21R2509 Annex 1800000 Attachments.pdf

ATTACHMENT J-1800000-01

DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

DEFINITION/ACRONYM DESCRIPTION

Environmental Permits The facility environmental permits and EPA ID numbers shall be obtained and held by Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

Hazardous Material (HM) Any material designated by the Department of Transportation (DOT) as posing a potential threat while being transported. Hazardous materials are listed in 49 CFR Part 172.

Hazardous Waste (HW) Any discarded solid waste (liquid, semi-solid, solid, or gaseous) that meets the definition of a hazardous waste by USEPA, state authorities, or the Navy. In accordance with RCRA, a solid waste is a listed hazardous waste if it is specifically listed, or it is a characteristic hazardous waste if it exhibits the characteristics of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity. Discarded HM/HWORW in this contract is all waste that may be turned in to the Environmental Services contractor, including RCRA hazardous waste, state regulated waste, Universal Waste, Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) regulated waste, and non-hazardous waste.

Hazardous Waste Management Plan

In accordance with OPNAVINST 5090.1C, every Navy shore activity that generates HW shall develop and use a HW Management Plan or a HW management component in its P2 Plan and EMS. A HW Management Plan shall:

– Identify applicable federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to the generation and management of HW.

– Identify training requirements and describe procedures for obtaining training and maintaining training records.

– Assign responsibilities for the generation, designation, handling, storage, treatment, disposal, and all documentation.

– Describe all HW generation and management procedures.

– Include or reference the HW minimization plan and goals.

– Include or reference contingency plans and emergency response procedures.

The plan shall be kept up to date to include changes in HW generation and management procedures, as well as changes in applicable federal, state, and local HW regulations. The plan shall include or reference minimization procedures sufficient to achieve DOD minimization goals. Tenant activities may be covered by the host CO's HW Management Plan.

HW Manifest A HW manifest as defined in 40 CFR 260 is required for the transport of hazardous waste. The installation commanding officer (ICO) or the ICO’s designated representative shall retain signature authority for HW manifests.

Installation Environmental Program Manager (IEPM)

The Government function on the Installation that has the authority to implement the Navy's environmental policies and decision-making regarding environmental compliance issues as well as environmental operational issues. The IEPM is the primary liaison for all federal, state, and local regulatory agencies and government officials, and the point of contact for all inquiries from outside the installation (e.g., public or news media inquiries) unless otherwise specified in writing.

Less-than-90-day Accumulation Areas or Storage Facilities

Accumulation areas that are not RCRA permitted hazardous waste storage facilities but can serve as temporary accumulation areas for hazardous waste subject to a 90-day time limit in accordance with 40 CFR 262 or state equivalent regulations.

Memorandums of Agreement/Understanding

The installation commanding officer or his designated representative shall retain signature authority for all MOAs and MOUs.

Other Regulated Waste

(ORW)

Wastes that are not hazardous under federal RCRA regulations, but may be regulated by other federal programs (e.g., TSCA, OSHA, CERCLA, DOT) or state agency.

Sampling Plan Plan and procedures to conduct sampling, field testing and laboratory analysis for a defined testing objective.

ATTACHMENT J-1800000-01

DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

DEFINITION/ACRONYM DESCRIPTION

Satellite Accumulation Areas

Temporary hazardous waste accumulation areas that have a maximum capacity limit of 55 gallons per area in accordance with 40 CFR 262 or state equivalent regulations.

Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan

Plan and procedures for the installation to exercise oil spill prevention measures and to provide effective countermeasures in the event of oil spill ashore. This may include field testing and inspection services to maintain compliance.

Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF)

Facilities that are permitted by RCRA regulations to provide treatment, storage and disposal services for hazardous wastes.

BUMEDINST Bureau of Medicine and Surgery Instruction CFR Code of Federal Regulations DRMO Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office EPA Environmental Protection Agency FISC Fleet Industrial Supply Center HAZMART A centralized repository for the control of all hazardous materials that will order, receive, distribute, store, dispose of and track all hazardous materials used in Installation operations.

HMTID Hazardous Material Turned in for Disposal HMTIS Hazardous Material Turned in for Storage NAVSEA Naval Sea Systems Command NELAP National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NON Notices of Noncompliance NOV Notices of Violation OHS Oil and Hazardous Substances OPNAVINST Chief of Naval Operations Instruction P2ADS Pollution Prevention Annual Disposal Summary POC Point of Contact QA/QC Quality Assurance and Quality Control RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SPCC Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures TSDF Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities

ATTACHMENT J-1800000-02

REFERENCES AND TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS

References Titles OPNAVINST 5090.1 Environmental and Natural Resources Program Manual NAVSEA T0300-AZ-PRO-010 Navy Environmental Compliance Sampling & Field Testing Procedures Manual DoD Instruction 4715.4 Pollution Prevention BUMEDINST 6280.1 Management of Infectious Waste DoD Publication 4715.5-G Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document EPA 833-B-92-001 NPDESW Stormwater Sampling Guidance EPA SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods EPA PB83-124503 Handbook for Sampling and Sample Preservation of Water and Wastewater.

EPA/600/4-85/013 Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and

Marine Organisms Environmental permits 40 CFR 112 Protection of the Environment – Oil Pollution Protection Site Specific Plan (ie SPCC, STMP) Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document (OEBGD)

ATTACHMENT J-1800000-03

SAMPLING PLAN FOR FIRM FIXED PRICE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

ELIN A001: During the month of February or March, and August or September, the Contractor shall schedule and perform the following: Sample and analyze the 58 water supply wells and 4 Water Treatment Plants drinking water in Attachment J-1800000-07.

Sampling shall be in accordance with SESD Operating Procedure guidance, SESDPROC-301-R1 Groundwater Sampling Attachment J-1800000-04. Any changes in the initial schedule shall be coordinated at a minimum of 48 hours in advance to ensure that the well can be turned on and run prior to the sampling. If well is off-line, information shall be captured in the summary section of each report The following information shall be collected at each wellhead site during the sampling collection:

(1) Well identification number

(2) Number of samples taken

(3) Date and time of samples taken

(4) pH of sample taken

During each sampling event, sample each drinking water well as identified in attachment J-1800000- 08 Well Inventory, and analyze it for VOCs, SOCs, Chlorides, Munitions Constituents and Perchlorate.

VOC, SOC and Chloride laboratory analyses shall be performed by a laboratory that is certified in the State of North Carolina in accordance with EPA Method 524.2, “Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry” and CCPCUA Water Use Permit #CU3080. The Contractor shall submit laboratory certification for all tests required by this contract. The Contractor shall order third-party performance standards from Supelco for SW – 846 Method 8330 (Nitroaromatics and Nitramines) and EPA Method 314.0 for perchlorate. The standards will be directly forwarded from Supelco to a State certified laboratory to be analyzed at the same time as the well samples. The preparation of standards by Supelco and the analyses by the designated certified lab will be provided at the normal turnaround times. The list of compounds that are to be included in this testing is in Attachment J-1800000-06.

The following Quality Control procedures shall be used with the sampling:

(1) Trip blank - one per cooler per shipping day.

(2) Equipment reinstate every day.

(3) Field blank – one per day

(4) Field blank – one for every 10 wells. The duplicate must be taken from the sample which will become the laboratory matrix spike/spike matrix duplicate.

The results must be measured to the limits of Method 524.2’s MDLs. Any method blank contamination shall be run again.

Within 45 days of the completion of each sampling event, the Contractor shall submit a final report in accordance with Attachment J-1800000-05. Contractor shall notify the Government of any problems immediately after sampling.

Laboratory analyses shall be performed by a laboratory that is certified in the State of North Carolina in accordance with EPA Method 524.2. The Contractor shall submit laboratory certification for all tests required by this contract.

Vicinity maps are included in Attachment J-1800000-09-01 through 07.

SESD Operating Procedure Groundwater Sampling

Page 1 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1 Groundwater Sampling_AF.R1

Effective Date: November 1, 2007

ATTACHMENT J-1800000-04

SCIENCE AND ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION

Region 4

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science and Ecosystem Support Division

Athens, Georgiaꞏ

Title: . Groundwater

Name: Donald Hunter

Number: SESDPROC-301-Rl

Authors

Title: Environmental Scientist, Regional Expert

1.2-zn_.:_-fl/ Date: 1!

Approvals

Date: l\ 0 l \ 0/

Page 2 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

Revision History

This table shows changes to this controlled document over time. The most recent version is presented in the top row of the table. Previous versions of the document are maintained by the SESD Field Quality Manager.

History

Effective Date

SESDPROC-301-R1, Groundwater Sampling, replaces

SESDPROC-301-R0.

General Corrected any typographical, grammatical and/or editorial errors.

Title Page Changed title for Antonio Quinones from Environmental Investigations Branch to Enforcement and Investigations Branch

Section 1.3 Updated information to reflect that the procedure is located on the H:

drive of the LAN. Clarified Field Quality Manager (FQM) responsibilities.

Section 1.4 Updated referenced operating procedures due to changes in title names.

Alphabetized and revised the referencing style for consistency.

Section 1.5.1 Corrected the title of the Safety, Health, and Environmental Management Program Procedures and Policy Manual.

Section 1.5.2, 4th bullet Added references to the CFR and IATA’s Dangerous Goods Regulations.

Section 2.5 Updated referenced operating procedures due to changes in title names.

November 1, 2007

SESDPROC-301-R0, Groundwater Sampling, Original Issue

February 05, 2007

Page 3 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 General Information

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope/Application

1.3 Documentation/Verification

1.4 References

1.5 General Precautions

1.5.1 Safety

1.5.2 Procedural Precautions

2 Special Sampling Considerations

2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Analysis

2.2 Special Precautions for Trace Contaminant Groundwater Sampling

2.3 Sample Handling and Preservation Requirements

2.4 Quality Control

2.5 Records

3 Groundwater Sampling Methods - Purging

3.1 General

3.1.1 Purging and Purge Adequacy

3.1.2 Equipment Considerations for Purging

3.2 Wells Without Plumbing or In-Place Pumps

3.2.1 Purging with Pumps

3.2.1.1 Peristaltic Pumps

3.2.1.2 Submersible Pumps

3.2.2 Purging With Bailers

3.2.3 Field Care of Purging Equipment

3.2.4 General Low Flow/Low Stress Method Preference

3.2.5 Low Flow/Low Volume Purging Techniques/Procedures

3.3 Wells With In-Place Plumbing

Page 4 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

3.3.1 Continuously Running Pumps

3.3.2 Intermittently or Infrequently Running Pumps

3.4 Temporary Monitoring Wells

3.4.1 General Considerations

3.4.2 Purging When Water Level Is Within Limit of Suction

3.4.3 Purging When Water Level Is Greater Than Limit of Suction

3.4.4 Considerations for Direct Push Groundwater Sampling

3.5 Investigation Derived Waste

4 Groundwater Sampling Methods – Sampling

4.1 General

4.2 Sampling Wells With In-Place Plumbing

4.3 Sampling Wells without Plumbing, Within the Limit of Suction

4.3.1 Equipment Available

4.3.1.1 Peristaltic Pump, Direct from Pump Head Tubing

4.3.1.2 Peristaltic pump/vacuum jug

4.3.1.3 RediFlo2® Electric Submersible Pump (with Teflon® tubing)

4.3.1.4 Bailers

4.4 Sampling Wells without Plumbing, Exceeding the Limit of Suction

4.5 Sample Preservation

4.6 Special Sample Collection Procedures

4.6.1 Trace Organic Compounds and Metals

4.6.2 Order of Sampling with Respect to Analytes

4.6.3 Filtering

4.7 Specific Sampling Equipment Quality Assurance Techniques

4.8 Auxiliary Data Collection

4.8.1 Well Pumping Rate - Bucket/Stop Watch Method

1 General Information

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Scope/Application

1.3 Documentation/Verification

Page 5 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

1.4 References

1.5 General Precautions

1.5.1 Safety

1.5.2 Procedural Precautions

2 Special Sampling Considerations

2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Analysis

2.2 Special Precautions for Trace Contaminant Groundwater Sampling

2.3 Sample Handling and Preservation Requirements

2.4 Quality Control

2.5 Records

3 Groundwater Sampling Methods - Purging

3.1 General

3.1.1 Purging and Purge Adequacy

3.1.2 Equipment Considerations for Purging

3.2 Wells Without Plumbing or In-Place Pumps

3.2.1 Purging with Pumps

3.2.1.1 Peristaltic Pumps

3.2.1.2 Submersible Pumps

3.2.2 Purging With Bailers

3.2.3 Field Care of Purging Equipment

3.2.4 General Low Flow/Low Stress Method Preference

3.2.5 Low Flow/Low Volume Purging Techniques/Procedures

3.3 Wells With In-Place Plumbing

3.3.1 Continuously Running Pumps

3.3.2 Intermittently or Infrequently Running Pumps

3.4 Temporary Monitoring Wells

3.4.1 General Considerations

3.4.2 Purging When Water Level Is Within Limit of Suction

3.4.3 Purging When Water Level Is Greater Than Limit of Suction

3.4.4 Considerations for Direct Push Groundwater Sampling

3.5 Investigation Derived Waste

4 Groundwater Sampling Methods – Sampling

Page 6 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

4.1 General

4.2 Sampling Wells With In-Place Plumbing

4.3 Sampling Wells without Plumbing, Within the Limit of Suction

4.3.1 Equipment Available

4.3.1.1 Peristaltic Pump, Direct from Pump Head Tubing

4.3.1.2 Peristaltic pump/vacuum jug

4.3.1.3 RediFlo2® Electric Submersible Pump (with Teflon® tubing)

4.3.1.4 Bailers

4.4 Sampling Wells without Plumbing, Exceeding the Limit of Suction

4.5 Sample Preservation

4.6 Special Sample Collection Procedures

4.6.1 Trace Organic Compounds and Metals

4.6.2 Order of Sampling with Respect to Analytes

4.6.3 Filtering

4.7 Specific Sampling Equipment Quality Assurance Techniques

4.8 Auxiliary Data Collection

4.8.1 Well Pumping Rate - Bucket/Stop Watch Method

Page 7 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

Contents

1 General Information

1.1 Purpose

This document describes general and specific procedures, methods and considerations to be used and observed when collecting groundwater samples for field screening or laboratory analysis.

1.2 Scope/Application

The procedures contained in this document are to be used by field personnel when collecting and handling groundwater samples in the field. On the occasion that SESD field personnel determine that any of the procedures described in this section are either inappropriate, inadequate or impractical and that another procedure must be used to obtain a groundwater sample, the variant procedure will be documented in the field log book, along with a description of the circumstances requiring its use.

1.3 Documentation/Verification

This procedure was prepared by persons deemed technically competent by SESD management, based on their knowledge, skills and abilities and have been tested in practice and reviewed in print by a subject matter expert. The official copy of this procedure resides on the H: drive of the SESD local area network. The Field Quality Manager (FQM) is responsible for ensuring the most recent version of the procedure is placed on the H: drive and for maintaining records of review conducted prior to its issuance.

1.4 References

International Air Transport Authority (IATA). Dangerous Goods Regulations, Most Recent Version

Puls, Robert W., and Michael J. Barcelona. 1989. Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals Analysis. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials 6(4), pp.385-393.

Puls, Robert W., Don A. Clark, and Bert Bledsoe. 1992. Metals in Ground Water:

Sampling Artifacts and Reproducibility. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials 9(2),

pp. 149-162.

SESD Guidance Document, Design and Installation of Monitoring Wells, SESDGUID- 001, Most Recent Version SESD Operating Procedure for Control of Records, SESDPROC-002, Most Recent Version

Page 8 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

SESD Operating Procedure for Sample and Evidence Management, SESDPROC-005, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Logbooks, SESDPROC-010, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field Sampling Quality Control, SESDPROC-011, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field pH Measurement, SESDPROC-100, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field Specific Conductance Measurement, SESDPROC- 101, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field Temperature Measurement, SESDPROC-102, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field Turbidity Measurement, SESDPROC-103, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Groundwater Level and Well Depth Measurement, SESDPROC-105, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Management of Investigation Derived Waste, SESDROC- 202, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Pump Operation, SESDPROC-203, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination, SESDPROC-205, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination at the FEC, SESDPROC-206, Most Recent Version

SESD Operating Procedure for Potable Water Supply Sampling, SESDPROC-305, Most Recent Version

United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 1975. Handbook for Evaluating Water Bacteriological Laboratories. Office of Research and Development (ORD), Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.

US EPA. 1977. Sampling for Organic Chemicals and Microorganisms in the Subsurface.

EPA-600/2-77/176.

Page 9 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

US EPA. 1978. Microbiological Methods for Monitoring the Environment, Water and Wastes. ORD, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio.

US EPA. 1981. "Final Regulation Package for Compliance with DOT Regulations in the Shipment of Environmental Laboratory Samples," Memo from David Weitzman, Work Group Chairman, Office of Occupational Health and Safety (PM-273), April 13, 1981.

US EPA. 1995. Ground Water Sampling - A Workshop Summary. Proceedings from the Dallas, Texas November 30 – December 2, 1993 Workshop. ORD, Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory. EPA/600/R-94/205, January 1995.

US EPA. 2001. Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual. Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD), Athens, GA

US EPA. Analytical Support Branch Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual. Region 4 SESD, Athens, GA, Most Recent Version

US EPA. Safety, Health and Environmental Management Program Procedures and Policy Manual. Region 4 SESD, Athens, GA, Most Recent Version

1.5 General Precautions

1.5.1 Safety

Proper safety precautions must be observed when collecting groundwater samples. Refer to the SESD Safety, Health and Environmental Management Program (SHEMP) Procedures and Policy Manual and any pertinent site-specific Health and Safety Plans (HASP) for guidelines on safety precautions. These guidelines should be used to complement the judgment of an experienced professional. Address chemicals that pose specific toxicity or safety concerns and follow any other relevant requirements, as appropriate.

1.5.2 Procedural Precautions

The following precautions should be considered when collecting groundwater samples.

• Special care must be taken not to contaminate samples. This includes storing samples in a secure location to preclude conditions which could alter the properties of the sample. Samples shall be custody sealed during long-term storage or shipment.

• Always sample from the anticipated cleanest, i.e., least contaminated location, to the most contaminated location. This minimizes the opportunity for cross-contamination to occur during sampling.

Page 10 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

• Collected samples must remain in the custody of the sampler or sample custodian until the samples are relinquished to another party.

• If samples are transported by the sampler, they will remain under his/her custody or be secured until they are relinquished.

• Shipped samples shall conform to all U.S. Department of Transportation

(DOT) rules of shipment found in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR parts 171 to 179), and/or International Air Transportation Association (IATA) hazardous materials shipping requirements found in the current edition of IATA’s Dangerous Goods Regulations.

• Documentation of field sampling is done in a bound logbook.

• Chain-of-custody documents shall be filled out and remain with the samples until custody is relinquished.

• All shipping documents, such as air bills, bills of lading, etc., shall be retained by the project leader and placed in the project files.

Page 11 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

2 Special Sampling Considerations

2.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Analysis

Groundwater samples for VOC analysis must be collected in 40 ml glass vials with Teflon® septa. The vial may be either preserved with concentrated hydrochloric acid or they may be unpreserved. Preserved samples have a two week holding time, whereas unpreserved samples have only a seven day holding time. In the great majority of cases, the preserved vials are used to take advantage of the extended holding time. In some situations, however, it may be necessary to use the unpreserved vials. For example, if the groundwater has a high amount of dissolved limestone, i.e., is highly calcareous, there will most likely be an effervescent reaction between the hydrochloric acid and the water, producing large numbers of fine bubbles. This will render the sample unacceptable. In this case, unpreserved vials should be used and arrangements must be confirmed with the laboratory to ensure that they can accept the unpreserved vials and meet the shorter sample holding times.

The samples should be collected with as little agitation or disturbance as possible.

The vial should be filled so that there is a meniscus at the top of the vial and absolutely no bubbles or headspace should be present in the vial after it is capped.

After the cap is securely tightened, the vial should be inverted and tapped on the palm of one hand to see if any undetected bubbles are dislodged. If a bubble or bubbles are present, the vial should be topped off using a minimal amount of sample to re-establish the meniscus. Care should be taken not to flush any preservative out of the vial during topping off. If, after topping off and capping the vial, bubbles are still present, a new vial should be obtained and the sample re-collected.

Samples for VOC analysis must be collected using either stainless steel or Teflon® equipment, such as:

• Bailers must be constructed of stainless steel or Teflon®

• RediFlo2® submersible pumps used for sampling should be equipped with

Teflon® sample delivery tubing

• Peristaltic pump/vacuum jug assemblies should be outfitted with Teflon® tubing from the water column to the transfer cap, which should also be constructed of Teflon®

2.2 Special Precautions for Trace Contaminant Groundwater Sampling

• A clean pair of new, non-powdered, disposable gloves will be worn each time a different location is sampled and the gloves should be donned immediately prior to sampling. The gloves should not come in contact

Page 12 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1 with the media being sampled and should be changed any time during sample collection when their cleanliness is compromised.

• Sample containers for samples suspected of containing high concentrations of contaminants shall be stored separately.

• Sample collection activities shall proceed progressively from the least suspected contaminated area to the most suspected contaminated area if sampling devices are to be reused. Samples of waste or highly contaminated media must not be placed in the same ice chest as environmental (i.e., containing low contaminant levels) or background samples.

• If possible, one member of the field sampling team should take all the notes and photographs, fill out tags, etc., while the other members collect the samples.

• Clean plastic sheeting will be placed on the ground at each sample location to prevent or minimize contaminating sampling equipment by accidental contact with the ground surface.

• Samplers must use new, verified certified-clean disposable or non-disposable equipment cleaned according to procedures contained in SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination (SESDPROC-205) or SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination at the FEC (SESDPROC-206) for collection of samples for trace metals or organic compound analyses.

2.3 Sample Handling and Preservation Requirements

1. Groundwater samples will typically be collected from the discharge line of a pump or from a bailer, either from the pour stream of an up-turned bailer or from the stream from a bottom-emptying device. Efforts should be made to reduce the flow from either the pump discharge line or the bailer during sample collection to minimize sample agitation.

2. During sample collection, make sure that the pump discharge line or the bailer does not contact the sample container.

3. Place the sample into appropriate, labeled containers. Samples collected for VOC analysis must not have any headspace (see Section 2.1, Volatile Organic Compound Analysis). All other sample containers must be filled with an allowance for ullage.

4. All samples requiring preservation must be preserved as soon as practically possible, ideally immediately at the time of sample collection. If preserved VOC vials are used, these will be preserved with concentrated hydrochloric acid by ASB personnel prior to departure for the field investigation. All other chemical preservatives required for the remaining suite of analytes will be supplied by ASB personnel and will be added to the samples by SESD field personnel or other

Page 13 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1 authorized persons. The adequacy of sample preservation will be checked after the addition of the preservative for all samples except for the samples collected for VOC analysis. Additional preservative should be added to achieve adequate preservation. Preservation requirements for groundwater samples are found in the USEPA Region 4 Analytical Support Branch Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual (ASBLOQAM), Most Recent Version.

2.4 Quality Control

If possible, a control sample should be collected from location not affected by the possible contaminants of concern and submitted with the other samples. This control sample should be collected as close to the sampled area as possible and from the same water-bearing formation. Equipment blanks should be collected if equipment is field cleaned and re-used on-site or if necessary to document that low-level contaminants were not introduced by pumps, bailers or other sampling equipment.

2.5 Records

Information generated or obtained by SESD personnel will be organized and accounted for in accordance with SESD records management procedures found in SESD Operating Procedure for Control of Records, SESDPROC-002. Field notes, recorded in a bound field logbook, will be generated, as well as chain-of-custody documentation in accordance with SESD Operating Procedure for Logbooks, SESDPROC-010 and SESD Procedure for Sample and Evidence Management, SESDPROC-005.

Page 14 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

3 Groundwater Sampling Methods - Purging

3.1 General

3.1.1 Purging and Purge Adequacy

Purging is the process of removing stagnant water from a well, immediately prior to sampling, causing its replacement by ground water from the adjacent formation that is representative of actual aquifer conditions. In order to determine when a well has been adequately purged, field investigators should monitor the pH, specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity of the ground water removed during purging and, in the case of permanent monitoring wells, observe and record the volume of water removed.

Prior to initiating the purge, the amount of water standing in the water column (water inside the well riser and screen) should be determined, if possible. To do this, the diameter of the well should be determined and the water level and total depth of the well should be measured and recorded. Specific methodology for obtaining these measurements is found in SESD Operating Procedure for Groundwater Level and Well Depth Measurement (SESDPROC-105). Once this information is obtained, the volume of water to be purged can be determined using one of several methods. One is the equation:

V = 0.041 d2h

Where: h = depth of water in feet d = diameter of well in inches V = volume of water in gallons

Alternatively, the volume may be determined using a casing volume per foot factor for the appropriate diameter well, similar to that in Table 3.1.1. The water level is subtracted from the total depth, providing the length of the water column.

This length is multiplied by the factor in the Table 3.1.1 which corresponds to the appropriate well diameter, providing the amount of water, in gallons, contained in the well, i.e., one well or water column volume. Other acceptable methods include the use of nomographs or other equations or formulae.

With respect to volume, an adequate purge is normally achieved when three to five well volumes have been removed. The field notes should reflect the single well volume calculations or determinations, according to one of the above methods, and a reference to the appropriate multiplication of that volume, i.e., a minimum three well volumes, clearly identified as a purge volume goal.

With respect to the ground water chemistry, an adequate purge is achieved when the pH, specific conductance, and temperature of the ground water have stabilized

Page 15 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

TABLE 3.1.1

WELL CASING DIAMETER vs. VOLUME

WELL CASING DIAMETER (INCHES) vs. VOLUME (GALS.)/FEET of

WATER

CASING GALLONS/FT

1 0.041

2 0.163

3 0.367

4 0.653

5 1.02

6 1.469

7 1.999

8 2.611

9 3.305

10 4.08

11 4.934

12 5.875 and the turbidity has either stabilized or is below 10 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTUs) (twice the Primary Drinking Water Standard of 5 NTUs). Although 10 NTUs is normally considered the minimum goal for most ground water sampling objectives, lower turbidity has been shown to be easily achievable in most situations and reasonable attempts should be made to achieve these lower levels. Stabilization occurs when, for at least three consecutive measurements, the pH remains constant within 0.1 Standard Unit (SU), specific conductance varies no more than approximately 10 percent, and the temperature is constant.

There are no set criteria for establishing how many total sets of measurements are adequate to document stability of parameters. If the calculated purge volume is small, the measurements should be taken frequently enough to provide a sufficient number of measurements to evaluate stability. If the purge volume is large, measurements taken every 15 minutes, for example, may be sufficient. See the SESD Operating Procedure for Field pH Measurement (SESDPROC-100), SESD Operating Procedure for Field Specific Conductance Measurement (SESDPROC- 101), SESD Operating Procedure for Field Temperature Measurement (SESDPROC-102) and SESD Operating Procedure for Field Turbidity Measurement (SESDPROC-103) for procedures for conducting these purge adequacy measurements.

Page 16 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

If, after three well volumes have been removed, the chemical parameters have not stabilized according to the above criteria, additional well volumes (up to five well volumes), should be removed. If the parameters have not stabilized within five volumes, it is at the discretion of the project leader whether or not to collect a sample or to continue purging. If, after five well volumes, pH and conductivity have stabilized and the turbidity is still decreasing and approaching an acceptable level, additional purging should be considered to obtain the best sample possible, with respect to turbidity. The conditions of sampling should be noted in the field log.

In some situations, even with slow purge rates, a well may be pumped or bailed dry (evacuated). In these situations, this generally constitutes an adequate purge and the well can be sampled following sufficient recovery (enough volume to allow filling of all sample containers). It is not necessary that the well be evacuated three times before it is sampled. The pH, specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity should be measured and recorded, during collection of the sample from the recovered volume, as the measurements of record for the sampling event.

For wells with slow recovery, attempts should be made to avoid purging them to dryness. This can be accomplished, for example, by slowing the purge rate. If a well is purged to dryness, it may result in the sample being comprised partially of water contained in the sand pack, which may be reflective, at least in part, of initial, stagnant conditions. Additionally, as water enters a well that has been purged to dryness, it may cascade down the sand pack and/or the well screen, stripping volatile organic constituents that may be present and/or introducing soil fines into the water column.

It is particularly important that wells be sampled as soon as possible after purging. If adequate volume is available immediately upon completion of purging, the well must be sampled immediately. If not, sampling should occur as soon as adequate volume has recovered. Sampling of wells which have a slow recovery should be scheduled so that they can be purged and sampled in the same day, after adequate volume has recovered. Wells of this type should not be purged at the end of one day and sampled the following day.

3.1.2 Equipment Considerations for Purging

Monitoring well purging is preferably accomplished by using in-place plumbing and dedicated pumps or by using portable pumps/equipment when dedicated systems are not present. The equipment utilized by Branch personnel will usually consist of peristaltic pumps and variable speed electric submersible pumps, but may also include bladder pumps or inertial pumps. The pump of choice is usually a function of the well diameter, the depth to water, the depth of the well and the amount of water that is to be removed during purging. Whenever the head difference between the sampling location and the water level is less than the limit of suction and the volume to be removed is reasonably small, a peristaltic pump

Page 17 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1 should be used for purging. For wells where the water level is below the limit of suction and/or there is a large volume of water to be purged, the variable speed electric submersible pump would be the pump of choice. SESD Operating Procedure for Pump Operation (SESDPROC-203) contains the use and operating instructions for all pumps commonly used during SESD ground water investigations.

Bailers may also be used for purging in appropriate situations, however, their use is discouraged. Bailers tend to disturb any sediment that may be present in the well, creating or increasing sample turbidity. If a bailer is used, it should be a closed-top Teflon® bailer.

3.2 Wells Without Plumbing or In-Place Pumps

For permanent monitoring wells, the depth to water (water level) and depth of the well (total depth) should be determined before purging. Caution should be exercised during this procedure to prevent cross-contamination between wells. This is a critical concern when samples for trace organic compounds or metals analyses are collected. See SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination (SESDPROC-

205) for cleaning procedures for well sounders. After cleaning, the well sounding device should be protected to keep it clean until its next use.

3.2.1 Purging with Pumps

3.2.1.1 Peristaltic Pumps

The following step-by-step procedures describe the process of purging with a peristaltic pump:

1. Cut a length of standard-cleaned (SESD Operating Procedure for Field

Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination at the FEC (SESDPROC-

206) Teflon® tubing, equal to the well depth plus an additional five to ten feet. Enough tubing is needed to run from the ground surface up to the top of the well casing and back down to the bottom of the well.

This will allow for operation of the pump at all possible water level conditions in the well.

2. Place one end of the tubing into the vacuum side of the peristaltic pump head. Proper sizing of the Teflon® and Silastic® or Tygon® tubing should allow for a snug fit of the Teflon® tubing inside the flexible tubing mounted in the pump head.

3. Run a short section of tubing (does not have to be Teflon®) from the discharge side of the pump head to a graduated bucket.

Page 18 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

4. Place the free end of the Teflon® tubing into the well until the end of the tubing is just below the surface of the water column.

5. Secure the Teflon® tubing to the well casing or other secure object using electrician's tape or other suitable means. This will prevent the tubing from being lost in the well should the tubing detach from the pump head.

6. Turn on the pump to produce a vacuum on the well side of the pump head and begin the purge. Observe pump direction to ensure that a vacuum is being applied to the purge line. If the purge line is being pressurized, either switch the tubing at the pump head or reverse the polarity of the cables on the pump or on the battery.

7. If the pumping rate exceeds the recovery rate of the well, continue to lower the tubing into the well, as needed, until the drawdown stabilizes or the well is evacuated to dryness. If the pump is a variable speed peristaltic pump, and the water level in the well is being drawn down, reduce the speed of the pump in an attempt to stabilize the drawdown.

If the well can be purged without evacuating the well to dryness, a sample with greater integrity can be obtained.

8. For wells which are not evacuated to dryness, particularly those with recovery rates equal to or very nearly equal to the purge rate, there may not be a complete exchange and removal of stagnant water in that portion of the water column above the tubing intake. For this reason, it is important that the tubing intake be placed in the very uppermost portion of the water column while purging. Standard field measurements should frequently be taken during this process to verify adequacy of the purge and readiness for sampling, as described in Section 3.

3.2.1.2 Submersible Pumps

When a submersible pump is used for well purging, the pump itself is lowered into the water column. The pump must be cleaned as specified in SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination (SESDPROC-205).

The pump/hose assembly used in purging should be lowered into the top of the standing water column and not deep into the column. This is done so that the purging will "pull" water from the formation into the screened area of the well and up through the casing so that the entire static volume can be removed. If the pump is placed deep into the water column, the water above the pump may not be removed, and the subsequent samples, particularly if collected with a bailer, may not be representative of the aquifer conditions. It is recommended that no more than three to five feet

Page 19 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1 pump should be raised until the intake is within one foot of the top of the water column for the duration of purging. If the pump rate exceeds the recovery rate of the well, the pump will have to be lowered, as needed, to accommodate the drawdown. After the pump is removed from the well, the hose and the pump should be cleaned as outlined in SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination

(SESDPROC-205).

3.2.2 Purging With Bailers

Standard-cleaned (SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination (SESDPROC-205) or SESD Operating Procedure for Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination at the FEC (SESDPROC-206) closed-top Teflon® bailers with Teflon® coated stainless steel leaders and new nylon rope are lowered into the top of the water column, allowed to fill, and removed.

It is critical that bailers be slowly and gently immersed into the top of the water column, particularly during final stages of purging, to minimize turbidity and disturbance of volatile organic constituents. The use of bailers for purging and sampling is discouraged because the correct technique is highly operator dependent and improper use may result in an unrepresentative sample.

3.2.3 Field Care of Purging Equipment

New plastic sheeting should be placed on the ground surface around the well casing to prevent contamination of the pumps, hoses, ropes, etc., in the event they accidentally come into contact with the ground surface or, for some reason, they need to be placed on the ground during the purging event. It is preferable that hoses used in purging that come into contact with the ground water be kept on a spool or contained in a large wash tub lined with plastic sheeting, both during transportation and during field use, to further minimize contamination by the transporting vehicle or the ground surface.

Careful consideration shall be given to using submersible pumps to purge wells which are excessively contaminated with oily compounds, because it may be difficult to adequately decontaminate severely contaminated pumps under field conditions. When wells of this type are encountered, alternative purging methods, such as bailers, should be considered.

3.2.4 General Low Flow/Low Stress Method Preference

The device with the lowest pump or water removal rate and the least tendency to stress the well during purging should be selected for use. For example, if a bailer and a peristaltic pump both work in a given situation, the pump should be selected because it will greatly minimize turbidity, providing a higher quality sample (Sec.

Page 20 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

SCIENCE AND ECOSYSTEM SUYPPORT DIVISION

3.4.2, Purging When Water Level Is Within Limit of Suction, contains a description of low flow purging and sampling with a peristaltic pump used in a temporary well).

3.2.5 Low Flow/Low Volume Purging Techniques/Procedures

An alternative to the low flow/low stress purging method is the low flow/low volume method, commonly referred to as the “micro-purge” method. The low flow/low volume purging method is a procedure developed and used to minimize purge water volumes. The pump intake is placed within the screened interval at the zone of sampling, preferably, the zone with the highest flow rate. Low flow rate purging is conducted after hydraulic conditions within the well have re-stabilized, usually within 24 to 48 hours. Flow rates should not exceed the recharge rate of the aquifer. This is monitored by measuring the top of the water column with a properly cleaned water level indicator or similar device while pumping. This method is not considered to be a standard method by the Branch and is only acceptable under certain hydraulic conditions. It’s use must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

3.3 Wells With In-Place Plumbing

Wells with in-place plumbing are commonly found at municipal water treatment plants, industrial water supplies, private residences, etc. Many permanent monitoring wells at active facilities are also equipped with dedicated, in-place pumps. The objective of purg-ing wells with in-place pumps is the same as with monitoring wells without in-place pumps, i.e., to ultimately collect a ground water sample representative of aquifer conditions. Among the types of wells identified in this section, two different approaches are necessary.

A permanent monitoring well with an in-place pump should, in all respects, be treated like a monitoring well without a pump. One limitation is that in most cases the in-place pump is “hard” mounted, that is, the pump is suspended in the well at a pre-selected depth and cannot be moved up or down during purging and sampling. In these cases, well volumes are calculated, parameters are measured and the well is sampled from the pump discharge, after volume removal and parameter conditions have been met.

In the case of the other types of wells, i.e., municipal, industrial and residential supply wells, however, not enough is generally known about the construction aspects of the wells to apply the same criteria as used for monitoring wells, i.e., 3 to 5 well volumes.

The volume to be purged in these situations, therefore, depends on several factors:

whether the pumps are running continuously or intermittently and whether or not any storage/pressure tanks are located between the sampling point and the pump. The following considerations and procedures should be followed when purging wells with in-place plumbing under the conditions described.

3.3.1 Continuously Running Pumps

Page 21 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

If the pump runs more or less continuously, no purge (other than opening a valve and allowing it to flush for a few minutes) is necessary. If a storage tank is present, a spigot, valve or other sampling point should be located between the pump and the storage tank. If not, locate the valve closest to the tank.

Measurements of pH, specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity are recorded at the time of sampling.

3.3.2 Intermittently or Infrequently Running Pumps

If the pump runs intermittently or infrequently, best judgment should be utilized to remove enough water from the plumbing to flush standing water from the piping and any storage tanks that might be present. Generally, under these conditions, 15 to 30 minutes will be adequate. Measurements of pH, specific conductance, temperature and turbidity should be made and recorded at intervals during the purge and the final measurements made at the time of sampling should be considered the measurements of record for the event.

3.4 Temporary Monitoring Wells

3.4.1 General Considerations

Procedures used to purge temporary ground water monitoring wells differ from permanent wells because temporary wells are installed for immediate sample acquisition. Wells of this type may include standard well screen and riser placed in boreholes created by hand augering, power augering, or by drilling. They may also consist of a rigid rod and screen that is pushed, driven, or hammered into place to the desired sampling interval, such as a direct push Wellpoint®, a Geoprobe® Screen Point 15 sampler or a Hydropunch® sampler. As such, the efforts to remove several volumes of water to replace stagnant water do not necessarily apply because stagnant water is not present. It is important to note, however, that the longer a temporary well is in place and not sampled, the more stagnant the water column becomes and the more appropriate it becomes to apply, to the extent possible, standard permanent monitoring well purging criteria to it to re-achieve aquifer conditions.

In cases where the temporary well is to be sampled immediately after installation, purging is conducted primarily to mitigate the impacts of installation. In most cases, temporary well installation procedures disturb the existing aquifer conditions, resulting primarily in increased turbidity. Therefore, the goal of purging is to reduce the turbidity and remove the volume of water in the area directly impacted by the installation procedure. Low turbidity conditions in these types of wells that are completed within the limit of suction are typically and routinely achieved by the use of low-flow/low stress purging techniques using variable speed peristaltic pumps.

Page 22 of 30 SESDPROC-301-R1

3.4.2 Purging When Water Level Is Within Limit of Suction

In situations where the elevation of the top of the water column is within the limit of suction (no greater than about 25 feet head difference between the pump and the water level), a variable speed peristaltic pump may be used to purge temporary wells. Enough tubing is deployed to reach the bottom of the temporary well screen. At the onset of purging, the tubing is slowly lowered to the bottom of the screen and is used to remove any formation material which may have entered the well screen during installation. This is critical to ensuring rapid achievement of low turbidity conditions. After the formation material is removed from the bottom of the screen, the tubing is slowly raised through the water column to near the top of the column. The tubing can be held at this level to determine if the pump rate is drawing down the water level in the well. If the water level remains the same, secure the tubing at the surface to maintain this pumping level.

If drawdown is observed on initiation of pumping, reduce the pump speed and attempt to match the drawdown of the well. Sustained pumping at these slow rates will usually result in a relatively clear, low turbidity sample. If the drawdown stabilizes, maintain that level, however, if it continues to lower, "chase" the water column until the well is evacuated.