RFP_3-26_ATTACHMENT_A-1_AND_A-2.pdf
PDF 154 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFP 3-26
- Issued by
- Niobrara County, Wyoming
About this file
This document contains evaluation criteria and rating forms for the City of Cheyenne's Request for Proposal (RFP) for consulting services on the Yellowstone Road and Dell Range Boulevard Rehabilitation and Improvements Project in Wyoming. The RFP seeks proposals from professional engineering firms licensed by the Wyoming Board of Professional Engineers and Professional Land Surveyors to provide analytical and design engineering services for the project. Proposers must be registered with the Wyoming Secretary of State to conduct business in the state. The evaluation process consists of two rounds: an initial proposal evaluation phase and a second-round interview phase. Proposals should be concise and address the specified selection criteria demonstrating the firm's ability to perform the required work.
The first-round evaluation assesses five primary categories: experience and personnel qualifications (weighted at 5), past performance on City of Cheyenne or other public jurisdictional projects (weighted at 3), knowledge and technical expertise including software capabilities (weighted at 5), specific requirements including familiarity with the local project area (weighted at 5), and general proposal compliance with RFP instructions (weighted at 4). The second-round evaluation focuses on related project experience of the consultant team and project manager (weighted at 5), understanding of project requirements including knowledge of community constraints and innovative ideas (weighted at 5), consultant capacity and personnel commitment (weighted at 3), and participation and responsiveness during interviews (weighted at 2). Evaluation ratings range from 0 (item not addressed) to 5 (clearly outstanding), with total scores calculated by multiplying individual ratings by assigned weights.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of Cheyenne / Request for Proposal / Attachments A1 and A2
ATTACHMENT A-1
FIRST ROUND CONSULTANT PROPOSAL EVALUATION
Ratings Weight Clearly outstanding in this item
5 Weak in this item 2 Level of importance, 1 through 5, assigned by City Engineer’s Office
Well-Qualified in this item 4 Unsatisfied in this item 1 Average in this item 3 Item not addressed 0
Project Name and No. ___________________________________________________________________________
Firm Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Committee Person: _______________________________________ Date: _______________________________
RATING ITEM RATING X WEIGHT = SCORE
1)
Experience and Personnel Qualifications Does the Consultant Team have professional personnel committed to the project with the qualifications, education, and specific experience to perform the tasks and services necessary for successful completion of the project.
Personnel
Related Experience
2)
Past Performance What do past Consultant Performance Appraisals or references indicate about the firm's performance on other City of Cheyenne or other public jurisdictional work (i.e.
meeting deadlines, goals, and objectives, staying within budgets, timely invoicing, coordination, communication, and overall project management.
Were previous projects completed on time and within budget?
Did the project manager / firm provide timely communication and comprehensive project management?
Were the previous work products complete and accurate?
3)
Knowledge and Technical Expertise The proposer will be evaluated on technical suitability for the tasks required. Proposals should contain complete discussions regarding technical qualifications and expertise. Software to be utilized in the work should be described with adequate information.
4) Specific Requirements Familiarity of firm and/ or personnel with the local/ project area, geography, and facilities. Ability to relate to the project requirements.
5) Proposal – The proposal shall be evaluated for general compliance with the instructions issued in the RFP including content, quality, organization, and brevity.
City of Cheyenne / Request for Proposal / Attachments A1 and A2
ATTACHMENT A-2
SECOND ROUND CONSULTANT EVALUATION - INTERVIEWS
Project Name and No. ___________________________________________________________________________
Firm Name: ____________________________________________________________________________________
Committee Person: _______________________________________ Date: _______________________________
Ratings Weight Clearly outstanding in this item
5 Weak in this item 2 Level of importance, 1 through 5, assigned by City Engineer’s Office
Well-Qualified in this item 4 Unsatisfied in this item 1 Average in this item 3 Item not addressed 0
RATING ITEM RATING X WEIGHT = SCORE
1) RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE
a. Rate the overall experience and qualification of the consultant team personnel, excluding the Project Manager.
b. Rate the experience and qualifications of the Project Manager. 4
2) UNDERSTANDING OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
a. Did the consultant team address all requirements of the project Scope of Work?
b. Rate the consultant team’s knowledge of the community, project area, project constraints, opportunities, and/or threats?
c. Did the consultant team offer innovative or creative ideas, or value-added alternative scoping to enhance the project?
d. Overall impression of the interview, i.e. organization, teamwork, problem solving ability, and ability to communicate.
3) CONSULTANT’S ABILITY AND CAPACITY TO PERFORM THE WORK
a. Key personnel committed to the project? 3
b. Have key personnel and subconsultants collaborated on previous projects?
4) OTHER
a. Did the key personnel who will be assigned to the project participate in the interview?
b. Did the consultant interview team respond effectively to direct questions or issues raised by the committee?
c. Rate the consultant team’s analysis, interview preparation, and level of interest.
TOTAL SCORE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .