Amendment 0002 Responses to Attachment L-02 Questions Comments and Data Request Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Solicitation for Electronic Warfare Training Systems (EWTS) II Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N00024-23-R-5108
About this file
This document contains responses to offeror questions regarding Solicitation N00024-23-R-5108 for Electronic Warfare Training Systems (EWTS) II. The Navy seeks to procure an electronic warfare virtual training system to train students on electronic warfare concepts and systems. Key details include an extension of the proposal deadline by three weeks, clarification that the software development plan and rationale attachment do not count toward page limits, alignment of first article delivery dates between the RFP and FAR provisions, and confirmation that classified work will require personnel with minimum SECRET clearances. Facility and security requirements for classified work were also further described. Various conflicts and ambiguities were addressed and resolved through modifications issued in Amendment 0002.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet 1
| Responses to Offeror submission of L-02. Electronic Warfare Training Systems (EWTS) II RFP N00024-23-R-5108. Responses dated 29AUG2023 | ||||||
| Question | Document Description | Page # | Section/ Paragraph | Question/Comment | Proposed Action/Change | Program Office/NAVSEA 02 Response |
| 1 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 25 | C2.10 | IPPD was dropped after CMMI V1.2 | Remove IPPD | The Government concurs and has removed IPPD in Amendment 0002. |
| 2 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 35 | C.3.4.3 | Reference to Technical Review Manual (TRM)-Tailored 13 February 2013 (attachment J-10). Attachment J-10 is Technical Review Manual Version 3.0. Are those the same document? | Update Section C.3.4.3 to reflect the correct reference | The Government has updated Section C.3.4.3 to the correct TRM Version 3.0 Reference in Amendment 0002. |
| 3 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 92 | 52.209-3 (b) | Clause 52.209-3 (b) states first article test report must be submitted within 30 from the contract date associated with CDRL A006. First article delivery date in Section F is 45 days AOE. Is first article test report delivery date correct? | Update Clause 52.209-3 (b) to reflect first article delivery 45 days aoe | No, the Government has aligned FAR Clause 52.209-3 and CDRL A006 in Amendment 0002 so that notification of First Article Testing is due 30 days in advance of the First Article Test. The Report submitted from the First Article Test is due within 55 days of contract award (10 days after First Article Test) in accordance with CDRL A006. Section F reflects when the First Article Test shall occur. |
| 4 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 108/109 | 2.4 | Are we limited to 8 ½ x 11 pages, or can we use 11 x 17 pages? | Please clarify the page size limitations | The Electronic version has been updated to reflect 10-point font and 8 ½ x 11 page size in Section L 2.4 in Amendment 0002. |
| 5 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 150 & 175 | 2.1 & L-227-H002 | Proposal Structure, Format & Page Count table states Vol II attachments do not count toward the Volume page count. This conflicts with last sentence in L-227-H002(b) for SDP rationale. | Please remove the page count limitation and affirm that this section is a separate attachment | The SDP and SDP Rationale do not count towards the volume page limitation. Both documents are attachments and NOT subject to the page limitations. The Government has modified NAVSEA Clause L-227-H002(b) to indicate this change under Amendment 0002. |
| 6 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 150 | L 2.1 | Factor 1 Element 3 lists the SDP as an attachment to the proposal with no page limit. Is this a generic SDP or a plan specific to the Sample Problem L-08? | Confirm that the SDP is intended as as response to L-08 Sample Problem | The SDP is to be delivered as an attachment in response to Attachment L-08 Sample Problems. |
| 7 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 150 | L.2 Note 1: | Note 1 mentions 'applicable subcontractors' for submitting Past Perf information and refers us to L.3.3; there is no mention of 'applicable subcontractors in L.3.3. | Please define 'applicable subcontractors'. | Applicable Subcontractors are defined as Subcontractors exceeding $2 million in proposal value. The Government has updated Note 1 as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 8 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 152 | 3.0.1 | Contents for Executive Summary calls for an "Index Page"; there is no other reference for an Index page in the RFP; | Please clarify what is required for the Index Page | The Government has removed any reference to the Index Page as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 9 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 156 | 3.2.1 Item#9 | Item #9 references Section C.3.10. Section C.3.10 doesn't exist | Update reference to C.3.9 | The Government concurs and has updated reference to C.3.9 as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 10 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 158 | 3.2.2 | Do the Level I, II & III descriptions apply to positions descriptions in Tables L3.1 or L3.2? | If so, notate those with a "*". If not, remove. | The Government has removed the Level I, II and III descriptions in Amendment 0002. |
| 11 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 159 | L.04 Past Performance | There are multiple, conflicting references to page count between the instructions in Attach L-04 and Section L in the RFP. L.2 Note 1 indicates 5 pages for the entire PP narrative; Attachment L-04 indictes 3 pages total (including the cover page); | Please clarify the actual page limit for the Past Perf Volume and how it is calculated? | Attachment L-04 has been updated to remove the three page reference. The Offeror's past performance shall not exceed five pages in length. Each subcontractor shall not exceed two pages in length. Cover sheet does NOT count against page count. The updates have been made as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 12 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 159 | L 3.3 | RFP states "Past Performance Questionnaire, Attachment L-03, shall include the following information in the following format:" with a list of information generally associated with a Past Performance Narrative. Is the intent that the L-03 Past Performance Questionannaires, include all of this information or should the reference for this information be L-04 Previous Contract Effort Narratives? | Update to reference L-04 Previous Contract Effort Narratives | The Government has updated the reference in Attachment L-04 Previous Contract Effort Narratives as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 13 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 175 | L-225-H001 | This section calls for the submission of relevant experience for projects of similar size, scope, and complexity within prior 60 months. | Please describe how, and where, this isnformation is to be furnished. | This information shall be included in Attachment L-04. |
| 14 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 175 | L.227-H002 | This section calls for the submission of a Software Development Plan (SDP), along with rationale. | (1) Is this the same SDP required by L-3.1.3? Please describe how, and where, this isnformation is to be furnished. | Yes, this is the same SDP as required by Section L 3.1.3. This information can be located in Volume II, Factor I, Element 3. The Offeror shall provide the information as an Attachment to Volume II. |
| 15 | Attachment L-08 | 1 | Address following #1 | TSTC LVC CRD use cases is referenced as Attachment L-09, however Attachment L-09 is "Cost & Price Sheet" | Add TSTC LVC CRD file as attachement L-11, update reference from L-09 to L-11. | This item was corrected during Amendment 0001 which updated the Attachment Reference from L-09 to L-08. |
| 16 | Attachment J-01 thru J-05 and Section C.3.9, NAVSEA C-204-H002 | 1 | Attachment Page 1 of 1, C.3.9 and NAVSEA clause C-204-H002 | We noticed that this opportunity is not identified as a Classified action but that a DD254 is required to receive the TIP and meet the requirements identified in C.3.9 and NAVSEA clause C-204-H002 . What type of tasking on this opportunity is contemplated that requires a Classified facility? | Explain requirement for a Classified facility and personnel security requirements to perform on this contract. | The Government has updated Section C 3.9 in Amendment 0002 to better describe the Facility and Systems Security Requirements. All persons performing classified tasking on this contract must have and maintain a minimum SECRET clearance. |
| 17 | N00024-23-R-5108 | N/A | N/A | Requesting a three week extension to the proposal timeline based on complexity of solicitation. | Extend proposal timeline by three weeks. | The Government is granting a three week extension as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 18 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 158 | L / 3.2 | Why is the junior cateory listed but not ever used in the labor mix categories? | Clarify labor categories. | The descriptions are supplemental information to labor categories inclusive of the terms. |
| 19 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 113 and 162 | J and 3.6.2.2.2 | Is there a key for the yellow highlights? | Explain yellow highlight reason. | The yellow highlights have been removed in Amendment 0002. |
| 20 | N00024-23-R-5108 | 150 | L-04 | Page counts for Previous Contract Effort Narratives for offeror and subcontractos is conflicting. | Please clarify page counts for Previous Contract Effort Narratives for offeror and subcontractos. | Attachment L-04 has been updated to remove the three page reference. The Offeror's past performance shall not exceed five pages in length. Each subcontractor shall not exceed two pages in length. Cover sheet does NOT count against page count. The updates have been made as part of Amendment 0002. |
| 21 | N00024-23-R-5108 | Section L 2.4 | What page size should be used? | Please clarify the page size limitations. | See the Government's response to Question 4. | |
| 22 | ||||||
| 23 | ||||||
| 24 | ||||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 26 | ||||||
| 27 | ||||||
| 28 | ||||||
| 29 | ||||||
| 30 | ||||||
| 31 | ||||||
| 32 | ||||||
| 33 | ||||||
| 34 | ||||||
| 35 | ||||||
| 36 | ||||||
| 37 | ||||||
| 38 | ||||||
| 39 | ||||||
| 40 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .