RFP_527-26_Scoring_Template.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Competitive Selection OH|DOT52726-1
- Contract number
- DOT52726-1
- Issued by
- Ohio
About this file
This document is a Cost Proposal Scoring Template for RFP 527-26, involving three bidders: Nussbaum Transportation Services, Inc., Growmark, Inc., and Einride Autonomous Technologies US Inc. The scoring template appears to be from a state or local government procurement process, evaluating technical and price proposals for a transportation-related contract.
The scoring methodology assigns points based on technical proposal quality and pricing, with Nussbaum Transportation Services receiving the highest total score of 805 points. Their technical score was 480 points and their proposed price was $49,654, which was also the lowest price submitted. In contrast, Growmark proposed a significantly higher price of $1,624,567.33 and received a total score of 447 points, while Einride Autonomous Technologies proposed $904,068 and scored 428 points. The evaluation uses a formula that weighs technical merit (560 possible points) and cost competitiveness (245 possible points) to determine the most advantageous proposal.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nussbaum Transportation Service 527-26 Cost Proposal Scoring Template Instructions
| BIDDER: | Nussbaum Transportation Services, Inc. | ||
| For Reviewer: | |||
| Proposer Technical Points | 480 | Sum of the points within the proposal indicated in Appendix A, Table 2 |
Highest Technical Points Received 480
| Technical Proposal Points | 560 | |
| Technical Proposal Points = (Offeror’s Technical Proposal Points/Highest Number of Technical Proposal Points Obtained) x 560 | For Office of Contracts: | |
| Proposer Price | 49654 | Total budget indicated within cost proposal in Appendix A, Table 5 |
Lowest Price Received 49654
Cost Proposal Points 245
TOTAL SCORE 805
Growmark, Inc.
527-26 Cost Proposal Scoring Template Instructions
| BIDDER: | GROWMARK, INC. | ||
| For Reviewer: | |||
| Proposer Technical Points | 377 | Sum of the points within the proposal indicated in Appendix A, Table 2 |
Highest Technical Points Received 480
| Technical Proposal Points | 440 | |
| Technical Proposal Points = (Offeror’s Technical Proposal Points/Highest Number of Technical Proposal Points Obtained) x 560 | For Office of Contracts: | |
| Proposer Price | 1624567.33 | Total budget indicated within cost proposal in Appendix A, Table 5 |
Lowest Price Received 49654
Cost Proposal Points 7.488289205
TOTAL SCORE 447
Einride Autonomous Technologies 527-26 Cost Proposal Scoring Template Instructions
| BIDDER: | Einride Autonomous Technologies US Inc. | ||
| For Reviewer: | |||
| Proposer Technical Points | 355 | Sum of the points within the proposal indicated in Appendix A, Table 2 |
Highest Technical Points Received 480
| Technical Proposal Points | 414 | |
| Technical Proposal Points = (Offeror’s Technical Proposal Points/Highest Number of Technical Proposal Points Obtained) x 560 | For Office of Contracts: | |
| Proposer Price | 904068 | Total budget indicated within cost proposal in Appendix A, Table 5 |
Lowest Price Received 49654
Cost Proposal Points 13.4561006473
TOTAL SCORE 428
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .