N00244/N0024420Q00084.02_Amendment_1_Questions.pdf
PDF 57 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintenance, Repair, and Rebuilding of Equipment
- Solicitation number
- N0024420Q0008
About this file
N00244/N0024420Q00084.02_Amendment_1_Questions.pdf
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N00244/N0024420Q00084.02_Amendment_2_Questions.pdf | ||
| N00244/N0024420Q00081.02_Eqmt_and_Labor_List.pdf | ||
| Solicitation.pdf | ||
| PWS.pdf | ||
| Evaluation.pdf | ||
| BNJ.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers:
1. The load bank testing services included in our original scope of work utilized a 100kVA load bank. The current scope is requesting 750kVA load bank. If deemed acceptable by Eaton, would the government be accepting of the use of a 100kVA load bank?
Answer – This request is acceptable as long as the load bank is adequately size to support the equipment tested, and meets all manufactures recommended test requirements.
2. The original proposal submitted was developed with a Monday through Friday contiguous work effort. The PWS is requesting work be performed across multiple days with a weekend break of no work.
This will result in additional costs. If all UPS work can be performed across a 5 day period with mitigated risk, would the customer be accepting of the contiguous Monday through Friday schedule?
Answer – This request is not acceptable. This work shall be performed across multiple days with a weekend break of no work.
File details come from the government source that posted it.