T2C2 SF1449_W15P7T-23-R-0002_03Nov2022.pdf

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

Offeror To Complete Block 12, 17, 23, 24, & 30

1. Requisition Number Page Of

2. Contract No. 3. Award/Effective Date 4. Order Number 5. Solicitation Number 6. Solicitation Issue Date

7. For Solicitation Information Call:

A. Name B. Telephone Number (No Collect Calls) 8. Offer Due Date/Local Time

9. Issued By Code 10. This Acquisition is Unrestricted OR Set Aside: % For:

Small Business Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Eligible Under the Women-Owned Small Business Program

Hubzone Small Business EDWOSB

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business NAICS:

Email: 8(A) Size Standard:

11. Delivery For FOB Destination Unless Block Is Marked

12. Discount Terms 13a. This Contract Is A Rated Order Under DPAS (15 CFR 700) 13b. Rating

See Schedule 14. Method Of Solicitation RFQ IFB RFP

15. Deliver To Code 16. Administered By Code

Telephone No.

17a. Contractor/Offeror Code Facility 18a. Payment Will Be Made By Code

Telephone No.

17b. Check If Remittance Is Different And Put Such

Address In Offer 18b. Submit Invoices To Address Shown In Block 18a Unless Block Below Is Checked

See Addendum 19.

Item No.

20.

Schedule Of Supplies/Services 21.

Quantity 22.

Unit 23.

Unit Price 24.

Amount

(Use Reverse and/or Attach Additional Sheets As Necessary)

25. Accounting And Appropriation Data 26. Total Award Amount (For Govt. Use Only)

27a.Solicitation Incorporates By Reference FAR 52.212-1, 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3 And 52.212-5 Are Attached. Addenda Are Are Not Attached.

27b.Contract/Purchase Order Incorporates By Reference FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 Is Attached. Addenda Are Are Not Attached.

28. Contractor Is Required To Sign This Document And Return _________ 29. Award Of Contract: Ref. Offer Copies to Issuing Office. Contractor Agrees To Furnish And Deliver All Items Set Forth Or Otherwise Identified Above And On Any Additional Sheets Subject To The Terms And Conditions Specified.

Dated . Your Offer On Solicitation (Block 5), Including Any Additions Or Changes Which Are Set Forth Herein, Is Accepted As To Items:

30a. Signature Of Offeror/Contractor 31a. United States Of America (Signature Of Contracting Officer)

30b. Name And Title Of Signer (Type Or Print) 30c. Date Signed 31b. Name Of Contracting Officer (Type Or Print) 31c. Date Signed

Authorized For Local Reproduction Previous Edition Is Not Usable

Standard Form 1449 (Rev. 2/2012) Prescribed By GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

W15P7T-23-R-0002

TYCE L. RUCKS (443)861-4733

TYCE.L.RUCKS.CIV@ARMY.MIL

W15P7T

ARMY CONTRACTING CMD-APG

6565 SURVEILLANCE LOOP

APG, MD 21005-1846

X

X 100

541614

X

X DOA7

X

SEE SCHEDULE

SEE SCHEDULE

X X

X 1

1 133

19.

Item No.

20.

Schedule Of Supplies/Services

21.

Quantity

22.

Unit

23.

Unit Price

24.

Amount

32a. Quantity In Column 21 Has Been

Received Inspected Accepted, And Conforms To The Contract, Except As Noted: _________________________________________________

32b. Signature Of Authorized Government Representative 32c. Date 32d. Printed Name and Title of Authorized Government Representative

32e. Mailing Address of Authorized Government Representative 32f. Telephone Number of Authorized Government Representative

32g. E-Mail of Authorized Government Representative

33. Ship Number 34. Voucher Number 35. Amount Verified 36. Payment 37. Check Number Correct For Partial Final Complete Partial Final

38. S/R Account No. 39. S/R Voucher Number 40. Paid By

41a. I Certify This Account Is Correct And Proper For Payment 42a. Received By (Print) 41b. Signature And Title Of Certifying Officer 41c. Date 42b. Received At (Location)

42c. Date Rec’d (YY/MM/DD) 42d. Total Containers

Standard Form 1449 (Rev. 2/2012) Back

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: TYCE L. RUCKS

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCAP CCB/(443)861-4733

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

General Information to Offerors:

1. Responses must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation (including attachments). "Fill-ins" are provided on the standard form SF 1449 and other solicitation documents. Examine the entire solicitation carefully. The penalty for making false statements is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.

2. Responses must be plainly marked with the solicitation number and the date and local time set for receipt of proposals in the solicitation document.

3. General Procurement Information:

The Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), on behalf of the Product Manager (PdM) Satellite Communications

(SATCOM) anticipates awarding a stand-alone contract for the development of Logistics and Management Support Services for Transportable

Tactical Command Communications (T2C2) and Scalable Class of Unified Terminals (SCOUT) (Small and Medium) to include the Ultra Lite, previously known as the Global Rapid Response Information Package (GRRIP). This action will be providing required Satellite

Communications (SATCOM)capabilities utilizing a family of terminals (FOTs) material solution strategy to satisfy a variety of operational needs associated with providing the fusion of maneuver, fires, intelligence, operations support and sustainment information for select teams/small units at the front edge of the battlefield. This is critical to the Army's ability to conduct Unified Land operations over extended distances in all tactical terrains. The Army will deploy T2C2 FoT capabilities to remote tactical elements whose organic tactical network cannot meet time-sensitive Situational Awareness (SA) or reporting mission requirements.

This solicitation is being issued under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)) and FAR 6.204, Section 8(a)

Competition, to procure logistics and management support services for the development of the logistic documentation required to establish and maintain Sustainment Support Packages (SSPs) for each terminal variant and configuration. The North American Industry

Standard Classification Code assigned to this requirement is 541614, size standard $17.5 Million. The period of performance of the awarded action will be a base period of twelve (12) months, four (4) twelve (12) month option periods, and a FAR 52.217-8 Option to

Extend Services for a period not to exceed an additional six (6) months. No contract will be awarded until appropriated funds are made available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this requirement without incurring any proposal fees.

The North American Industry Standard Classification Code assigned to this requirement is 541614, size standard $17.5 Million.

1. Issuing Office:

United States Army Contracting Command/Aberdeen Proving Ground

Office symbol: ACC-APG

2. Point of Contact Information:

Name: TYCE L RUCKS

Title: Contract Specialist

Email: tyce.l.rucks.civ@army.mil Phone: (443)861-4942

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0001 ***

PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS:

If a Contractor chooses to submit a proposal, the proposal package shall be received by Contracting Officer Licinda Peters, licinda.m.peters.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialists Tyce Rucks, tyce.l.rucks.civ@army.mil, and Judy Anderson, judy.l.anderson20.civ@army.mil, no later than (NLT) 1200 Noon Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) December 1, 2022. The submission size per email shall not exceed 9MB and shall include all necessary supporting documents. Any proposal not received in its entirety by the above listed closing time will not be considered for award. It is each Offerors responsibility to ensure that their proposal is received by the Government by the above listed time. If an Offeror does not receive confirmation of receipt of proposal from the Government, then it is their responsibility to contact the Contract Specialists identified above to confirm that their proposal has been received.

Offerors shall provide with their proposal the name, title, address, email address and telephone number of the company point of contact(s) regarding business decisions made with respect to the proposal who can contractually obligate the company. Offerors shall

2 133

W15P7T-23-R-0002

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

identify those individuals as authorized to negotiate with the Government regarding the proposal.

Offerors shall submit a Technical, Past Performance, Pricing Volume(s), Property Management Plan and Organizational Conflict of Interest

Declaration/Mitigation Plan in response to the T2C2 solicitation.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a stand-alone contract without asking any questions, clarifications, or having discussions with Offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions or ask questions or clarifications if they are later deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. Each Offerors initial proposal shall contain the Offerors best terms.

The Offeror shall submit the proposal volumes as follows:

VOLUME I Technical. This volume shall consist of one of the following files: xxxxxTECHxxxxx.docx or xxxxxTECHxxxxx.pdf (see below for naming instructions).

VOLUME II Past Performance. This volume shall consist of one of the following files: xxxxxPASTPERFxxxxx.docx or xxxxxPASTPERFxxxxx.pdf

(see below for naming instructions).

VOLUME III Cost/Price. This Volume shall consist of all of the following files: xxxxxCOST-PRICExxxxx.xlsx, xxxxxSANITIZEDxxxxx.xlsx, and xxxxxCOST-PRICENARRxxxxx.docx (see below for naming instructions).

VOLUME IV - OCI Declaration/Mitigation Plan and Property Management Plan. This Volume shall consist of the following files:

XXXXXOCIXXXXX.docx and xxxxxPROPERTYMNGTxxxxx.docx

In the document titles, the Offeror shall replace OfferorName with the Offerors Name and shall replace TBD with the date of the proposal submission. Examples:

1. VOLUME I Technical: OfferorNameTECHTBD.docx or OfferorNameTechTBD.pdf

2. VOLUME II Past Performance: OfferorNamePASTPERFTBD.docx or OfferorNamePASTPERFTBD.pdf

3. VOLUME III Cost/Price: OfferorNameCOST-PRICETBD.xlsx and OfferorNameCOST-PRICENARRTBD.docx.

4. VOLUME IV - OCI Declaration/Mitigation Plan and Property Management Plan: XXXXXOCIXXXXX.docx and xxxxxPROPERTYMNGTxxxxx.docx

Each volume shall be properly identified, numbered, clearly indexed, logically assembled, and tabbed. Each volume shall contain clearly identified sections and all pages shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date, and solicitation number in the header or footer.

Cost/Price information shall not appear in Volume I or Volume II. If the proposal fails to separate cost/price information from these two volumes, it may not be considered for award. If a subcontractor deems its proposal to contain proprietary information, then the subcontractors Cost/Price Volume shall be submitted electronically to Contracting Officer Licinda Peters, licinda.m.peters.civ@army.mil and Contract Specialists Tyce Rucks, tyce.l.rucks.civ@army.mil, and Judy Anderson, judy.l.anderson20.civ@army.mil by the above listed deadline. If a subcontractor deems its proposal to not contain proprietary information, then the subcontractors Cost/Price Volume shall be submitted with the primes proposal.

The Offeror shall include a statement that its proposal is valid for a minimum of 180 days from the date of proposal receipt, it will furnish to the Government the items and/or services identified in its proposal at the pricing agreed upon, and the items/services shall be delivered to the designated locations within the time frame specified within the resulting contract.

Proposals shall not contain classified information or data. All proprietary data shall be clearly marked.

Responses must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation (including attachments). "Fill-ins" are provided on some of the solicitation documents. Examine the entire solicitation carefully.

Proposals shall consist of separate files as set forth and named in the table below. MS Office software (compatible) or higher, or searchable ADOBE PDF shall be used to create the required files. The Cost/Price Volume shall be submitted as an EXCEL spreadsheet only;

no PDFs will be accepted for the Cost/Price Volume, with the exception of the Cost Narrative.

Each Volume/Part of the proposal shall be limited to the number of pages outlined in the table below. Page limit is viewed as total pages within a file. The page limit does not include any cover letter, table of contents, cover page, acronym list, or glossary page.

Please be aware that the pages excluded from the page limit are included to assist the Government during its evaluation and are not considered in the substantive evaluation of the proposal. The Government will not evaluate any pages that exceed the page limits identified below.

Pages containing text shall be typewritten on 8.5 x 11 paper. Drawings, tables, and other graphics shall be reduced only to the extent

3 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

legibility is not lost. Each page shall be single spaced with a minimum of twelve (12) point Times New Roman font and have no less than one (1) inch margins/borders.

The following parameters are set for each proposal volume.

VOLUME I TECHNICAL DOCUMENT:

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

FILE NAME: xxxxTECHxxxx.docx or xxxxTECHxxxx.pdf

PAGE LIMIT/NOTES: 30 Page Limit broken down as 25 pages for Subfactor 1 - Technical Approach and 5 pages for Subfactor 2 - Labor Mix

Narrative is not included in page count. The page limit does not include any cover letter, table of contents, cover page, acronym list, or glossary page.

VOLUME II PAST PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT:

PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL

FILE NAME: xxxxPASTPERFxxxx.docx or xxxxPASTPERFxxxx.pdf

PAGE LIMIT/NOTES: 5-page limit per past performance example submitted (up to 3 for Prime, and up to 2 for each significant subcontractor), and 1 Summary page for Volume II Past Performance. The page limit does not include any cover letter, table of contents, cover page, acronym list, or glossary page.

A significant subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor that is proposed to perform more than 20% of the total value of required services in the Offerors proposal.

VOLUME III COST/PRICE DOCUMENTS:

COST/PRICE PROPOSAL

FILE NAME: xxxxCOST/PRICExxxx.xlsx

PAGE LIMIT/NOTES: No Page Limit; RFP Attachment 1, completed by the Offeror and renamed as described above, SHALL be submitted with all formulas visible in each cell with a value. Proposals submitted that do not adhere to the format or cell requirements may not be further considered for award.

COST/PRICE NARRATIVE PROPOSAL

FILE NAME: xxxxxCOST/PRICENARRxxxxx.docx

PAGE LIMIT/NOTES: No page limit

The following documents shall be included in the proposal within Volume IV.

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN

FILE NAME: xxxxxPMPxxxxx.doc or xxxxxPMPxxxxx.pdf

PAGE LIMIT/NOTES: No page limit

OCI DECLARATION/MITIGATION PLAN

FILE NAME: xxxxOCIxxxx.doc

PAGE LIMIT/NOTES: No page limit

PROPOSAL CONTENTS

The Governments evaluation will be limited to the information provided by the Offeror, and nothing will be assumed. The Offeror is responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete, thorough, and accurate evaluation of the submitted proposal. Any information deemed proprietary shall be clearly marked.

Volume I Technical:

The technical proposal SHALL NOT merely restate the requirements as listed in the PWS. Offerors are cautioned that merely restating or parroting the technical requirements or PWS paragraphs with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform.

Subfactor 1: Task 2 - Logistics, Section 3.5.2, and Task 6 Configuration Management, Section 3.5.6 (25 page limit)

Offerors shall provide a detailed approach to meeting all of the requirements in PWS 3.5.2 (Task 2) and 3.5.6 (Task 6), including all subparagraphs, unless the subparagraph is specifically omitted below. Please be advised that the omitted subparagraphs are not inclusive of any additional subparagraphs unless specifically listed below. For example, even though PWS 3.5.2.7 is omitted, offerors are still required to address the requirements in PWS subparagraphs 3.5.2.7.1 - 3.5.2.7.4.

4 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Offerors are not required to provide an approach to the following PWS subparagraphs:

3.5.2.5

3.5.2.7

3.5.2.9.2

3.5.2.9.2.1

3.5.2.9.7

3.5.2.9.8

3.5.2.9.10

3.5.6.3

3.5.6.5.2

Offerors are encouraged to identify any risks associated with performing the requirements under Task 2 and Task 6, and provide risk mitigation strategies as applicable.

Subfactor 2: Labor Mix (5 page limit for narrative)

Offerors shall provide a redacted excel spreadsheet with its labor mix (labor categories and hours) and a written narrative explaining why the proposed labor mix is adequate to support each task within PWS Section 3.5 as noted below. There is no page count for the Labor mix.

PWS Section 3.5.1 TASK 1 Program Management

PWS Section 3.5.2 TASK 2 Logistics

PWS Section 3.5.3 TASK 3 Security

PWS Section 3.5.4 TASK 4 Engineering

PWS Section 3.5.5 TASK 5 Quality Assurance

PWS Section 3.5.6 TASK 6 Configuration Management

Volume II Past Performance

The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offerors ability to supply products and services that meet its Mission needs based on a demonstrated record of performance. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2), the recency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractors performance shall be considered. There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality

(including general trends in contractor performance and source of information). These aspects are considered by the Government in establishing one performance confidence assessment rating for each Offeror.

The Offeror may submit up to three (3) past performance examples for the Prime, and up to two (2) past performance examples for each proposed significant subcontractor. The Offerors past performance may include experience with the Department of Defense, other Federal

Government Agencies, State Agencies, Local Governments, and Commercial Customer contracts, task orders, or delivery orders. If the significant subcontractor(s) have no recent and relevant past performance, the Offeror must state as such. The Offeror and sigin The

Offeror shall not submit an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract as a Past Performance example: but rather, underlining order or delivery order should be submitted. Each task order or task order under an IDIQ contract that an Offeror provides as Past Performance will count as one (1) Past Performance example. The Offeror shall submit a one-page summary of the Past Performance examples as part of their Past Performance Volume.

Recency - A Past Performance example is recent if any portion of the period of performance of the contract, task order, or delivery order occurred within three years of the date of issuance of this proposal.

Relevance The degree in which a past performance example is similar to this effort to include, but not limited to: similarity of product/service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and extent of subcontracting/teaming. For significant subcontractors, the relevancy shall be limited to the areas that they are performing within this contract.

Quality The quality of a contractors performance on a past effort. The Government considers the quality of the contractors performance by examining past performance information, which may be obtained from any sources available to the Government including, but not limited to, Past Performance Questionnaires, the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other databases, and interviews.

For each Past Performance example, the Offeror including all of its teaming partners all of its significant subcontractor(s), identified in the proposal are required to provide the following information:

a. Contract Number (and task order number if applicable) and the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, Data Universal Number

System (DUNS) Number and North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code.

b. Contract Type (Fixed-Cost/price (FP), Cost Reimbursement (CR), Time & Material (T&M), etc.) and if providing a task order as an

5 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

example of past performance, then specify the base Contract Type (definite quantity, indefinite quantity, or requirements).

c. Total Value of the Contract. If the contract noted within Offerors past performance was a cost type contract, the Offeror shall state whether performance cost was above, at, or below the proposed amount within its proposal.

d. Contract Performance Schedule and Actual Dates of Contract Performance.

e. Government or Commercial Contracting Activity Address, Telephone Number, and Email.

f. Administrative Contracting Officers (ACO) Name, Telephone Number, and Email.

g. Contracting Officers Representative (COR) Name, Telephone Number, and Email.

h. Any Prime or significant subcontractor (as defined above), joint venture or teaming agreements.

i. For any contracts that did not/do not meet original schedule or technical performance requirements, provide a brief explanation of the reason(s) for the shortcomings and any corrective action(s) taken to avoid recurrence. The Offeror shall list each time that the schedule was revised and provide an explanation of why the revision was necessary. All Requests for Deviation and Requests for Waiver shall be addressed with respect to causes and corrective actions.

j. For each contract listed, including those listed for a proposed significant subcontractor, the Offeror shall state whether or not a

Cure Notice or Show Cause Letter was received. The Offeror shall follow the procedures listed below to provide this information.

1.If a Cure Notice or Show Cause letter was received on a listed contract, then the Offeror shall provide a copy of the Cure

Notice or Show Cause Letter for each contract where it was received. The Offeror shall also provide a description of any corrective action implemented. If there were no corrective actions implemented, the Offeror shall include a statement and explanation as to the reason.

2.If a Cure Notice or Show Cause Letter was not received on a listed contract, then the Offeror shall affirmatively state that no

Cure Notices or Show Cause Letters were received for that contract.

3.The Offeror shall indicate if any of the contracts listed were terminated, the type of termination, and reasons for the termination.

k. The Offeror shall briefly describe the specific work that was performed by itself or proposed significant subcontractors or joint venture or teaming agreement, noting whether the work was completed as the prime or subcontractor, in addition to providing the CAGE code for each contract or task order. A CAGE code is a five-character alpha-numeric, unique identifier assigned by the Defense

Logistics Agency (DLA). CAGE codes are assigned to businesses, organizations, etc. that wish to pursue contracts or grants from the

United States federal government.

The factors listed below shall be made into a table and used when providing a summary of the past performance information:

Customer Agency

Contract/TO#

Contract Type

Total Value

Period of Performance

Description of Service and Supplies

PCO

GOV'T Point of Contact

Joint Venture/Teaming

% Performed by Subs

Offerors and proposed significant subcontractors may ask customers to submit Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) for the same or similar work directly to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist(s). These do not count toward the total past performance

6 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

submissions referenced above. Contractors may include PPQs for contracts entered into with the Federal Government, State/Local

Governments and/or commercial customers. The Offeror shall first complete Part I of Attachment 7 and email the questionnaire (with a cover letter that provides the e-mail addresses of the Contracting Officer, Licinda Peters, licinda.m.peters.civ@army.mil, and the

Contract Specialists, Tyce Rucks tyce.l.rucks.civ@army.mil, and Judy Anderson, judy.l.anderson20.civ@army.mil), to the Contracting

Activity Point of Contact (POC) Respondent with email copy to the Aberdeen Proving Ground Government POCs above, who will complete Part

II and Part III of the form and return it to the Government. Offerors are encouraged to submit PPQs at least one week prior to the proposal due date and time to ensure an efficient evaluation of the Offerors past performance.

Corporate Entities - If any contract, listed as part of the Past Performance submission, was performed by a corporate entity or division other than the corporate entity or division that would perform work under this solicitation, then the Offeror shall identify that entity or division and indicate which entity will perform this effort. The Offeror shall also provide this information for any significant subcontractor, for which the Offeror is submitting past performance information.

Predecessor Companies - If an Offeror or its subcontractor(s) only have recent and relevant performance history as a part of a predecessor company, then the Offeror may submit the recent and relevant past performance of that predecessor for evaluation. The

Offeror shall also provide the historical evolution of the current company from the predecessor company.

It is the Offerors responsibility to provide clear, thorough, and complete past performance information so that the Government can conduct an evaluation of Past Performance. The Government reserves the right to consider any recent/relevant past performance efforts and data obtained from external sources other than the proposal, such as from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS), but the burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror. The Offeror shall sanitize any classified information related to classified contracts.

Volume III Cost/Price

This is a commercial Firm Fixed Price (FFP) single award contract for services. Offerors shall submit their offer by completing the

Pricing Proposal Workbook found at Attachment 1. The Cost/Price proposal shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel format with all formulas functioning and intact and visible in each cell that has a calculated value. For evaluation purposes, worksheets shall not be formatted into tables. Please be advised that all computations shall be made to the nearest one-hundredth of one cent. Additionally, a Cost

Narrative shall be submitted.

The PCO has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition on this acquisition. However, if at any time during this acquisition the PCO determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, Offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the PCO to determine the reasonableness of price.

1. Period of Performance

Base Period: 14 March 2023 - 13 March 2024

Option Year 1: 14 March 2024 - 13 March 2025

Option Year 2: 14 March 2025 - 13 March 2026

Option Year 3: 14 March 2026 - 13 March 2027

Option Year 4: 14 March 2027 - 13 March 2028

2. The Offeror shall complete Attachment 1 Cost/Price Template at its Cost/Price proposal. It consists of eight(8) separate tabs as follows:

Tab 1: Instructions

Tab 2: Offeror Information

Tab 3: Price Sheet, Section B

Tab 4: Total Proposed Price

Tab 5: FFP CLINs

Tab 6: Travel CLINs

Tab 7: ODC CLINs

Tab 8: CDRLs

The Offeror shall complete all the green colored cells in the Attachment 1 (T2C2- Cost Price Spreadsheet).

Cost Narrative:

Offeror(s) shall provide whatever information is necessary to help the Government understand why the proposed costs are realistic in its cost narrative. Each Offerors cost proposal shall contain sufficient quantitative and narrative documentation necessary to adequately support and explain the costs proposed, including subcontractor proposed costs.

7 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(xxxxCOSTNARRxxxx.docx (or PDF).

The Offeror shall provide its CAGE code and its cognizant Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and Defense Contract Management Agency

(DCMA) office contact information. Offerors shall supply a listing of individual Subcontracts/Interdivisional Effort (S/IE) identifying the company and its specific division or segment (including CAGE code), including the cognizant DCAA and DCMA office for each. Offeror shall provide narrative on any real or anticipated changes of ownership, significant expansion or contraction of business base, extraordinary events, etc.

LABOR:

Labor shall be proposed on a Firm Fixed (FFP) basis.

The Offeror shall manually enter the appropriate costs into the FFP CLINs tab (cells marked in green) of the Attachment1 T2C2 Cost Price

Spreadsheet tab. The Offeror shall submit pricing for all CLINs identified. Offerors shall not re-format or remove cells from the spreadsheet. Submission of the pricing data shall be complete and accurate. All prices will be provided as FFP; therefore, all proposed prices shall be inclusive of all direct cost (i.e., direct labor, subcontracting, associated indirect labor costs and profit), related to each CLIN. All CLINs, shall be proposed.

TRAVEL & ODCs:

Travel and ODCs will be proposed on a Firm Fixed Price basis.

The Offeror shall include the exact Government-provided estimates for Travel and Other Direct Cost (ODC), in its cost proposal (see table below). The Government estimates for Travel are the total cost exclusive of the Offerors associated indirect charges. The Offeror shall propose any applicable indirect charges and fee on the Travel and ODCs in accordance with its disclosed accounting practices.

Please see table below.

Table 2:

Contract Period Travel Estimate ODCs AVG Estimate

Base Period $40,000.00 $100,000.00

Option Period 1 $40,000.00 $100,000.00

Option Period 2 $40,000.00 $100,000.00

Option Period 3 $40,000.00 $100,000.00

Option Period 4 $40,000.00 $100,000.00

For reimbursement of travel and ODC, Awardee shall present to the government an invoice with ODC cost break-down and/or trip detail broken out inclusive of number of people, number of days, Government per diem etc., and indirects and fee as applicable.

In accordance with FAR 45.102, Policy, DFARS PGI 245.103-70, Furnishing Government Property to Contractors, the Government has made the decision to provide Government Property at no cost or rent as outlined in a listing within Attachment 10.

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRLS), DD Form 1423:

CDRLS shall not be separately cost/priced under this effort. Submission of Data shall be in accordance with CDRL, DD Form 1423 as

Attachment 9 Contract Data Requirement List.

A total evaluated price will be calculated for Offerors proposal. The total evaluated price will be calculated by summing the total proposed pricing for all FFP labor CLINs required to complete each PWS task area, other direct costs, and travel.

The Government will evaluate an Offerors proposed total amount by performing a price analysis on the total evaluated price. The

Government will perform a price analysis utilizing any one or a combination of the price analysis techniques identified in Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.404-1(b)(2) and (g) to determine proposed prices fair and reasonable.

There is no page limit on the Cost/Price narrative. The Cost/Price Template shall be submitted with all formulas visible in each cell with a value. Proposals submitted that do not adhere to the format or cell requirements may not be further considered for award.

In accordance with FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, the Government may require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. The FAR 52.217-8 option will be evaluated by adding one-half (1/2) of the Offerors final option period probable cost to the Offerors Total Evaluated Price. Thus, the Offerors Total Evaluated Cost/Price for the purposes of evaluation will encompass the Base Period, Option Period 1, Option Period 2, Option Period 3, Option Period 4 and the equivalent of one half of Option Period 4 (for up to 6 months of additional performance in the event the Government exercise the Option to Extend

Services clause IAW FAR 52.217-8).

8 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN

The Government Property (GP) clause, FAR 52.245-1 requires a number of actions from contractors, including safeguarding government property, keeping specified records, and providing other notifications to the government. The government property clause has specific language that makes the contractor liable for loss or damage to GFP if compliance with the rules for managing GFP are not followed.

Offerors shall develop a Property Management Plan pursuant to FAR 45.202(b), separate from any other volume, demonstrating how they will perform comprehensive self-assessments at regular intervals and will operate to manage property under its stewardship, in accordance with contractual requirements, and continuous process improvement.

Major sections of the Offerors Property Management Plan should address:

Outcome-Description___________________

Acquisition-Offerors shall outline how property acquisitions are documented, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(i.

Receipt-Offerors shall describe/outline how property receipt is documented, recorded, and identified, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(ii).

Records-Offerors shall outline how property records are created and maintained, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(iii).

Physical Inventory-Offerors shall outline method to perform, record, and disclose physical inventory results, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(iv.

Subcontractor Control-Offerors shall outline whether contractual terms and conditions are flowed down to subcontractors, per FAR 52.245-

1(f)(1)(v)(A).Offerors shall outline how subcontracts are properly administered and when reviews of subcontractor Property Management

Systems are performed, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(v)(B).

Reports-Offerors shall outline process to create and provide property-related reports, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(vi).

Relief of Stewardship Responsibility and Liability-Offerors shall outline process to recognize, investigate, and report losses of

Government property, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(vii).

Utilization-Offerors shall outline how Government property is to be used, consumed, moved, and stored, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(viii.

Maintenance-Offerors shall outline how Government property is to be maintained and when property requiring replacement and/or capital rehabilitation is to be reported to the Property Administrator, per FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(ix).

Property Closeout-Offerors shall outline how property closeout is performed and when it is reported to the Property Administrator, per

FAR 52.245-1(f)(1)(x).

There is no page limit on Offerors Property Management Plan.

ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCI) DECLARATION/MITIGATION PLAN:

The Offeror shall identify and address in a separate document from any other volume, all actual or potential Organizational Conflicts of

Interests (OCI), per FAR 9.5, for itself and any significant subcontractors, or indicate that there are no known potential OCIs by submitting a declaration. If any actual or potential OCIs are identified, then the Offeror shall submit a mitigation plan. If the

Contracting Officer determines that any actual or potential OCIs cannot be mitigated, then the Offeror will not be eligible for award.

There is no page limit for OCI submission.

Other Information:

The contractor is advised that invoicing under the resultant contract will be on an FFP, monthly basis for all labor CLINs. When calculating the proposed total amount for each labor CLIN, the contractor is advised that to mitigate invoicing issues, and reduce contract administration burden, total proposed CLIN amounts should be evenly divisible by 12.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

EVALUATION AND BASIS OF AWARD Best Value

To be eligible for award, the Offeror shall:

1. Receive no less than an Acceptable rating on Volume I Technical (Subfactors 1 and 2); and

9 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

2. Receive no less than an Satisfactory Confidence or Neutral Confidence rating on Past Performance; and

3. Follow all instructions of this RFP; and

4. Comply with all submission requirements; and

5. Have no actual or potential OCIs, or any actual or potential OCIs have been determined by the Contracting Officer to be mitigated;

and

6. The proposed cost/price shall be found fair and reasonable.

Award will be made to the eligible Offeror whose proposal offers the best overall value to the Government after conducting a tradeoff between Volume I Technical, Volume II Past Performance, and Volume III Cost/Price. The proposal offering the best overall value will be determined by using the tradeoff process described in FAR 15.101-1, which allows the Government to conduct tradeoffs between non-cost factors and price and allows the Government to award to other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated proposal.

Volume I Technical (Subfactor 1) is significantly more important than Volume II Past Performance.

Volume II Past Performance, is significantly more important than Volume III Cost/Price.

The Government will only accept one (1) proposal from each Offeror.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a stand-alone contract without asking any questions, clarifications, or having discussions with Offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to ask clarifications, and/or establish a competitive range and conduct discussions, if the Contracting Officer determines that doing so is in the best interest of the Government. Each Offerors initial proposal shall contain the Offerors best terms.

An Offeror shall not assume that the Contracting Officer will independently obtain information necessary to evaluate its proposal.

Therefore, Offerors shall supply all information required to evaluate its proposal. Proposals that have an omission, or that fail to follow the instructions of this RFP, or that are unclear or inconsistent, may result in the Offeror receiving an unacceptable rating in the corresponding Volume or the proposal being found ineligible for award.

The Government reserves the right to contact third parties for past performance information, and the Government reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation.

OFFERORS SHALL ENSURE THAT THEIR PROPOSAL MEETS ALL OF THE SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN THIS SOLICITATION.

Evaluation of VOLUME I Technical

1. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates the Offerors understanding of the requirements and the feasibility of the Offerors approach.

Sub-Factor 1 Technical Approach will be rated adjectivally in accordance with the Combined Technical/Risk Rating chart below.

Sub-Factor 2 Labor Mix will be evaluated on an Acceptable / Unacceptable basis in accordance with the acceptable/unacceptable definitions below.

2. If an Offeror is rated as Unacceptable in either Subfactor 1 or Subfactor 2, Volume III Cost/Price may not be evaluated.

Technical Evaluation Definitions________________________________

Discriminator: Definition

Significant Strength: An aspect of an Offerors proposal with appreciable merit or which will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Strength: An aspect of an offeror's proposal with merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

10 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Ratings_______

Color Adjectival

Rating: Rating

Blue: Outstanding

Description: Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple: Good

Description: Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green: Acceptable

Description: Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow: Marginal

Description: Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red: Unacceptable

Description: Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

As a reminder, merely parroting, or repeating back, the requirements of the PWS does not demonstrate an understanding of the requirement and may result in Volume I - Technical receiving an unacceptable rating.

Evaluation of VOLUME II Past Performance

1. The past performance evaluation factor assesses the degree of confidence the Government has in an Offerors ability to supply products and services that meet the Governments needs, based on a demonstrated record of performance. The Past Performance Confidence Assessment is an evaluation of the likelihood (or Governments confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitations requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information. The Government will evaluate the Offerors and its proposed significant subcontractor(s) past performance information and make a single overall confidence rating.

2. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to limit its review of past performance information to what he/she determines to be relevant. The Contracting Officer, using sound business judgement, may consider Federal contract past performance to be more relevant than State Agencies, Local Government or Commercial Customer performance assessments.

3. NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or neutral) past performance.

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method________________________________________

Adjectival Rating: Description

Very Relevant:

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant:

Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant:

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant:

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

11 133

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method________________________________________________

Adjectival Rating: Description

Substantial Confidence:

Based on the offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence:

Based on the offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence:

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offerors performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence:

Based on the offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence:

Based on the offerors recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required.

Evaluation of VOLUME III Cost/Price

1. The total evaluated cost/price to be used in the award determination will be the total identified in the Offerors xxxxCOST-

PRICExxxx.xlsx file, which includes the base and all options, plus the Option to Extend Services IAW FAR 52.217-8, subject to a most probable cost adjustment. The FAR 52.217-8 option will be evaluated by adding one-half (1/2) of the Offerors final option period probable cost to the Offerors Total Evaluated Price. Thus, the Offerors Total Evaluated Cost/Price for purposes of evaluation will encompass the Base Period, Option Period 1, Option Period 2, Option Period 3, Option Period 4 and the equivalent of one half of Option

Period 4 (for up to 6 months of additional performance in the event the Government exercises the Option to Extend Services clause IAW

FAR 52.217-8).

2. FFP CLINs will be evaluated utilizing price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b) and (g).

3. Offerors pricing will be compared to other Offerors proposing on this solicitation, historical cost for similar tasks and to the

Internal Government Cost Evaluation to determine that the proposed prices are fair and reasonable or unbalanced pricing between contract line numbers (CLINs) is not occurring in evaluating reasonableness. Indications of potential underbidding or unbalanced pricing will be reflected in the pricing evaluation. An offeror may be rejected and ineligible for award if it is determined that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government, in accordance with the instructions provided in the solicitation.

4. NOTE: The Government may use external sources of information in performing any cost evaluation to include, but not limited to, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, Department of State, DCAA, or DCMA. This DOES NOT relieve the Offeror from the requirement to submit supporting documentation for its rates proposed.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

1. For proposal and evaluation purposes only, estimated award timeframe is February 2023. The actual award date may vary.

2. The Government reserves the right to cancel this requirement at any time.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

12 133

PIIN/SIIN

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

1011 BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE - PROGRAM MANAGMENT 1 LO $ _________________________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: BASE PD T2C2 LITE PRG MGMT

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0365

1012 BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE - LOGISTICS 1 LO $ _________________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: BASE PD T2C2 LITE LOGISTICS

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0365

1013 BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE-SECURITY 1 LO $ ______________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: BASE PD T2C2 LITE-SECURITY

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0365

1014 BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE-ENGINEERING 1 LO $ _________________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: BASE PD T2C2 LITE ENGINEERING

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

13 133

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0365

1015 BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE-QUALITY ASSURANCE 1 LO $ _______________________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: BASE PD T2C2 LITE QA

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0365

1016 BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE-CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT 1 LO $ ______________________________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: BASE PERIOD T2C2 LITE-CONFIG

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0365

1021 OY1 T2C2 LITE-PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1 LO $ ________________________________ __________________

SERVICE REQUESTED: OY1 T2C2 LITE-PROGM MANAGMENT

CLIN CONTRACT TYPE:

Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance _________________________

INSPECTION: Destination ACCEPTANCE: Destination

DEL REL CD QUANTITY DAYS AFTER AWARD __________ ______________ ________________

001 1 0730

14 133

Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Reference No. of Document Being Continued

MOD/AMD

1022 OPTION PERIOD 1…