Question_and_Answer_Matrix_Amend_2.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted

Attached to
MSC Global Material Management Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-18-R-2000
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

Updated Q&A Matrix

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MSC Global Material Management, newest first.
File Type Posted
N32205-18-R-2000_Amendment_0007.pdf PDF
Amendment_6_N32205-18-R-2000.pdf PDF
Amendment_5_N32205-18-R-2000.pdf PDF
Amendment_4_N3220518R2000.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet_Rev3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet_Rev2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N3220518R2000_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
N32205-18-R-2000_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet_Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Exhibit_A_-_Contract_Data_Requirements_List.pdf PDF
N32205-18-R-2000_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_D_-_Throughput_Report.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Question_and_Answer_Matrix_Amend_1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_6_-_Non-Disclosure_Agreement.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1-_Resume_Format.docx DOCX document
N32205-18-R-2000_Request_for_Proposal.pdf PDF
Question_and_Answer_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_Price_Proposal_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment_5_-_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet.doc DOC document
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Questions

SECTIONOriginal Question/Government ResponseFollow-up QuestionsGovernment Answer
PWS 11.3 & Questions/AnswersPlease clarify for each class of ship if the table presented in PWS 11.3 is for SRI, DMP, or both? - Government's response, "Paragraph 11.3 states, 'If a ship requires both an SRI and DMP inventory it will count as two ships'"The question was not answered - what is the Government's intention for this table? Line items are only useful if industry knows the amount of inventory and the average time specified in days is provided with an explanation of the current FTE# supporting that inventory. For example, Large ships on average are completed within 21 days - is this 4 FTEs, 5.5 FTES, etc. completing this in the 21 day estimate? There is one key personnel listed for Afloat Inventory is this one person completing all this inventory? Industry does not have enough information to provide a clear and concise bid. Request more information for assessing workload and/or provide a staffing baseline/LOE.The key person for afloat inventory is for managing the afloat inventory team not to complete the entire inventory. The table in 11.3 should be combined with the tables in 15.1 and 15.2 to establish your proposed price for afloat inventories.
PWS 3.0Will the Government be providing Cell phones for the Program Manager and designated leads?No
PWS 3.0Will the Government provide barcode software and tags?If necessary
Attachment D & PWS 11.3Although the Government provided the newest Attachment D - Throughput Report, Industry is unsure if this report includes ALL location data metrics including afloat inventory. With a minimum of 12 ships requiring inventory, it is impossible for industry to provide proper FFP pricing analysis to account for the afloat inventory and its accompanied surge support.

1. Please provide an estimated LOE for afloat inventory

2. Please confirm CLIN X002 covers 12 inventories and CLIN X003 Covers all afloat inventories over 12Throughput information was for all ashore locations only. (1) See the answer above that the afloat inventory workload is provided in 11.3 plus tables 15.1 and 15.2 (2) Yes, this is confirmed. Please note that 11.3 was updated to state only 6 ships for the base period
PWS 3.3Government stated in questions/answers " Equipment is meaning any vehicles or material the contractor may need for successful performance" and "MHE is covered by the Government"Besides 3.3.6, all tasks are coordination and packaging for transportation. PWS 3.3.6 states, "Provide transportation in support of MSC warehouse operations…" - this is a very vague statement and does not assist industry in assessing the need for items such as equipment and vehicles. With no information regarding the type of material being transported, industry has no way to assess the proper amount or type of material required for performance tasks. Please provide more information regarding the transportation tasks/activities, locations transportation is required, and the type of material being transported.1. Norfolk : Box truck, state truck / pick up

2. BATS : State truck / pick up

3. Bahrain : Pickup

4. Singapore: Lorry

5. Hawaii : State truck

6. Guam : State truck / pick up

7. Korea : Passenger van

1. Norfolk : Box truck, state truck / pick up

2. BATS : State truck / pick up

3. Bahrain : Pickup

4. Singapore: Lorry

5. Hawaii : State truck

6. Guam : State truck / pick up

7. Korea : Passenger van 8. Charleston: Pickup

PWS 3.0Without incumbent knowledge of operation, it is difficult, if not impossible, to build an accurate cost estimate for materials and equipment. Request an ODC CLIN with explanation of what is reimbursable.A material CLIN and plug number has been included in Amendment 0002. The PWS has been updated in section 9 to incorporate language as guidance
Questions and AnswersThe government’s response on line item #69 was that they would NOT reimburse tolls on company owned (contractor) vehicles while delivering MSC material, but did not address reimbursing tolls for the rental vehicles. The rental vehicles will be billed back to the government as ODC, so tolls should be too. Sometimes, there is simply no way around paying a toll while delivering MSC material to various locations around Hampton Roads and this cost should be billable. Request the Government allow EZ Passes for rental vehicles be covered under the ODC CLIN.
Tolls would be considered incidental to the scope of work and would not be reimbursable by the Government
PWS 3.0The Government states, "Other material as approved by the Gov" - Is this "other material" cost reimbursable?It is reimbursable per the terms under paragraph 9 of the PWS
The Government includes FAR 52.222-41 Service Contract Act. There are multiple wage determinations for each region. Please include by reference or in full the wage determinations which apply to this contract.These are included by reference under the "Wage Determination" section of the RFP (last page of the original RFP)
Government stated, "GS equivalents do not exist on this contract…"Request FAR 52.222-42 be removed from solicitation clauses.This is a required clause, so it will remain but has no requirement

File details come from the government source that posted it.