Coast_Guard_Crewman_Station_SOW_20_Aug_2018.docx

SOW 14EE07 20 Aug 2018

STATEMENT OF WORK

Minotaur Crewman Simulator Student Station For Coast Guard HC-130J Aircraft

NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER

TRAINING SYSTEMS DIVISION

12211 Science Drive

ORLANDO, FL 32826-3275

iii

Table of Contents

Document Revision History

Statement of Work For Minotaur Crewman Simulator Student Station For Coast Guard HC-130J Aircraft

SCOPE

The Statement of Work (SOW) defines the requirements for the design, fabrication, procurement, assembly and delivery of the physical hardware comprising the Minotaur Crewman Simulator Student Station for Coast Guard HC-130J Aircraft to NAWCTSD.

The student station is a component of the Mission System Operational Readiness Trainer (MS-ORT) C4ISR Sensor Trainer for the HC-130J Aircraft.

BACKGROUND

The Coast Guard requires a high fidelity simulator that replicates the look, feel and operation of the Minotaur Mission System Operator (MSO) stations as fielded in the HC-130J Aircraft.

The simulator will be used to conduct initial, refresher, and transition training, as well as annual standardization checks and mission rehearsal training for Coast Guard Airmen.

A single (1) reconfigurable Student Station will support training on two (2) variants of the actual fielded MSO consoles:

The first MSO Station variant, found in the HC-130J aircraft features the Minotaur equipment built into a single integrated console. In this arrangement, two Mission System Operators (1 and 2) sit side by side, sharing a single common equipment panel and desktop arrangement. See section 7, Exhibits, Figure A.

For the purposes of this training device, the primary physical difference between the HC-130J console arrangement is the single component labeled “Laptop Display”, found in the upper center of Figure A (shared by both HC-130J MSOs). Figure D shows the HC-144 variant with the “Laptop Display” just above the keyboard and underneath the MSO lower console on each separate station.

In order to achieve the general look and feel of the actual MSO stations, while avoiding the cost of employing expensive flight hardware, this simulator makes extensive use of Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) touch screen displays. These displays will feature photo-realistic hardware depictions of actual equipment, animated under computer control (see Figure E), allowing the student to monitor and control the simulated aircraft systems. When a student station is converted from one aircraft version to another, the graphic depictions of aircraft control panels and their related touch screen interface areas are moved among the various touch screen displays under programmed computer control to physically replicate the mounting positions of the actual aircraft consoles.

Several pieces of COTS equipment found in the actual aircraft MSO stations will be used to enhance fidelity of the simulation. The MSO Displays (4) will be the same as that used on the aircraft, as well as the MSO Keyboards (2), trackballs (2), and the Universal Hand Control Unit (UHCU) (1) that is used to control the simulated Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) unit. Additionally, two (2) “Laptop” displays will be placed in a lowered/angled position just forward of each MSO Keyboard/trackball mounting area.

The contractor will propose a design herein defined and, once approved by the Government, shall fabricate and finish parts, procure related COTS equipment, assemble, integrate and deliver the physical components of the Minotaur Crewman Simulator Student Station to NAWCTSD as a prototype. The prototype will be evaluated for at least 30 days and at the end of 30 days a report forwarded to the contractor for design changes. It is anticipated any changes will be minor

The NAWCTSD team will perform the software development, integration, test and delivery of the completed MS-ORT system to the Coast Guard.

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between documents referenced herein and the contents of this SOW, the contents of this SOW shall take precedence. Nothing in this SOW, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

Government Documents Mission System Operational Readiness Trainer (MS-ORT) C4ISR Sensor Trainer for the C-130J Aircraft In-house Preliminary Design Review (iPDR)/Critical Design Review (iCDR), 08 January 2018, PowerPoint.

USCG Minotaur Critical Design Review, 20 JAN 2015, PowerPoint.

41814D0010076 - APSD HC-144 Minotaur CDR Brief v4 (2-3-16), PowerPoint.

Control Console/Industrial Console Supplier Research, 09 JAN 18.

Non-Government Documents Interface Control Document (ICD) for EO/IR Universal Hand Control Unit (UHCU), Document No. 7436861, Date: 01/03/11, Lockheed Martin MS 2 Tactical Systems.

Cortron Quote QD 18005 -00, for Keyboard, P/N 537-0191, 03NOV2017.

Cortron Quote QD 18006 -00, for Trackball, P/N 606-0035, 03NOV2017.

CDW-G Quote HZGG098, for Managed Ethernet Switch, 31MAY2017.

eLO All In One Computer/Touchscreen Drawing MS601835.

Monitor documentation PTAC 210 and Neurologic NLS RF-20-R-PIP-28-V2 attached to this SOW.

REQUIREMENTS

General Work Planning and Scheduling The contractor shall meet delivery as listed in para 6.

The contractor shall identify problems and potential problems that could adversely impact system performance, cost and/or delivery schedule in a timely manner, accompanied by proposed solutions. (i.e. part obsolescence)

The contractor shall identify differences between information found between government supplied documentation and the directives of this SOW in order to minimize confusion or rework.

Program Management The contractor shall:

a. Organize, coordinate and control the program activities to ensure compliance with the contract requirements and delivery of the required product.

b. Provide the personnel, materials, equipment and facilities to complete the requirements of this SOW.

c. Provide the program management, engineering support, logistics support, clerical support and other business support functions in support of this SOW.

d. Measure, monitor and assess the progress of work performed and costs incurred under this contract.

Facility Access

a. The contractor shall allow the government access to the contractor’s facility for the purpose of reviewing the contractor’s performance on this contract as required.

Contractor-Owned Unclassified Network Security- Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information

The safeguarding of Controlled Unclassified Technical Information applies to prime contractors and their subcontractors, if applicable, for information resident on or transiting through contractor unclassified information systems. The contractor shall provide security to safeguard unclassified controlled technical information on their unclassified information systems from unauthorized access and disclosure. The contractor shall take means (defense-in-depth measures) necessary to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Government controlled unclassified information to include the following:

a. The contractor shall manage and maintain contractor-owned unclassified IT network assets used to process U.S. Government controlled unclassified information (sensitive information) IAW DFARS 252.204-7012.

1) The security requirements in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171, “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations,” http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171 that is in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the Contracting Officer, as soon as practical, but not later than December 31, 2017. The Contractor shall notify the DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO), via email at osd.dibcsia@mail.mil, within 30 days of contract award, of any security requirements specified by NIST SP 800-171 not implemented at the time of contract award; or

2) Alternative but equally effective security measures used to compensate for the inability to satisfy a particular requirement and achieve equivalent protection accepted in writing by an authorized representative of the DoD CIO;

b. Apply other information systems security measures when the Contractor reasonably determines that information systems security measures, in addition to those identified in DFARS 252.204-7012, may be required to provide adequate security in a dynamic environment based on an assessed risk or vulnerability.

Cyber Incident and Compromise Reporting The contractor shall report to DoD cyber incidents that affect unclassified controlled technical information resident on or transiting contractor unclassified information systems set forth IAW DFARS 252.204-7012. The contractor shall report the incident to < at http://dibnet.dod.mil. > and to the COR and NAWCTSD program manager.

Transmission of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) by E-mail Unclassified e-mail containing CUI shall be encrypted. The contractor shall implement DoD compliant Private Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate that enables electronic transmission via unclassified networks while protecting the CUI with a digital signature and encryption.

Transmission of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE). SAFE is designed to provide an alternative way to send encrypted files other than email. Information regarding the use of SAFE can be found at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Default.aspx. The contractor shall ensure the following:

a. All files transferred via SAFE shall be for official US Government related business.

b. All files transferred via SAFE shall be UNCLASSIFIED.

c. SAFE CANNOT be used to transmit classified information.

d. All files shall be encrypted.

Information Security Requirements for Protection of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Systems The contractor shall safeguard unclassified DoD information stored on non-DoD information systems to prevent the loss, misuse, and unauthorized access to or modification of this information. The contractor shall:

a. Refrain from processing DoD information on public computers (e.g., those available for use by the general public in kiosks or hotel business centers) or computers that do not have access control.

b. Protect information by no less than one physical or electronic barrier (e.g., locked container or room, login and password) when not under direct individual control.

c. Sanitize media (e.g., overwrite) before external release or disposal.

d. Encrypt the information that has been identified as Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) when it is stored on mobile computing devices such as laptops and personal digital assistants, or removable storage media such as thumb drives and compact disks, using the best available encryption technology.

e. Limit information transfer to subcontractors or teaming partners with a need to know and a commitment to at least the same level of protection.

f. Transmit e-mail, text messages, and similar communications using technology and processes in accordance with National Institute of Standards Technology Federal Information Processing Standards (NIST FIPS), given facilities, conditions, and environment. Examples of recommended technologies or processes include closed networks, virtual private networks, public key-enabled encryption, and Transport Layer Security (TLS).

g. When traveling, encrypt organizational wireless connections and use encrypted wireless connections. When encrypted wireless is not available, encrypt application files (e.g., spreadsheet and word processing files), using no less than application-provided password protection level encryption.

h. Transmit voice and fax transmissions only when there is an assurance that access is limited to authorized recipients.

i. Provide protection against computer network intrusions and data exfiltration, including no less than the following:

1) Current and regularly updated malware protection services, e.g., anti-virus, anti-spyware.

2) Monitoring and control of inbound and outbound network traffic (e.g., at the external boundary, sub-networks, individual hosts) including blocking unauthorized ingress, egress, and exfiltration through technologies such as firewalls and router policies, intrusion prevention or detection services, and host-based security services.

3) Prompt application of security-relevant software patches, service packs, and hot fixes.

j. Comply with other current Federal and DoD information protection and reporting requirements for specified categories of information (e.g., Critical Program Information (CPI), Personally Identifiable Information (PII), and export controlled information).

Facility All tasks are conducted at the contractor’s facility unless otherwise indicated.

Detailed Requirements General Mechanical/Electrical

a. The USCG MS-ORT system shall be physically and functionally compatible with the facilities hosting the HC-144B OFT.

b. The USCG MS-ORT system shall be designed for operation within the following physical environments. Facility is maintained anywhere from 68 to 74 degree with relative humidity (RH) anywhere from 30 to 60 percent.

c. The Student Station shall operate on standard 115VAC 60 Hertz, 15-amp service.

d. The Student Station and Student Chairs shall fit and operate within a single room containing the Instructor Operator Station (IOS), Instructor Chairs, and 40U Computer Equipment Rack. See Figure F.

e. The Student Station, with minimal disassembly, shall fit through a standard door frame measuring 3feet, 3/8inch wide.

f. The Student Station shall be movable for the purpose of repositioning the unit for routine installation and maintenance activities.

g. The Student Station shall be maintainable using standard hand tools.

h. The Student Station primary components such as Display Monitors, Touch Screens, UPS, PDU, Eswitch, cables etc. shall be securely mounted/attached within the unit framework.

i. The Student Station primary components such as Display Monitors, Touch Screens, UPS, PDU, Eswitch, cables etc. shall be easily removed/replaced during maintenance activity.

j. All interconnecting cables used in the system shall be identified with individual “W” wire and “P” plug number schema to support assembly and maintenance by the end user.

k. All individual system components (power supplies, displays, E switches etc.) with interconnection receptacles shall be marked with “R” receptacle, and “J” jack number to support assembly and maintenance by the end user.

l. A Technical Data Package containing mechanical, electrical cabling, parts lists, cable assembly, and general assembly drawings shall be produced to describe the Student Station in enough detail to reproduce and maintain the system. The TDP shall be delivered with unlimited Government rights.

m. The Technical Data Package shall contain any detailed instructions required to assemble or repair the Student Station to include parts lists with part numbers, quantities, manufacturers’ names and sources of distribution. The TDP shall be delivered with unlimited Government rights.

Student Station Specifics

a. The Student Station shall replicate the overall look and feel of the HC-130J MSO 1 and MSO 2 Crew Station. See Figure A.

b. The Student Station shall have a replica (similar) MSO Crew Station Upper Console for mounting and support of the actual COTS MSO Displays (4) (see Figure G), and the Touchscreen Displays (6). Refer to Figure E for the general layout required for all of the displays.

c. The MSO Crew Station Upper Console shall feature the same (similar) display angles as found in the actual aircraft. See Figure C for an example.

d. The Upper Console shall have side cowlings similar to that found on the aircraft.

e. The Upper Console shall have a rear covering to enclose the equipment inside.

f. The Student Station shall provide readily opened doors or removable panels enabling routine maintenance activities to occur to the equipment mounted on, into and within the Student Station.

g. The Student Station shall support any bulkhead connector, cable pass-through, or ventilation infrastructure required by the equipment mounted inside.

h. The Student Station shall have a replica (similar) MSO Crew Station Desktop for mounting of the actual COTS keyboards (2), actual COTS trackball assemblies (2) (Figure H), and the Universal Hand Control Unit (UHCU) (Figure I).

i. The MSO Crew Station Desktop shall replicate the same recesses for the keyboard and trackball as found in the actual aircraft. See Figure A for an example.

j. To support the other versions of MSO stations on the Student Station, two (2) “Laptop Display” units shall be accommodated on the desktop. Refer to Figures D and J. The Contractor shall propose a method wherein the Student Station can quickly be converted from physically representing a HC-130J MSO Station with no laptop displays being mounted between the top of the keyboard, and that replicating the other MSO Station with the two laptops located within a sloped “trough” built into the desktop. Since this laptop unit is being used as a display, and touchscreen and bezel buttons are required for the trainees to operate, it is necessary to use the actual aircraft equipment monitor.

k. The Student Station shall host Communications Microphone/Headsets (2) and Communications PTT/Footswitch (2) for the MSO trainees to interface with the Simulated Intercom and Radio equipment.

l. The Student Station Desktop shall provide a hook to hang up the Headsets, in a determined location, when headsets are not in use.

m. The Student Station shall use the actual Universal Hand Control Unit (UHCU) for the MSO trainees to operate the simulated FLIR unit.

n. The Student Station Desktop shall feature a government furnished bracket to hang up the UHCU when not in use.

o. Mounting for Student Station Microphone/Headset cable receptacles (2), Communications PTT/Footswitch (2) cable receptacles, and the UHCU cable receptacle shall be provided in a position that replicates the general location found in the actual aircraft. Refer to Figure A.

p. The Student Station shall have chairs similar in design and dimension to that shown in Figure C. A roll around base is acceptable, and mounting rails such as that found on aircraft are not required.

q. The Student Station shall have a MSO Crew Station Lower Console for mounting and support of the Upper Console and Desktop. Refer to Figure D for the general idea of how the Lower Console should be designed to accommodate MSO 1 and 2.

r. The front, left and right sides of the Lower Console shall be a solid wall to function as a kick panel/cowl.

s. The Lower Console shall provide readily opened doors or removable panels enabling routine maintenance activities to occur to the equipment mounted inside the Student Station.

t. The Lower Console shall support any bulkhead connector, cable pass-through, or ventilation infrastructure required by the equipment mounted inside.

u. The Lower Console shall provide an internally mounted shelf for mounting and support of the following components: an Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS); an Power Distribution Unit(s) (network controlled); an Ethernet Switch; two (2) laptops; and any other equipment determined as required to support the simulated equipment used on the Student Station.

v. The Student Station UPS shall of sufficient size to enable graceful shutdown of the MS-ORT Computer Systems in the event of total loss of power.

w. The Student Station UPS shall be selected to protect the Student Station electrical components from damage due to electrical transients, voltage spikes, and brownouts.

x. The Student Station Ethernet Switch shall be a Government approved, Managed Switch.

y. The Power Distribution Unit(s) shall be selected to enable computer/network control of the power outlets supplying the individual 115VAC powered components located within the Student Station.

z. A physically protected switch and power indicator shall be provided to apply and monitor general power to the Student Station. The Contractor shall recommend a location for these components.

aa. A physically protected emergency power off switch shall be incorporated into the Student Station.

Material

a. The contractor will propose suitable materials, colors and textures for the Student Station to simulate the aircraft crew station environment.

b. All materials created or acquired under this SOW will be Contractor Acquired Property as defined in FAR 52.245-1 (a) and will be property of the Government.

Part Numbers

a. Keyboard – Cortron, Model 100, P/N 537-0191 (trainer version of P/N 537-0174).

b. Trackball – Cortron, Model T25D, P/N 606-0035 (trainer version of P/N 606-0020).

c. All In One Computer/Touch Screen – ELO I-Series for Windows, 22-inch AiO Touchscreen, Model Number E971081.

d. Laptop Display Screen – Digital Systems Engineering, Inc. (DSE) Programmable Tactical Awareness Controller (PTAC210).

e. Network switch – Cisco Catalyst 3650-24TS-L, Ethernet switch, 24 ports, managed, rack-mountable, P/N WS-C3650-24TS-L.

f. Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) – TBD, (contractor proposed).

g. Switched Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) – APC AP7902B (an example). Student Station will require enough outlets to control all devices mounted within. (Contractor proposed).

h. Chairs –TBD, (contractor proposed).

i. Neurologic monitor

SPECIFICATIONS

Deliverable Summaries The contractor shall provide all deliverables listed below to the Contracting Officer’s Representative and the Procuring Contracting Officer. All deliverables shall be delivered with unlimited rights unless otherwise agreed upon by the Procuring Contracting Officer.

a. Prototype 1 delivered to NAWC TSD Orlando- 90 days ARO

b. Final Student Station delivered to NAWC TSD Orlando- 180 ARO

c. TDP draft – 120 days ARO

d. TDP final - 210 days ARO

Government Furnished Information None listed.

5. Government Furnished Equipment

a. UHCU mounting bracket.

6. Delivery Dates

a. 90 days after contract award- Prototype 1

b. 120 days ARO – TDP Draft

c. 180 days after contract award- Final Student Station

d. 210 days ARO

7. Figures

Figure A – HC-130J MSO 1 and MSO 2 Crew Station (viewed from crewmember seat position)

Figure B - HC-144J/HC-27J MSO 1 and MSO 2 Crew Station (view from behind crewmember seats)

Figure C - HC-144J/HC-27J MSO 1 and MSO 2 Crew Station (side view as placed in aircraft)

Figure D - HC-144J/HC-27J MSO 1 and MSO 2 Crew Station (3-D view) – Laptop display reference only

Figure E – Example of MS-ORT Student Station Display Layout

Figure F – Example of MS-ORT Training Room Layout/Minimum Dimensions

Figure G – MSO Display Data (notional only – not the actual neurologic monitor)

Figure H – MSO Keyboard and Trackball Data

Figure I – MSO FLIR Control (UHCU)

Figure J – Laptop Display Example image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.png image1.wmf