BLDG_8_SOLICITATION.pdf

ACQR5282234

TITLE: RENOVATION BUILDING 8, MARINE BARRACKS WASHINGTON, 8TH& i STREETS SE, WASHINGTON, DC

NAICS: 236220

SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS: BEST VALUE TRADE OFF

TYPE OF CONTRACT: DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) FIRM FIXED PRICE (FFP)

COMPTETION REQUIREMENTS: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT BETWEEN $10,000,000 AND $25,000,000

ALL INQUIRIES MUST BE MADE IN WRITING AND EMAILED TO CYNDI.CROWDER@NAVY.MIL WITH INQUIRIES ATTACHED AS A WORD DOCUMENT (PLEASE NOT TABLES). ALL REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DOCUMENTS AND AMENDMENTS WILL BE POSTED TO NAVY ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ONLINE (NECO) WEBSITE AT HTTPS://WWW.NECO.NAVY.MIL. POTENTIAL OFFERORS WILL NOT BE CONTACTED

REGARDING ANY CHANCES.

PRIMARY CONTACT: CYNTHIA CROWDER EMAIL CYNDI.CROWDER@NAVY.MIL

CYNTHIA Y. CROWDER 202-685-3157

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

14-Jun-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______555 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________15 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST.

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

(hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008018R2234 72

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008018R2234

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Each

BASE BID

FFP

Basis of Bid for item 0001 shall be the entire work completed as REPAIR complete in accordance with the specification and drawing with the exception of the NEW construction defined in Item 0002.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: ACQR5282234

NET AMT

0002 Each

NEW CONSTRUCTION

FFP

Basis of Bid for Item 0002 shall be the NEW construction to complete the new basement slab between Columns 27-32 in accordance with the specification and drawing.

0003 Each

FURNITURE, FIXTURE & EQUIPMENT (FF&E)

FFP

Basis of Bid for Item 0003 shall be establishment of a HAR for any possible future work associated with FF&E/Collateral Equipment

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 20 00 - Instructions for Procurement

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

All drawings, specifications and amendments shall be posted to the Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO) website at https://www.neco.navy.mil. Hard copies will not me mailed.

Potentials offerors will not be contacted regarding any changes posted. It is the Offerors responsibility to check the website periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

The following paragraphs are supplemental instructions to bidders to be used in conjunction with the remaining sections.

PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT:

The primary point of contact for this project is Cynthia Crowder at Cyndi.crowder@navy.mil Forward any Request for Information (RFI) regarding this project in writing at the above email address in Microsoft Word Format.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI):

CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE ENTIRE SOLICITATION

PACKAGE BEFORE SUBMITTING QUESTIONS. All inquiries must be submitted no later than COB 23 July 2019. All inquiries must be submitted in writing and emailed to Cyndi.crowder@navy.mil on Attachment (A) in a WORD document.

RFI CUT-OFF DATE IS 23 JULY 2019

PROPOSAL DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS:

Proposals may be sent via FEDEX, UPS or hand-carried to the following address:

NAVFAC Washington Attn: Cynthia Crowder 1314 Harwood Street SE, Bldg 212 Washington Navy Yard Washington, DC 20374

All proposals must be received no later than 6 August 2019 at 2:00 PM EST.

INSTRUCTION FOR HAND DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS:

If hand delivering, address package as if mailing, and deliver to First floor mailroom of Building 212

The current security condition at the Washington Navy Yard requires escorts for entry to the base by individuals not possessing a U.S. Government DoD Common Access Card (CAC) identification card. Individuals without a DoDCAC will not be permitted to enter the Navy

Yard. In order to have access individuals are required to have a picture ID, car registration and proof of insurance, and must enter into the O Street Gate and go inside the Visitors Center.

NAVFAC Washington will NOT be able to provide escorts for Navy Yard entry of hand delivered proposals. NAVFAC Washington will NOT receive hand delivered proposals at the Base Visitors/Pass Office or any location other than that identified for receipt in the solicitation.

The Government considers use of a courier service, such as FedEx or UPS, as hand delivery of proposals and the responsibility for timely delivery resides with the offeror.

Offerors are notified that the entry point for proposals submitted through the U.S. Postal Service is at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling and NOT at the Washington Navy Yard. Contractors proposals must be received by NAVFAC Washington at the Navy Yard by the due date outlines in the solicitation and delivery time from the Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling to the Navy Yard cannot be predicted nor guaranteed. Offerors should take this into consideration when determining delivery method.

Offerors should take into consideration when determining delivery method. Please note offerors have the option to deliver the PRICE SCHEDULE via the Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) website at https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE/Welcome.aspx. Instructions on how to use SAFE can be found on this website. Please note ONLY THE PRICE SCHEDULE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN are allowed to be delivered via this website. Other information submitted via this website WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Submissions via this method are subject to the same proposals due date and time as listed above.

All proposals must be received prior to the due date and time. Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be stamped with the date and hour of receipt and held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with

FAR 14.304-4.

Facsimile copies and email copies will NOT be accepted.

Please allow SUFFICIENT TIME for your proposal to be received prior to the proposed closing date/time.

Technical and Price Proposals shall submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes marked in the bottom right corner “Solicitation N40080-18-R-2234, DO NOT OPEN.”

Any proposals submitted after the time set for receipt will be stamped with the date and hour of receipt and held unopened until after award. The file shall be documented in accordance with FAR 14.304-4. There should absolutely be no price included in the technical proposal package

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/SITE VISIT:

THIS WILL BE THE ONLY GOVERNMENT SCHEDULE SITE VISIT

DATE: Wednesday 26 June 2019 TIME: 10:00 am EST LOCATION: Marine Barracks Washington place TBD

The following information is required from each attendee to have base access by 1400 on 24 June.

1) Last Name, First Name MI

2) DOB

3) SSN

The information above can be provided via email (encrypted) or by phone. If by phone, please contact either myself or the Deputy Public Works Officer at:

Dennis Martin Email: dennis.b.martin@usmc.mil Office: (202) 433 -0777

Installation parking will not be provided. There is public/street parking in the area of the Marine Barracks Washington.

PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND NUMBER OF COPIES:

Proposals are due by 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, 06 August 2019.

Volume 1: Technical Proposal – Offeror shall submit one (1) original and four (4) copies of their technical proposal, each in separate THREE RING BINDER, and tabbed appropriately by evaluation factor with the following characteristics:

Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.

Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

A complete electronic copy of the technical proposal as a single .pdf file on a CDROM (include with the Original non-price submission).

Volume 2: Price Proposal – The price proposals shall be submitted along with the technical proposals. The Offeror shall submit one (1) marked "Original" and one (1) copy marked :copy”, in a separate THREE RING BINDER. See Evalauation Criteria, Price, Solcitation Submittal Requirements for additional informaton.

The proposal shall be written to the greatest extent possible on a stand-alone basis so that its content may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use wouild conserve space without impairing clarity. Hyperlinking of cross-references is permissible.

Information required for proposal evaluation, but not provided in its designated volume of cross-referenced, is assumed omitted from the proposal.

(1) Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10 point font.

(2) Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged.

(3) Price Schedule.

(4) Copy of Online Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management (SAM)

(5) Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3 million.

(6) Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

Instructions for submitting Subcontracting Plan

LARGE BUSINESSES: If you are a Large Business, submit a Small Business Subcontracting Plan for this project in the format provided in Attachment Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Part 52.219-9. NAVFAC Washington highly encouraged Offerors to make good faith effort in meeting NAVFAC Washington’s minimum Subcontracting goals. The proposed goals and NAVFAC Subcontracting Targets are expressed as a percentage of total subcontracted values. The minimum NAVFAC Subcontracting Targets are as follows:

SB: 45%

SDB: 5%

HUBZone SB: 3%

WOSB: 15%

SDVOSB: 5%

SMALL BUSINESSES: Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required for small businesses. Simply state Company’s name is a small business and Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not applicable.

Project Title: Renovate Building 8, Marine Barracks Washington, Washington DC

The purpose of the contract is for the restoration and modernization of the Command Post/Building 8 at the Marine Barracks Washington (MBW). The renovation serves to: 1) create a positive and collaborative working environment which significantly improves communication, flow and quality in the workplace; 2) maximize the existing footprint to become a flexible, efficient and modern administrative space program capable of meeting the future needs of the Command Post; 3) address operational and functional space deficiencies and provide a high-performance, sustainable and safe working environment for the next fifty years. The project addresses a multitude of functional and operational deficiencies. The project will repair by replacement all building systems including the demolition and removal of all existing obsolete building materials and systems. It will replace internal non- original fixed partition walls, windows, interior and some exterior doors, internal floors, wall and ceiling hard and soft finishes. The renovation incudes the replacement of all plumbing systems and fixtures as well as upgrade of all HVAC systems. Other improvements include the installation of fire detection and suppression systems, replacement of electric power and lighting distribution lines and equipment, and upgrades to communication, security and alarm systems. The project will restore all existing historic stairways to meet safety code requirements, and incorporate one centrally located four stop elevator. Accessibility will be improved with an at-grade ADA compliant access to Building 8 from the west side. Removal and abatement of hazardous materials is necessary to create a safe working environment. The second floor breezeway connector and Kalwall enclosure to Building 9 will be repaired and refinished as part of this project.

Antiterrorism/Force Protection window, door and related component upgrades are included. All work will be in compliance with applicable ATFP, Fire Safety, Seismic, Accessibility codes and requirements. Sustainable design principles will be included in the design and construction in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other applicable regulations. Facilities will achieve a LEED Silver certification and comply with Energy Policy Act of 2005.

CONTRACT TYPE: This is a firm fixed price contract for construction services.

TERM OF CONTRACT: The contract period shall be for 570 calendar days from contract award (this includes 15 days for bond submittal).

COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: Work under this contract shall commence 15 days after award.

NAICS: 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

ESTIMATED PRICE RANGE: The magnitude of construction is between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000.

WAGE DETERMINATION: DC20190002 06/14/2019

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: $8,200 per calendar day

EVALUATION CRITERIA

BASIS OF AWARD:

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the Offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. As stated in the solicitation, and in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the

Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

4. As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Small Business Utilization Factor 4 - Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.”

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor 4. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) PRICE:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following price information based on the following:

• Text pages 8 ½ x 11 format, minimum 10-point font.

• Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged. The Offerors must acknowledge any and all amendments issued under this solicitation either by annotating it on the SF 1442, Price Proposal Form, or signing each SF 30 (Amendment) and submitting it with the Offeror’s proposal.

• Price Schedule.

• Proposed Modification/Change order Percentage rates.

• Copy of Online Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management (SAM)

• Confirmation of filing of Veterans' Employment and Training (VETS) VETS 4212 and/or VETS report for the cycle.

• Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3 million.

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, phone number, and email address.

• Subcontracting Plan in accordance with 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS 252.219-7003.

**See Instructions for submitting Subcontracting Plan.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation).

The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b). Non-Cost/Price Factors

Factor 1 – Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

1. Submit a minimum of three (3) and a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a project similar to the size, scope, and complexity characteristics set forth below. The overall relevancy will be determined by considering all three characteristics.

Size: 40,000 Square Feet and/or $12,000,000 construction cost

Scope: New construction and/or renovation of an administrative facility (e.g. private offices, open office workstations, meeting/conference rooms and other supporting building functions) and/or public works utility shops (e.g. wood shops, ground maintenance, and paint shops).

Complexity: At least one of the facilities indicated in Scope above must include the renovation of buildings that have been registered as historic by State Historical Preservation Offices or Federal Organizations and be inclusive of one or more of the following:

- Installation of blast resistant windows and door assemblies in an existing masonry façade.

- Construction of an additional floor within an existing building open space.

Proposal may be strengthened if the submitted projects possess:

1. Experience strengthening existing structures using a fiber reinforced epoxy composite system.

2. Experience with a relevant project which required minimum 20,000 Square Feet of building renovation.

3. Experience working in a constrained space and laydown area.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Projects that have not attained beneficial occupancy will not be considered.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract.

For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the JV members. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV partner offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. The JV member proposed for this contract shall specifically address field work performed by that JV member including field staffing and direct field work oversight. The JV member proposed for this contract shall also address home office management performed by that JV member including the number/percent of employees provided for the overall contract by the JV member as well as the overall percentage of work performed by the JV member. This same information shall also be provided for the task orders listed under IDIO contracts on Attachment C. If the Offeror does not specifically address what portion of the work under the submitted project was performed by the JV member offering on this contract, the project will not be evaluated. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) will not be considered.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The

Offer must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. More weight may be given to the Offeror’s projects than to those submitted for subcontractors.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

Factor 2 – Safety

(a) Submittal Requirements: (Include in response to RFP)

The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR); include 2016, 2017, and 2018 data. This rate compares company’s annual losses in insurance claims against its policy premiums. The Offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate if no EMR exists. If there is no EMR premium, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affect the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of the element.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rates; submit data from 2016, 2017, and 2018 calendar year’s. If the OSHA DART rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this element.

(3) Total Recordable Cases (TRC) Rates: Submit data from 2016, 2017 and 2018 calendar years. If the TRC rates cannot be submitted, affirmatively state so and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the TRC rate data negatively must be addressed as part of this element.

(4) Technical Approach for Safety should describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the offeror will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps

Note: The narrative shall be limited to two 8.5”x11” pages or one double sided 8.5”x11” sheet For a partnership or joint venture, the submittal requirements are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required.

(ii) The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- Experience Modification Rate (EMR)

- OSHA Days away from work, restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART)

- Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates

- Offeror Technical Approach to safety

- Other Sources of information available to Government

(1) Experience Modification Rate (EMR): For the three previous complete calendar years the offeror will submit EMR. If no EMR exists, the offeror may submit an insurance company-provided equivalent rate explaining why not. If an insurance company-provided equivalent rate is provided, it will be treated the same as an EMR. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the EMR and negative trends should be addressed as part of this selection factor. The board will evaluate the EMR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART): For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their OSHA DART and TRC, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit OSHA DART, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the OSHA DART to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(3) Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates: For the three previous complete calendar years, the offeror will submit their TRC rates, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If unable to submit the TRC rates, affirmatively state so, and an explanation must be provided. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the TRC rate data and negative trends should be addressed as part of this element. The board will evaluate the TRC rates to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any upward trends and extenuating circumstances that impact rates.

(4) Technical Approach to Safety: The offeror will describe their plan to evaluate their safety performance and that of potential subcontractors. Also, describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative shall be limited to two pages. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The board will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps. Those Offerors whose plan demonstrates a commitment to hire subcontractors with a culture of safety and who propose innovative methods to enhance a safe working environment may be given greater weight in the evaluation.

(5) Other Sources of Information Available to the Government: Other sources for safety may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) in Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and other related databases.

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its sub-contractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors.

The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to: OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support.

Offeror’s Experience Modification Rates (EMR) will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk Very Low Risk Less than 0.6 Low Risk From 0.6 to less than 0.8 Moderate Risk From 0.8 to 1.0 High Risk Greater than 1.0 to 1.1 Extremely High Risk Greater than 1.1

Offeror’s DART and TRC rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

Risk TRC Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.99 Extremely High Risk Greater Than 6.0

Factor 3 – Small Business Utilization

This Factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies.

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

1. Achievements: All offerors shall provide a narrative (limited to two 8.5” x 11” pages) to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) concerns to participate as subcontractors consistent with efficient contract performance. In support of narrative submissions:

a. All offerors shall submit small business subcontracting information associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor in the format provided in Attachment E, Small Business Subcontracting Record.

b. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall also provide copies of the most current individual subcontracting reports (ISRs) associated with each project cited under the Corporate Experience Factor if a small business subcontracting plan was required by the contract. If such projects were completed under specific task orders, provide ISRs for the overall contract. For cited projects with state and local government agencies, provide similar subcontracting performance reports if required by the contracts. When not specifically addressed in the ISR or similar report, offerors shall provide explanations for all instances of failures to meet dollar or percentage goals in individual subcontracting plans.

Notes:

The Government reserves the right to consider achievements information on other recent, relevant projects from all available sources.

Offerors utilizing achievements information of team members or key subcontractors shall clearly demonstrate how these companies will have meaningful involvement in the management of the subcontracting program for this acquisition. If not, such achievement information will not be considered under this factor. If the offeror is a new joint venture, partnership or other entity consisting of more than one company, provide achievements information for each individual business entity(ies) that will be responsible for managing the subcontracting program and clearly describe those responsibilities.

Failure to provide ISRs or any other requested information must be fully explained and may negatively impact your evaluation.

2. Small Business Participation and Commitment: All offerors shall submit a small business participation and commitment strategy including all data elements shown in Attachment F, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

a. Identify in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total acquisition the extent of work the offeror will self-perform as the prime contractor. If submitting an offer as a joint venture, identify the percentage of work each member will be responsible for and indicate the size status of each member (e.g. small business, woman-owned small business, other than small business).

b. Include supplemental narratives (limited to five pages) to address other elements of the offeror’s strategy such as binding agreements covering post award roles for execution of the contract and specific initiatives and tools that will be employed under the contract to enhance small businesses opportunities to both participate in this acquisition and build capabilities to support future NAVFAC acquisitions.

c. The anticipated prime and first tier overall small business participation rate for this acquisition (i.e. work to be performed by small businesses as the prime and/or subcontractors) is 20% of the contract value. Offerors are encouraged to exceed this percentage and seek meaningful levels of participation in each of the small business socioeconomic programs listed in Attachment E consistent with efficient contract performance. Offerors shall explain in their participation and commitment strategies how proposed participation rates were established.

The small business participation and commitment strategy must be in agreement with any required small business subcontracting plan and will be made a part of the contract upon award.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

Offerors will be evaluated on the extent to which their proposals and other performance information available to the Government demonstrate a history of successfully supporting Government policies concerning utilization of small business concerns as subcontractors including, when applicable, achievements against established small business subcontracting plan goals. Offerors will also be evaluated on the levels of small business participation proposed and the degree of commitment to use named sources. The anticipated benefits of proposed initiatives and tools to enhance small business participation and capabilities will be considered. The Government will assess proposal realism and the likelihood of success in achieving the small business objectives of this acquisition.

Forms to be used for offeror submission of Small Business Utilization Factor information are:

Attachment E – Small Business Subcontracting Record Attachment F – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy

Factor 4 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for construction experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment D) for each project included in Factor 1 for Construction Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Cynthia Crowder, Contracting Officer , cyndi.crowder@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided 8.5” x 11” pages (or four (4) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

ATTACHMENTS

The following documents will be uploaded under additional documents:

Attachment A – Request for Information form Attachment B – Price Schedule Attachment C – Construction Experience Project Data Sheet Attachment D – Past Performance Questionnaires Attachment E – Small Business Subcontracting Record Attachment F – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy Attachment G – Small Business Subcontracting Plan

Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government 0002 N/A N/A N/A Government 0003 N/A N/A N/A Government

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures MAY 2014 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or

Improper Activity

MAY 2014

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct OCT 2015 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996 52.204-2 Alt I Security Requirements (Aug 1996) - Alternate I APR 1984 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-5 Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business) OCT 2014 52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications OCT 2018 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

OCT 2018

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.207-3 Right of First Refusal of Employment MAY 2006

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015