ExhibitA_SOW_11-20-2015.pdf

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 1 of 33 Issue: 20 November 2015

STATEMENT OF WORK

FOR

SINCGARS CIRCUIT CARD ASSEMBLIES

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 2 of 33

TABLE OF CONTENT

TITLE PARAGRAPH

Scope 1.0

Applicable Documents 2.0

Requirements 3.0

Packaging 3.1

Configuration Control 3.2

Item Marking 3.3

Production Evaluation 3.4

Drawing Revisions 3.5

Contractor Performed First Article Testing 3.6

Requirements for Quality Assurance System and Testing 3.7

Obsolescence Management 3.8

Value Engineering 3.9

Post Award Conference 3.10

APPENDICES

Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 3 of 33

1.0 Scope. This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the efforts required to produce the products required by this solicitation/contract in accordance with (IAW) the documents listed below. The items being purchased are entitled “SINCGARS Circuit Card Assemblies (CCA)”.

2.0 Applicable Documents. The following documents are applicable to the extent cited.

2.1 Military and Federal Stds

Document No. Document Title Applicability

MIL-STD- 129 R Military Marking for Shipment and Storage Required

MIL-STD- 810G(1) Environmental Engineering Considerations and

Laboratory Tests

Required

2.2 Military and Federal Specs

MIL-HDBK- 61A Configuration Management Guidance (Dated 7

Feb 2001)

Referenced

2.3 Other DoD Documents

Document No. Document Title Applicability

CECOM- AG00000601C CECOM Special Packaging Instruction Required

CECOM- A3316719 Rev. D Specification - RF CCA Required

CECOM- A3272645 Rev. A Synthesizer CCA Required

DOD- 5220.22-M National Industrial Security Program Operating

Manual (NISPOM), Incoporating Change 1

DoDI- 5230.24 Distribution Statements on Technical Documents Required

2.4 Com’l Documents

ASME Y14.100 Engineering Drawing and Related Documentation

Practices

Required

IPC 2221B Generic Standard on Printed Board Design Required

ISPM Number 15

Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in

International Trade

Required

ISO 10303 Industrial Automation Systems and Integration –

Product Data Representation and Exchange

3.0 Requirements. The contractor shall produce the items in the quantity set forth in Section B of the schedule and delivery orders issued by the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) in accordance with documents listed above and this SOW. In the event of a conflict between the requirements of this SOW and any drawings for the item on contract, the requirements of this SOW shall govern.

3.1 Requirements for Packaging. Preservation, packing and marking for shipment shall be in accordance with

Section ‘D’ of the contract. Marking shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-129R. Radio Frequency

Identification (RFID) requirements shall be in accordance with the Section “F” clause, DFARS 252.211-7006, of the contract. MIL-STD-129R is applicable.

3.1.1 Packaging Instructions.

Military Packaging

DS7029 and/or DS7033 Preservation, Packing and Marking Instructions

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 4 of 33

DS7029 - DS7033 LEGEND

Qty Quantity

Prot Req Protection Required

PKG-REF Packaging Reference (Military/Federal Specification or Standard)

SPI Special Packaging Instruction

LPK Level of Packing

QUP Quantity per Unit Pack

ICQ Intermediate Container Quantity

Pkg Reqmt Codes Packaging Requirement Codes when PKG-REF cites MIL-STD-2073

The below codes are for special markings:

PC Project Code

WG Warranty/Guarantee

SL Shelf Life

BC Bar Code

FMS Foreign Military Sales

DS7029 - DS7033

NSN

Prot Req

PKG-REF or

SPI LPK QUP ICQ

Special Markings

Pkg J. J J J J J J J J J

Reqmt I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VII.a IX X

Codes (MP) (CD) (PM) (WM) (CD) (CT) (UC) (IC) (PK) (SM) 5998-01-455-9639 Military AG00000601C B 001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a/ n/a n/a BC

5998-01-455-9650 Military AG00000601C B 001 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a/ n/a n/a BC

3.1.2 Wood Packaging Material (WPM) shall meet the requirements below.

3.1.2.1 Wood packaging material (WPM) includes but is not limited to pallets, skids, load boards, pallet collars, wooden boxes, reels, dunnage, crates, frame and cleats. This requirement excludes materials that have undergone a manufacturing process, such as corrugated fiberboard, plywood, particleboard, veneer, and oriented strand board (OSB).

3.1.2.2 All WPM shall meet the requirements of International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM)

Number 15, “Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade”. DoD shipments inside and outside of the United States shall meet the requirements of ISPM 15 whenever WPM is used to ship DoD cargo.

3.1.2.3 All WPM shall comply with the official quality control program for heat treatment (HT) or kiln dried heat treatment (KD HT) (IAW) American Lumber Standard Committee (ALSC), Incorporated, Wood

Packaging Material Program and WPM Enforcement Regulations (see http://www.alsc.org/).

3.1.2.4 All WPM shall include certification/quality markings IAW the ALSC standard. Markings shall be placed in an unobstructed area that will be readily visible to inspectors. Pallet markings shall be applied to the stringer or block on diagonally opposite sides of the pallet and be contrasting and clearly visible. All containers shall be marked on a side other than the top or bottom, contrasting and clearly visible. All dunnage used in configuring and/or securing the load shall also comply with ISPM 15 and be marked with an ASLC approved

DUNNAGE stamp.

3.1.2.5 Failure to comply with these requirements may result in refusal, destruction, or treatment of materials at the point of entry. The Government reserves the right to recoup from the contractor any remediation costs incurred by the Government.

http://www.alsc.org/

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 5 of 33

3.2. Requirements for Configuration Control.

3.2.1 Configuration Baseline. The applicable Configuration Baseline (CB) for the listed Configuration Item

(CI)/Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI) is as follows:

NSN CB DESCRIPTION (CI/CSCI)

5998-01-455-9639 A3331822-1 RF CCA

5998-01-455-9650 A3331837-1 Synthesizer CCA

3.2.2 Configuration Responsibility. Each CI/CSCI, as developed/built and delivered, shall conform to the cited

CB and (if applicable) all subsequent CB’s that will be made contractually binding by the Procuring Contracting

Officer (PCO). Configuration changes not directly effecting the configuration baseline do not require

Government approval prior to incorporation, but must be documented by the contractor and shall be made available to the Government upon request. The contractor may use MIL-HDBK-61A as guidance for establishing a Configuration Management Program.

3.2.3 Departures from CB. No changes or departures from the CB are acceptable except for changes or departures which are submitted in accordance with DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80711A and are approved by the Government Configuration Manager (C Mgr.) or Configuration Management Officer (CMO) and which are made applicable to the contract by the PCO. Configuration Control shall be effected by the Configuration

Control Documents (CCDs) as follows:

3.2.3.1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) includes both the engineering change and the supporting documentation by which the change is described and suggested. An ECP describes changes to the CI/CSCI and associated Government documents and data that are affected by the proposed engineering change. An ECP shall be prepared on DD Form 1692, to include DD Form 1692/1 through 1692/6, addressing all areas impacted by the requested change. A separate ECP/VECP shall be prepared for each distinct engineering change.

3.2.3.1.1 A Notice of Revision (NOR) shows the detailed changes that must be made to technical documentation, except specifications, (one NOR per document) following approval of an ECP. The NOR is submitted as part of the ECP. The NOR shall be prepared on DD Form 1695.

3.2.3.1.2 A Specification Change Notice (SCN) is used to delineate the exact change(s) in a specification that will be distributed to users when the ECP is approved. The SCN is submitted as part of the ECP. The SCN is not used for a military or federal document, only a Request for Waiver can be used for those documents.

3.2.3.1.3 Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) is the same as an ECP except there are proposed cost savings for the program. The contractor shall follow the guidance in Section I of this contract for VECPs.

3.2.3.2 Request for Deviation (RFD). A RFD is a specific written authorization to depart from a particular requirement(s) of an item’s approved configuration documentation for a specific number of units or a specified period of time, either as an advance request or after the fact. The contractor shall identify the impact of the

RFD on performance, operational readiness and logistics support of the affected CIs. The Government may require consideration for any RFD. An RFD shall be prepared on DD Form 1694

3.2.3.3 Contractor shall provide all supporting program or cost data with the CCD. The contractor shall uniquely and sequentially identify (including the use of the contract number) each ECP, VECP, NOR, SCN or

RFD. The identification number should use less than 16 characters.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 6 of 33

3.2.4 Identification of Authorized Personnel. The contractor shall identify to the PCO, Administrative

Contracting Officer (ACO), and the technical office identified on the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80711A, the name(s) of the official(s) of its organization who are authorized to submit CCDs 30 Days after Contract (DAC).

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 7 of 33

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Original Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information

Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

A0001 TDP X TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

SINCGARS TBD

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

Scientific and Technical Reports Configuration Control

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-MISC-80711A SOW Para 3.2.3 RDER-PRC-TR

INSERT

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

IN

DD

ASREQ SEE ITEM 16

b. COPIES

SECT. B

8. APP CODE

N/A

11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

SEE ITEM 16

Reg

Repro

16. REMARKS:

Data Item Description DI-MISC-80711A: Delete block 10 instructions entirely and follow instructions in SOW 3.2.

The contractor shall prepare and submit Configuration Control

Documents in accordance with the SOW section for Configuration

Control (Para 3.2) when a change to or departure from a contractual baseline document is deemed necessary.

The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the draft submission. The contractor shall incorporate changes into the electronic deliverable within 30 days after receipt of Government comments. The Government will have 30 days to review, accept, and/or comment on the final submission.

All deliveries shall be delivered in digital format, compatible with

Microsoft Office 2007 software and shall be delivered both by electronic submission, e.g., e-mail, FTP, etc., as arranged with the requiring office, and also by CD ROM or DVD readable by computers running Microsoft Windows. Alternate delivery media may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

Email notification required with any electronic submission.

If the CDRL data deliverable is to be priced and is not NSP, then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area

Workflow Web Site in order to received payment for the data deliverable. (See Section G of the Contract).

RDER-PRC-TR

PCO

ACO

QAR

AMSEL-LCL-ECM

AMSEL-LCL-EIE*

*1 COPY VECP ONLY

15. TOTAL 0 6 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

11/20/2015 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

11/20/2015

Based upon DD Form 1423-1, 1 Jun 90

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 8 of 33

3.3. Requirements for Item Marking (Gov't Detailed Design Items).

3.3.1 Part Number Marking. Each item delivered under contract shall be marked in accordance with the Part

Number marking requirements specified in the applicable technical documents, to included but not limited to top drawing, Master Pattern, Print Wiring Board, and etc. Each item delivered under contract, along with each assembly, sub assembly, and module, shall be legibly marked with the appropriate part number and manufacturer’s identification. Hardware such as screws, nuts, bolts, etc., need not be marked. The marking shall become permanently part of the item after it is applied, and can be applied using deformation, tag, rubber stamp with permanent characteristics, etc. The marking shall not interfere with proper operation of the item, and shall have no deleterious effect on the item. Any item deemed unsuitable for marking as outlined herein shall be identified to the Contracting Officer for resolution as to marking requirement. This requirement may be entirely met by existing marking requirements contained within the drawings, specifications, or Unique Item

Identification requirements cited in this contract.

3.3.2 NSN Marking. NSN marking shall be in accordance with NSN marking requirement specified in the applicable technical documents. In addition to the marking required by para 3.3.1 above, each item on contract listed in Section B of the contract, shall be identified with its Government assigned NSN. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that using personnel can identify the circuit card or assembly when it is removed from its assembly, and when it is received from stock as a spare part. The marking can be on a paper label, placed in a location that will not harm the item. If guidance is necessary to implement this requirement, contact the

Contracting Officer for guidance.

3.4. Requirements for Production Evaluation.

3.4.1 General. The equipment on contract, including all materials, parts, subassemblies and assemblies, shall be produced in strict conformance with the Government-Furnished technical data, including all changes cited in the solicitation/contract, and as supplemented or modified by approved Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs).

This technical data may require compatibility corrections, referred to throughout this SOW as 'Production

Evaluation (PE) Compatibility' corrections, to improve production efficiency.

3.4.1.1 Contractor's Obligation and Responsibility. The contractor shall perform the following tasks.

3.4.1.1.1 Perform a PE review. The contractor shall continually review the technical data to identify and propose corrections for all PE compatibility discrepancies. This review shall commence during the production and quality planning phase and continue through the preproduction, production, inspection and testing phases of this contract. The contractor shall evaluate the Government-Furnished Technical Data Package (including drawings, specifications, gage drawings, test fixture drawings, master pattern drawings or data, engineering change proposals with notices of revisions (NOR) and specification change notices (SCN), models (if any) and any other data defined as technical data by the government) to determine such PE corrections, and submit PE

Compatibility ECPs to the Government to reflect these corrections, as described below. PE Compatibility corrections are discussed in Appendix entitled “Sample PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and

Deficiencies.”

3.4.1.1.1.1 Correction of Existing Compatibility Deficiencies in the Government-owned Technical Data

Package. The following PE compatibility deficiencies were revealed in the Government-owned Technical Data

Package. The contractor shall propose corrections to these PE compatibility deficiencies.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 9 of 33

3.4.1.1.1.1.1 Drawing A3272645 Rev. A, Specification-Synthesizer CCA, Sheet 10 refers to a Test Interface

(8177342) with no manufacturer information for testing the Synthesizer CCA. It is the contractor’s responsibility to identify and obtain all the test equipment that are required for testing this CCA. The contractor shall identify the manufacturer for this Test Interface or identify a commercial equivalent of this Test Interface.

In case the manufacturer for this Test Interface and a commercial equivalent can’t be identified, the Contractor shall develop and build a Test Interface in support of the testing for this CCA. To ensure that the appropriated test equipment is ued for testing the CCA, this Test Interface shall be verified by successfully passing the FAT test. The contractor shall submit a PE Compatibility ECP to correct the drawing deficiencies along with the supporting documents, such as the test results obtained from the FAT test and the technical documents for manufacturing the Test Interface if the contractor-built Test Interface is proposed. No contractor proprietary information shall be contained in the PE Compatibility ECP or affected documents/drawings.

3.4.1.1.1.1 .2 Drawing A3316719 Rev. D, Specification-RF CCA, Sheet 13 refers to an unidentified Automate

Test Interface for testing the RF CCA. It is the contractor’s responsibility to identify or obtain this Automate

Test Interface that is required for testing this CCA. In case this Test Interface can’t be identified and a commercial equivalent is not available, the Contractor shall develop and build a Test Interface in support of the testing for this CCA. To ensure that the appropriated test equipment is ued for testing the CCA, this Test

Interface shall be verified by successfully passing the FAT test. The contractor shall submit a PE Compatibility

ECP to correct the drawing deficiencies along with the supporting documents, such as the test results obtained from the FAT test and the technical documents for manufacturing the Test Interface if the contractor-built Test

Interface is proposed. No contractor proprietary information shall be contained in the PE Compatibility ECP or affected documents/drawings.

3.4.1.1.2 Submit PE Compatibility Engineering Change Proposals to the Government. Recommendations for compatibility changes shall be prepared and submitted as Engineering Change Proposals (ECP) with appropriate NORs and SCNs in accordance with the Configuration Management Section. PE ECPs shall:

a. Be submitted as soon as the need for a change is recognized.

b. Clearly and explicitly state the proposed change and the need for the change.

c. Include all technical documentation and supporting data required to justify the change.

3.4.1.1.3 Special Instructions for PE ECPs. The first page of the ECP form shall have the following:

a. This statement: “This ECP is submitted as a PE compatibility change as defined in the contract”.

b. Have 'PE Compatibility’ in Size 16 Font included in the Header and Footer of the page.

c. The effect on Delivery Schedule and Estimated Costs shall be indicated as “none”.

3.4.1.1.4 If the incorporation of a PE Compatibility ECP does not correct the deficiency, or creates another deficiency, the contractor shall submit any further ECPs and incorporate such approved changes into all items not yet accepted by the Government, at no cost to the Government.

3.4.1.1.5 Implement PE ECPs. The contractor shall apply all approved PE ECPs to the manufacture of the hardware on contract without increase in contract price or delay in delivery.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 10 of 33

3.4.1.1.6 Revise Technical Data (if required elsewhere in the contract). The contractor will generate all required additional data and revise affected Technical Data to incorporate PE corrections in accordance with the appropriate engineering drawings clauses without increase in contract price or delay in delivery.

3.4.1.1.7 Submit TDP Review Report. The contractor shall prepare and submit a TDP Review Report (including subcontracted PE effort - see paragraph 3.4.4 below) in accordance with DI-MISC-80750 as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80750.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 11 of 33

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to

Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for

Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

B0001 TDP TM OTHER MISC

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

SINCGARS TBD

Technical Data Package Review Report Production Evaluation (PE)

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MISC-80750 SOW Para 3.4.1.1.7 RDER-PRC-TR

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

QRTLY 30 DAC

SECT. B

8. APP CODE

N/A

11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

DID Modify DI-MISC-80750 as follows:

a. All references to ECP is limited to PE compatibility ECP's.

b. Information required for 10.2.1 shall be as follows:

1. Contract number.

2. PE-ECP Number.

3. Nomenclature of affected configuration item.

4. Date of ECP submittal to Government.

5. Date of Government authorization/disapproval.

6. Baseline documents affected.

7. Date of revision to baseline document.

8. Total number of drawings/specifications/other technical data reviewed during the reporting period. A list of all technical data reviewed shall be attached.

9. Total number of PE compatibility ECPs prepared during the reporting period.

10. Total number of drawings revised due to the PE effort during the reporting period. A list of revised drawings shall be attached.

11. The cumulative number of drawings/specifications/other technical data reviewed during the reporting period.

12. Percentage of total PE effort accomplished since contract award.

c. Information required for 10.2.2 shall be submitted as a letter of PE Certification to the PCO with a copy furnished to the addressee cited in Block 14. This letter shall be submitted concurrently with submission of the First Article Test (FAT) report or at first production lot submittal if FAT is not required and content of this letter shall be IAW SOW paragraph

3.4.1.1.8.

d. If any of the PE effort is subcontracted, the information per b. above for the subcontractor effort shall be separately listed and shall include the name of the subcontractor.

First submission of the report shall be 30 days after contract awards. Submission shall be quarterly when there are active delivery orders (DOs) only. Quarterly submission shall be resumed when the subsequent DOs award and the first submission for the subsequent DOs shall be 30 day after the award of DO.

Submit by LT except for final report, which shall be submitted by DD250. Data shall be submitted and exchanged electronically in Microsoft Office 2000 or Office XP suite of applications (MS Word, Excel, Power Point, Access, and Project). Alternate formats may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

RDER-PRC-TR 0 1 0

All deliveries shall be delivered in digital format, compatible with Microsoft Office 2007 software and shall be delivered both by electronic submission, e.g., e-mail, FTP, etc., as arranged with the requiring office, and also by CD ROM or DVD readable by computers running

Microsoft Windows. Alternate delivery media may be allowed subject to Government review and approval. Email notification required with any electronic submission.

If the CDRL data deliverable is to be priced and is not NSP, then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow Web Site in order to received payment for the data deliverable. (See Section G of the Contract).

15. TOTAL 0 1 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

11/20/2015 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 12 of 33

3.4.1.1.8 Submit TDP Certification. The contractor shall prepare and submit a letter of PE certification in accordance with DI-MISC-80750 as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-MISC-80750. This letter shall be prepared in accordance with the specific content and format requirements described below.

a. The certification shall be provided on company letterhead, and shall be dated and signed by an authorized official of the company.

b. This letter will state the following:

'(Company Name) has conducted the Production Evaluation effort required to date by Provision Number

(Number) of Contract Number (Number) for the (End Item). Although we recognize that PE is a continuing effort and that occasional PE Compatibility ECP's may arise during the full scale production phase of this contract, we have sufficiently identified and corrected any discrepancy, error, omission or deficiency in design or technical data which would otherwise have precluded practical manufacture, assembly or attainment of required performance as set forth in specification (Number of End Item Specification). Accordingly, we hereby certify that the technical data package, as changed or supplemented by the ECP's approved to date, is suitable for our use in fulfilling our obligation of delivering conforming items at the price and delivery schedule established in this contract’.

c. If the contractor does not submit this letter of certification at the specified time, the contractor shall be deemed to have failed to make delivery within the meaning of the 'Default' clause of this contract, and this contract shall be subject to termination for default. However, failure of the Government in such an event to terminate this contract for default shall not relieve the contractor of its responsibility to continue the Production

Evaluation effort and to meet the delivery schedule for all items, as well as meeting all other contract requirements.

d. Submission of the Certification shall not relieve the contractor from compliance with the PE requirement, which remains in effect for the duration of the contract.

3.4.2 PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies. The types of discrepancies, errors, omissions and deficiencies which require PE compatibility corrections are listed in Appendix entitled “Sample

PE Compatibility Discrepancies, Errors, Omissions and Deficiencies.” Examples are provided for illustrative purposes, and are not inclusive.

NOTE: In the event of incompatibility between a 'common' or 'standard' part and a mating part, preference shall be given to correcting the incompatibility by changing the mating part.

3.4.3 Other Discrepancies. The following discrepancies may be uncovered during the PE review. While the contractor is responsible for submitting ECPs to propose corrections to the discrepancies, such ECPs will not be submitted as PE ECPs, but as described below.

3.4.3.1 Over specified and nonessential requirements. When over specified or nonessential requirements are identified, the contractor shall submit an ECP proposing the elimination or modification of the nonessential or over specified requirements in accordance with the 'Configuration Management' provision of this contract. If significant savings are anticipated, the contractor shall submit the change as a Value Engineering Change

Proposal (VECP) in accordance with the 'Value Engineering' provision of this contract.

3.4.3.2 Design Deficiencies. While it is not the intent of the Government to transfer full design responsibility to the contractor, it is recognized that the PE effort may require some design effort on the part of the contractor. In the event that the contractor discovers a conflict between the specified performance requirements and the

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 13 of 33 construction characteristics specified by the technical data, the contractor shall immediately submit an ECP in accordance with the 'Configuration Management' provision of this contract. Such ECPs shall be identified as

'Basic Design Deficiency' ECPs, and shall describe the alleged design deficiency, the basis for the contractor's conclusion that it is not a PE compatibility discrepancy and the proposed change that will correct the deficiency.

3.4.4 Subcontracting of PE. If any item described by the Government-furnished technical data should be subcontracted, one of the following tasks shall be performed by the contractor:

3.4.4.1 This Production Evaluation requirement shall be made a part of the subcontract. The prime contractor is responsible for assuring that the subcontractor complies with the Production Evaluation requirements.

Submission of ECPs to the Government shall be made only by the prime contractor.

3.4.4.2 Production Evaluation responsibility will be retained by the prime contractor, and all approved PE ECPs shall be provided to the subcontractor for incorporation on hardware. In this situation, the contractor shall prepare and submit a letter to the Procuring Contracting Officer within seven (7) days of award of the subcontract. This letter shall identify the item that has been subcontracted without the PE clause and state the contractor's intention of retaining Production Evaluation responsibility for the subcontracted item.

3.4.5 Alternate Changes. The Government reserves the right to direct an alternate change to a PE ECP.

3.5 Requirements for Drawing (Revisions)

3.5.1 The contractor shall maintain drawings and specifications (Product Data) that accurately reflects the historical and current description of each Configuration Item (CI) in the Product Baseline (PBL) for the entire length of the contract.

3.51.1 Revision Procedures. The contractor shall furnish a list of all drawings and specifications to be revised to the Technical Activity upon approval of the First Article Test (FAT) Report, or delivery of the first production lot when there is no FAT requirement. This list shall cross reference the applicable Engineering

Change Proposal (ECP) and Notice of Revision (NOR) to the affected drawing or specification. Within 30 days after receipt of approval of the list the contractor shall revise and or create these drawings/specifications. The contractor shall incorporate all cited exceptions to the drawings and specifications, in addition to any approved

ECPs submitted since contract award, and submit the revised drawings and specifications to the Government in accordance with this SOW.

3.5.1.2 Revised Drawings. All revised drawings shall follow the same system for Assembly callouts, Parts Lists, Revision Blocks, etc., used on the Government furnished drawings. ANSI ASMEY14.100 and/or IPC 2221B shall be used for the drawing package revisions, as appropriate. Drawing formats shall be in accordance with

ASME Y14.100. Drawing revisions shall include the Notice of Revision (NOR) number in the changes column of the drawing revision block.

3.5.1.2.1 The contractor shall maintain the drawings in the identical native software format in which it was created or alternatively, in the appropriate format described in ISO 10303. All revised drawings shall be submitted to the Government in the identical native format in which it was created and supplied to the contractor by the Government. Submission of alternate software formats are addressed in para 3.5.1.7 of this

SOW.

3.5.1.2.2 Revisions to Raster Format Drawings. Many of the Government furnished drawings are in Raster format, mostly Naval.C4 format. These drawings can only be revised using Raster format drawings revision

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 14 of 33 software tool. CECOM LCMC uses RXSpotlight Pro 97 to update these drawings. Any Raster software tool can be used as long as the revised drawings are saved in Naval.C4 format. All revised Raster format drawings shall be submitted to the Government in Naval. C4 raster format.

3.5.1.3 New Drawings. New drawings associated with this effort shall be assigned new numbers in the designated series of Government drawing numbers. A CECOM LCMC drawing number and Government

CAGE CODE shall appear on each new Product Drawing and Associated List. If required, drawing and Master

Pattern numbers will be furnished by the Government upon written request to the Technical Activity. This request shall indicate the type of numbers (i.e. AXXXXXXX for drawings, PL AXXXXXXX for Parts Lists, MP AXXXXX for Master Patterns, and/or DMPXXXXX for Digital Master Patterns) and estimated quantity required of each type. The contractor shall use the assigned numbers for the corresponding contract only.

Unused numbers shall be returned via a letter from the contractor to the Technical Activity.

3.5.1.3.1 Sample Product Data (data files) for new drawings shall be submitted to the Technical Activity for

Government review in accordance with the CDRL for DD-1423 for DI-MISC-80508B.

3.5.1.4 When alternate designs are used, they shall reference the drawing of the approved design.

3.5.1.5 Marking for Government Use. Each drawing sheet shall bear the following notation in Gothic letters.

3.5.1.6 Source and Vendor Item (Specification) Control Drawings, depicting existing commercial items or vendor developed items advertised as available on an unrestricted basis as an “off the shelf” item, must identify at least two approved sources of supply unless specific approval is received from the Technical Activity for using a single source. The contractor shall not generate a Source Control Drawing without the specific, written approval of the Technical Activity.

3.5.1.7 Delivery of Product Data. The contractor shall deliver Product Data IAW DI-MISC-80508B.

Submission of other information and file formats requires prior Government approval and submission of sample files.

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PURCHASED BY THE

GOVERNMENT AND MAY BE REPRODUCED AND USED IN

CONNECTION WITH ANY GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT OR

MAINTENANCE OPERATION.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 15 of 33

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information

Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

C0001 TDP X TM OTHER

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

SINCGARS TBD

Technical Report – Study/Services Product Data

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-MISC-80508B SOW Para 3.5.1.7 RDER-PRC-TR

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

IN

DD SEE ITEM

ONE/R SEE ITEM 16

11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

PER

CONTRACT

16. REMARKS: Data Item Description instructions in Block 10 are deleted. The contractor shall provide all Product Data (PD) in accordance with SOW para 3.5. and shall deliver the revised drawings and specifications in the same format and media as received.

The contractor shall complete an Engineering Release Record (ERR) and include with each data submission. The ERR can be found at http://edm.monmouth.army.mil/pdm/err/index.html.

Sample PD: The contractor shall provide a submission of sample data that represents all software formats that will be delivered via LT

120 days prior to scheduled final delivery. Government requires 30 days to review and comment.

Submit final, corrected data on CD ROM per contract schedule.

Government acceptance will be withheld until all data can be accessed and verified.

Item 9: The contractor shall recommend distribution statements in accordance with DoDI 5230.24 with justification to the contracting officer. Upon approval, all data shall be so marked by the contractor.

If the CDRL Data Deliverable is priced and is not NSP (Not

Separately Priced), then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area Workflow website in order for the contractor to receive payment for the data deliverable (see section G of the

Contract). E-mail notification is required with any electronic submission.

RDER-PRC-TR

*SAMPLE

*FINAL

15. TOTAL 1 1 0

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

11/20/2015 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 16 of 33

3.5.1.7.1 Delivery Requirements for Classified Data. Classified engineering documents shall not be delivered in digital format. These documents shall be handled IAW DOD 5220.22-M. Classified product drawings shall be delivered as photographic contact copies on polyester photographic film, .003 minimum thickness, emulsion face, matte finish both sides. Classified Master Patterns (MPs) shall be delivered on stable base polyester material with a minimum thickness of 0.0075 IAW IPC 2221B. In addition, MPs must be clear for 1:1 scaled

MPs, but may be in matte form for other scales. Each CCA layer shall be displayed on a separate sheet.

3.5.1.8 Audit of Product Data. The Government will review the PD for accuracy and completeness before the

Government will accept the data. The audit process may require disassembly of contractor provided hardware.

The contractor shall provide sufficient resources, including hardware, for the Government to perform an audit on the PD to be delivered, if one is required.

3.6. Requirements for Contractor Performed First Article Testing.

3.6.1 General. The contractor shall perform First Article Testing (FAT) in accordance with FAR 52.209-3 (see

Section I of this contract) and this SOW. As part of FAT, the contractor shall:

a. Select the test unit(s) used for FAT from the first production lot. Test unit(s) shall be selected by the

Government representative.

b. Develop the test procedures and plans necessary to demonstrate that these units conform to the requirements established by the applicable specification(s) and other technical data provided in this contract.(Para 3.6.4)

c. Notify the Government and test the First Article units. (Para 3.6.5)

d. Provide a First Article Test Report to the Government which documents the FAT results. (Para 3.6.6)

e. Insure all equipment used to take performance readings for acceptance tests are kept within the performance parameters delineated by the manufacturer of that equipment. All equipment manufactured by the contractor shall be listed and the parameters established and maintained for this equipment also.

3.6.2 Test Requirements. The following test requirements shall be verified as part of FAT. Inspection requirements set forth in the specification for the CCAs shall be conducted to verify compliance with the performance requirements set forth in the specification for the CCAs. FAT inspection quantities shall be three

(3) for each CCA in the contract. Test unit(s) used for FAT shall be selected from first production lot, which shall contain a minimum of 33 units for each CCA by the Government representative.

3.6.2.1 Extreme Temperature. Inspections called out in 3.6.2.1.1 and 3.6.2.1.2 may be performed sequentially in which case the test requirements specified in A3316719 and A3272645 need only be performed at the conclusion of the combined high/low temperature test sequence and need not be performed in the transition interval between the low and high temperature extremes.

3.6.2.1.1 HighTemperature. The CCA shall be subjected to the test of MIL-STD-810G(1), Method 501.5, Procedure II. The CCA shall meet the requirements specified in Drwaing No. A3316719 for the RF CCA and Drwaing No. A3272645 for the Synthesizer CCA at an operating temperature of +71º C (160ºF) which includes a 15ºC rise for the effects of solar radiation on the equipment, and after exposure to an identical storage temperature of +71ºC (160ºF). For steps 4 and 7, temperature shall be maintained at +71 degrees C (160ºF) for a period of not less than 2 hours following temperature stabilization of the test items. Electrical tests will be conducted during and after exposure for compliance with the requirements specified in A3316719 for the RF CCA and A3272645 for the Synthesizer CCA.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 17 of 33

3.6.2.1.2 Low Temperature. The CCA shall be subjected to the test of MIL-STD-810G(1), Method 502.5, Procedure II. The CCA shall meet the requirements specified in Drwaing No. A3316719 for the RF CCA and Drwaing No. A3272645 for the Synthesizer CCA at an operating temperature of -51ºC (- 60ºF), and after exposure to an identical storage temperature of of -51ºC (-60ºF). For steps 4 and 7, temperature shall be maintained at -51 degrees C (-60ºF) for a period of not less than 2 hours following temperature stabilization of the test items. Electrical tests will be conducted during and after exposure for compliance with the requirements specified in A3316719 for the RF CCA and A3272645 for the Synthesizer CCA.

3.6.2.2 Random Vibration. The CCA shall be subjected to the test of MIL-STD-810G(1), Method 514.6, Procedure I, Category 20 (Ground Mobile). The vibration level shall be in accordance with Figure 1 through Figure 3 below. Test time shall be 2 hours in each of three mutually perpendicular directions, for a total of 6 hours. If the equipment is mounted on isolators, the isolators shall be in place. Post environment functional tests shall be conducted for compliance to the requirements specified in A3316719 for the RF CCA and A3272645 for the Synthesizer CCA.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 18 of 33

H z

.0

.5

.2

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0 0 7 .0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0 g

H z

T E

S T

T

IM

E

H

O U

R S

POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY (g2 / Hz)

.1

F R

E Q

U E

N C

Y

(H z)

F

IG

U R

E

V er ti ca l a x is

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 19 of 33

H z

.0

.5

.2

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0 g

H z

T E

S T

T

IM

E

H

O U

R S

POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY (g2 / Hz)

F R

E Q

U E

N C

Y

(H z

F

IG

U R

E

T r a n sv e r se a x

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 20 of 33

H z

.0

.5

.2

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0

.0 g

H z

T E

S T

T

IM

E

H

O U

R S

POWER SPECTRAL DENSITY (g2 / Hz)

F R

E Q

U E

N C

Y

(H z)

F

IG

U R

E

L o n g it u d in a l a x

(p er p en d ic u la r to t h e fr o n t p a n el

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 21 of 33

3.6.3 Production of First Article Units. All FAT samples shall be assembled at the same location at which production units will be assembled, using the same parts, materials, and manufacturing processes to be employed for subsequent production.

3.6.4 Test Plan. The contractor shall prepare and submit a First Article Qualification Test Plan in accordance with DI-NDTI-81307A as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-81307. In addition to the information required by DI-NDTI-81307, this submission shall contain:

a. The delineation and allocation of tests to be performed on each of the First Article units and the order of such tests (this may be prescribed in applicable technical data).

b. Step-by-step test procedures for each test and the data sheets (see 3.6.6.3) to be employed to document the results of testing.

c. Identification of required test facilities, equipment and personnel.

d. Test milestones schedules and the contractor's test readiness posture.

e. A table which cross references the paragraph number of the specification requirement (including a brief description of the requirement) and the associated paragraph number of the First Article Qualification Test

Plan.

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 22 of 33

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information

Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

D0001 TDP TM OTHER NDTI

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

SINCGARS TBD

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

First Article Qualification Test Plan and

Procedure

First Article Test Plan and

Procedure

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

DI-NDTI-81307A SOW Para. 3.6.4. RDER-PRC-TR

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

ONE/P 30 DAC (DAYS

AFTER

CONTRACT

AWRDED)

N/A

11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE Draft

A

Submit draft via LT. Government requires 45 days for review/comments. Submit final within 15 days of receipt of

Government comments, with DD-250 via WAWF. Government requires 30 days for review/approval.

All deliveries shall be delivered in digital format, compatible with

Microsoft Office 2007 software and shall be delivered both by electronic submission, e.g., e-mail, FTP, etc., as arranged with the requiring office, and also by CD ROM or DVD readable by computers running Microsoft Windows. Alternate delivery media may be allowed subject to Government review and approval.

Email notification required with any electronic submission.

If the CDRL data deliverable is to be priced and is not NSP, then an electronic DD Form 250 will be required via the Wide Area

Workflow Web Site in order to received payment for the data deliverable. (See Section G of the Contract).

QAR

15. TOTAL 2 2 0

Stanley U. Chan

RDER-PRC-TR

Electronics Engineer

11/20/2015 Daniel Webster

RDER-PRC-TR

Chief, Tactical Radio Branch

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 23 of 33

3.6.5 Notice of FAT Performance. As required by FAR 52.209-3, written notices concerning the time and location of FAT shall be furnished to the PCO, the Administrative Contracting Officer and the Government

Technical Activity listed in Block 6 of the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B.

3.6.5.1 Selection of First Article Samples. When Initial Production FAT applies to this contract (i.e., when

FAR 52.209-3 ALT I and ALT II are specified in Section I), FAT samples shall be selected at random from the initial production lot.

3.6.5.2 Reporting of FAT Failures. Reporting of FAT failures shall be by the FAT Report, in lieu of any other reporting requirements specified in this contract. In addition, FAT failures shall be verbally reported to the

Government's Quality Assurance Representative (QAR) and Government Technical Activity listed in Block 6 of the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B within twenty four hours of occurrence.

3.6.6 FAT Report. A FAT Report shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with FAR 52.209-3 and DI-

NDTI-80809B as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-80809B. The FAT Report shall be complete, accurate, and readable and shall provide sufficient data to determine that the hardware item meets all the requirements delineated in the contract. The report will include the following:

Attachment 0001 SPRBL1-16-R-0011 Page 24 of 33

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Form Approved

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information

Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No.