Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 266 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair Roads Paving
Solicitation number
W50S70-20-R-0014
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for road repair and paving services. The past performance questionnaire is a template for references to provide feedback on an offeror's performance on previous contracts. It requests ratings and rationales on compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction and general comments. The federal contract opportunity is a solicitation to award a firm fixed-price contract for road repair and paving work at a Georgia Air National Guard base. Services include mill and overlay, full depth repair, striping, signage and asphalt resurfacing, with a magnitude between $250,000 to $500,000 and a 270-day completion schedule. The NAICS code is 237310 for highway, street and bridge construction and the small business size standard is $39.5M average annual revenue.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Answers to Bidders Questions.pdf PDF
W50S70-20-R-0014-0001 SOLICITATION AMENDMENT.pdf PDF
Site Visit Sign-in Sheet.pdf PDF
ROADIMPROVE E.pdf PDF
ROADIMPROVE D.pdf PDF
ROADIMPROVE F.pdf PDF
Parking In Front Bldg 1905 Addition A and B.pdf PDF
W50S70-20-R-0014 SOLICITATION.pdf PDF
RFI_Template.doc DOC document
XDQU202688 SOW.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire – Cover Letter

GEORGIA AIR NATIONAL GUARD

165Th AIRLIFT WING & COMBAT READINESS TRAINING CENTER

1401 ROBERT B MILLER DRIVE

GARDEN CITY, GEORGIA 31408

3 August 2020

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W50S70-20-R-0014

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The GA AIR National Guard is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 237310. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to the 165 AW Contracting Office, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 3 September 2020, whichever occurs first.

Submit your completed questionnaire to MSgt James Sheppard.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at 912-966-8437 Commercial/ 8608437 DSN /912-966-8472 Fax or james.sheppard.1@us.af.mil .

Sincerely, MSgt James Sheppard III Contracting Officer mailto:james.sheppard.1@us.af.mil

Past Performance Questionnaire

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

GEORGIA AIR NATIONAL GUARD

Past Performance Questionnaire Cover Letter:
A CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION:
No Confidence:
Rationale 1:
Rationale 2:
Rationale 3:
Rationale 4:
Rationale 5:
No Confidence_2:
Rationale 1_2:
Rationale 2_2:
Rationale 3_2:
Rationale 4_2:
Rationale 5_2:
No Confidence_3:
Rationale 1_3:
Rationale 2_3:
Rationale 3_3:
Rationale 4_3:
Rationale 5_3:
No Confidence_4:
Rationale 1_4:
Rationale 2_4:
Rationale 3_4:
Rationale 4_4:
Rationale 5_4:
No Confidence_5:
Rationale 1_5:
Rationale 2_5:
Rationale 3_5:
Rationale 4_5:
Rationale 5_5:
F General Comments Provide any other relevant performance information:
Comments 1:
Comments 2:
Comments 3:
Comments 4:
Comments 5:
If yes please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact Name:
2020-08-03T14:24:56-0400
SHEPPARD.JAMES.1063717637

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .