Amendment_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No. 3. Effective Date 4. Requisition/Purchase Req No. 5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code) 9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print) 16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

W52P1J

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - RI

ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299-8000

BLDGS 60 & 62

ALLISON D. KOPP

EMAIL: ALLISON.D.KOPP.CIV@MAIL.MIL

W52P1J-16-R-0197

2017JUL21

X

X

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 10

/SIGNED/

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: ALLISON D. KOPP

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCRC-AL/(309)782-0732

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

1. The purpose of Amendment 0002 to Solicitation W52P1J-16-R-0197 is as follows:

A. Incorporate updated Technical Data Package (TDP) into Solicitation. The following drawings were changed from Distribution Statement

F. to Distribution Statement D.:

i. 12912208 (Pages 1,2)

ii. 12912216 (Pages 77,78)

iii. MIL-C-70983 (Pages 170-253)

The following drawings were changed from Distribution Statement B. to Distribution Statement D.:

i. 12912370 (Pages 81,82)

ii. MIL-C-70478D (Pages 294-338)

See Section C for link to updated TDP.

B. Incorporate updated Statement of Work (SOW) titled "Cartridge, 120mm HEAT-MP-T M830A1 (C791) Recapitalization/Maintenance Program" dated 3 August 2017 into Solicitation. The changes to this SOW are as follows:

i. Paragraph 3.5 is updated to add "The contractor has the option to retain/reuse the propellant bag or replace with a new propellant bag."

ii. Paragraph 3.18 is updated to state: "Dispose of inert residual components from teardown that could not be utilized to reassemble cartridges. Residual energetic material including projectiles with tracers and case adapters, propellant, or primers, shall be packaged and shipped to Letterkenny Munitions Center for disposal. The contractor shall prepare and ship this energetic material to

LECM and the USG will be responsible for the receipt and demil costs. Any cartridge, that upon inspection was determined unsuitable for teardown shall be returned to the USG so it will be put into the U.S. Army Demiliterization Account for disposal."

iii. Paragraph 5.16 g was added to state: "Deliver residual energetic material to LEMC 60 days after contract modification and authorization for demil is awarded. Complete shipping address will be provided with the contract modification."

See Section J for details.

C. Incorporate updated Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) page 5, Block 16 to state: "The Contractor shall submit a completed AIE package no later than 180 calendar days after contract award". See Section J for details.

D. Provide Additional Questions and Responses to Solicitation. These Additional Questions and Responses are hereby incorporated at

Section J, Attachment 10.

E. Revise paragraph L.4.1.ii to remove reference to clause 52.245-4006 and include reference to clause 52.245-9. See Section L for details.

F. Revise paragraph M.3.1 to remove reference to clause 52.245-4006 and include reference to clause 52.245-9. See Section M for details.

2. Except as provided herein, the balance of terms, conditions, and requirements as specified under Solicitation W52P1J-16-R-0197 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

2 10

W52P1J-16-R-0197 0002

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION J - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

List of Number List of Number

Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By Addenda Title Date of Pages Transmitted By________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________________________ ____________________________________________________________ _______________ ____________ _______________

Exhibit A CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL) M830A1 04-AUG-2017 016

Attachment 0002 M830A1 MAINTENANCE RECAPITALIZATION STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) 03-AUG-2017 021

Attachment 0010 M830A1 RFP QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES 04-AUG-2017 004

3 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 PROPOSALS: Proposals shall be submitted in accordance with (IAW) the instructions outlined in this section. Proposals should be specific, complete, and address each of the factors below. Failure to provide the required information and supporting documentation could result in the offer being rejected. The proposal submission shall consist of two volumes: Technical and Price. Offerors may choose Option A or Option B for its technical proposal.

L.1.1 There will be two options for proposal submission. Information pertaining to the requirements for each proposal option is contained in Section L.4, Specific Proposal Instructions. If Option A is chosen by the Offeror, proposals shall consist of the following and shall be submitted IAW this section:

Volume 1 Price

Volume 2 Technical (Submission of required data IAW Option A as outlined in Section L.4.2, fulfils Sub-factor 1: Teardown

Plan; Sub-factor 2: Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan; Sub-factor 3: Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan; and Sub-factor 4: Integrated Master

Schedule (IMS) requirements)

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror, proposals shall consist of the following and shall be submitted IAW this section:

Volume 1 Price

Volume 2 Technical

Sub-factor 1: Teardown Plan

Sub-factor 2: Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan

Sub-factor 3: Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan

Sub-factor 4: Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

L.1.2 Each proposal shall contain the Offerors best terms for award of a contract under the solicitation. Proposals shall be specific, complete and address each of the designated factors listed below. Failure to provide the required information/documentation in response to these instructions may result in the Offeror's proposal being rejected.

a. The U.S. Government anticipates award of one firm fixed price contract for all CLINs as a result of this solicitation on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for the Technical factor. The Price proposal will be evaluated to determine the proposal offering the lowest total evaluated price. The

Offerors proposal with the lowest total evaluated price will then be evaluated for technical acceptability. The Technical proposal will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. If an Offeror fails to achieve an Acceptable rating under

Option A, or fails to achieve an Acceptable rating on any of the four Technical sub-factors under Option B, it will receive an Unacceptable for the Technical factor and will not be considered for award.

b. Each Offeror shall provide the information as required by this solicitation (including attachments and exhibits) in the proper format. Proposals must contain all information as required by the solicitation and should be put into the format as described herein. Proposals that do not contain all of the information requested in the solicitation risk being determined unacceptable by the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government will not assume the offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in its proposal.

c. The proposal must not merely repeat the solicitation requirements, but rather must provide documentary evidence explaining how contract requirements will be met.

d. The U.S. Government intends to award without discussions (see FAR 52.215-1). However, the U.S. Government reserves to right to contact offerors for clarification, or discussions, if later determined by the Source Selection Authority to be necessary IAW FAR 15.306(a)(3).

e. The offeror shall enter unit prices for all CLINs on the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet (Attachment 0001). Please note specific instructions in Section B narrative. Failure to completely fill out the Price Evaluation Spreadsheet may result in the proposal being determined unacceptable and rejected. All unit prices proposed for each CLIN will be evaluated and binding. The U.S. Government reserves the right to require additional submission of data (i.e. data other than certified cost or pricing data) necessary to validate price reasonableness.

L.1.3 All questions concerning this procurement, either technical or contractual, must be submitted in writing to the

Contracting Officer and/or Contract Specialist. No direct discussion between the technical representative and a prospective offeror will be conducted. Questions shall be sent to the following points of contact:

E-mail: ryan.c.pierce.civ@mail.mil

E-mail: allison.d.kopp.civ@mail.mil

4 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.1.4 Proposals shall be submitted electronically to allison.d.kopp.civ@mail.mil and ryan.c.pierce.civ@mail.mil. Due to file size restrictions, proposals may be submitted through AMRDEC SAFE, https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx.

L.2. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:

L.2.1 The proposal shall be submitted in the English language and include all of the following:

a. One completed signed electronic copy of the complete solicitation and continuation sheets (Section A through M), Standard Form 33 (SF33) and acknowledgement of all amendments. The solicitation and amendments must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the offeror. Offeror must submit a completed Price Evaluation Spreadsheet (Attachment

0001) as stated in Section L.4.1. Offerors are directed to thoroughly read the solicitation and fill in information on appropriate clauses as stated in the solicitation.

b. For any fill-ins that are not applicable, the offeror must acknowledge by indicating N/A.

c. The proposal shall include computation for use of Government-Owned property, if applicable, as stated in Section L.4.1.

d. As a requirement under this solicitation, all Offerors must submit Representations/Certifications data into the System _______ for http://www.sam.gov/ The purpose of electronic Representations and Certifications is to provide all Offerors with a________________________ portal in which to submit Reps/Certs in a publicly accessible format, nullifying the requirement to submit identical information in response to each and every Federal contract solicitation. Any Offeror that has previously submitted

Representations/Certified data into SAM is reminded to update the data prior to submitting with the proposal and shall ensure its records are not expired.

e. The Offerors proposal shall be valid through December 31, 2017 in lieu of the 60 days as stated on page one of the

SF33, block 12.

L.3 FORMAT FOR PROPOSALS

L.3.1 Each proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes as set forth below:

a. Volume 1: Price Proposal

The Price Factor shall be contained in a separate file from the Technical Factor. The Price Evaluation Spreadsheet

(Attachment 0001) shall be submitted electronically in Microsoft Excel format and Adobe PDF files. Unit prices shall be limited to two decimal places.

b. Volume 2: Technical Proposal

i. Option A: Documentation of previous successful recapitalization of 120mm Tank Ammunition (ie. Wide Area Work

Flow (WAWF) Acceptance document, approved Ammunition Data Card, proof of successfully executed purchase order); OR

ii. Option B: Maximum proposal page allowance identified below:

Sub-factor 1: Teardown Plan (10 pages)

Sub-factor 2: Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan (10 pages)

Sub-factor 3: Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan (10 pages)

Sub-factor 4: Integrated Master Schedule (no page limitation, see below)

The minimum font size shall be 12 point for all pages. Font smaller than 12 point is ONLY acceptable in graphics, sketches, tables, charts, price matrix, etc. but must be readable without magnification. The Integrated Master

Schedule (IMS) shall be submitted in a separate .pdf file (no larger than 11 x 17 printed) and Microsoft Project format. The IMS will not count towards the above page limitations.

L.3.2 Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and solicitation number in the header and/or footer. The Offeror is responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of the proposal. Offerors shall provide a proposal that, at a minimum, addresses those evaluation Factors and Sub-factors required in Section L and Section M of the RFP. Each proposal shall address the requirements of Section C.

L.4 SPECIFIC PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details (i.e. drawings, test data) to permit a complete and accurate evaluation.

The Volume 2, Option B: Technical Proposal, shall have a separate index, which contains narrative titles, which are cross-referenced

5 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

to the applicable RFP Requirement included in its written proposal. This index shall not count against the page limitation. In the response to the RFP the Offeror must address the following Factors and Sub-factors:

L.4.1 VOLUME 1 - PRICE PROPOSAL:

a. Offerors must complete the Price Evaluation Sheet at Attachment 0001 IAW Section B narrative in order to be considered for award. Failure to do so may result in the offer being rejected.

b. All prices for this acquisition shall be stated in U.S. dollars and unit prices shall be limited to two decimal places.

c. The proposal shall consist of:

i. The Pricing volume shall consist of one (1) electronic copy submitted via AMRDEC SAFE as defined in paragraph L.1.4 above.

ii. If an Offeror plans to use any item of Government property in the possession of the Offeror or its proposed subcontractors, for any performance resulting from this solicitation, the Offeror shall submit the required information contained in clause 52.245-9. For the purpose of identifying the kinds and quantities of property and the rental time, the Offeror shall base its estimate on the quantity for each CLIN. Although FAR 52.245-9(e) and the clause located in

Section L entitled Submission Requirements for Use of Government- Owned Property require the offeror to calculate the rental evaluation factor, the Government reserves the right to make corrections as needed.

iii. The Pricing volume shall contain any additional information considered necessary to explain the proposed pricing.

L.4.2 Volume II: TECHNICAL

Offerors may choose to utilize either Option A or Option B to address all requirements of this solicitation. Option A is for an

Offeror to submit documentation identifying previous successful recapitalization of 120mm M865 TPCSDS-T Tank Ammunition and applicable information detailed below to fulfill the Technical Factor only. If an Offeror submits its technical proposal IAW Option

A, a written proposal will not be required. If an Offeror cannot meet all of Option A Technical proposal criteria, then it shall submit a full proposal under Option B criteria.

Required criteria for Technical Proposal Options are detailed below:

L.4.2.1 OPTION A - TECHNICAL FACTOR PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS: Option A is for the Offeror to submit documentation identifying previous successful recapitalization of 120mm M865 TPCSDS-T Tank Ammunition. Documentation must demonstrate acceptable performance, such as a

WAWF acceptance document, approved Ammunition Data Card, or proof of successfully executed purchase order. Recapitalization needs to include teardown of 120mm Tank Ammunition cartridges including removal of the cartridge case, handling and screening of the propellant for foreign debris, reassembly of the cartridges, loading propellant to a targeted charge weight, and pack out of the cartridges. In order to utilize Option A the following criteria must be met:

a. The documentation must be for successful recapitalization of the M865 TPCSDS-T.

b. Each document identifying previous successful recapitalization of 120mm M865 TPCSDS-T Tank Ammunition must be dated within 12 months from the date of issuance of this RFP.

L.4.2.2 OPTION B, TECHNICAL FACTOR AND SUB-FACTOR PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS: Offerors are only required to submit a proposal IAW Option B if the Option A process (paragraph L.4.2.1) could not be fulfilled.

L.4.2.2.1 Teardown Plan Sub-factor:

The Offeror shall submit a detailed Teardown Plan which must be achievable and realistic. The Offeror's Teardown Plan, for recapitalization and to meet the requirements of the solicitation, shall include, at a minimum, the following:

The Offeror's Plan shall describe the procedure for inspection and teardown of cartridges, including the determination of whether cartridges are suitable for recapitalization, as well as preservation and preparation of case adapter for reuse. The Offeror's Plan needs to address the process for conducting propellant stability, inspection of packaging materials and disposal of the disassembled components.

L.4.2.2.2 Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan Sub-factor:

The Offeror shall submit the Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan which must be achievable and realistic. The Reassembly/LAP Propellant

Plan, for recapitalization and to meet the requirements of the solicitation, shall include, at a minimum, the following:

The Offeror's Plan shall thoroughly describe handling propellant, accurately weighing propellant, controlling exposure of propellant

6 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

to foreign material (list out), screening propellant to assure there is no foreign material and assuring the correct amount of propellant is loaded into each cartridge.

L.4.2.2.3 Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan Sub-factor:

The Offeror shall submit the Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan which must be achievable and realistic. The Offeror's Reassembly/LAP Bonding

Plan, for recapitalization and to meet the requirements of the solicitation, shall include, at a minimum, the following:

The Offeror's Plan shall thoroughly describe Load, Assemble and Pack of ammunition which requires assembly and alignment of two unthreaded or otherwise non-mechanically locked components which are secured with adhesive such as the skived edge interface used to join the two piece combustible cartridge case common to all 120mm tank ammunition. The Offeror's Plan shall discuss the process controls used to assure the two unthreaded components are properly secured.

L.4.2.2.4 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Sub-factor:

The Offeror shall submit the IMS which must be achievable and realistic. The Offeror's IMS, for recapitalization and to meet the requirements of the solicitation, shall include, at a minimum, the following:

The Offeror's IMS shall contain the applicable Process Flow Diagram which shall include the required events for production, Contract

Data Requirement Lists (CDRLs) Exhibit A, First Article Requirements (including vendor/sub-contractor), inspection, teardown, supplier deliveries, and reassembly/LAP. The Offeror's IMS shall identify the critical path and long lead purchase items.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***

7 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis for Award:

A Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Process IAW FAR 15.101-2 will be utilized to select the successful

Offeror. Award will be made to the Offeror who provides the lowest price with a technically acceptable proposal. The U.S. Government will evaluate proposals submitted IAW this section and will make a determination considering the following factors: (1) Price and (2)

Technical.

a. The U.S. Government plans to award one Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

b. The U.S. Government will evaluate each proposal strictly IAW Section M.

M.1.1 Discussions:

a. The U.S. Government intends to award a contract without discussions. The Contracting Officer may contact Offerors for clarification, as described in FAR 15.306(a) and FAR 52.215-1, without opening discussions. However, the U.S. Government reserves the right to conduct discussions and to permit Offerors to revise its proposal if determined necessary by the

Contracting Officer.

b. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions are necessary, they will be held IAW FAR 15.306.

c. Clarifications will not constitute as discussions, and will not obligate the U.S. Government to open discussions or establish a competitive range.

M.1.2 Other Evaluation Considerations:

a. Proposals that are unrealistic in terms of technical or contain unbalanced prices may be considered an indication of a lack of understanding of the complexity of the contract requirements and may be determined unacceptable.

b. Pursuant to FAR 9.103, a contract will only be awarded to an Offeror that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible. Separate from the LPTA source selection criteria, an Offeror must be able to demonstrate it meets the standards of responsibility set forth in FAR 9.104. To assist in the Contracting Officers Determination of Contractor Responsibility, the U.S. Government may conduct a pre-award survey on any Offeror whose proposal is considered for award.

M.2 Factors:

Award will be made to the Offeror based on the instructions set forth in Section L, and the evaluation of the factors IAW Section M. If

Option A is chosen by the Offeror, the award will be based on the following Factors:

Volume 1: Price

Volume 2: Technical (Submission of required data IAW Section L.4.2, fulfills Sub-factor 1: Teardown Plan; Sub-factor 2:

Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan; Sub-factor 3: Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan; and Sub-factor 4: Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) requirements)

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror, the award will be based on the following:

Volume 1: Price

Volume 2: Technical

Sub-factor 1: Teardown Plan

Sub-factor 2: Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan

Sub-factor 3: Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan

Sub-factor 4: Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

M.3 Evaluation Procedures, Criteria, and Ratings:

The U.S. Government will evaluate the prices IAW the information included in the Section B narrative in the solicitation. Once the total evaluated price has been determined for each offeror, the total evaluated prices will be ranked from low to high. The technical evaluation will then be conducted on the lowest priced proposal for acceptability. If the lowest priced proposal is determined to be unacceptable, the next lowest proposal will be evaluated for acceptability. This process will continue until a proposal is deemed to have the lowest price and is technically acceptable.

8 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Each Offeror's proposal will be evaluated against the evaluation criteria to determine whether the Offeror has the technical expertise required to successfully deliver the product IAW the delivery schedule as delineated in Section B of the solicitation. The U.S.

Government will assign a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable for the Technical Factor. The definition of each rating is below:

Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Acceptable: Proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not clearly meet the requirements of the solicitation.

M.3.1 Price Factor Evaluation

The U.S. Government will evaluate Offerors proposed price as set forth on the Price Evaluation Sheet (Attachment 0001) and any Use of

Government Owned Property (FAR 52.245-9).

The U.S. Government intends to award one firm fixed price contract.

a. Price Evaluation Spreadsheet (Attachment 0001) - For each proposal, the U.S. Government will first calculate each CLIN Total

Evaluated Price. The Total Evaluated Price will be calculated by summing the individual CLIN Total Evaluated Prices plus the

U.S. Government Property Evaluation Factor, if applicable.

If an Offeror fails to submit unit prices for any proposed CLIN, its proposal may be considered unacceptable and the U.S.

Government may reject the proposal.

b. If applicable, the U.S. Government will add the calculation of Government owned real property and/or production and research property as required by the provisions contained in Section L.4.2 of the solicitation.

The Total Evaluated Price will be calculated by adding the following price factors together:

CLIN Total Evaluated Price from Attachment 0001, Price Evaluation Spreadsheet

+ Total of U.S. Government Property use calculation as identified IAW Section L.4.1 of the solicitation

= Total Evaluated Price

Price Analysis shall be used to determine price reasonableness. Additional analysis techniques may be used as determined necessary by the Contracting Officer. As part of the evaluation, proposals may be reviewed to identify any significant unbalanced pricing. In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g), i.e., Unbalanced Pricing, a proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the U.S. Government.

M.3.2 Technical:

The U.S. Government will evaluate the technical proposal to determine if the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding and ability to comply with the requirements of this solicitation. The Technical factor is comprised of four sub-factors: Sub-factor 1: Teardown Plan;

Sub-factor 2: Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan; Sub-factor 3: Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan; and Sub-factor 4: Integrated Master Schedule

(IMS).

M.3.2.1 OPTION A, TECHNICAL FACTOR EVALUATION CRITERIA:

If Option A is chosen by the Offeror to address the technical factor, evaluation will be conducted at the factor level. The U.S.

Government will assign a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable for the Technical factor. If an Offeror fails to achieve an Acceptable rating under Option A, the Offeror's proposal will receive an Unacceptable for the Technical factor and will not be considered for award. The minimum requirements have been met for the Option A proposal approach if the Offeror submits documentation identifying previous successful recapitalization of 120mm M865 TPCSDS-T Tank Ammunition IAW the following criteria.

a. The Offeror provided adequate documentation for the M865 TPCSDS-T.

b. The Offeror's documentation identifying previous successful recapitalization of 120mm Tank Ammunition is dated within 12 months prior to the date of issuance of this RFP.

M.3.2.2 OPTION B, TECHNICAL FACTOR AND SUB-FACTOR EVALUATION CRITERIA:

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror for the Technical factor and sub-factors, evaluation will be conducted at the sub-factor level with an overall Technical factor rating assigned based on the individual sub-factor ratings and findings. The U.S. Government will assign a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable for each sub-factor. An Unacceptable rating in any sub-factor will result in an overall rating of Unacceptable for the Technical factor and the Offeror's proposal will not be considered for award.

9 10

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.4.1.2.1 Teardown Plan Sub-factor:

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror for the Technical factor and sub-factors, the U.S. Government will evaluate the Offerors detailed

Teardown Plan proposal for recapitalization and its ability to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The U.S. Government will evaluate the Offerors Teardown Plan submission for its achievability and realistic execution. The U.S. Government will evaluate the following areas:

The Offeror's proposal describes the procedure for inspection and teardown of cartridges, including the determination of whether cartridges are suitable for recapitalization, as well as preservation and preparation of case adapter for reuse. The Offeror's proposal addresses the process for conducting propellant stability, inspection of packaging materials and disposal of the disassembled components.

M.4.1.2.2 Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan Sub-factor:

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror for the Technical factor and sub-factors, the U.S. Government will evaluate the Offerors detailed

Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan proposal for recapitalization and its ability to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The U.S.

Government will evaluate the Offerors Reassembly/LAP Propellant Plan submission for its achievability and realistic execution. The U.S.

Government will evaluate the proposal in the following areas:

The Offeror's proposal demonstrates an understanding of the requirements and a thorough approach to handling propellant, accurately weighing propellant, controlling exposure of propellant to foreign material (list out), screening propellant to assure there is no foreign material and assuring the correct amount of propellant is loaded into each cartridge.

M.4.1.2.3 Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan Sub-factor:

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror for the Technical factor and sub-factors, the U.S. Government will evaluate the Offerors detailed

Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan proposal for recapitalization and its ability to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The U.S.

Government will evaluate the Offerors Reassembly/LAP Bonding Plan submission for its achievability and realistic execution. The U.S.

Government will evaluate the following areas:

The Offeror's proposal demonstrates an understanding of the requirements and a thorough approach to Load, Assemble and Pack of ammunition which requires assembly and alignment of two unthreaded or otherwise non-mechanically locked components which are secured with adhesive such as the skived edge interface used to join the two piece combustible cartridge case common to all 120mm tank ammunition. The Offeror's proposal discusses the process controls used to assure the two unthreaded components are properly secured.

M.4.1.2.4 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Sub-factor:

If Option B is chosen by the Offeror for the Technical factor and sub-factors, the U.S. Government will evaluate the Offeror's IMS for recapitalization and its ability to meet the requirements of the solicitation. The U.S. Government will evaluate the Offeror's IMS submission for its achievability and realistic execution. The U.S. Government will evaluate the following areas:

The Offeror's proposal provided an adequate IMS, with applicable Process Flow Diagram, which includes the required events for production including CDRLs Exhibit A, First Article Requirements (including vendor/sub-contractor), inspection, teardown, supplier deliveries, and reassembly/LAP. The Offeror's IMS identified the critical path and long lead purchase items were included.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

10 10