W911SA19B20140001_Solicitation_Amendment_0001.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair B2880, Fort McCoy, WI
Solicitation number
W911SA19B2014
Issued by

About this file

Solicitation Amendment 0001

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W911SA19B2014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

CONTRACTOR Q&A

Q1. What are the heights of the existing girt framing (and number of girts) where the walls are infilled with 8” metal stud framing?

A1. Assumed: 4’ 8’… depends upon what area you are looking at.

Q2. At Electrical W110 the east wall has a detail cut through it. The detail is 7/A6.1 and shows a rated slip track detail (type 2 wall). Is this wall above an existing wall, or is the entire wall new, or is it an existing wall? A similar condition exists in Comm. W111, except the detail is 6/A6.1. Mechanical room E131 has the same situation occurring, again the detail cuts are shown at what appears to be existing walls (details 6 & 7/A6.1 are shown). If this is a wall on top of an existing wall, how high are the existing walls?

A2. Existing wall heights are assumed to be 10’-0”

Q3. On sheet A0.2 the training room W120 note New 1-HR Fire rated partition in some cases is pointing to existing walls. Are some of the exiting walls really new partitions?

A3. See sheets A1.0 & A1.1 for demo and sheets A1.2 & A1.3 for new framing.

Q4. 1/A5.0 the detail shows 8” metal stud framing, does the framing go from elevation 104’ – 8” to 108’ – 8” only?

A4. At that detail the 8” studs go to 108’-8” at other areas where there is brick there is also steel studs. Check the elevation sheets.

(End of Summary of Changes) image1.wmf

File details come from the government source that posted it.