W56KGY22R0004-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2021NOV10

W56KGY

ACC-APG Division C (W56KGY)

6565 SURVEILLANCE LOOP

APG, MD 21005-1846

NICHOLAS MITROCSAK

EMAIL: NICHOLAS.M.MITROCSAK.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W56KGY-22-R-0004

2021OCT29

X

X 2021DEC08 05:00pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 15

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: NICHOLAS MITROCSAK

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCAP-CCC/(443)861-5393

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Other

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1) The purpose of this Amendment (0001) on is to include:

a) Updated attachments in Section J

b) Incorporate language edits and changes in Section L and M.

2) Attachments 0002, 0005, 0006, 0007, 0008 and 0010 have been changed as follows:

a) Attachment 0002's date and page number in section J of this solicitation is hereby changed as follows:

From: 17 September 2021, 54 pages

To: 08 November 2021, 27 pages

b) Attachment 0005 in section J of this solicitation is hereby changed as follows:

From: "COMPETITIVE RANGE EVENT PLAN" dated 16 September 2021

To "PHASE I PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION EVENT PLAN" dated 10 November 2021

c) Attachment 0006 in section J of this solicitation is hereby changed as follows:

From: "PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION EVENT PLAN" dated 17 September 2021

To: "PHASE II PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION EVENT PLAN" dated 2021Nov10

d) Attachment 0007's date and page number in section J of this solicitation is hereby changed as follows:

From: 04 October 2021, 10 pages

To: 04 November 2021, 32 pages

e) Attachment 0010's date and page number in section J of this solicitation is hereby changed as follows:

From: 17 September 2021, 49 pages

To: 08 November 2021, 25 pages

3. The Technical Factor in Section M of this solicitation is hereby changed as follows:

a) The title/description of paragraphs a "Phase One Product Demonstration" and paragraph b "Phase One Product Demonstration" have been amended.

b) The titles of attachments 0005 and 0006 have been changed in accordance with the changes annotated in paragraph 2 of this A

Narrative.

c) The definitions for "Go" and "No Go" in Table 2 "Phase Once Product Demonstration" have been amended.

4. Section L has is hereby updated to reflect the change in document titles annotated in paragraph 2 of this A Narrative.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

2 15

W56KGY-22-R-0004

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Attachment 0002 BASE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENT DOCUMENT 08-NOV-2021 027 EMAIL

Attachment 0005 PHASE I PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION EVENT PLAN 10-NOV-2021 013 EMAIL

Attachment 0006 PHASE II PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION EVENT PLAN 10-NOV-2021 024 EMAIL

Attachment 0007 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION 04-NOV-2021 032 EMAIL

Attachment 0008 SOLICITATION TABLES 04-NOV-2021 004 EMAIL

Attachment 0010 DELIVERY ORDER 1 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT 08-NOV-2021 025 EMAIL

3 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors (Section L)

1. Introduction. During the conduct of this acquisition, all documents will be submitted to Army Contracting Command- Aberdeen Proving

Ground (ACC-APG) via DOD Safe. Request for drop boxes will need to be submitted by email to the PCO and Contract Specialist, detailed below, one (1) business day in advance. All exchanges with Offerors will occur with the PCO and Contract Specialist via email. During the conduct of this acquisition, once proposals/documents are submitted via DOD Safe, the Government requests that Offerors submit

[request] a confirmation email from The points of contacts at :

Ms. Meghan C. Whitmore

Procuring Contracting Officer

E-mail: meghan.c.whitmore.civ@mail.mil

And

Mr. Nicholas M. Mitrocsak

Contract Specialist

E-mail: nicholas.m.mitrocsak.civ@mail.mil

Offerors proposal shall consist of five (5) volumes.

The Volumes are as follows:

I. Executive Summary

II. Technical

III. Price

IV. Past Performance

V. Small Business

Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. Offerors are cautioned that parroting of the technical requirements or the SOW (Attachment 0001) with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal.

2. Proposal Submission Requirements.

a. Each proposal volume shall be separate and include the prescribed files identified in Table 1 -- Requirements for Submission of

Proposal Materials, below. Electronic submission of proposal is mandatory, IAW the solicitation instructions, with the time of receipt of the required electronic proposal volumes to the Procuring Contracting Officer and Contact Specialist (detailed in paragraph 1

Introduction) serving as the compliance time for directed proposal submission date and time. The electronic proposal files submitted to

SAM.GOV will be the official submission used for evaluation purposes.

b. Files submitted to the Government shall NOT contain CLASSIFIED data. The use of external hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

The use of hyperlinks that link within a document, such as table of contents links, are allowed.

c. SAM.GOV registration and (active) System for Award Management (SAM) account is required to submit proposals.

d. WARNING: Do not wait until the last minute to submit proposals. To avoid late proposal submissions, Offerors are encouraged to submit proposals 24 hours prior to the required due date and time. Request for DOD Safe drop boxes will need to occur at a minimum one

(1) business day in advance of submittal as detailed in paragraph D1.

e. Note: Offerors are offered the opportunity to participate in an open integration period of time using Commercial Cloud Services and to access the Intel Apps Test Harness prior to the proposal submission date. Offerors are not required to participate, and this integration session will not be evaluated. For additional information, please refer to the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan

(Attachment 0005), and the Phase II Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006) of the solicitation.

f. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or proposal revisions) shall be clearly marked. The changed information shall be clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page, and underlining and/or strike-through of text shall be used to distinguish the changed information. The revised pages shall be dated. Each file containing change or revisions shall be clearly labeled with its title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

g. The volumes of material shall be submitted as depicted in Table 1 - Requirements for Submission of Proposal Materials. All proposal submissions must be in Microsoft Office (MS) Office using a version no earlier than 2007.

4 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

*** SEE Table 1. Requirements for Submission of Proposal Materials in Attachment 0008, "Solicitation Tables" of Section J ***

3. Proposal Files.

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume should be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume should be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. A table of contents shall be created using the table of content feature in MS Word. MS

Word files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Font Type Arial font is required.

Font Size A standard 12-point minimum is required. An 8-point minimum may be used for tables, illustrations, headers and footers.

Line Spacing Pages shall be single spaced.

Margins Top, Bottom, Left, Right 1

Gutter 0

From Edge Header, Footer 0.5

Page Size, Width 8.5

Page Size, Height 11

NOTE: 11X17 folded pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations; however, each 11X17 page counts as two (2) pages.

b. File Packaging. Proposal file names shall include the volume number proceeding the identified filename stated in Table 1 -

Requirements for Submission of Proposal Materials. All PDF documents shall be provided as searchable PDF files. If proposal files are compressed (zipped), using WinZip version 6.2 or later, into multiple zip files, each zip file must be clearly identified by Volume, as per Table 1 instructions. PLEASE NOTE, Offerors are cautioned that large file sizes of proposals significantly delay submissions, or may not be permitted due to file size restrictions on DOD Safe. High resolution graphics may greatly increase file sizes. Up to five (5) files can be uploaded at one (1) time. The combined size of the five (5) files cannot exceed 100MB. Also note, self-extracting .exe files will not be accepted. Additionally, the Government does not accept responsibility for the organization of electronic proposal submissions. If proposal files are missing or not identified per the instructions provided by this solicitation, the proposal will be immediately eliminated from the competition. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring all appropriate files are included in the proposal submission. Proposal files may be submitted individually without compression at Offerors discretion.

If files are divided into smaller files to support electronic transmission, individual files should be clearly labeled such as technical 1 of 5, etc. Break attachments into smaller files or use the upload utility multiple times if files exceed the 100MB size limit. Filenames MUST be labeled as indicated in Table 1 - Requirements for Submission of Proposal Materials.

Updated computer software virus protection is required. Offerors should not submit proposals without first having scanned them using appropriate computer virus protection software. Uploading files with viruses may jeopardize bid submission.

The Government will not accept or consider any proposal submission methods other than as discussed herein.

c. Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Volumes

I, II, and IV of the proposal shall consist of a table of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, summary section, and the narrative discussion. The summary section shall contain a brief abstract of the volume. Any proprietary information shall be clearly marked. No price information shall be presented in any part of the proposal except as provided in Volume I, Executive Summary and Volume

III, Price Factor. Each volume shall be prepared on a standalone basis, so that its contents may be evaluated with minimum cross-referencing to another volume of the proposal. Each table of contents shall delineate the subparagraphs with that volume to the proposal content when applicable. The submission of alternate proposals shall not be allowed.

i. Volume I - Executive Summary. The Offeror shall utilize this volume to provide an overview of the proposal and summarize pertinent information contained in all volumes of the proposal. The information contained in this volume must be consistent with data in the other volumes. References to the proposal locations providing substantiating data shall be given as appropriate. The information contained in this volume is not an evaluation factor, but is required for award.

This volume shall be organized into the following sections:

1) Proposal Synopsis: The Offeror shall utilize this section of the Executive Summary to summarize pertinent information contained in all volumes of the proposal. The Offeror is free to submit this section of the Executive Summary in any format desired, subject to the limitations previously set forth above, and to include any and all information it believes will support its proposal.

Offerors are reminded that the Executive Summary is an introductory summation of the proposal. Therefore, no information shall be in the

Executive Summary that does not appear elsewhere in the proposal.

5 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

2) Commercial Item Assertions: The Offeror shall provide documentation to support that its solution is a commercial item. The commercial item assertions should explicitly detail how the proposed solution fits the definition of a commercial item as stated in FAR

2.101.

The Government may consider applicable law, regulations, policy, and guidance when determining whether an Offeror's solution is a commercial item, as defined in FAR 2.101.

If the Offeror does not provide sufficient evidence that its solution is a commercial item, then the Government may determine that the Offeror is not eligible for award.

3) Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms: The Executive Summary shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

4) Award Documents/Certifications/Representations: The Offeror shall provide any Award Documents, Certifications, and/or

Representations to accompany the proposal submission as required by the solicitation under representations, certifications, and other statements of Offerors.

The Prime Offeror shall have an approved Secret facility clearance and Top Secret safeguarding for classified material and property in effect at time of award, based on the IS&A DoD Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254, PM IS&A requirements.

The following information must be provided to verify the secure facility clearance:

- Contractor Name

- Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code

- Corporate Mailing Address

- Classified Mailing Address

- Security Office Information including:

i. Name

ii. Title

iii. E-mail address

iv. Telephone Number

If the Prime Offeror does not have an approved Top Secret facility clearance at time of proposal, Offerors shall submit a plan with timeline to achieve those requirements within 180 days from time of initial award.

5) Data and Software Rights Assertions: IAW the content and formatting requirements for Data and Software Rights Assertions

(set forth in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.227- 7017), the Contractors Data and Software Rights

Assertions shall comply with the following requirements:

- The Prime Offeror shall not assert license restrictions on items, component, or processes themselves. The asserted license restrictions shall pertain to software or technical data that relates to items, components, or processes.

- The Prime Offerors assertions shall not include technical data or software that will not be furnished to the Government under this Contract.

- The Prime Offeror shall provide a concise (but specific) description of the technical data and software deliverables that will be furnished to the Government with restrictions, rather than generically asserting license restrictions in technical data or technology.

- The Prime Offeror is responsible for ensuring that Data and Software Rights Assertions from its subcontractors comply with the aforementioned content and formatting requirements (IAW DFARS 252.227-7017).

- Prime Offerors shall provide Data/Software Rights Assertions in tabular format prescribed in DFARS 252.227-7017. In addtion to the content and formatting requirements set forth in DFARS 252.227-7017, the Prime Offerors Data/Software Rights Assertions table shall list all commercial or non-commercial technical data and software data deliverables that the Prime Offeror intends to furnish to the Government with license restrictions. Thus, the Data/Software Rights Assertions shall include all technical data and software data deliverables that are provided to the Government without an unlimited and/or unrestricted rights license. In the the Prime

Offerors identification of technical data and software license rights, the Prime Offeror shall reference any applicable commercial software license agreement related to proposed commercial software deliverables. The Government will consider and data deliverables, that are required in the SOW but not listed in the Prime Offeror's Data/Software Rights Assertions, as technical data or software deliverables furnished to the Government without restrictions.

6) Commercial Plan or Subcontracting Plan: Other than U.S. Small Business Offerors shall submit either a commercial plan as defined at FAR 19.701, or a Commercial Subcontracting Plan meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003, or DFARS

6 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

252.219-7004, if the Offeror has a comprehensive subcontracting plan. Other than U.S. Small Businesses must submit acceptable subcontracting plans to be eligible for award. The Commercial Subcontracting Plan or Commercial Plan will be IDIQ level attachments, applicable to all orders issued. The requirements in this paragraph are for compliance purposes and shall not be considered as an evaluation factor during the Governments award selection trade-off analysis.

ii. Volume II - Technical Factor. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

1) Product Demonstration: Offerors shall participate in a technical product demonstration as part of the proposal response, whereby the Offeror demonstrates its product solution. The technical product demonstration is where the Offeror will demonstrate whether its solution can accomplish the steps defined in the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0005), for phase one (1), and the Phase II Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006) for phase two (2). Each phase of the product demonstration will be conducted at APG, MD or a nearby facility and will not exceed two (2) business days, consisting of one (1) day (Day 1) of system set-up and configuration and one (1) day (Day 2) for the Product Demonstration. This period includes time for system set-up, Demonstration Task

Execution, and teardown. The Offeror will be required on site at the Government designated facility for this demonstration and is allotted up to four (4) Offeror personnel, to include a system operator. Offerors will be permitted to cycle personnel in the demonstration room during scheduled breaks IAW the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0005), and the Phase II Product

Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006) . The Government will provide two (2) workstations. The Offerors system operator will perform all steps on the system IAW the the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0005), and the Phase II Product Demonstration

Event Plan (Attachment 0006).

Sample Data Available Upon Request: Product Demonstration sample data is available upon request as Government Furnished

Information (GFI). Please see the All Source II GFI list (Attachment 0006) for a summary of the information that can be provided. In order to receive a copy of the GFI, the Offeror shall send an email to the PCO with the company CAGE code, and Amazon Web Service (AWS) account number identified, no later than 15 days after the issuance of the solicitation. Once in receipt of the request, the Government will coordinate delivery of the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) data and Amazon Machine Image (AMI) of the Intel Apps Test

Harness to the Offeror.

2) As stated in the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0005), and the Phase II Product Demonstration Event

Plan (Attachment 0006) all Offerors are offered the opportunity (but it is not a requirement) to participate in an open integration session prior to the execution of the product demonstrations. Offerors may use this time to setup and configure its All Source II

Software Solution and test connectivity to the Intel Apps Test Harness. Offerors will be permitted to create AMIs in its own environment and transfer to the Product Demonstration environment. This integration period will not be evaluated by the Government.

IAW these instructions, Offerors must submit its non-disclosure agreements (NDA) with the non-Government advisors to the

PCO, Ms. Meghan.c.whitmore.civ@mail.mil and Contract Specialist Mr. nicholas.m.mitrocsak.civ@mail.mil prior to participating.

iii. Volume III Price Factor. The Offeror shall submit pricing for all CLINs identified in the TEP Worksheet (Attachment 0003).

Offerors shall not re-format or remove cells from the spreadsheet. Submission of the pricing data shall be complete and accurate. All prices will be provided as FFP, therefore all proposed prices shall be inclusive of all direct cost (i.e., direct labor, material, travel, and other direct costs), associated indirect costs, and profit related to each CLIN. Any CLINs, where a proposed $0.00 price is submitted, shall be accompanied by an additional statement verifying the pricing of $0.00 is correct.

The proposed unit pricing in the Offerors proposal and TEP (Attachment 0003) will become the actual firm fixed prices in any resultant contract for the expected five-year ordering period of the basic contract. This also applies to any range pricing as applicable. The TEP Worksheet will become an attachment in Section J. These prices will also be used for the issuance of Delivery Order

1 which will be awarded simultaneously with the base IDIQ contract.

Please Note: Pricing for delivery orders shall reflect the pricing as set forth in the Total Evaluated Price (TEP) attachment to the basic contract. However, when proposing in response to a Government RFP for an individual Delivery Orders, the contractor is authorized to propose prices lower than what is in the TEP.

The Government expects adequate price competition under this effort. If, however, at the time of proposal due dates there is not adequate price competition, then Offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Government to determine fair and reasonable price.

All information related to pricing shall be included in the section of the proposal defined as Volume III Price Factor. In the event the PCO determines additional information (Certified or other than certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR

15.403) is necessary in order to determine the reasonableness of price, information below may be requested:

- Catalog Pricing Relevant Offeror commercial catalog, its date, catalog prices, and related discounts. Include an explanation of any differences between the offered price, the established catalog price, and price of recent sales in quantities similar to the proposed quantities.

- Market Pricing Description of the nature of the relevant market and how that market affects the offered price including the source and date or period of any relevant market quotation or other basis for market price, the base market price, and applicable

7 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

discounts or other price adjustments.

- Other evidence of prices charged Evidence of prices charged other customers under similar circumstances. For example, the firm could provide copies of contracts with other customers to document the prices charged.

- Unbalanced Pricing If the Offerors unit prices appear unbalanced when comparing them from quantity range to quantity range or ordering period to ordering period, the Offeror shall provide documentation, including calculations and supporting rationale, explaining the apparent unbalanced pricing.

For proposal preparation purposes only, the expected or approximate date for initiation of contract performance for the

Single Award base IDIQ, as well as the first DO, is 25 March 2022. The actual performance dates may vary.

iv. Volume IV Past Performance Factor. This volume shall contain past performance information regarding similar contracts.

Offerors shall submit Government contracts for the Prime Offeror and each major subcontractor in performance or awarded during the past

36 months (three (3) years), from the issue date of this solicitation, which are relevant to the requirements of this solicitation, to include the NAICS code the work was completed under. The Offeror shall submit only those recent and relevant contracts for itself and its major subcontractor(s) for identical or similar efforts to the requirements of this RFP. The proposal volume shall contain no more than five (5) contracts for the Prime Offeror and three (3) contracts for each of the Prime Offerors major subcontractors. A minimum of one (1) contract reference is required for each proposed major subcontract. Major subcontractors are defined as members of a Prime

Offerors overall team who are anticipated to perform more than twenty percent (20%) of the proposed TEP. Relevant efforts are defined as efforts that are essentially the same as or similar in scope and complexity with a minimum of one (1) year of completed performance, within the NAICS code 511210. In order to be considered relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate for each proposed contract that it, or its major subcontractor, performed a minimum of 33% of the dollar value of the contract. Data concerning the Prime Offeror shall be provided first, followed by each proposed major subcontractor, in alphabetical order. The Offeror shall also submit the written consent of its major subcontractors to allow the disclosure of its subcontractors past performance information to the Prime Offeror.

1) Section 1 Contract Descriptions. This section shall include the following information in the following format.

i. Contractor/Subcontractor place of performance, CAGE code and data universal numbering (DUNS) number. If the work was performed as a subcontractor, also provide the name of the prime contractor and point of contact (POC) within the prime contractor organization (name, and current address, e-mail address, and telephone and fax numbers).

ii. Government contracting activity, and current address, PCO name, e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

iii. Governments technical representative/Contracting Officers Representative (COR) name, current email address, telephone and fax numbers.

iv. Government contract administration activity and the Administrative Contracting Officers name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax number.

v. Government contract administration activitys pre-award monitors name, and current e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers.

vi. Contract number and, in the case of indefinite delivery type contracts, General Services Administration contracts, and blanket purchase agreements, include delivery order numbers.

vii. Contract Type (specific type such as fixed-price (FP), cost reimbursement (CR), Cost Plus Fixed Fee

(CPFF)- term form, CPFF-completion, time & material (T&M), etc.). In the case of indefinite delivery contracts, indicate specific type

(requirements, definite quantity, and indefinite quantity) and secondary contract type (FP, CR, T&M, etc.).

viii. Awarded price/cost.

ix. Final or projected final price/cost.

x. Original delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

xi. Final or projected final, delivery schedule, including dates of start and completion of work.

xii. One (1) contract, Delivery Order counts as a single reference. Do not combine multiple contracts, DOs, or TOs into one (1) reference.

xiii. The Offeror must provide the current SOW with each refference. The Prime Offeror/major subcontractor must cross reference the relevancy of the work they accomplished under the provided SOW to the All Source II SOW.

8 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

2) Section 2 Performance. Offerors shall provide a specific narrative explanation of each contract listed in Section 1, Contract Description, describing the objective achieved and detailing how the effort is relevant to the requirement of this solicitation. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The Offerors shall list each time the delivery schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All requests for variance shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions. The Offerors shall also provide a copy of any cure notices or show-cause letters received on each contract listed and a description of any correction action implemented by the Offeror or proposed subcontractor. The Offerors shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated and the type and reason(s) for the termination.

3) Section 3 Subcontracts. Offerors shall provide an outline of how the effort required by the requirements will be assigned for performance within the Offerors corporate entity and among the proposed subcontractors. The information provided for the Prime

Offeror and each proposed major subcontractor must include the entire company name, company address, CAGE code, DUNS number, and type of work to be performed by citing the SOW subparagraph number. This includes all major subcontractors. The Offeror must define the dollar value of work that each Offeror/major subcontractor will accomplish.

4) Section 4 New Corporate Entities. New corporate entities may submit data on prior contracts involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the Offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Information should be included in the files described in the sections above.

5) Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). For all contracts identified in Section 1 of the PPQ, Contract Descriptions, a PPQ must be completed and submitted.

The Offeror shall complete Part I of the PPQ and e-mail the completed questionnaire to both the Government contracting activity and Government technical representative responsible for the past/current contract.

The Offeror may not fill in and/or submit any past performance information for data entered into Part 1.

The Offeror must instruct the POCs for the cited past performance data in Part 1 that the questionnaires must be filled out by Government personnel for Government contract vehicles.

Past performance data for commercial past performance may be filled out by personnel of the commercial entity cited.

Offerors must instruct the POCs for past performance data cited in Part 1 of the PPQ to complete Part II of the questionnaire electronically and email the entire questionnaire to the cited contracting office no later than the proposal due date, at

Meghan.c.whitmore.civ@mail.mil and nicholas.m.mitrocsak.civ@mail.mil. The Offeror shall e-mail these two addresses a list of all the

POCs who were sent a questionnaire. The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date. The POC list shall be submitted in MS Word for Windows table format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number;

Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

Offerors must instruct the POCs for past performance data cited in Part 1 of the PPQ to complete Part II of the questionnaire electronically and email the entire questionnaire to the cited contracting office no later than the proposal due date, at

Meghan.c.whitmore.civ@mail.mil and nicholas.m.mitrocsak.civ@mail.mil.

The Offeror shall also e-mail these two contracting office addresses a list of all the POCs who were sent a questionnaire.

The Government must receive this list no later than the proposal due date but earlier submission is acceptable and appreciated; however, it will not impact the final rating of performance risk. The information shall be submitted in MS Word for Windows table format to include the following fields: Solicitation Number; Company Name; Contract Number; Government Agency; POC Last Name, First Name; POC

Title; POC Telephone Number; POC E-mail Address; and Date E-Mail to POC (month/day).

6) Submissions. Offerors are discouraged from providing POCs with another contractors facility, i.e., in case an Offeror (or one of his/her team members) is in a subcontract with another contractor who has submitted a proposal on the same requirement. Offerors shall provide and submit the prime contract number and all Governmental agency POC information, in lieu of subcontract numbers or prime contract POC information in situations as described above.

v. Volume V Small Business Factor

1) All offerors (both other than small businesses and small businesses) shall submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan

Commercial Plan (Commercial Plan). In accordance with FAR Part 19.701 a Commercial Plan is subcontracting plan (including goals) that covers the offerors fiscal year and that applies to the entire production of commercial items sold by either the entire company or a portion thereof (e.g., division, plant, or product line). Any contractor receiving a contract with a value greater than $750,000 must agree in the contract that small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance. It is further the policy of the United States that its prime contractors establish procedures to ensure the timely payment of amounts due pursuant to the terms of its subcontracts with small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns.

2) The Commercial Plan shall be in accordance with FAR 52-219-9(d). This required information will be used to evaluate the extent of your proposed participation/commitment to use U.S. small businesses in the performance of this acquisition (as small business prime offerors or small business subcontractors) relative to Section M, Factor IV, Small Business Participation. The Commercial Plan

9 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

will be incorporated into the base IDIQ. Binding commitments are considered enforceable contractual requirements. Note: The small plan outlines the "specifics" or the "how" or the "details" of the Offerors firm intentions to maximize the utilization of small businesses within this acquisition. The offeror shall articulate small business contributions to contract performance at the Prime contract through first tier subcontract levels. Second and lower tier small business subcontractors will not be considered towards the total small business participation percentage.

d. Discussions.

i. General Information.

- The Government reserves the right to award without discussion.

- The Offerors proposal will be evaluated as set forth in Section M of this solicitation. IAW FAR 15.306(d), the Government may hold discussions with Offerors. Clarifications and/or discussions may be deemed necessary, as described in FAR 15.306(a). However, the

Offerors initial proposal should contain its best terms and conditions from a price and technical standpoint as the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award the resultant contract without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions, if necessary.

- If the PCO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the PCO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

ii. Discussion Scheduling. If discussions are conducted, the PCO may schedule discussion session(s) to clarify Offerors questions on Evaluation Notices (ENs), and each Offeror will be notified of the time and place prior to its discussion session. Appropriate security clearances should be provided by the Offerors in sufficient time to process the requests. The PCO will provide additional instructions with the notification. The discussion sessions will take place at a facility of the Governments choosing in the Aberdeen, MD area.

Non-Government Advisors. Offerors are advised that non-Government advisor subject matter experts (SMEs) have participated in the development of the requirement or may participate in the source selection process. The non-Government advisor SMEs that may participate in the source selection process will have access to all the necessary parts of the Offerors proposal pertinent to the SMEs area of expertise. Non-Government SMEs that will participate in the source selection process will not have access to price data or past performance information. These individuals are non-voting members of the evaluation team. The companies listed below are precluded from being a prime contractor or from participating in any teaming arrangement with potential Offerors due to Organizational Conflict of

Interest concerns. Offerors must advise the PCO as soon as possible of any concerns/questions with regard to the use of the non-

Government SMEs from the companies listed below. Any Offeror that is affiliated with or is contemplating a contractual relationship with the companies listed below must notify the PCO as soon as possible. In accomplishing its duties, the below firms may require access to proprietary information contained in the Offerors proposals. Therefore, pursuant to FAR 9.505-4(b), these firms must execute an agreement with each Offeror that states that they will (1) protect the Offerors information from unauthorized use or disclosure for as long as it remains proprietary, and (2) refrain from using the information for any purpose other than that for which it was furnished.

To expedite the evaluation process, each Offeror must contact the above companies to effect execution of such an agreement prior to the submission of proposals. Each Offeror shall submit copies of the agreement with its proposal within Volume I -Executive Summary (4)-

Award Documents/Certifications/Representations.

Each Offeror must submit copies of its complete NDA with the following companies:

1) Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., 8283 Greensboro Drive, McLean, VA, 22102-3830; CAGE Code: 17038; POC: Ryan Ludwig, Phone:

732-936-3539, Email: ludwig_ryan@bah.com

2) QED, 6165 Guardian Gateway, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005;

CAGE Code: 42FD6; POC Mr. Scott Balda; Email: sbalda@qed-sys.com

3) Decisive Engineering Corporation, 112 Deer Path Ln, Freehold, NJ 07728, CAGE: 4LUL1, POC Mr. Igor Taran, Email:

itaran@deceng.net

4) Focused Ingenuity, Inc., 205 Wood St, Burlington, NJ 08016, CAGE: 5VD20, POC: Mr. Michael Amabile, Email:

mamabile@focusedingenuity.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***

10 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. Basis for Award (Section M)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose best overall proposal is determined to be most beneficial to the Government.

The Government anticipates awarding to a single Offeror in response to this solicitation.

The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposals that are determined to be the most beneficial to the

Government, with appropriate consideration given to the four (4) evaluation factors: Technical, Price,Past Performance and Small

Business. For the Technical and Price factors, the Government will utilize the tradeoff process under the Best Value Continuum. The

Technical factor is significantly more important than the Price factor. Offerors will be cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest prices offered or the highest technically rated proposals. Past Performance factor will assess the degree of confidence in the offeror. Small Business factors will be rated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. A minimum rating of acceptable must be achieved for the Technical and Small Business factors and a rating of Limited Confidence or higher for Past Performance to be considered eligible for award. Offerors proposed prices within the Price Factor must be equal to or less than the Government affordability values for each Delivery Order identified within the TEP Worksheet (Attachment 0003) to be considered eligible for award.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award the contract without conducting discussions with Offerors. The Government reserves the right to hold discussions as determined necessary or required in the sole discretion of the Government's Procuring

Contracting Officer. Therefore, an Offerors initial proposal should contain its best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The

Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range if the PCO determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an effective competition can be conducted.

Proposals with an omission or unclear proposals may be judged to mean the Offeror does not fully understand the requirements or understand what it takes to meet or exceed the requirements, regardless of the proposed price. In that case, the Offeror may be found unacceptable and ineligible for award.

B. Factors to Be Evaluated

Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the proposal. These proposals will be deemed the most advantageous to the Government based upon the evaluation factors described below.

Factor I Technical

Factor II Price

Factor III Past Performance

Factor IV Small Business

C. Evaluation Approach

1. Technical Factor. Two (2) phases of the technical proposal evaluation will be conducted by the Government. Under both phases, the

Government will evaluate the extent to which an Offerors solution is able to accomplish the steps set forth in the Phase I Product

Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0005), and the Phase II Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006), which is provided for evaluation purposes only.

a. Phase One Product Demonstration: During this phase the Government will evaluate on a Go/No Go Basis the extent to which an

Offerors solution is able to accomplish the steps described in Phase One of the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment

0005), which are provided for evaluation purposes only. During Phase I of the Product Demonstration, Offerors solution is required to successfully complete all steps in Phase One of the Phase I Product Demonstration Plan (Attachment 0005). The basis for the Contracting

Officer establishing the competitive range for continuation into Phase Two Product Demonstration (as set forth in Attachment 0005) and beyond will be successful completion of Phase One and rated "Go". Those Offerors who do not successfully complete all the Phase I

Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0005) steps will be considered unsuccessful, rated "No-Go", will not be part of the competitive range, and will not be considered eligible for award. Ratings of Go/No Go Evaluation are detailed in Table 2 below.

Table 2 - Phase One Product Demonstration:Go/No Go Evaluation

Go - Completes the thread steps as aligned to the PRD requirements, stated in the in the Phase I Product Demonstration Event Plan

(Attachment 0005) Appendix A.

No Go - Does not complete the thread steps as aligned to the PRD requirements, stated in the in the Phase I Product Demonstration Plan

(Attachment 0005) Appendix A.

*** SEE Table 2. Phase One Product Demonstration:Go/No Go Evaluation in Attachment 0008, "Solicitation Tables" of Section J ***

b. Phase Two Product Demonstration: During this phase, the Government will evaluate the extent to which an Offerors solution is

11 15

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

able to successfully complete the steps called out in the Phase II Product Demonstration Plan (Attachment 0006) specifically the demonstration test thread in Appendix A of the attachment. During the Phase Two Product Demonstration, an Offerors solution is not required to successfully complete all Phase II Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006) Appendix A. Offerors who successfully complete a higher number of steps will receive a higher rating. Conversely, an Offeror's solution that accomplishes less of the Phase II

Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006) steps will be rated lower. An Offeror's solution that does not present a viable solution to the Government may receive a combined technical/risk rating of unacceptable, see Table 3 - Combined Technical/Risk Ratings.

The Government will consider assigning findings for the Technical Product Demonstration and Sustainment Approach. The Government will assign ratings, detailed in Table 3 - Combined Technical/risk rating, based on an Offerors proposed solution to an individual step set forth in the Phase II Product Demonstration Event Plan (Attachment 0006) Appendix A. To receive consideration for award, an Offeror must receive a technical rating of Acceptable or better.

Table 3 - Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Color Rating--Adjectival Rating--Description

Blue--Outstanding--Proposal indicates and exceptional approach and understanding of the requirement and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low

Purple--Good--Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirement and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate

Green--Acceptable--Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirement and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate

Yellow--Marginal--Proposal has not demonstrated and adequate approach and understanding of the requirement and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high

Red--Unacceptable--Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

*** SEE Table 3. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings in Attachment 0008, "Solicitation Tables" of Section J ***

Table 4 - Technical Risk Rating Method

Adjectival Rating--Description

Low--Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption to schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance.