RFP_Evaluation_Tools.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted

Attached to
Integrated Institutional Planning, Budgeting, Assessment, and Accreditation Platform
Solicitation number
2137674
Issued by
Nassau County, New York

About this file

This RFP evaluation tools document supports SUNY Old Westbury's procurement of an integrated institutional planning, budgeting, assessment, and accreditation platform. The University seeks a secure, cloud-based software solution that consolidates strategic and operational planning, budget development and resource allocation workflows, outcome assessment and program review, accreditation and compliance evidence management, KPI tracking, performance dashboards, cross-unit reporting, and institutional data alignment capabilities. The platform must support institution-wide deployment across academic and administrative units and enable coordinated, multi-level planning processes that align with MSCHE accreditation standards and regulatory reporting requirements. The platform must be configurable and customizable rather than template-based, with the ability to adapt to Old Westbury's governance structures and planning frameworks.

The evaluation framework utilizes a weighted scoring rubric across nine categories: Functional Fit (20%), Configurability (15%), Training & Support (15%), Integration Capability (10%), Security & Compliance (10%), Implementation Approach (10%), Reporting & Dashboards (10%), Data Migration (7%), and Vendor Experience (3%). Mandatory requirements include strategic goal hierarchy support, KPI and action tracking, budget request workflows, outcome and measure tracking, accreditation standards evidence mapping, role-based dashboards, API data exchange, SSO authentication support, and historical data import capabilities. Desirable features include scenario modeling, predictive analytics, and benchmark data feeds. The evaluation matrix assesses vendor compliance across functional domains including strategic planning, budget workflows, assessment tracking, accreditation evidence mapping, dashboards, SSO, APIs, data migration, and training delivery, with scoring on a scale of 1-5 for each weighted category.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Scoring Rubric

CategoryWeight %Score (1-5)Weighted Score Formula
Functional Fit200
Configurability150
Integration Capability100
Security & Compliance100
Implementation Approach100
Training & Support150
Reporting & Dashboards100
Data Migration70
Vendor Experience30
100

Vendor Response Matrix

Requirement IDRequirement AreaRequirement DescriptionMandatory (Y/N)Vendor Response (Comply/Partial/No)Configuration NeededCustom Dev NeededAvailable Out of Box (Y/N)Comments
PLANNING-01PlanningStrategic goal hierarchy supportY
PLANNING-02PlanningKPI and action trackingY
BUDGETING-01BudgetBudget request workflowY
ASSESSMENT-01AssessmentOutcome and measure trackingY
ACCREDITATION-01AccreditationStandards evidence mappingY
REPORTING-01ReportingRole-based dashboardsY
INTEGRATION-01IntegrationAPI data exchangeY
SECURITY-01SecuritySSO supportY
MIGRATION-01MigrationHistorical data importY
TRAINING-01TrainingInitial (at Implementation and Continuous Training for all usersY

Mandatory vs Desirable

RequirementCategoryPriorityNotes
SSO AuthenticationSecurityMandatory
Role-based permissionsSecurityMandatory
Strategic planning workflowsPlanningMandatory
Budget approval workflowsBudgetMandatory
Accreditation evidence mappingAccreditationMandatory
DashboardsReportingMandatory
Scenario modelingBudgetDesirable
Predictive analyticsReportingDesirable
Benchmark data feedsIntegrationDesirable

Feature Comparison

FeatureVendor AVendor BVendor CVendor DVendor ENotes
Strategic Planning
Budget Workflow
Assessment Tracking
Accreditation Evidence
Dashboards
SSO
APIs
Data Migration
Training Included
Unlimited Users

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .