Attachment_E_-_Pricing_Tables.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AFRICAP Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- SAQMMA15R0022
About this file
Attachment E - Pricing Tables
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. Compliance Checklist IDIQ
| Pricing Table 1 | |
| Price Volume Compliance Checklist |
| RFP | ||
| Reference | Requirement | Comply |
| (Yes/No) | Proposal Reference | |
| L.19.3.2 (1) | The electronic price proposal shall consist of the following, which are described further in this subsection: |
a. Narrative (in Word or PDF)
b. Pricing Tables 1-7 (in one folder containing one Excel workbook)
c. Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7) (in a second folder containing one or more Excel workbooks)
d. Supporting Information (in Word or PDF)
Offerors shall prepare on a CD-ROM one electronic file for each of the above sections. Therefore, offerors shall prepare four files on each CD-ROM.
L.19.3.2 (2) The hard-copy price proposal shall consist of the following, which are described further in this subsection:
a. Narrative
b. Pricing Tables 1-7
c. Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7)
d. Supporting Information
Offerors shall separate each of the above sections by a distinct tab and divider page.
| L.19.3.2 (3) | The content of the electronic price proposal and hard-copy price proposal shall match. If differences exist between the two proposals, the hard-copy proposal shall take precedence. |
| L.19.3.2 (4) | Pricing Tables 1-7 are provided by the Government and shall be completed by the offerors. Detail Pricing Tables shall be provided and completed by the offerors. |
| L.19.3.2 (5) | Offerors shall not add, delete, or otherwise alter the existing format or content in Pricing Tables 1-7. Offerors shall complete the required areas only. |
| L.19.3.2 (6) | Offerors shall use for pricing purposes the following period of performance: |
Base Period: March 11, 2015 through March 10, 2016 Option Period 1: March 11, 2016 through March 10, 2017 Option Period 2: March 11, 2017 through March 10, 2018 Option Period 3: March 11, 2018 through March 10, 2019 Option Period 4: March 11, 2019 through March 10, 2020 Six-Month Option to Extend: March 11, 2020 through September 10, 2020
| L.19.3.2 (7) | In Pricing Table 1, offerors shall complete the “Comply (Yes/No)” and “Proposal Reference” columns. |
| L.19.3.2 (8) | In Pricing Table 2, offerors shall identify their most current indirect cost rates that would be used as the proposed provisional billing rates. If applicable, these indirect cost rates should be reflected in the most current indirect cost rate agreement that has been negotiated between the Offeror and its cognizant Federal agency official. |
| L.19.3.2 (9) | In Pricing Table 2, the proposed provisional billing indirect cost rates shall not exceed the ceiling indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 3. |
| L.19.3.2 (10) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall propose only their own indirect cost rates. Indirect cost rates for subcontractors and/or other entities not proposed as the offeror shall not be included in part or in whole. |
| L.19.3.2 (11) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall add or delete rows as necessary. The number (e.g., “1)”) in the “Indirect Cost Rate Description” column signifies a specific indirect cost rate description. For example, an offeror may elect to propose “Fringe Benefits” next to “1)”, “Overhead” next to “2)”, and “G&A” next to “3).” |
| L.19.3.2 (12) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, each row will apply to a different Contractor Fiscal Year Period, which offerors shall identify with month, day, and year in the right-most column. |
| L.19.3.2 (13) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, offerors shall propose a Contractor Fiscal Year Period for each of its fiscal years through the life of the contract. Offerors shall assume that the life of the contract, including any extension, is March 11, 2015 through September 10, 2020. |
| L.19.3.2 (14) | In Pricing Tables 2 and 3, Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) factors shall be separately identified if the offeror allocates FCCOM costs as part of its established cost accounting practices. |
| L.19.3.2 (15) | In Pricing Table 4, offerors shall propose one profit percentage and one fee percentage per contract period. |
| L.19.3.2 (16) | In Pricing Table 4, the proposed profit percentages and fee percentages shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (17) | In Pricing Table 4, each proposed fee percentage shall not exceed 10%. |
| L.19.3.2 (18) | In Pricing Table 5, offerors shall propose one not-to-exceed (NTE) fully-loaded hourly labor rate per labor category/CLIN per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to perform the labor category. |
| L.19.3.2 (19) | In Pricing Table 5, the respective proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be based on a normal workweek of 40 hours (8 hours per day x 5 days per week) for performance in the continental United States (CONUS), and 48 hours (8 hours per day x 6 days per week) for performance outside the continental United States (OCONUS). “CONUS” means the 48 contiguous states, Alaska, Hawaii, and the District of Columbia. |
| L.19.3.2 (20) | In Pricing Table 5, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall consist of a proposed unloaded hourly rate, any labor-related direct costs (e.g., fringe benefits, bonuses), applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including other compensation costs like post hardship differential pay and danger pay. See Section B.4. |
| L.19.3.2 (21) | In Pricing Table 5, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall apply only to individuals who have legal status to work in the United States of America (e.g., United States citizens, United States resident aliens, and individuals with permits showing authorization to work in the United States). |
| L.19.3.2 (22) | In Pricing Table 5, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (23) | In Pricing Table 5, offerors shall not complete the cells shaded in gray. The Government has determined the labor category located on the same row as the gray cells is not expected to perform under the workweek schedule identified with such cells. |
| L.19.3.2 (24) | In Pricing Table 6, the Government provided formulas to transfer automatically the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates from Pricing Table 5 to the respective cells in the “NTE Rate” column. However, offerors shall verify the transfer. |
| L.19.3.2 (25) | In Pricing Table 6, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the two labor sections. Each formula is “Staffing” multiplied by “NTE Rate” multiplied by “Hours.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (26) | In Pricing Table 6, the estimated indirect costs in the “Ind $” column shall reflect the product of the applicable proposed ceiling indirect cost rate(s) proposed in Pricing Table 3 and the RFP-specified estimated direct equipment cost. |
| L.19.3.2 (27) | In Pricing Table 6, for equipment, the Government provided a formula to calculate automatically each proposed estimated fee in the “Fee $” column. Each formula is the applicable fee percentage proposed in Pricing Table 4 multiplied by the sum of “Dir $” and “Ind $.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (28) | In Pricing Table 6, the Government provided a formula to calculate automatically each proposed Subtotal under the “Other Direct Costs/Materials” section. Each formula is “Dir $” plus “Ind $” plus “Fee $.” However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (29) | In Pricing Table 6, the Government provided formulas to calculate automatically the proposed Subtotal, Total, and Overall Proposed Price. However, offerors shall verify the arithmetic accuracy. |
| L.19.3.2 (30) | In Pricing Table 6, the proposed Subtotal, Total, and Overall Proposed Price shall be in whole numbers (i.e., no decimals). |
| L.19.3.2 (31) | In Pricing Table 7, offerors shall propose one NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate per period for each RFP-specified labor category (as applicable) proposed to be performed only by employees not exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. |
| L.19.3.2 (32) | In Pricing Table 7, offerors shall propose one NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate per applicable labor category per period, regardless of which entity (offeror, subcontractor offeror, or other) is anticipated to perform the labor category. |
| L.19.3.2 (33) | In Pricing Table 7, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be based on performance exceeding a normal workweek of 40 hours (8 hours per day x 5 days per week) for performance inside the continental United States (CONUS). |
| L.19.3.2 (34) | In Pricing Table 7, each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall consist of a proposed unloaded hourly rate, overtime premium, any labor-related direct costs (e.g., fringe benefits, bonuses), applicable indirect costs, and profit. It shall not consist of any other costs, including other compensation costs like post hardship differential pay and danger pay. See Section B.4. |
| L.19.3.2 (35) | In Pricing Table 7, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall apply only to individuals who have legal status to work in the United States of America (e.g., United States citizens, United States resident aliens, and individuals with permits showing authorization to work in the United States). |
| L.19.3.2 (36) | In Pricing Table 7, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall be listed in the “Rate” column. |
| L.19.3.2 (37) | In Pricing Table 7, the overtime premium included in each proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate shall be listed in the “Premium” column. |
| L.19.3.2 (38) | In Pricing Table 7, the overtime premium listed in the “Premium” column shall include any indirect costs and profit associated with such premium, and which were included in the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate listed in the “Rate” column. |
| L.19.3.2 (39) | In Pricing Table 7, the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates and premium costs shall not exceed two decimal places. |
| L.19.3.2 (40) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), offerors shall show for each performance period the build-up of each NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate proposed in Pricing Table 5 (see exception under item 65 below). Offerors shall identify on the build-up schedule: |
a. Each RFP-specified labor category (see Section H.7)
b. Each internal labor category corresponding to RFP-specified labor category
c. Identification of whether the proposed fixed fully-loaded hourly labor rate applies to labor performed by a service employee (as defined in FAR 22.001) or by a professional employee (as defined in 29 CFR 541)
d. Identification of whether the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate applies to labor performed by: 1) the offeror; 2) subcontractor offeror(s); and/or 3) divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the offeror under a common control
e. Proposed unloaded hourly labor rate
f. Each proposed labor-related direct cost description (if applicable) (e.g., fringe benefits, bonuses)
g. Each proposed labor-related direct cost (if applicable)
h. Each proposed indirect cost rate description (e.g., Overhead, G&A)
i. Each proposed indirect cost rate
j. Each proposed indirect cost
k. Proposed profit percentage
l. Proposed profit dollar amount
m. Proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate
L.19.3.2 (41) In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), offerors shall show for each performance period the build-up of each NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate proposed in Pricing Table 7 (see exception under item 65 below). Offerors shall identify on the build-up schedule:
a. Each RFP-specified labor category (if applicable)
b. Each internal labor category corresponding to RFP-specified labor category
c. Identification of whether the proposed fixed fully-loaded hourly labor rate applies to labor performed by: 1) the offeror; 2) subcontractor offeror(s); and/or 3) divisions, subsidiaries, or affiliates of the offeror under a common control
d. Proposed unloaded hourly labor rate
e. Proposed overtime premium cost
f. Each proposed labor-related direct cost description (if applicable) (e.g., fringe benefits, bonuses)
g. Each proposed labor-related direct cost (if applicable)
h. Each proposed indirect cost rate description (e.g., Overhead, G&A)
i. Each proposed indirect cost rate
j. Each proposed indirect cost
k. Proposed profit percentage
l. Proposed profit dollar amount
m. Proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate
| L.19.3.2 (42) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), each proposed profit percentage used in the build-up of each fixed fully-loaded hourly labor rate proposed in Pricing Tables 5 and 7 shall match the respective profit percentage proposed in Pricing Table 4. |
| L.19.3.2 (43) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7) (in electronic submission only), offerors shall show with formulas the arithmetic process by which they calculated their proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates in Pricing Tables 5 and 7. |
| L.19.3.2 (44) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), the proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates shall match the respective proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates in Pricing Tables 5 and 7. |
| L.19.3.2 (45) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), offerors shall show for each contract period the breakdown of the estimated equipment costs. The breakdown shall consist of the following: |
a. RFP-specified estimated direct equipment cost
b. Each applicable indirect cost rate description (e.g., G&A)
c. Each applicable ceiling indirect cost rate
d. Each ceiling indirect cost
e. Each fee percentage
f. Each fee dollar amount
g. Subtotal
| L.19.3.2 (46) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7) offerors shall ensure that the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rate(s) are for the contractor fiscal year(s) that coincides with the contract performance period. When a given performance period traverses two contractor fiscal years, the offeror shall show and compute accordingly for the given performance period the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rate(s) for each of the two contractor fiscal years. |
| L.19.3.2 (47) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), the proposed applicable ceiling indirect cost rates shall match the respective ceiling indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 3. For award of the IDIQ contract, ceiling indirect rates are required to be applied only to the RFP-specified estimated direct equipment costs. |
| L.19.3.2 (48) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), the proposed ceiling indirect cost subtotals shall match the respective proposed “Ind $” costs in Pricing Table 6. |
| L.19.3.2 (49) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), the proposed fee percentages shall match the respective fee percentages proposed in Pricing Table 4. For award of the IDIQ contract, fee percentages are required to be applied only to the sum of the RFP-specified estimated direct equipment costs and proposed ceiling indirect costs. |
| L.19.3.2 (50) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), the proposed fee subtotals shall match the respective “Fee $” amount proposed in Pricing Table 6. |
| L.19.3.2 (51) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7) (in electronic submission only), offerors shall show with formulas the arithmetic process by which they calculated their proposed ceiling indirect costs, fee, and subtotal for equipment. |
| L.19.3.2 (52) | In the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7), for proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates based on a 40-hour normal workweek, offerors shall identify the hours in excess of an average of 40 hours per week, by labor category at the same level of detail as compensated hours, and the uncompensated overtime rate per hour, whether at the prime or subcontract level, for any proposed hours against which an uncompensated overtime rate is applied [see FAR 52.237-10 (Identification of Uncompensated Overtime)]. This includes uncompensated overtime hours that are in indirect cost pools for personnel whose regular hours are normally charged direct. |
| L.19.3.2 (53) | In Pricing Tables 1-7 and the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall complete all applicable data cells. |
| L.19.3.2 (54) | In Pricing Tables 1-7 and the Detail Pricing Tables (in electronic submission only), offerors shall not hide or lock any rows, columns, or cells that contain proposed data. |
| L.19.3.2 (55) | In Pricing Tables 1-7 and the Detail Pricing Tables, offerors shall propose all rates, costs, and prices in United States currency. |
| L.19.3.2 (56) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify, for each labor category, the basis of estimate of the proposed unloaded hourly labor rates. Examples are actual salary, market survey(s), and letter of intent to hire. |
| L.19.3.2 (57) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the number of hours in their normal workweek. |
| L.19.3.2 (58) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify, based on Pricing Table 6, their: |
a. Proposed subcontractors;
b. Total dollars estimated to be subcontracted to each proposed subcontractor;
c. Total dollars estimated to be performed by the offeror; and
d. Percentage of work (based on estimated total dollars) to be performed by the offeror and each proposed subcontractor.
| L.19.3.2 (59) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the name and full contact information of their cognizant Federal auditor (e.g., local Defense Contract Audit Agency branch). |
| L.19.3.2 (60) | In the Narrative, offerors shall identify the name and full contact information of their cognizant Federal agency official (CFAO). The CFAO works in the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency, which is normally the agency with which the offeror has the largest dollars in negotiated contracts, including option periods. . See FAR 42.003. |
| L.19.3.2 (61) | In the Narrative, pursuant to FAR 52.246-6(f) (Inspection – Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour), offerors shall identify the percentage of the proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly labor rates attributable to profit. |
| L.19.3.2 (62) | In the Supporting Information, offerors shall submit evidence to support the provisional billing indirect cost rates proposed in Pricing Table 2. Offerors shall submit such at least one of the following pieces of evidence, pursuant to the following order of Government preference: |
a. Current negotiated indirect cost rate agreement with the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
b. Current forward pricing rate recommendation issued by the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official
c. Most recent (within the last two years) audit report from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other qualified external auditor
d. Most recent (within the last two years) audit report from a qualified internal auditor
e. Current indirect cost rate proposal submitted to the offeror’s cognizant Federal agency official and cognizant auditor
f. Identification of the indirect cost pools and respective allocation bases, and breakdown of the cost elements/costs comprising such pools and bases. The Government prefers that the offeror submit such evidence in a format similar to the applicable schedules in Enclosure 6 (Incurred Cost Proposals) of DCAA’s Information for Contractors, which may be found on DCAA’s Web site (www.dcaa.mil) under the “Audit Process Overview – Information for Contractors” link under the Guidance tab at the top of the homepage.
| L.19.3.2 (63) | In the Supporting Information, in accordance with FAR 52.237-10(f) (Identification of Uncompensated Overtime), offerors shall include a copy of their policy addressing uncompensated overtime. |
| L.19.3.2 (64) | In the Supporting Information, offerors, in accordance with FAR 15.404-3(b) (Subcontract Pricing Considerations), shall conduct appropriate cost or price analyses to establish the reasonableness of proposed subcontract prices, and shall include the results of these analyses. |
a. Results shall be in the form of the cost/price analysis report(s), which shall include:
1. Cost/price analysis technique(s) used (e.g., comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation);
2. Summary findings;
3. Detailed findings; and
4. Basis for the determination of fair and reasonable proposed subcontract prices.
b. For award of the IDIQ contract, “proposed subcontract prices” shall mean “fully-loaded labor rates proposed by the subcontractor offeror to the (prime) offeror, or fully-loaded hourly labor rates negotiated between the subcontractor offeror and (prime) offeror.”
L.19.3.2 (65) At this time, the Government does not require submission of subcontractor offerors’ build-up of their proposed or negotiated fully-loaded hourly labor rates, but the (prime) offeror shall show on its build-up schedule in the Detail Pricing Tables (for Pricing Tables 5-7) any applicable indirect costs and profit it applied to the subcontractor offerors’ proposed or negotiated fully-loaded hourly labor rates.
2. Provisional Billing Rates Pricing Table 2
Proposed Provisional Billing Indirect Cost Rates
| Indirect Cost Rate Description (e.g., Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A) | Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | Basis of Estimate of Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | |
| (e.g., Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement with Cognizant FAO) | Allocation Base | ||
| (e.g., Direct Labor Dollars, Total Cost Input) | Contractor Fiscal Year Period |
(e.g., January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015) 1)
2)
THE FOLLOWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY:
| Indirect Cost Rate Description | Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | Basis of Estimate of Proposed Provisional Billing Rate | Allocation Base |
| Contractor Fiscal Year Period |
1) G&A 6.27% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 G&A 6.25% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 G&A 6.00% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 G&A 5.95% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 G&A 5.80% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 G&A 5.80% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 G&A 5.80% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021
3. Ceiling Indirect Cost Rates
| Pricing Table 3 | |
| Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rates |
| Indirect Cost Rate Description (e.g., Fringe Benefits, Overhead, G&A) | Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate | Basis of Estimate of Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate | |
| (e.g., Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement with Cognizant FAO) | Allocation Base | ||
| (e.g., Direct Labor Dollars, Total Cost Input) | Contractor Fiscal Year Period |
(e.g., January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015) 1)
2)
THE FOLLOWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY:
Indirect Cost Rate Description Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate Basis of Estimate of Proposed Ceiling Indirect Cost Rate Allocation Base Contractor Fiscal Year Period
1) G&A 6.27% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 G&A 6.25% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016 G&A 6.00% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 G&A 5.95% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2018 G&A 5.80% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2019 - December 31, 2019 G&A 5.80% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 G&A 5.80% December 1, 2014 Forward Pricing Rate Agreement with Cognizant Federal Agency Official Total Cost Input January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2021
4. Profit and Fee Percentages
| Pricing Table 4 | |
| Proposed Profit Percentages and Fee Percentages |
| Proposed Profit Percentages | |||||
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | Six-Month Option to Extend |
(see FAR 52.217-8)
| Proposed Fee Percentages | |||||
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | Six-Month Option to Extend |
(see FAR 52.217-8)
5. NTE Labor Rates Pricing Table 5
Proposed Not-to-Exceed (NTE) Fully-Loaded Hourly Labor Rates
Base Year Option Year 1 Option Year 2 Option Year 3 Option Year 4 Six-Month Option to Extend (see FAR 52.217-8)
CLIN Solicitation Reference Labor Category 40 48 40 48 40 48 40 48 40 48 40 48
| RFP-specified | ||
| X001 | H.7.1 | Contracts Administrator (CONUS) |
| X002 | H.7.2 | Program Manager (OCONUS) |
| X003 | H.7.3 | Project Manager (OCONUS) |
| X004 | H.7.4 | Construction Engineer (OCONUS) |
| X005 | H.7.5 | Translator (OCONUS) |
| X006 | H.7.6 | Lead Trainer (OCONUS) |
| Notes |
| 40 = The number of hours in a normal workweek at which the NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates in that column are being proposed. |
| 48 = The number of hours in a normal workweek at which the NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rates in that column are being proposed. |
| No rates shall be proposed in the gray cells. |
6. IDIQ Prices Pricing Table 6 IDIQ Proposed Prices
Proposed Labor Prices
| Six-Month Option to Extend | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | (see FAR 52.217-8) | |||||||||||||||||
| CLIN | Solicitation Reference | Labor Category | Staffing | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | NTE Rate | Hours | Subtotal | Total |
| X001 | H.7.1 | Contracts Administrator (CONUS) | 1 | 0.00 | 1,880 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,880 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,880 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,880 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,880 | 0 | 0.00 | 940 | 0 | 0 |
| X002 | H.7.2 | Program Manager (OCONUS) | 1 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,128 | 0 | 0 |
| X003 | H.7.3 | Project Manager (OCONUS) | 25 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,128 | 0 | 0 |
| X004 | H.7.4 | Construction Engineer (OCONUS) | 10 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,128 | 0 | 0 |
| X005 | H.7.5 | Translator (OCONUS) | 50 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,128 | 0 | 0 |
| X006 | H.7.6 | Lead Trainer (OCONUS) | 25 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 2,256 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,128 | 0 | 0 |
| Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other Direct Costs (ODCs)/Materials
| Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | Dir $ | Ind $ | Fee $ | ||
| Equipment | 115,000,000 | 0 | 115,000,000 | 0 | 115,000,000 | 0 | 115,000,000 | 0 | 115,000,000 | 0 | 115,000,000 | 0 | |||||||
| Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | Subtotal | ||||||||||||||
| 115,000,000 | 115,000,000 | 115,000,000 | 115,000,000 | 115,000,000 | 115,000,000 | 690,000,000 |
Sub-total Base Year 115,000,000 Sub-total Option Year 1 115,000,000 Sub-total Option Year 2 115,000,000 Sub-total Option Year 3 115,000,000 Sub-total Option Year 4 115,000,000 Six-Month Option to Extend (see FAR 52.217-8) 115,000,000
OVERALL PROPOSED PRICE 690,000,000
| Notes |
| CONUS = Continental United States |
| OCONUS = Outside the Continental United States |
| Staffing = RFP-specified estimated maximum number of full-time equivalent (FTE) employees that may be required to perform the requirement |
| NTE Rate = Proposed NTE fully-loaded hourly labor rate |
| Hours = RFP-specified estimated number of productive hours per year |
| Subtotal (Labor) = Staffing x NTE Rate x Hours |
| Dir $ = RFP-specified estimated direct costs |
| Ind $ = Estimated ceiling indirect costs |
| Fee $ = Estimated fee dollars |
| Subtotal (Travel) = Direct $ + Ind $ + Fee $ |
| Total = Sum of Subtotals |
| Overall Proposed Price = Sum of Totals |
7. NTE Overtime Labor Rates
| Pricing Table 7 | |
| Proposed Not-To-Exceed (NTE) Fully-Loaded Hourly Labor Rates and Premiums for Overtime Performance |
| Base Year | Option Year 1 | Option Year 2 | Option Year 3 | Option Year 4 | Six-Month Option to Extend | ||||||||
| (see FAR 52.217-8) | |||||||||||||
| CLIN | RFP-specified Labor Category | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium | Rate | Premium |
| Notes |
| Rate = Proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly labor rate for performance exceeding a normal workweek of 40 hours. |
| Premium = Portion of proposed not-to-exceed fully-loaded hourly overtime rate attributable to the overtime premium (includes associated indirect costs and profit). |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .