Score_Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection OH|DOT59026-1
- Contract number
- DOT59026-1
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document is a Score Sheet for a technical proposal evaluation, involving Vital Vendor Vital Assurance LTD and the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). The evaluation scoresheet assesses the vendor's proposal across three primary criteria: Proposal Experience (45 points), Staff Plan (35 points), and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Response (5 points). The technical evaluation weighs factors such as prior experience with safety and security programs, personnel qualifications, organizational structure, and DBE participation.
The vendor's proposal received a total technical score of 595 points, which exceeds the minimum required technical score of 575 points. The total submitted price is $1,372,984.03, resulting in a cost per quality point of $2,307.54. The evaluation indicates that the technical proposal with the lowest cost per quality point will be recommended for contract award. The scope appears to be focused on safety and security programs, specifically related to rail fixed guideway public transportation, with an emphasis on organizational capabilities, personnel resources, and meaningful DBE participation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Vital
| Vendor | Vital Assurance LTD | ||||
| Item | Evaluation Criteria | Weighting | Doesn't Meet 0 | Partially Meets 4 | Meets |
7 Exceeds
| Proposal Experience | |
| 1 | Work Plan: Experience and Proposer’s Quality of Response: |
1.Prior experience with safety and security programs, with emphasis on rail fixed guideway public transportation.
2.Understanding of the work to be completed 3.Responsiveness to the Scope of Work
| 4.Clarity of proposal and work to be performed. | 45 | 315 | |
| 2 | Staff Plan: Structure of Proposer’s Organization |
1.Qualifications of personnel – (education, experience and training) Resumes (limit ten) including identification of Project Manager 2.Access of respondent’s resources and personnel to ODOT/local public entities.
| 3.Availability and responsiveness of proposer’s resources and personnel. | 35 | 245 | |
| 3 | DBE Response: |
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Participation:
1.Evidence of meaningful DBE participation either from the prime consultant and/or any subcontractors
| 2.All DBE firms included their appropriate DBE certification from Ohio with the proposal. | 5 | 35 | |||
| Column Subtotal of Partially Meets Points | 0 | ||||
| Column Subtotal of Meets Points | 595 | ||||
| Column Subtotal of Exceeds Points | 0 | ||||
| Grand Total Score | 595 |
Based upon the Grand Total Technical Score earned, does the vendor’s proposal meet or exceed the minimum Technical score of 575 points?
| YES | X | No | |||
| (If No, Vendor's Cost Propsal will NOT be opened.) | |||||
| Cost Per Quality Point | |||||
| Vendors Total Submitted Price | $1,372,984.03 | /Grand Total Techincal Score | 595 | ||
| Cost Per Quality Point: | $2,307.54 | ||||
| The Technical Proposal with the lowest Cost per Quality point will be recommended for award of the contract. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .