RFQ_25-44_Addendum_1.pdf
PDF 238 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Professional Geotechnical Services State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 25-44
- Issued by
- Seminole County, Florida
About this file
This is Addendum No. 1 to RFQ 25-44 issued by the City of Oviedo, Florida, dated July 29, 2025, clarifying requirements for Professional Geotechnical Services. The addendum addresses five questions from prospective proposers regarding reference contact methods, scope items including building envelope and facilities consulting, project timeframe requirements, and submission format specifications. The City indicated that it may contact references via phone or email, that building envelope and facilities consulting represent potential scope items for evaluation of existing city building foundations, and that proposers must demonstrate successfully completed municipal projects from within the past five years in their project approach section. Similarly, references must involve similar work completed within the past five years. The submission format requires all team organizational charts to remain at standard 8.5" by 11" page size rather than the larger 11x17 format. All other provisions of the original RFQ dated July 13, 2025, remain unchanged, and proposers must acknowledge receipt of this addendum on page 32 of the original RFQ packet to avoid disqualification.
No pricing, set-aside designations, incumbent vendor information, or funding sources are addressed in this addendum. The document serves solely as a clarification mechanism to ensure all prospective firms understand the City's expectations regarding project experience timeframes, reference documentation, and submission formatting standards for the competitive qualifications process.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ_25-44_Proposal_Evaluation_Committee_Minutes.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Proposal_Evaluation_Committee_Minutes.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Bid_Opening_Minutes.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Bid_Opening_Minutes.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Bid_Opening_Minutes.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Addendum_2.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Addendum_2.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Addendum_2.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Addendum_1.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Addendum_1.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Professional_Geotechnical_Services.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Professional_Geotechnical_Services.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Professional_Geotechnical_Services.pdf | ||
| RFQ_25-44_Professional_Geotechnical_Services.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of Oviedo, Florida
RFQ 25-44: Professional Geotechnical Services
Addendum No. 1
July 29, 2025
To Prospective Proposers and Others Concerned:
This Addendum is in response to questions from interested proposers and forms a part of the RFQ documents dated July 13, 2025, for the above referenced RFQ. Please note, questions are recorded as they are received, including grammar and spelling errors.
Receipt of this addendum must be acknowledged on page 32 of the original RFQ packet. Failure to do so will subject the Proposer to disqualification.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:
1. Q: How will the city follow up with/reach out to references?
A: The city may contact the references either by phone or email.
2. Q: What portion of this contract does the city anticipate will include building envelope or facilities consulting scopes?
A: These two items are potential scope items. For example, the city could ask the consultant to provide geotechnical services related to evaluation of an existing city building/facility’s foundation.
3. Q: Page 17 (Section 4 Project Approach) requires successfully completed municipal projects to demonstrate a typical project approach/procedures. Does the city prefer a specific project timeframe (e.g., within the last three to five years)?
A: Yes, within the past 5 years.
4. Q: Page 17 (Section 5 References) requires at least three references for whom respondents are performing - or have performed - similar work. For completed projects, does the city prefer a specific timeframe (e.g., within the last three to five years)?
A: Yes, within the past 5 years.
5. Q: Since this is an electronic submission, will the city allow an 11x17 page size for the team organizational chart (in section 3)?
A: No, please keep it to an 8.5” by 11” size.
All other areas of RFQ 25-44 remain unchanged.
END OF ADDENDUM NO. 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .