Attachment_11_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Program Management Office (PMO) Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SECHQ1-15-R-0004
- Issued by
- Securities and Exchange Commission
About this file
Attachment 11 - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 38
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 11 Past Performance Questionnaire
SECHQ1-15-R-0004
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Office of Acquisitions, intends to obtain qualified firms under RFP No. SECHQ1-15-R-0004 to provide professional business, program and project management support services in support of the mission requirements of the SEC. In order to accurately evaluate the Offeror’s past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying the past performance history of this Offeror.
Two forms are provided to complete the evaluation: 1) Performance Rating Form; and 2) Supplemental Comment Form. Upon completion of this form, please submit it with your proposal by the due date outlined in the solicitation.
The following standards shall be used in arriving at the rating.
| Outstanding (O) |
| The Offeror’s record of past performance, as applicable, specifically relates to and suggests that SEC can expect superior performance and customer satisfaction for this effort with very low risk. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| The Offeror’s record of past performance, as applicable, specifically relates to and suggests that SEC may expect highly satisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort with minimal risk. |
| Acceptable (A) |
| The Offeror’s record of past performance, as applicable, specifically relates to and suggests that the SEC may expect satisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort. |
| Marginal (M) |
| The Offeror’s record of past performance, as applicable, suggests that the Government may expect less than satisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort. The Quoter’s performance record presents a high degree of risk. |
Unacceptable (UA)
The Offeror’s record of past performance, as applicable, suggests that the Government may expect unsatisfactory performance and customer satisfaction for this effort. The Quoter’s performance record, as applicable, suggests a high degree of risk.
Neutral (N)
A "Neutral" rating indicates an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on relevant past performance is not available.
Performance Rating Form
NAME OF COMPANY EVALUATED:
ADDRESS OF COMPANY EVALUATED:
CONTRACT NUMBER
CONTRACT PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
| CONTRACT VALUE |
| CONTRACT TYPE |
CONTRACTING OFFICER NAME,
ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL ADDRESS
TYPE OF SERVICES PERFORMED (ACTIVITY):
| NAME OF EVALUATOR, AGENCY, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER AND EMAIL ADDRESS |
| DATE EVALUATION PROVIDED |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
Performance Elements
| O |
| VG |
| A |
| M |
| UA |
| N |
| 1. |
| Quality of Technical Approach |
(Were the services comprehensive, complete and feasible?)
| 2. |
| Understanding of Requirements |
(Did the contractor show an understanding of the scope of the requirements and an appreciation of the complexity of the requirements?)
| 3. |
| Effective and Efficient use of Resources |
(Was the contractor able to obtain in a timely manner the amount and type of personnel resources required to support the project, and maintain the required workforce throughout the term of the contract?)
| 4. |
| Timeliness of Performance |
(Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)
| 5. |
| Quality of Performance/Customer Satisfaction |
(Was the contractor successful in delivering the quality service as required and was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?)
| 6. |
| Business Behavior |
(Was the contractor reasonable and cooperative in response to changes in technical direction, correcting errors, poor performance, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and other quality issues?)
| 7. |
| Communication |
(Did the contractor work and communicate well with contracting offices, CORs, government sponsors, users, project stakeholders and other contractors.)
| 8. |
| Cost Control |
(Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic costs, monitoring performance, operating at or below budget, and implementing corrections/changes in a cost effective manner?)
| 9 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 10. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “Supplemental Comment Form”. |
| YES/NO |
| 11. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
Supplemental Comment Form
Please provide any additional comments regarding your performance element ratings in the space below. Please add additional pages as necessary.
PAGE
1 SECHQ1-15-R-0004 Attachment 11
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .