall, adjacent to office leak (Photograph 10). The sidewalk does not appear to be sufficiently slope away from the building (Photograph 11);
2. Moisture infiltration was reported a section of the north facing wall (Photograph 12). The sidewalk did not appear to be sufficiently sloped away from the wall (Photograph 13), and the sealant was deteriorated at the base of the wall (Photograph 14).
WATER TEST:
A water spray test was conducted on the NE facing wall above the office leak. A hose bib was utilized at the site, and a water pump was used to increase the pressure at the test location. The roof was tested first for approximately 15 minutes
(Photograph 15), no leaks were identified. The coping termination at the wall was tested for approximately 15 minutes
(Photograph 16), no leaks were identified. The single ply base flashing and termination bar was then tested for approximately 15 minutes (Photograph 17), and no leaks were observed. The through-wall flashing was tested for approximately 10 minutes before water was observed entering the building where the ceiling tiles were previously removed in the office. The area identified that caused the leak was marked on the roof with orange spray paint
(Photograph 18).
CONCLUSIONS:
Based on overall visual inspection, the roof appears to be in good condition. The water test conducted revealed that the leaks were due to issues in the through-wall flashing. The flashing was observed to not be adhered to the receiver metal in several locations. No further observations can be made until the brick is removed, and the flashing condition can be examined more closely. The site grading condition appears to not sufficiently slope away from the building, causing ponding water at the exterior wall and moisture entry into the building along the floor.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Install new through-wall flashing and counter flashing on the NE facing wall above roof level
2. Install two new gravel-stop closures and backer rod and sealant where missing at the NE facing wall above roof level
3. Install new trench drain to address ponding problems near Building 12. Trench drain will connect to a new stormwater pipe that will discharge to grade as shown in the Conceptual Site Plan attached with this report. In addition, demolish existing pavement and install new pavement to slope to trench drain.
ROOF REPAIR
1. 40 linear feet of flashing @ $175/LF = $7,000.00
2. 2 gravel stop closures at $100/EA = $200.00.
3. Backer rod and sealant above roof = $100.00
4. Mobilization/Demobilization = $4,000.00
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $11,300.00
TRENCH DRAIN INSTALLATION
1. Saw cut existing pavement – 127 LF @ $4.55/LF = $578
2. Demolish existing pavement – 68 SQ YDS @ $9.55/SQ YD = $650
3. Install 12” Wide Trench Drain – 118 LF @ $150/LF = $17,700
4. Install Expansion Joint Between Trench Drain and Existing Sidewalk – 118 LF @ $3.54/LF = $418
5. Install 8” Storm Pipe with Pipe Bedding – 98 LF @ $25.50/LF = $2,500
6. Install Cleanout for 8” Storm Pipe – 1 EA @ $500/EA = $500
7. Install Asphalt Pavement – 68 SQ YDS @ $24.35/SQ YD = $1,656
8. Seal Sawcut Between New and Existing Pavement – 127 LF @ $3.71/LF = $472
9. Install Sodding – 1,000 SQ FT @ $520/1,000 SQ FT = $520
10. Install Outlet Protection – 2 SQ YDS @ $104/SQ YD = $208
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
11. Install Silt Fencing During Construction – 15 LF @ $1.60/LF = $24
12. Construction Contingency (20%) - $5,050
ESTIMATED BUDGET: $30,276.00
Photograph 1 - Removed ceiling tiles in office
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N Text Box
1035125317N
Photograph 2 - Rust was observed on bottom side of structural support member.
Photograph 3 - Detached metal termination
Photograph 4 - Discoloration of roof membrane; a sign of ponding water.
Photograph 5 - Receiver flashing lap not sealed
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
Photograph 6 - Through-wall flashing is not adhered to receiver flashing
Photograph 7 - Receiver flashing not lapped
Photograph 8 - Missing sealant in control joint.
Photograph 9 - Open sealant joints at metal coping termination.
Photograph 10 - Organic growth in mortar joints.
1035125317N
Trench Drain Area #1
Photograph 11 - Sidewalk not properly sloped away from building
Photograph 12 - Moisture intrusion along base of wall
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
1035125317N Text Box Trench Drain Area #1
1035125317N
Trench Drain Area #2
Photograph 13 - Sidewalk not properly sloped away from building
Photograph 14 - Deteriorated sealant along base of wall
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
1035125317N Text Box Trench Drain Area #2
1035125317N
Photograph 15 - Roof was tested above office
Photograph 16 - Coping termination was tested
Photograph 17 - Base flashing and termination bar was tested
Photograph 18 - Leak identified in through-wall flashing
DESCRIPTION: DATE:
DRAWING NO:
CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
STANLY COUNTY, NC - AIRPORT BUILDING 12
NC AIR NATIONAL GUARD WATER INFILTRATION STUDY
EXHIBIT
01/11/2017
DEMOLISH AND INSTALL
NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT
(APPROX. 610 SQ. FT.)
INSTALL 12" WIDE TRENCH
DRAIN (TYP.) (APPROX. 118 LF)
INSTALL 8" STORM PIPE
(APPROX. 98 LF)
PIPE TO DAYLIGHT
TO GRADE WITH
OUTLET PROTECTION
POTENTIAL UTILITY CONFLICT AREAS (TYP.).
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY UTILITY LOCATIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
CONNECT TRENCH DRAIN
TO NEW STORM PIPE.
POSSIBLE UTILITY ROUTE (TYP.).
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY UTILITY ROUTES
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
EXISTING CONCRETE
SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
INSTALL SOD OVER
PIPE TRENCH
(APPROX. 1,000 SQ. FT.)
SAWCUT ALONG EXISTING
PAVEMENT (TYP.)
(APPROX. 127 LF)
INSTALL NEW CLEANOUT
SEAL ALONG
ASPHALT CUT (TYP.).
(APPROX. 127 LF)
INSTALL EXPANSION
JOINT ALONG TRENCH
DRAIN (APPROX. 118 LF)
INSTALL SILT FENCE
(APPROX. 15 LF)
NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY LUCAS-FORMAN, INC. DATED 11/04/2016.
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
1035125317N
Trench Drain Area #1
1035125317N
TRENCH DRAIN INSTALLATION
1. Saw cut existing pavement – 55 LF
2. Demolish existing pavement – 6 SQ YDS
3. Install 12” Wide Trench Drain – 55 LF
4. Install Expansion Joint Between Trench Drain and Existing Sidewalk – 55 LF
5. Install 6” Storm Pipe with Pipe Bedding – 65 LF
6. Install Cleanout for 6” Storm Pipe – 1 EA
7. Patch concrete – 2 SQ YDS
8. Seal Sawcut Between New and Existing Pavement – 110 LF
Attachment A - NCANG Leak Investigation - Bldg. 12
1035125317N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .